by the way, on the espresso broadcast, she emphasized how i could have known in four months that tabachnyk'sociate would be appointed to this... position, and i wonder what the motivation was, so all these months the needle was finding out at the customs office who else submitted documents for this position that was qualifications, they did not answer anything, and the worst thing is that in this position, this associate of the tobacconist, olya kravchenko, she may have access to state secrets, we send requests, we barely received information that as of june 13, she did not receive access to state secrets, but now... everything could have changed, at the beginning of july we sent another request, but simply getting answers to the questions we are interested in is unrealistic, ms. irina, well, we always talk about customs in principle... since i i remember, there were always some scandals with corruption, etc bribes, serhii medvedchuk will not let you lie, and everything at the customs was done because of money, and i am not talking about the legal ones now, but there was hope that at least a

monitor , that is for example, it remains to be seen where he will leave, remember the passion of tabachnyk, who was in the ministry of infrastructure, headed the legal department, and we knew that in 3-4 months she would leave and head the customs department, that is, we have personnel decisions , when later... after two or three months, when the scandal blows, the person will be transferred somewhere, but this must be followed 100%, because it is already a well-established scheme, well, which we really see more than once, but we must not forget and monitor in order to it was not covered up, and the second is what mr koshel has already focused attention, but i want to raise this issue a little more widely, when the parliament invites anyone to it, then it is the parliament-representative body, it represents the people. of ukraine, and there are quite frequent cases when neither representatives of the government come to the session hall, nor there, for example, the prosecutor general, well, this is not a case, because it undermines the subjectivity of the parliament and parliamentarism, it

monitor, for example, what should be watched, and where he will walk out, remember a... the passion of tabachnyko was in the ministry of infrastructure, headed the legal department, and we knew that in 3-4 months she will walk out and head the customs department, that is, we have personnel decisions, when after 2-3 months, when the scandal subsides, the person will be transferred somewhere, but this must be followed 100%, because this is a well-established scheme, well, which we can see really more than once, but you must not forget and monitor. you, so as not to smother it. and the second is this something that mr. koshel has already focused on, but i want to raise this issue a little more broadly. when the parliament invites anyone to its presence, it is the parliament-representative body. he represents the people of ukraine. and there are quite frequent cases when neither the representatives of the government come to the session hall, nor there, for example, the prosecutor general, well, that's not the case, because it undermines. the subjectivity of the parliament and parliamentarism, you ar