>> in the center, there is one tacoria. commissioner dwight: i get that you want to bring things into compliance. i mean it does team a little perverse that here they are operating, we're taxing them, we're taking full advantage of the fact that they exist and yet we're sort of turning a blind aye to the fact that they shouldn't exist under regulations, so in some way, we almost feel -- i feel sort of honor bound to ratify their existence rather than make them kind of operate under the constant threat of being kicked out. >> right, the thing is i don't want to -- when a lot of people go shopping, you know right now, i'm glad target is coming to the city because i have so many people that leave the city to go shopping at these places outside of san francisco. that's tax money leaving the city. >> absolutely. >> and that's one thing, small business and the big formula retails need to work, in my opinion, hand in hand because a lot of these formula retail places bring in the jobs like allen just managed about the ripple effect

>> in the center, there is one tacoria. commissioner dwight: i get that you want to bring things into compliance. i mean it does team a little pe

which is 75 square feet should vacate and be taken by urban tacoria, we don't want to force that tenant into a c.u. process. i'm trying to address some materiality to the anti-roll-up process. >> i'm not a real estate expert. does anyone -- >> from listening to the discussions, perhaps propose the approval of the legislation with the recommended amendments that a conditional use is triggered when a size over 7,500 square feet or a roll-up of x amount, which is kind of what i was hearing from the conversation. >> 75,000 -- >> 75,000, squse me, square feet. >> what that would allow is for the -- 75,000 is bigger than the largest space there and is actually bigger than all of the other spaces combined. so that is not going to happen unless someone comes over and takes over the entire thing and makes it a macy's. >> wal-mart. >>ney man -- neiman marcus. >> we're getting into the realm of things that won't happen. the intent is to ratify it as it exists today and to try to sidestep any potential unintended consequences of approving it as it is today and then not anticipating that something e