the supreme court, and in the end, it was taddy cut to the whole group that everyone wanted to bury it, to bury it. this sentence and maybe even to bury this sentence along with the sentence. the university should have told the court, with all respect, this matter is a matter of academic debate, from here until the download of the work of teddy katz, the shelves of the library, on the shelves of the library, there are differences between them. hitler's book is placed on the bookshelves, it was only necessary to burn it, when the university stands by the side of the plaintiffs in the court and not strictly by the side of the author of the work and his instructor, so it conveys a violation of the most basic academic principle. this is actually what the university did. it was the goal is to silence him as he expressed himself in this work, and that was the price he paid , suddenly, he turned into a slave of israel, a person who is not welcome in this country, who causes harm. now the children are starting to get phone calls about their father . it's scary, what, you feel like the country