june included translating the legacy business program resources handbook into chinese, spanish and tagalog and creating an reapplication process for the rent stabilization grant. we had nine tweets on twitter and posted nine entries on facebook about the legacy business program and legacy businesses. we finalized rules and regulations for the legacy business registry. we created a document called "becoming employee owned" in partnership with the democracy of work institute, small business tool kit to introduce legacy businesses to the succession and of transitioning to employee ownership. we issued the legacy business program inyou'll report from fiscal year '17-'18. entered for the fiscal year '18-'19 in four languaging and partnered with the office of contact administration to conduct outreach to city departments to encourage them to patronize legacy businesses. major upcoming activities for july and beyond, finalizing the logo with contractor creative group. working with osaki on marketing and branding including brand identity, collateral and public relations and website improvements. r

into chinese, spanish, and tagalog. the sponsor paid to have it translated into chinese and spanish, and we posted all of those documents on the department's web item. >> supervisor kim: and what is the general protocol for all of these notices at the planning department? >> under ceqa, there's no requirement to translate notices or documents -- >> supervisor kim: i know. that wasn't my question. i know that ceqa doesn't, but as a city where we ensure inclusion and language access, what is the department's protocol for when we translate notices in spanish and chinese? >> we translate notices upon request. >> supervisor kim: okay. i think we have to change this practice. there are too many members in san francisco that speak chinese and spanish as their primary language, and especially in a neighborhood that's as diverse as district ten, you're not doing public outreach if people can't understand the notices. i'm not going to quibble over what happened in this particular case, but i'm very concerned that the planning dep