. >> host: tane in king george, virginia, please go ahead with your question or comment. >> caller: hi, many schweikart. >> guest: hi. >> caller: in doing research for my book, i came across a question i'm hoping you can answer. i included in the apep dix for my book the various conclusions for ratification from the original constitution. and in looking at those and in looking at how the final bill of rights was written, there's a huge disconnect. has anyone done a study or published anything that explains why the bill of rights used the language that they did? >> guest: yeah, and i can't name the books off the top of my head, but there are a number of good, scholarly books out will that deal with not only the ratification of the constitution, but the bill of rights. i think the first draft of the bill of rights, i could be wrong, but i think it had 13 different rights enunciated? it was 12, okay, i was pretty close. and, yeah, i mean, i think that there's some good stuff out there. if you just go to amazon and put in ratification and bill of rights, i think you'd come up with probably