taryn davis was just 21 when her husband, michael, was killed by a roadside bomb in iraq in 2007. >> one of the last things i said to him was "i love you more than life itself." >> reporter: living without michael is an everyday struggle. >> when i went out into the world, i just felt like they didn't want to embrace, you know, who i was, which was a military widow. and in the back of my mind i'm thinking, that title, it symbolizes my husband's sacrifice and my own. and if i can get through it, you know, maybe one day it can signify my survival. >> reporter: to help her own healing taryn began reaching out to other widows. but talking alone wasn't enough. soon taryn started organizing events like parasailing, surfing, even swimming with dolphins, to bring this courageous group of women together in what she called the american widow project. >> i found myself laughing and smiling for the first time. and i look around, and here's a group of extraordinary women who know the level of pain that i've been through and have that want to find life again like i do. and i kept laughing and i ke

soon, taryn started organizing events, like parasailing. surfing, even swimming with dolphins. to bring this courageous group of women together. in what she called, the american widow project. >> i found myself laughing and smiling for the first time. and i look around and here's a group of extraordinary women. and we know the level of pain that i've been through and have that want to find life again, like i do. and i kept laughing and i kept smiling. we're like battle buddies, we're going to go through this together. >> reporter: from the golf course where they hold an annual tournament, this year raising a record amount. >> a check for $120,000. [ cheers and applause ] >> let's get on the airplane, come on. >> reporter: to the skies, carrying on the camaraderie their husbands once shared. in may, the widows took an unforgettable leap of faith, diving out of a plane at 13,000 feet. and in the process, honoring their husbands' eventous spirit. jamie patterson lost her husband, nick in 2007. >> this is the picture my husband jumped with every single time. i wanted to jump with i

eventually, but the way, margaret taryn. this sort of last duty of them and became unitarians.they did make a big fuss. they just like the community of people and their into assimilating and becoming more american. it didn't seem like a big deal for them. their tattered authority going to the unitarian church. the more i thought about it, i was raised catholic and i'd always sort of heard that my father, who has been raised episcopal has rated to catholicism and my mother said eic converted and wanted this big church wedding in the next lane i got up were going to church. he says we went to church yesterday. [laughter] became really obsessed with catholicism, learned the church history and doctrine and then all of a sudden he was in and he wasn't so keen on it anyway. so he converted many became hugely anti-catholic or is it that time and my siblings came along, going to church was exploded thing. my father would be an affront to my mother would be just a mess and putting our hats on. but we came home from dinner, he would launch into a sermon about the evils of the catholic ch

not in a fractured voice characterized by the courts' critics but in a unanimous or super majority taryn voice. two, far from creating new barriers, the courts' decisions assailed reject new novel and frequently unsupported theories advanced by trial lawyers to circumvent reasonable requirements which were designed to prevent frivolous litigation and assure due process to all parties. and three, the designer of many of these requirements was none other than congress. with this in mind it is worth exploring a couple of the cases highlighted in today's hearing. largely ignored so far in this hearing has been the unanimity of the court determination that the action could not be brought under rule 23 b 2 but was more appropriate if appropriate at all under b 3 which permits broader claims of monetary damages. it is obvious why it is that that claim was brought under b 2. b 3, the certification for monetary damages under b 3 is harder and more costly than under the injunktive relief section and that's the lawyers attempted to shoe horn what were claims for monetary relief into the b 2 setting