are there any other members from the public who would like taspeer speak in support of the project? seeing none public comment is closed. the appellate will have up to 3 minutes to do a rebutal at this time >> thank you praezdant breed, member thofz board. steve williams. the planning department has not answered the question, didn't say anything and this is the first we heard that they consider a closeier letter anulled the placement on the hazardous waste list. it isn't in the brief, there is no citation to any authority, no citation to statutory provision and not even indicta. it amounts to a empermissible and narrow interpretation which flies in the face of all legal authority that holds sequa is interpreted as enforced as broadly as possible to afford the citizenoffs california the greatest joirmtal protection. the site is on the list. the statute said if the site is on the list it can't have a exemption. [inaudible] that is thitsies words, the fact the site on the list. it could have easily done that. the parker [inaudible] case from the first district court of appeal speaks di