i was talking a tit for tat activity. i was talking i a group— tit for tat activity.of women earlier who basically appalled. even one basically were appalled. even - i basically were appalled. even one -m_ basically were appalled. even one - i spoke to basically were appalled. even one i spoke to cancelled her person i spoke to cancelled her to person i spoke to cancelled her _ to things - person i spoke to cancelled her to things like netflix subscriptions to things like netflix and amazon prime, to my american companies, — and amazon prime, to my american companies, with the sort of sense zz= 77:7;— 7w = really by the threat of tariffs in canada — really by the threat of tariffs in canada. now it has i but - but at the thihfi, “555 551155 5 5'5h it but at the same 55i5e 55555 551155 5 555 it but at the same time e5i5e e5555 it51155 5 5i55 it but at the same time there i; i— i” in £5 igfi damage has been done. i was talking to tocat— damage has been done. i was talking to local businessmen earlier and he said, _ to local businessmen earlier and he said. you _ to local

kizndggfilzevel of tit—for—tat the two?km�*igfsl �* llllj.l ma ma km�*igfsl �* llllj.l m m tides; '- - he pushing usvery kizndggfilzevel of tit—for—tat he pushing us very close is, he is pushing us very close to the edge. i would say that it's tough for you it's tough for canada. you mentioned the opening that trudeau 7 trudeau has 77 trudeau has resigned. justin trudeau has resigned. liberal is in the the liberal party is in the of choosing a process of choosing a new leader. they will be an process of choosing a new leader. no y will be an process of choosing a new leader. no later be an process of choosing a new leader. no later than1 process of choosing a new leader. no later than october, election no later than october, possibly sooner this year, but possibly sooner this year, that if the polls are right see government change to 77 j to the 77 j to the conservative j e w mu" 77 7 w 521};qu ” 7 77 hnd7all7of7this77 7 77 hndallofthisis 7 party. and all of this is setting a very earth setting a very scorched earth basis f

and then it got our industry in a for tat. so we're going to work hard with both the eu, where a lot of distilled spirits come into the u.s. market from the eu. obviously a lot of tequila, a lot of canadian whiskey, and the american distilled spirits industry wants to be able to export these products. so we're going to work hard to try to get these issues resolved. >> is there any way this trade war happens, this for tat or anything like it? and customers do not pay for it. >> it's it's going to have an impact. it's going to have an impact on american consumers, canadian consumers, mexican consumers of in in the success story of the distilled spirits industry is when there's zero for zero tariffs and zero trade barriers. so we're going to work hard between the u.s. and the eu. in 1997, it called off all tariffs right. and the industry grew by 450% on the american side. and on the eu side. and the same applied for canadian canada and mexico as well, and the u.s. so we are the picture perfect example of fair trade and how a in a

he engaged in a brief tit for tat trade war in his first is there anything china, .answer or should i give you a political answer? absolutely, absolutely. the european union has treated us so terribly. this is in mr trump's playbook. he engaged in a brief tit for tat trade war in his first term, when he slapped tariffs on canadian aluminium products and steel. canada retaliated and they've promised to do the same again. mark carney, the frontrunner to be the new canadian prime minister, said they won't be pushed about. i think president trump probably thinks that we in canada will cave in, but we are going to stand up to a bully. we're not going to back down. we're united. um, and we will retaliate. but many economists say these tariffs are a risky move that could spark a wider trade war, and american consumers might pay the price. an air ambulance carrying six people, including a child, has crashed in a heavily—populated residential area in the us city of philadelphia. local media is reporting that the child on board the learjet had been receiving care for a life—th

likely do you think it will be we do retaliatoryt—for—tat measures, retaliatory tariffs?gy, or gigourse theirstrategy; or think there is the you think there is the that potential here that donald trump uses this as trump uses this'ssrs" r tactic and is able extra ct extract concessions? extrct concessions to extract concessions? well, all of the _ to extract concessions? well, all of the countries, - to extract concessions? well, all of the countries, canada i all of the countries, canada and mexico have all of the countries, canada and m up :o have all of the countries, canada and m up:o plans. ve all of the countries, canada and i\ has o plans. ve all of the countries, canada and i\ has o well, plans. ve all of the countries, canada and i\ has o well, although'e all of the countries, canada and i\ h been nell, although'e all of the countries, canada and i\ h been a all, although'e all of the countries, canada and i\ h been a all, more jgh'e e-= 7 with �* statements, saying they reserve just saying they reserve the right to you you . u—eefze 7 you would 7 7 you would exp

, canada and the us, tit—for—tat, they try aim it they try and aim where it hurts. ~ . ~ they try andrts. ~ ., ~ ., any minute, zzziny minute, but i zzziiny minute, but i n to bring1inute, but i zzzii'n- you le, but i zzzii'n- you in but i zzzii'n- you in here, dr vinjamuri. so many leslie vinjamuri. so many economists think tariffs are a economistsrthinkrtariffs are a idea, but donald trump is with the us 7 with the us and gambling with the us and even the global economy by putting these tariffs on. so a lot of iaskiing,’why 7 7' ' iaskiing,’whyisfir ” ' ”méskihg’,'wi{yis'i}? ' ’ iaskiing,’why is}; doing 717- e.. 7 the wall street it? to a point, the wall street which m journal, which certainly the has frequently z 2 _—:£ ze-= trump, the tariffs, dumb, not to put— trump, the tariffs, dumb, not to put too— trump, the tariffs, dumb, not to put too fine a point 5—— 2 very widespread there is very widespread _ that - there is very widespread that they are not there is very widespread for that they are not there is very widespread for the 1at they are not there is very widespread for the u

war could look like. and to a lesser extent china — i think the countermove is going to be a tit—for—tatsense that mexico is looking at introducing substantial tariffs on us goods tariffs. what do you make of china's response? they seem to be more reserved. 10%. and they come back to market tomorrow. it will be fascinating how they trade on this. but appreciating what is going on. is there enough details as to who and what is affected at the moment. interpreted by the market over the next 48 hours. so it is wait and see where the sand lies mid week you have to say it has had and impact to the markets — strengthen considerably this morning. the us has imposed duty of 10% on canadian oil imports. out what is the plan c or the plan d. while the flows from the north from canada and the south from mexico get reduced from some extent in the short term, can 0pec+ bring some back and give the crude to the us? season comes then we will face the impact because the us has not a small number. to tackle the prices. into beyond a quarter into the summer season, then there will be really price impacts.

and to our members i've also been saying, look, let's not do any for tat. it's not when you hear something from one member, you immediately apply counter tariffs. >> but of course right away now we are seeing for tat tariffs. so her message to chill out not exactly resonating here. >> yeah. and i think i mean it is it's kind of hard where we think of the global economy has evolved and how we define value. it's not just tariffs. we think about security. it's tied into it. so it's not just, you know, the families of jobs, the agriculture, the industries that can go down the list. kim, that is affected. and to be able to send that strong message is, is something that seems like the countries are not willing to sacrifice. >> the trump administration is making its america first policy known on the international stage in other ways as well. marco rubio landed in panama on saturday, his first trip as u.s. secretary of state. the first leg on his central american tour could be the most contentious. president trump says panama is overcharging american ships using th

china relationship, it's very much for tat. you do something to hurt me. i'm going to do something to hurt you back. but it's not clear if china has that leverage. in fact, it's quite possible that it just may try to leverage its supply chain and not institute any kind of tariffs, as we traditionally have seen. but none of this really is a surprise to china. this is something that president trump talked about during the campaign. this possibility of tariffs. china also knows just how fragile the world landscape is. china has depended on the u.s. very much as a large export market, but in recent months we have seen it expand its export reach, not just depending on the united states, but looking at places such as southeast asia, latin america, africa, even russia in an attempt to spread its business. also, it's important to note that china that the united states said it's instituting these tariffs because it's not satisfied with how china has been responding to the fentanyl crisis. china did respond to that, saying it has shown its support to the u.s., but t

we can get into a tit—for—tat trade war.ee it as an economic win. immediate effects which probably come through the markets, but also supply chains. particularly the vehicle industry in north america. it is highly across the united states, and the united states, mexico and canada. these things will flow through quite quickly. sort of financial market reaction. broadly, most economists are concerned about the impact on inflation and growth. united states. variables. others watching around the world? what is the potential impact elsewhere? trade relationships. complacent about this. some countries, like the uk has balanced trade with the united states. australia has a trading deficit with the united states. that means we are perhaps well—placed. there's also the knock—on effects, if we get into a growth and we have already seen the emf flag this. the uk government is to introduce new laws to crack down on images of child sexual abuse generated by artificial a fake child sex abuse image, but the home office says the uk helena w

what the possible of it and -m| of it and the countermove be — a the countermove will be — a tit—for—tatlooking at introducing substantial introducingsubstantial tariffs us goods, introducingsuastantial; tariffs us goods, the same for on us goods, and the same for canada. how i think, canada. how this, i think, to the first and — where does that then — where does that trade—off really by trade—off really materialise by end �* month in �* nations the battle; the battle? it's 7 w ” ragtime; it's going? be very for 1951.3; evéegry fascinating for on 194.3; evéegry fascinating for on the markets. volatility on the markets. it is — canada has already said go 25% they'll go 25% like—for—like those tariffs. china seem with those tariffs. china seem more reserved?— more reserved? 1096 at the moment — more reserved? 1096 at the moment - _ more reserved? 1096 at the moment - remember, - more reserved? 1096 at the i moment - remember, they've more reserved? 1096 at the - moment - remember, they've been -=:: a break for 7 a break for a 7 a wbrewawkaorwaweewkw w w ' waifiéfkiéfqwge'kfsné w w ' a break

china quickly retaliated saying it would do the same, a tit for tat row that could have big implicationsor the global economy. would take effect next monday. an extra 10% tax will be added to goods including crude oil and agricultural machinery, while imports of coal the us tariffs. with its northern neighbour — canada. saying canada had agreed to some of his demands. our north america business correspondent michelle fleury in response to the threat of tariffs, some canadian monica morelli cancelled subscriptions to amazon she isn't planning to sign back up. it's not acceptable. they were bracing for the worst. around 80% of canada's exports end up in america. this company has been in business for over 50 years. working together, creating relationships that took a very and now knowing that that relationship was as fragile been around for half a century hurts a lot. replaced by a sense of relief. all of that tied up with those announcements coming from the white house causing consternation around the world china says it's to investigate the us tech giant google alleging it's �*violating t

he's also said today that the matter of brexit it alone, or, in this global tit—for—tat, does it endmade within hours of the disaster. mr trump suggested — without evidence — diverse aviation workforce. initiatives in safety roles. here's some of what he said. "the faa's diversity push includes focus on hiring people that is amazing. and they want them in, and they want them — they can be air traffic controllers. i don't think so. policies in the government. i asked him what he made of trump saying that when he made those comments, no—one had found any evidence responsible for the crash. because i think he probably understood that the media was going to focus on this in the immediate aftermath of the crash and then would move on to other topics. found other conclusions, it'll have moved off so this discussion potentially distracting, then, there are those people — relations to those victims — who are waiting to find out what exactly happened. right. political lessons to the outcome. so that was what he set out to do. policies at the federal aviation administration. and there are some

so i think if it happens, i think that'll be the first tit—for—tat, particularly with the eu, where it trump doesn't favour singular—product tariffs, that they favour big blanket bans, because they're more powerful and effective, and that perhaps they'd be only used on a short—term basis to get what they want, of what we saw at the weekend with columbia, as well. is these sort of sweeping generalisations of a tariff, everything. on his campaign promise. beautiful word than tariffs. tariffs is the greatest weapon we have." and i think, you know, this is him following through on that on a particular good. and the one thing you mentioned, caitriona, you know, then we start looking at disruptions to supply chain, the us economy. so i do think timing also is an element here of, and we were talking about messaging on tariffs, of the white house press briefing. karoline leavitt, the new press secretary, holding her first briefing. the norm in recent times. and the amount of interest. seen the press room more crowded than i have in the last and the one with president trump yesterday. it was pa

we can get into a tit—for—tat trade get.erican economy for and for president trump? it is hard to see — and for president trump? it is hard to see it _ and for president trump? it is hard to see it as _ and for president trump? it is hard to see it as an _ and for president trump? it is hard to see it as an economic 77-i 7 77- -7 win. whetwene’e’e�*tn’en’ifi tet= ’ ste p wine what’we'ne’e’e�*te’ee’ia take l step back and wine what’we'ne’e’e�*te’ee’ia fate?" step back and see the a step back and see the effects which immediate effects which - come - immediate effects which come through probably come through the markets out but also supply chains _ markets out but also supply chains. particularly the vehicle _ chains. particularly the vehicle industry in north - these - vehicle industry in north these things will flow america. these things will flow through— america. these things will flow through quite quickly. one of threeeh qeite qeiekty, qne ef ...._.....-...,,,,,,,,, threeeh qeite qeiekty, qne at ...._.....,,,,,,,,,,,,a is

queue here, but may not be immune, especially when major powers, allies even, do start these tit—for—tat european i think that we have to do to avoid this everything to avoid this unnecessary and stupid totally unnecessary and stupid tariff war or trade war. but at the same time — and this my the same time — and this is my advice to all my in brussels — have to, our possible 7 our possible talks 7 our possible talks with? filming eb? efiiiifilé elli; fiiifi american friends, i think cannot lose, of course, sense, we cannot lose "mm”! sense we cathjma w. ..- w . .-. .-. of common sense we cahhatjma —~— ~— w — ——— m of interests common sense we cannetjma —~— ~— w — ——— m of interests — awarenessofour interests h the swarenessofeur interests f the same time, we cannot but at the same time, we cannot our european and asked him if he was worried about what the us would we've just heard that a few minutes ago, negatively this morning and during the day and mexico of 25%. so, it's likely to be bad news. and financial markets are already factoring as the eu, and we've just had a masterly course of ho

of course there is a risk of a tit-for-tat, retaliation from these countries, what could amount to atrade war. catriona: how have the markets reacted to the news so far? that very definite word from the white house press secretary. ritika: the s&p 500 reversed any gains it had in the session today, trading in the red. a lot of whiplash, fast-changing news. now they say they will be implementing tariffs tomorrow. the dollar rose on the back of this while stocks fell. industries from your chipmakers to your miners, auto industry, they will likely have a big impact. it's a risky gamble. the u.s. imports so many of its goods from canada, mexico, china, you think about the auto industry. the typical car could have a price increase of $3000 as a result. that could devastate the industry. when it comes to the issue of gasoline prices, canada is the biggest source of foreign oil in the u.s., we import some 4 million barrels a day. and food prices, the u.s. importing everything from beer to avocados from mexico, so we could see prices rise on the back of this. there is a lot of nervousness in

this is raising as of this is raising concerns. as pointed out there, you pointed out there, tit—for—tatt donatotrump hoping to exactly is it that donalotrump hoping to achieve through is hoping to achieve through this? you for example this? you mentioned for example tackling immigration, for example. that asked exactly what donald _ example. that asked exactly what donald trump - example. that asked exactly what donald trump is - example. that asked exactly | what donald trump is saying, there are who say that but there are some who say that perhaps this is more of a perhaps this is more efs . f * tactic, and a way negotiation tactic, and a way of raising revenue. so for example, there's a trade example. there's a trade deal is up for review, and that that is up for review, and that coming year, some are saying this is and some are saying this is actually a way of using ractuallyra way—of—using tariffs eight leverage to be able is eight leverage to be able that trade deal and negotiate that trade deal and actually gain some traction in news bring you — local media is reporting that a sm

wrong impression, that those are outlaws. to the wrong impression, that those are outlaws. those are tat on to longerterm, how likely the longer term, how likely is that you think there will be it that you think there will be permanent ceasefire in place 7that gaza 77tha7t7g7a77za7 7777re7bui71d? to make sure it will need to make sure that it will become permanent, lots of pressure needs to be exerted, on netanyahu and particularly on netanyahu and right wing fanatical his right'wing fanatical we need the world move 7 move swiftly towards to move swiftly towards this unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe, attend to our people, the rebuilding people, startt'ne rebuilding israel has left gaza as because israel has left gaza as a wasteland.— a wasteland. how do you see donald trump _ a wasteland. how do you see donald trump fitting - a wasteland. how do you see i donald trump fitting - this? donald trump fitting into this? he said it was bring peace he said it was to bring peace to the middle east and peace does not mean that you remove from their native means that you actually people tsos

are you not concerned that if into a it turns into a tit—for—tat situation, this will turn bigger tradee war? in the end, i i said, trump ir? in the end, i i said, trump is' in the end, i i said, trump is a n the end, i i said, trump is a n the and , as i said, trump is a bully and if you take back against if you take back, against a will keep on bully he will keep on building if you show him it is in you. if you show him it is in his own interest not to escalate the further, we can to a mutual then we can come to a mutual ., agreement. i think beneficial agreement. i think donald trump negotiates in a way where he you in the way where he punches you in the face first and sees how you while should mil: ”230m 53?” escalate further on the very to escalate further on the very first we cannot and first stage, we cannot and not back down. do first stage, we cannot and not back down. ., , ., shall not back down. how do you think this - particularly - think this could particularly some germans, given how the 77 the automotive 7 the automotive sector is vital the automotive sector is and the fa

>> reporter: well, we should anticipate there to abtit-for-tat because the orders that the orders that the president signed give him the authority to keep raising tariffs on the three countries if they respond in kind. that could be an uptick in inflation. now, the canadian prime minister justin trudeau spoke to americans last night warning the tariffs, quote, will put your jobs at risk, potentially shutting down american auto assembly plants and manufacturing facilities and canada's planned retaliatory tariffs will raise american grocery and gas prices. while trump accused mexico of having an alliance with drug cartels, they say they exist in the gun shops that sell high-powered weapons to criminal groups. china says it deplores and apposes this move and had take necessary countermeasures to deferred its rights and interests. it is planning to protest these tariffs to the world trade organization. >> ed, what's on secretary rubio's agenda in panama? >> reporter: yeah, you know, rubio the first latino secretary of state. so he is taking his first overseas mission to central america and

region, notjust israelis or europe, but in the region that really condemn role in war and believe'd�*tat governance for istsi is net raisins find an governance for the alternativegovernance for the authority palestinian authoritv and there , ,. ~ those to the palestinian authority and there , ,. i, those to the right of the minister 7 minister wht7> do not want prime minister who do not want to find one and want and to find one and want chaos and the car company in the gaza strip so palestinians leave —— so they cannot form cacophony. so they cannot form the basis of self and steps towards a palestinian state, so there are pressures against this going forward both within israel and within the region israel and'wlthln the region broadly. israel and—within'the ~ {a �* broadl ., , , , more broadly. just briefly, with 25 seconds _ more broadly. just briefly, with 25 seconds left, - more broadly. just briefly, with 25 seconds left, we i more broadly. just briefly, i with 25 seconds left, we know benjamin netanyahu expected to with 77 7i7with7b7o7hei7d7 77 777o7h777 77 e say what you expect th

the tit for tat move response to the trump administrations 10 percent across the board level on chinese imports and marks the new stage. and the longstanding trade dispute between the world's top economies with the risk exchange of sanctions. china is also announced a range of measures targeting us businesses including google. alright, let's get more on this from cd 10 to the world porter and the international relations analyst, sion sure way, who joins us from badging. so way, take us to the details of bad things. response to washington's terrified on imports from china. all right, thank you for having me here at the, from my observation to major responses. shelby notate one is that the china william post hargrove's own. so thank and for that goose is specially energy products from the us effective february 10th. that is from the customs tal risk commission of china's state council. actually into toes a 10 or 15 percent target will be applied to to us co and our in g. we've a 10 percent of the target will be imposed on oil, agriculture, machinery, largest use of payment to be coast and

the tit for tat move response to the trumpet. ministration is 10 percent across the board lobby on chinese imports. in march the new stage and the longstanding trade dispute between the world's top economies with the brisk exchange of sanctions. china has also announced a range of measures targeting us businesses including google. all right, we can cross out to nelson. wong, vice chairman of the shanghai center for rim pac nelson. good to have you on the program with us. um, of course we know that during his campaign, um, trump promised that he would continue this trade war on a china, which he started in his 1st term. so these tariffs on china are really no surprise, but i'm wondering what will be the impact on the general public, especially now that china has kept back with its own terrace up. well, i think we, uh, it's fair to say that the chinese government has the wrong to become more careful and diligent 12 dealing with relations with the u. s. and we have to accept the fact that the thing is donald trump is now returning back to the white house. the new administration in the u. s. i

well, it can, of course, just directly retaliate a tit for tat style. the problem is, the us time trade war has been going on for a while now. and china is economy isn't doing nearly as well as it was at the beginning of the trade work. conversely, the us is doing much better, so there are things like restricting where are its exports, which the us needs for its high tech products, and then also imposing tear up some things like savings. but it's marginal in terms of where the us can go further as far as citizen and export to other markets. yeah, in the us, as china, as largest overseas market, just focus briefly through how these times would impact its ability to set its goods in the us as well. yeah, indeed, that's easy. the part of the problem is the economies are structured differently and china is gross bottle is an export driven. and just as you said, the us is largest export market. so when you get slapped with 10 percent, which by the way that might sound like it's less than what's being imposed on canada and mexico kind of mexico that know tari

consequences about the american chinese economies spell it can of course just directly retaliate a tit for tat style. the problem is the us time trade war has been going on for a while now. and chinese economy isn't doing nearly as well as it was at the beginning of the trade work. conversely, the us is doing much better. so there are things like restricting where are its exports, which the us needs for its high tech products, and then also imposing care of some things like savings. but it's marginal in terms of where the us can go further sources and, and export to other markets. part of the problem is the economies are structured differently and china is growth bottle is export driven. and just as you said, the us is its largest export market. so when you get slapped with 10 percent, which by the way that might sound like it's less than what's being imposed on canada and mexico kind of mexico that no tariffs and they're going to $25.00. china is already had these tariffs put on by the 1st trump administration, and those were plain change. and as binded ministrations us another 10 percent on

build bridges with trump and say that we have to negotiate a compromise with him in state of a tit for tat because they have many, many issues to discuss with him, particularly security and trans atlantic alliance. and they don't want to bends or bridges, but from now. okay, thank you so much, josh. and we'll come back to you in just a moment. but for the meantime we're going to go to jessica washington, who is in badging for us. and this is a causing serious concern there as well. well, the spacing had to sign response to trump to move 8 of care of said that you to take effect in this in 24 hours there. i'm certainly strong condemnation in here in the aging. this is a will see chinese via periods, but this move from donald trump has 3 good history, good swift action from badging and switch condemnation. what we've heard from the ministry of commerce and the ministry of foreign affairs, is that china and tends to take this to the world trade organization. it intends to file a lawsuit. then that message has been lost. that across speech outlets of state media news papers throughout the coun

. >> if we have tit-for-tat retaliation, all we know is that it will have a global negative impact. >. >> it is not the tool for economic security consideration. collects it's obvious whether it's inflationary or deflationary. >> there could be a moment where even the high level of government debt, saying we want we want a much higher coupon. >> we will see double-digit global gdp losses. >> that is catastrophic. >> policymakers reacting to the threat of u.s. tariffs and these warnings coming before trump's announcements that tariffs on canada, mexico and china will begin tomorrow. with a carveout for oil of 10% when it comes to canada. but wti is popping because you have 4 million barrels per day being transported from the canadian market into the u.s. market. there the pop on the back of these tariffs. the divergence between wti and brent. for how long one has to question. but right now oil prices are surging on the back of this news. around 4 million barrels per day , 500 thousand from mexico, among the top two trading partners overall and this in terms of what's coming through on

concerned that if. this -- i i not concerned that this —— am i not concerned that if this ties into tit—for—tation, it is going to end “p situation, it is going to end up in a much bigger trade war? as i before, trump is as i said before, trump is a and if you guy get a bully and if you guy get a bully, you keep on bullying you, if you show that it is in bully, you keep on bullying yol own ou show that it is in bully, you keep on bullying yol own interest that it is in bully, you keep on bullying yol own interest nott it is in his own interest not to escalate the situation any further, you can come escalate the situation any further, ' beneficialne escalate the situation any further, ' beneficial agreement. 5553“? eifiififi'fi' fife???“ negotiates in a donald trump negotiates in a way where he punches you in a ”wtfiét’in” -, if 7777777t7hat7i7n7the77 7 7 7777777t7hat7i7n7the77 7777a7s 7 7 7t7hat7i7n7the77 77713757575 7 7 7that7i7n7the77 77713757575 is7 7 face that in the face as he is how you react. but we should react �* and further, how you react. but we should the ct �*and further, how you react.

he engaged in a brief tit—for—tat trade war in his first term when he slapped tariffs on canadian aluminiumraeli prisoners held in israeli prisons. we have really had reaction from the israeli prime benjamin minister, benjamin netanyahu, saying he the hostages saying he welcomed the hostages and they will continue to and that they will continue to work to bring home the rest. and that they will continue to work 1 were g home the rest. and that they will continue to work 1 were still me the rest. and that they will continue to work 1 were still held 1e rest. and that they will continue to work 1 were still held captive those were still held captive in gaza. these scenes in gaza. these are the scenes that we have been in that we have been watching in younis in southern gaza. palestinian were as palestinian prisoners were released. this is in tel aviv and is a helicopter that moving the t2his this is t2his is a military centre. this is a military helicopter that we understand is moving one of the is mov'rrrg’one of the hostages southern israel from southern israel towards medical facility for

threshold for pain and making the case that there will be some pain in this case from this trade tit for tat but he believes or is making the case in other countries. >> martha: no pain, no gain i guess. thank you, peter. with that let's bring in press secretary caroline levitt, thank you for joining us. good to have you here today. has the call begun with prime minister trudeau? >> last i checked, yes. the call was underway at 3:00 p.m. with the prime minister of canada and as promised president trump is delivering on his promises to the canadian people to put them first and i would like to take a step back today, the previous president joe biden allowed an unprecedented surge of illegal deadly drugs and illegal immigrants into the interior of our country that has cost american lives. and within two weeks president trump has -- the mexican president gave this morning and agreed to send 10,000 troops to our southern border to protect our homeland with a one-month delay on those tariffs so we will see what comes out of the call between president trump and the canadian prime minister but presi

or are we potentially going into a for tat point counterpoint where they continue to climb? >> again, i think uncertainty is a bit paul kagame this time around. mexico and canada have indicated that they're ready to put retaliatory tariffs in place. um, i'll be watching how quickly that happens. if the countries think that a deal is on the table in the short term, that could be had to avert or reduce these tariffs. you may not see those go in place right away. you may see the countries giving a chance for those discussions to continue. um, if they do, uh, put tariffs of equivalent value in place right away, then the ball is back in the trump administration court, um, raising even higher. could, uh, risk economic impact that that the president just doesn't want to see? >> yeah. the president imposed tariffs on chinese imports during his first term. and for as much as the democrats criticized the president's decision when president biden came in, he didn't remove them. and then in the latter part of his term, he added new tariffs on some chinese imports. so as we watch this po

. >> before, china's foreign policy is very much this idea of for tat. you heard us.do something to hurt you back. but this is all unfolding in the midst of the chinese new year. beijing is pretty much pretty much shut down. we have. >> not been. >> able to hear from the government, but in the past has said that there are no winners in a trade war or a tariff war. and beijing, the government will do what it needs to to protect its interests. i was messaging with an expert in all of this, jack buffington. he was saying to me that perhaps china will choose to just leverage its existing supply chain. we are not going to get a clear idea until next week at the very earliest, when perhaps we'll hear from a government spokesperson. but what is clear is that china is a manufacturing force for the entire world. i have been to these factories. they are big. they are sprawling american companies like them because they are flexible. they are nimble. if one company, for example, is making shoes and it wants to change the color or style, it's something that these factories in chin

>> oh, they'll be for tat. they will be exactly the same. they will hit u.s. exports into those countries and they will be tariffs. you see the problem with the problem challenge issue, whatever you want to say with canada and mexico is that we've spent the last three decades doing this, integrating the border now first with nafta, then with usmca. the very goal of trade policy in the last 30 years has been to create a frictionless, borderless trade area between the three countries. now, you're going to do this. essentially. think of it like that. every single item of every little car, whether it's the thrust capacitor, the widget widget, whatever it is, is going to cross the border backwards and forwards and get tariffs and tariff and tariffs. and this is what's happening. you the imagine you've just taken the whole trading relationship and turned it upside down. and as the wall street journal describes it, the dumbest trade war ever because it wasn't necessary. there is a huge gap between what what the president's doing and what he could have done and how yo

. >> a for tat trade war. new overnight china fighting back, hitting the u.s. with retaliatory tariffs. plus. >> no country has. >> ever made an offer of friendship such as this. >> an unprecedented offer. el salvador willing to house u.s. deportees in its jails, including american citizens and then. >> ellen national security. critical support. tulsi gabbard getting a boost from a key senator ahead of today's committee vote. all right. it is 6 a.m. here on the east coast. a live look at capitol hill on this tuesday morning. good morning everyone. i'm kasie hunt. it's wonderful to have you with us. new overnight china announces tariffs on american goods just minutes after president trump's tariffs on chinese imports went into effect. >> china will be speaking to china probably over the next 24 hours. >> on fentanyl and china. president trump. >> we don't want fentanyl coming into our country. now we had another big thing. speaking of china. china is involved with the panama canal. they won't be for long. but that was just an opening salvo. if we can't make a de

this isn't the for tat as it gets worse. know, it's tempting to say, oh, look at this, blah blah blah. but this makes perfect sense if you think of the sheer vast swathes, hundreds of billions of dollars worth of goods being on both sides that are going to be hit, this makes perfect sense because what is a stock price? the stock price is a barometer of a company's current and future earnings. they will go down. it's about economic growth. i don't know how many times we can say it. and bear in mind if we just think about the countries that were now involved canada, mexico, china. he's threatened the eu, he's threatened panama, he said. the uk possibly. and on it goes. >> yeah. so i had someone who represents the distilled spirits industry on. they were talking about how bad they're going to get hit. but the auto industry seems to be particularly fragile in this moment. what's going on? >> right. imagine you're canada. and imagine i'm the united states, and i'm a car that's being made now as the because of both decades of the

. >> a for tat trade war. new overnight china fighting back, hitting the u.s.retaliatory tariffs. plus. >> no country has. >> ever made an offer of friendship such as this. >> an unprecedented offer. el salvador willing to house u.s. deportees in its jails, including american citizens and then. >> ellen

and won't it be for tat where they respond in kind on orange juice or bourbon, which is what the canadiansdid the last time? >> well, i will tell you that the cost of the american people for rampant illegal immigration and for the illicit drug trade that has started with precursor materials in china to fentanyl being put together south of our border in mexico and then trafficked into into the united states. those costs have been significantly more damaging to the american people than this proposed possible trade war. at the end of the day, what president trump is doing is that he wants china and mexico and canada to take our national security interests just as seriously as they take theirs. and when it comes to fentanyl, let's be very clear. the precursor material is from china. the tablets are assembled in mexico. they come into the united states, and they are the number one killer of americans between the ages of 18 and 45. so donald trump told everybody on the campaign trail he's going to use every tool available to secure this nation. and this is a part of it. >> come back. i got to it

~ a then t t t tat t t t tthtetntthtey'll t tta t t t thtetntthey'll have t tatt t t t thtetntthey'll8. the eu will retaliate which iswha in 2018. .,. , the eu will retaliate which iswha in 2018. , ~ ., happened in 2018. exactly. and at some point _ happened in 2018. exactly. and at some point - will _ happened in 2018. exactly. and at some point - will come - happened in 2018. exactly. and at some point - will come backi happened in 2018. exactly. and at i some point - will come back to some point people will come back to the table and make a deal. keir said that the uk c�*:—o-:4 s-aesi-es use-u — ,, , to choose between the and eu. does he? m eu. doeshe? ., ,, us and the eu. does he? flies uk en'o s a us and the eu. does he? rafi - uk enjoys a very — the uk enioysa very soecial unlike other, and relationship, unlike any other, and that's not to say there that's not to say that there aren't going to be some a that's not to say that there aren't going friction ome a that's not to say that there aren't going friction here a that's not to say that there aren't going friction here there. a

unfortunately, our industry has been embroiled in a for tat tariffs since june 2018, when the europeanon imposed a tariff over a trade dispute related to the steel and aluminum case, where then president trump certainly tried to create more aluminum and steel production in the united states. so our industry hopefully will navigate this storm. but there's a lot of anxiety. what are some of the provinces have decided to do? they've announced that they're going to pull american distilled spirits off the shelves in canada. canada's a big customer, but let me share a great american success story that not too many people know. 20 years ago, there were about 60 distilleries in the united states, and today there's over 3000. many of them small mom and pop distilleries. and they look at markets like canada and mexico and the european union to export those those terrific products. they're sprinkled in communities all around the country. and please go visit one. but we want to keep that great american success story going. and, you know, we live in divisive times, no doubt. and folks, whether you'

there's a heck of a lot smarter that that's much smarter than the tit for tat approach that china adoptedy preserve a lot of commerce. we have with mexico, our biggest trading partner. you know, we did $807 billion in business with this country in 2023. trump could really sink them if they're not careful. but there's no free lunch in this business. if mexico slips into a recession because of the tariffs, then we can expect a surge in illegal immigration no matter what. the border is too big for 10,000 soldiers on their side, a wall, and as many soldiers and ice officials, officers to police, it is not going to work. however, sheinbaum said that she had a good 30 minute conversation with respect. and that quote, it's about collaboration, coordination without losing sovereignty, end quote, i like that. for example, she said she was concerned about the smuggling of automatic weapons to and that president trump agreed to help her stop it. i think trump knows that trade with mexico isn't tomatoes or guacamole, or building materials, or even the intertwined nature of the auto business. he knows

before i turn it over to mayor for a few comments, i just want to say tat this afternoon we are goingto see some heroics and action suspects being apprehended, violence six being apprehended. great work by investigators and just great police work overall. and so i look forward to the captains sharing exactly what their members did to to obtn today's today's award. and with that and without further ado, i'd like to introduce our mayor, mayor lori . >> thank you, assistant chief. i appreciate it. i have comments to read but first let me just say to the four of you and i'll read out your bios in a minute. thank you. i started about three weeks ago officially and i get reports nightly from chief scott about what is going on out in the field. and you know, every night there is something and you all are putting yourselves in harm's way every single day, every single night. it does not go unnoticed. i was sitting there while a.c lading off that y lt of supporters. i'm also getting a shout out chris. thank you, chris. thank you, chief. sir, people care about you all i care about you a it gone

first term, president biden follows with a lot of exec of orders himself so now we are in a tit-for-tatuation. yes, republicans believe that the whole doj, fbi has been politicized anyway and they are very resentful of all the investigations, especially the russia investigation, the special prosecutor muller. from their point of view it did not go anywhere. i have the traditional point of view that you had to investigate some of these but you were taking a clear risk in building an image of the fbi is politicized and so this stuff about post watergate obviously does not impress some republicans because they do not see that there was much of an arm's-length talking about that arm's-length relationship in the biden administration. so there is a real problem being set here. the issues i discussed are real and despite any mistakes that were made in the obama or biden administration, the dangers that could follow from a more thorough presidential control of the fbi or doj are still there. they do not go away simply because bad things happened in the obama or biden administration's. we've got

first term, president biden follows with a lot of exec of orders himself so now we are in a tit-for-tatuation. yes, republicans believe that the whole doj, fbi has been politicized anyway and they are very resentful of all the investigations, especially the russia investigation, the special prosecutor muller. from their point of view it did not go anywhere. i have the traditional point of view that you had to investigate some of these but you were taking a clear risk in building an image of the fbi is politicized and so this stuff about post watergate obviously does not impress some republicans because they do not see that there was much of an arm's-length talking about that arm's-length relationship in the biden administration. so there is a real problem being set here. the issues i discussed are real and despite any mistakes that were made in the obama or biden administration, the dangers that could follow from a more thorough presidential control of the fbi or doj are still there. they do not go away simply because bad things happened in the obama or biden administration's. we've got

communicate with our federal partners and there are some restrictions because we are not members of the joint tat terrorism task force where we don't always get the information and as timely as we would like to. let me put it that way i mean we eventually get it but i do think those are issues that we have to talk about and to the extent there are those escalate to the level of you know, if the fbi reaches out or if you're engaged in communications, could you please include that in your chief's report for the mayor? and let me be clear there have not been any of that outreach from the fbi or anybody else, but there's been public speculation about this in public discussion but there's been no forward movement on that and that's very helpful. i imagine the answer to this would be it depends on the specific task force mou if if the situation were to arise with any of these on this table that you felt like it was in conflict like you said with our values i assume the next steps would be taken are specific to the mou is what language they have on on termination on the unilateral termination. would tha

say they will implement corresponding countermeasures, and canada has already responded with a for tat on us imports. mexico were price. canada and mexico were hit with 25% import taxes on goods, and there's a 10% tax on china. well, china and mexico say they will implement corresponding countermeasures, and canada has already responded with a for tat 25% on us imports. however, the president has defended the move and denies tariffs will be damaging for the united states. >> tariffs don't cause inflation, they cause success and cause big success. so we're going to have great success. there could be some temporary short term disruption and people will understand that. i had that one in negotiated some of the good deals for the farmers. and unfortunately those deals have been led astray by biden and his people because they didn't enforce the deal. but the tariffs are going to make us very rich and very strong, and we're going to treat other countries very fairly. conviction was reduced to manslaughter on appeal. let's turn to the middle east, where the city of jenin, in the occupied west

and canada has already responded with a for tat 25% on us imports. however, the president has defended the move and denies tariffs will be damaging for the united states. >> tariffs don't cause inflation. they cause success because big success. so we're going to have great success. there could be some temporary short term disruption and people will understand that. i had that one in negotiated some of the good deals for the farmers. and unfortunately those deals have been led astray by biden and his people because they didn't enforce the deal. but the tariffs are going to make us very rich and very strong, and we're going to treat other countries very fairly. >> tony martin, who was jailed for shooting dead a teenage burglar in 1999, has died at the age of 80. the farmer was convicted for killing 16 year old fred barras and injuring another man when he fired his shotgun three times towards intruders. he served three years intruders. he served three years in prison for murder before being released when his conviction was reduced to manslaughter on app