tatarov, who practically usurped power by influencing law enforcement agencies and, in most cases , theial branch of government, we can see this in particular in the case of roman chervinsky . yesterday, i was at the kyiv court of appeal trying to take roman on bail so that he does not sit in a pre-trial detention center, she is not deprived of her rights and freedoms for no reason, er, she is deprived of her liberty, and can you imagine if at the last session, er, in quotation marks, they did not have time to bring the documents to the courtroom? now some fools called and said that these buildings were journalized and the authorities once again proved their inability to prove in any court hearing that chervinsky's novel needs some kind of court punishment, they imitate this process in order to simply punish a person with deprivation of liberty and taking into account that the majority of the military under oath and cannot come to court for three reasons - to support their comrade-in-arms, an officer who , at one time, did everything possible so that the wagnerian criminals were brought

tatarov to transfer a number of cases these retractions of the national anti-corruption bureau to theservice of ukraine, this is not a question of the security service of ukraine, this is a question of who initiated this change, and why did mr. tatarov, who was under investigation for corruption at the time, initiate it, and that he is in the interests of a lawyer in the interests of the suspect, nikitasya actually corrupted the state expert and involved a fake expert in the case, so he should have been responsible for this, but at that time we did not have a head of a specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, and the investigation of rights was decided the prosecutor general, do you remember 100% the prosecutors general regardless of the last name in our country? and these are the people of the president 's office. and then the prosecutor general rewrote the case, they sent it to the security service of ukraine, the case fell apart, and the idea was liked, that is, in principle, the office of the president at the age of tatarov , who are responsible for solving problems on the

if these changes take place, please , it will be tatarov's scheme. you remember the criminal case of nabu's investigation, and then they are witnesses who pass through this case testifying against tatarov, they attributed the alleged murder before this sauce, the case was transferred to the security service of ukraine, where they successfully buried it, and then they said, well , they didn't reach pechersk, there, because of some other hill, and somehow other hills , and that's why the tatar was like rafik, not guilty of anything. we must understand that this issue is popular in society, i myself said that if during martial law, in accordance with the law , you limit the rights of citizens and everything is right and true, then let's talk about those whom we empower on our behalf to own so that they carry an additional responsibility well, that's clear, i'll remind our viewers that corruption is always in power, corruption is not there, it's not there, it's not there, it's not in the opposition , corruption among those who are poor, even before the d

and where does the information that this is an initiative of tatarov come from, because it is directly his responsibility to be responsible for the legislative ministers of the president of ukraine, which are related to anti-corruption, which are related to the activities of law enforcement agencies, these are the first and second - this is also known from our sources, and here are all the risks that you listed. and in your opinion, will there be a reaction from western partners in general, this is such an initiative, does it not contradict the requirements of the western partners regarding the anti-corruption reform in general? maybe they have already voiced some warnings. i think they are still studying this idea. they haven't seen the bill yet, but i am convinced that the reaction will be harsh. the reaction will be harsh and not public at first . and then if there was no appropriate reaction from the president and his office, there will be a public reaction, and unfortunately this reaction may be reflected in our cooperation with the international monetary fund by the european unio

tatarov a, kosovo bleds. polina do you know the answer to the question?i don’t know, but i answered, bkletsk, well done, i’m so overwhelmed i’m sitting. do you know tim in response to the question? i have no idea of ​​the three names, i probably only remember the dumpling, which is why i chose the correct answer to this question is a variant blets. let's move on to the ninth question. in which of these sports do participants compete on horseback, and bridge b lacrosse time maybe there are some guesses. in what sense is there freestyle? bridge guys, there are, then, two horses, let's go with them to bridge and play. how was dmitriev chosen? which option did you choose option b. i reasoned very well logically. let's bridge well bridge - this is translated from english as a bridge and i'll think about it. what does this have to do with horses, and in the word lacrosse the word cross is mentioned, and so i chose option b. well, this is like on a horse, for example, probably, yes, but the floor is generally a t-shirt. a team sport in which participants on hors

tatarov, from the management befu from the leadership of other law enforcement agencies regarding the fact that this criminal activity will be stopped in the near future, we expect results from them , by the way, we will hear the current in the coming weeks also all law enforcement agencies regarding the illegal tobacco market. the same situation with vodka. we see improvement . we see an increase in excise tax. on the internet and google vodka in a tetrapack, you can even go to any part of the country to find out where illegal vodka is put in these bottles, and it is very unfortunate, it is absolutely disgraceful for a country at war, but danylo, who is responsible for the attack, forgive the vodka laxity, who does not finalize not only vodka, because we are talking about, if we are talking with you, for example, about the reserves of the state budget, then this is the customs , first of all, there are very large reserves and , secondly, the receipts of import taxes, secondly, it is tobacco somewhere we count 20 billion a year, also vodka, fuel is somewhere around 10-15 yes hmm, the

decide, i am right i would very much like to discuss the topic with you, or to discuss the text with tatarove are happy. we are happy to provide the site as soon as the texts are available. what to do with petty corruption, because we talk a lot about big corruption, but everything starts with small things, and unfortunately, it exists, but if we as an organization, you asked the question very well, because countermeasures against corruption at different levels must be divided into completely different ones tools when we are talking about major political corruption, the key factor is the irreversibility of the punishment for the crime of corruption. well, the top corruptor will always find a way to circumvent the rules, he and the top corruptor, then the official, when we are talking about administrative or petty corruption, there is no other way than systemic reforms there you won't solve the problem with punishments, there are too many people involved, that's why top corruption is not the severity of punishments, shallow corruption and administrative or settlement - these are always only r

in our country, de facto, yarmak rules because he rules through tatarov, uh, the judicial branch of government, because of that. stefanchuk rakhamiu eh he rules the verkhovna rada because of the bumblebee, he rules the cabinet of ministers , but everyone is a yoke and de facto m-m a person who has no constitutional relationship to power de facto rules well, like in normal countries, there is a legislative power . well, like in the same united states, there is an executive power and they somehow have to communicate with each other . we have an authoritarian country with a suppressed democracy that fights for civilization for democracy. well, that is such a paradox . and someday historians will write that an authoritarian country is fighting for democratic ones the value of the question of how long the war will last and the question of what the government will be, for example, after a few more years of the war, just under such conditions , eh, the war, well, who knows when the war will end , how will our offensive in the south end this year, eh, the russians can fall in march , march itself it i

tatarov, yes, that is, when will it end ?the officers will be thrown under some political articles behind bars during the war, is it not possible to break this trend ? the whole country, the majority of the country is the military and we must understand that the time will come when the military must be defended because we understand what kind of military they now have , including political ambitions, i will not say about the military, the military, oh maybe those who have been in uniform there all their lives, and we have military personnel who perform tasks, even those who were not military personnel yesterday, and they have already shown that they are worthy of this country and they protect it. regardless of how they were yesterday , now our entire country is military. therefore it is very important in the country, it is justice. and the fact that there is now , according to chervinsky , according to marchenko, it shows a complete lack of justice. and it should be such people who have shown that they are technically ready t

right side of father, well , father andriy, as they say in the people, well, that is, when we see a tatarovthe president, then we understand that in this case, with those practices of manual control of law enforcement and judicial prosecutorial bodies, this is not at all the direction in which we should move , particularly in anti-corruption practices, and there is a general factor here, and it just lies exclusively precisely in the political will, and you, as an expert, will not be able to influence this factor, and in fact, ukraine is interesting because of that and it differs from the majority. we are in this kind of ground, they call it the waiting room, where we are with other candidate countries, so ukraine is distinguished by the fact that we have a very strong civil society, and this civil society and expert environment are very a big, significant role is played precisely in the fact that this is the political context. yes , he stayed on the right track, as our european partners like to say. relatively speaking, i put a lot of hope on our civil society in this regard. if we see that

enforcement officers are engaged in evaluations they have to keep the rhythm and then they should be tatarovnd political well i won't say tatar or tatar political leadership it's hard for me to say which one i know which one you accept mr. tatarok participates in the political leadership or is he just , you know, like a conductor, he says there we work here , here we wrap the fish and so on. of course, all these things are so big political, they happen with a big sanction or silent the consent of the top political leadership about this policy, we would not like it, but no , what are you saying ? hands to dismiss from positions and so on, unfortunately, this was in previous years and our law enforcement officers, i can say without a doubt, they took care of such stories. turbulence at this time, when the maidan was literally taking place there, yes, there, the entire law enforcement system was completely paralyzed and it could not adapt to the challenges that they decided to do, why would i do something , er, i am free for this once again, yes, well not yet again, but dismissal, yes, or they

those for whom no one has ever voted well, for example, there are the men from the party regions tatarovandriy yarmak, for example, the elected positions are generally assigned to them in a manual mode and they are now running the country, that's what your colleagues in political analysis say, and the parliament can be run in a manual mode, i'll tell you more, you can't at all you can manage and go to sleep for a month or a second, and all the work of the state mechanism will be performed by the first deputy, the second deputies, the third deputies, and everything will work as well. and it is possible that in some directions, we as citizens will not even notice the difference, we will not even notice the difference, but i am convinced that tomorrow will not happen of the government and the mechanism will work in manual mode, the other question is how effective is such a manual control mechanism. it was never effective neither during the war nor with, nor before the war, nor after the war that is why we need to carry out systemic changes for today. that is, these are not just words, we ca

but this decision didn’t suit tatarov’s hopes, so she went to court to receive compensation for moral’t want to let the situation take its course, and due to the fact that, as it turned out, there were already a lot of neighbors who suffered from these same dogs tkachev and they say in the winter one of the staffords attacked the spitz and bit the bites , and the hostess also tried to protect him. i'll kill then the initiation of a criminal case. the victim was denied. she received compensation of 54,000 rubles. but the problems with the mistress of fighting dogs, who either could not control them, or did not want to, did not decrease. natalya konstantinova is also the owner of a spitz named chip, now she practically does not let go of him. they walk only near the house, so that in case of danger they can run into the entrance or the help of the tenants last time the pet, barely managed to recapture. she grabbed the dog, but we were not afraid. ah, i don’t know, i don’t even know how it all happened and how we pulled her out of these teeth at all, it confuses local residents and the f

tatarov ace. b lets c kopyl time polina do you know the answer to the question? but i answered bkletsk, i’m so overwhelmed i’m sitting. tim do you know the answer to the question? i have no idea of ​​the three titles. i, perhaps, remember only the dumpling, so i chose the correct answer to this question option b years. let's move on to the question. in which of these sports do participants compete on horseback, and bridge b lacrosse time well , as far as i remember, this is swimming in what sense? bridge guys, there are, then, two horses, let's go with them to bridge and play. how was dmitriev chosen? which option did you choose option b. i reasoned very well logically. let's bridge well bridge - this is translated from english as a bridge and i'll think about it. what relation can this have to horses, and in the word lacrosse , the word cross is mentioned, and therefore i chose option b. well, i was wrong. alla - it's like, yes, for a horse, for example, probably, yes, but the floor is generally a t-shirt. a team sport in which participants on horseback move the