more polarizing the content among 1900 that users will stay glued to their screens for instance tattersall's theory is judged extremely good basically risen whereas like some very solid scientific explanation that's less of a click bait that and it will be considered bad because it makes basically less money for. or you tube or facebook you tube and other social media and then money through advertising and the more uses for us sites content the more companies can challenge for space along with the view count and interaction rate watch time is a decisive criterion which algorithms used to select from $10.00 to $0.15. with bad polarizing content and often strange ideas conspiracy theory videos generate lots of time very crazy faking formations are a really good because you're like is that true you want to know so you click on your trade to look for to see if it's true or not and even if you click on new look fall like 5 minutes on the site over and over this resource hopelessly bullshit then 0 reason is still going to consider that as a success. that's a fanfic you tube's algorithm isn't progr