want to talk now about, inspired by a letter we received from london from lawyer and blogger tatyana solovyovas at the end of the letter that she would like us here to voice the material that she sent us in our speech. i immediately want to make a reservation tatyana apologize to you, which we naturally cannot invest in program step by step. everything you write about, although it is very interesting. well, besides. uh, again, i want to apologize for the fact that i will connect some things, as it seems to me, logically and comment on what worries me and i, i hope, worries a huge number of people. who come to us for transmission. and i ask you not to immediately look in our words. eh, axioms are statements of some specifics that require confirmation of scientific philosophical and so on. no, i would ask you to treat this as an attempt to put a question on which we can and should look for the answer together. here is what tatyana solovyova writes , i took all the materials exclusively from official sources of the world economic forum sites at the imf from western leading economists and the west

let's return to the text of tatyana solovyova this summer, at a rally in the open seam, he said thathe coronavirus showed that capitalism in its modern form can no longer continue and openly called for a great reset and the fourth industrial revolution it was supported by the imf international monetary fund. un the entire british crown and a number of similar structures. and that's it, how the parrots hardened the nerve of the windows apart here challenge the world, that is, this is a narrow window of opportunity to change the world. remember this formulation is a narrow window of opportunity to change the world. that is, the authors are the ideas of ideology. this idea. they understand that if they don’t slip through this window, if before this x hour comes, humanity wakes up and turns on their brains may not get what they want. and what do they want? this is exactly what we need to talk about for the great reset. schwab was calling long before this pandemic of this contagion that came into the world. why, after the spanish flu, they returned to normal, which killed a lot more peopl

here is what tatyana solovyova writes.s actually behind the facade of all this is one name is technocracy, that is, the centralized management of countries by societies of resources, which will be carried out by a thin layer of technocrats, whom no one has chosen and appointed, everything under marxist sauce and as the main goal total control control over everything in the video in clear text it is said that the bodies will become so high-tech that the border between the body and technology will be erased, and here we already see that there is no place for god at all, because if you believe that a person is a creation of god, then how can. this divine creation is led by the artificial intelligence of the technocracy, and in this case, what happens, but it turns out that there will be new castes of people henry rich and genepur, genetically enriched and genetic glory, that is, one who has undergone genetic modification, then accepted the rules of the game that he imposes in okay, a who did not accept. he's an outcast, he wo

also from the material of tatyana solovyova, the pope recently called for prayers for artificial intelligence yes, so that he serves people to pray not for health care, for example, so that it would be quite logical, well, or ask the lord to have mercy on us and deliver us from mora, which would be christian and how they pray in our orthodox church, but pray for artificial intelligence either for him or for him to serve us. isn't this the preparation of our pasta for them to accept, but the fact that we it is proposed when a given, but in general artificial intelligence. he a somehow at least somehow joins the divine origin of man. that is, in other words it turns out. what is the catholic church? can become part of the same layer? which will rule the world, as we are invited. and again i ask you, do not accuse me of being against artificial intelligence. uh, that i'm a retrograde, that, well, and so on and so forth. i am absolutely not against artificial intelligence. i'm opposed to no control between where artificial intelligence serves. and where does he serve, remember the interview that