berdyansk and luhansk, after that we did not have the opportunity to hear that tausy was received by the armed forces of ukraine. therefore, here everything depends on the germans, german representatives, and in particular on scholz, who for some reason does not want to transfer them. that is, this decision is only up to him, as we can see, and the bundestag supported this proposal, although he did not say there that it should be taurus, there are long-range weapons. ugh , and anything that helps to destroy the enemy at a distance, that is, not direct physical contact, at a distance, can be considered a dust-busting weapon, well, in a broad sense, this fits the understanding of long-range weapons, but obviously taurus are meant, well, let’s just wait there , in fact, what is this, how will this pressure on scholz end? denis, but for why are the tauruses in ukraine, how are they different, for example, from storm shadow and scalp, which is already available? well, the question here is that the more means of destruction, the better, especially since, in principle, they are more long-ra

again i want to remind the audience, perhaps also experts, colleagues, including that there is no tausy, for example , there will be no meeting with the orchestra, they will start to work, and then we will actually find out about it, this is absolutely correct, and if we are talking about our sea, then the enemy is certainly on the lookout...