i've sat witjues like silverman, garland, taylor, e winds, they set a lot of attention to that.overnment has never made that in all of the years of the apa. at least, not that i remember, sitting here for 12 years. i heot seen that made. it's a pretty radical rewrite, as the chief justices, of what has been standard, administrative la practice, and you're invoking three pages of brf to this complete change that all ofhe judges have been doi f all of these years, and then the government comespand acknowledges that in case after case after case with the labor, the energy, environmental, and i think it's a big step. he saying you're not payi attention to the text, we id. set aside is set aside. that's always been nderstood to me. the rules are longer in place. nobody, no case has ever said what you're saying. it is a recent law in the proposal, good for that. but that has not been the law. i find it prtty astonishing thyocome up here and make this -- and i realize iss not the main part of you submission, but i'd i'm just going tous back pretty strongly on the three pages fortossing