teague did hear the following month. i was not present for that hearing, but he did hold a very full and complete public hearing, and i think we have provided full public process to allow everyone to be heard, as well as we've had this appeal before the board of appeals which has been continued numerous times to allow additional dialogue between the parties. so as i stated, the application initially was for five a.d.u.s. there were variances required for the rear yard in-fill, as well as exposure variance because it does have a noncompliant rear yard. the project was adjusted to comply with the unit code, and even those other units would now comply with the exposure requirements because exposure has been reduced to i think about a nine-foot-clear area and 225 square feet, so i think even under the previous approval -- previous proposal made the approval variable under current law, but that is not what is before you. the main issue here seems to be parking, and the retention of parking. the project was revised to retain t

cory teague again for the planning department. i will assure you the acting zoning administrator at that time did not go out on a limb by his or herself to make that determination. i can assure you that the full resources of the department and the city were consulted to make that determination. a lot of conversations about the nuances of what the original propertiener was, but all we have is the record. if you look at the original variance letter from 1970 and why it's being provided it talks in have you flowery language that it would be an open space open to the tenants of the buildings, and it was going to be this kind of great open space, natural plaza for the community. that did not happen. the development context that exists now is very different than what happened then. i would disagree with the appellant, again, that we didn't address the issue raised about parking and why no one's talking about it. our brief directly addresses their question in their brief about the parking and how it was used in the justification of the v

teague's suggestions? i'd like to see a new approach which really clearly delineates objectives which are in line with the responsibilities that we are tasked with. >> president hillis: yeah. i think first and foremost is the tenants and the issue with the tenant. and i think secondly, yeah, if there's a -- if we can look at an option that has a little bit more equal size units -- i guess that there's a third floor that's going to be built that's going to have a full floor, but is there a way to look at that commercial unit differently. ground floor of units aren't the best, but perhaps you can tie them to the units above and there could -- you know, those could be two larger -- two large units, too, with the third-floor unit, and there's no parking or there's parking and the ability to do that, where you give a little more space to those units on the second floor. does that sound right, commissioner moore? >> commissioner moore: yes. i'd still like to suggest that the architect explore a.d.u.'s in san fra

teague's decision. the hu's purchased the property in 2009, their site permit was approved by the planning department in october 2015 and issued in 2016. our addendum drawings were filed in february 2017. that april of 2017, we discovered our site is hindered by an n.s.r. requiring the northwestern part of the lot must remain open as open space stemming from this old variance decision. in 1970, our adjacent owner to the north wished to subdivide his property. george imperiali wanted to sell a large portion of his lot, and arthur court, the preceding owner of our property wanted to buy that property as mr. williams stated. the subdivision would cause 3030 larkin to be in violation of several requirements, yet a variance was granted. the 1970 decision transferred an area to our ownership as an area to remain an open space in perpetuity. that's depicted here. 3030 larkin, the appellant's property is now over here. subsequent lot adjustment created a new lot, lot 22, and that created our new parcel, 24, whi

>> well, they've already been written by zoning administrator teague. >> commissioner honda: but he was acting zone administrator at the time. >> he was acting at the time, and he was acting well, and it was permitted. so under the unit size, the units are -- the proposed units are 581 square feet, 781 square feet, and 615 square feet. some of the units are -- aren't even subject to this variance. and they could actually remove more parking without even need for this variance. >> all right. thank you. >> vice president swig: thank you for my question. >> clerk: okay. commissioners, this matter is submitted. >> commissioner honda: make me the guy, sure. so what's before us, you know, as you mentioned, vice president, is under the eyes of planning, they are allowed to do that, which is correct, ask that would be if this is a fully code compliant project. what is before us is not a fully code compliant project because it requires a variance. the findings for a variance and allowance of variance are very strict. as you mentioned, the hardship. i don't find the hardship personally in this, a

sorry mr teague. the property, evidently, by the tenants that are on the property , say it has been vacant since 2015. in san francisco, we do have vacancy controls. aren't they supposed to -- and then the other thing is, they are a block book notification -- is there a black book notification. >> not that i am aware, but i can check. >> is bbn only good for building permits are planning staff? >> it is for any permit or any other application that requires review by the planning department. >> if there is not, it is recommended somebody gets a b.b.n. so if the owner were to file any permits that they will be notified. >> true. but only if it requires planning department department review. this permit, this is subject -- he did not require planning department review. it would have not triggered the notice. >> thank you, very much. >> thank you. okay. >> there are plans. two sets to appeal the kitchen. sorry about that. i misread it. >> thank you. we will now move on to public comment for this item. oka

violence was instigated by "a motley rabble of saucy boys, andoes, irish teagues, jacktars. he ignored thee testimony of numerous witnesses who described the scene in detail and either failed to atticks. they focus on andrew, a young slave owned by oliver wendell who said he saw a man he thought was addicts rush forward, grab a musket" a soldier over the head before he was shot dead. scoffed at thein account. unless all the other witnesses were stone blind, this detail the. exist anywhere except andrew's own brain. adams set skepticism aside. the story of the aggression was just a detail he needed to defend the soldiers and protect boston's reputation. upon, adams argued, by "a stout mulato fellow whose looks enough or terrify any person." adams placed responsibility on adducks:. the jury returned its verdict in 2.5 hours. after accounting for montgomery's shot, which is believed to have killed attucks, it will follow that the other three were killed not by the other six prisoners, but by three of them only and therefore they cannot all be found guilty of it. on the strength

presidents teague. also an abc news exclusive, the woman accusing an nfl star of domestic abuse is breaking her silence. outrage over the redskins' decision to sign him. >>> and jennifer aniston and dolly parton turning the tables. jennifer will be interviewing dolly about a new movie. you don't want to miss it. two legends. and it's pretty darned good. it's coming up on gma. >> legend recognized. dolly parton is my favorite celebrity of all time. i cannot wait to see this interview, ginger. is it good? >> good. it's great. you're going to love it. >> we'll be there. >> thanks, ginger. my other favorite thing this morning, dear evan hansen. it just opened in san francisco last night. you will laugh. you will cry. it's better than "cats." you can get a ticket for 25 bucks. >>> we are also squealing with excitement because we have a excitement because we have a thricalifornia phones offers free specialized phones... like cordless phones. - ( phone ringing ) - big button, and volume-enhanced phones. get de

promise the teague it comes to china.here is a lot of skepticism around foreign governments, not just the u.s. they have heard this before. can china do enough to convince the u.s. side that this time they are serious and within 90 days they are ready to roll out these measures. much. thank you so he is reporting from hong kong. alix: s&p futures had an interesting 48 hours. there was a nice gap up. then you had that rally hold up for a little bit and then it faded yesterday. it's continuing to fade today as well. how long is the risk rally lasting? joining us now is the longview economics ceo. : i thought it was encouraging. i would not be surprised if you see a bump up. nineve been rallying for trading days. we have, quite a long way. deal was as good as we can expected really. i'm not surprised by all the shenanigans that seem consistent with the way china behaves anyway. i'm not discouraged. i think this rally will persist. it's the first two weeks of december that are usually pretty soggy. people forget that. always

our experience with armor warfare, we cut our teague with recent colonel patton and others, integration of aviation and -- but the legacy of those who fought in this war and the stories like riegger and york and witsle, harris, its tells me your life matters and what you do in life echos across generations and to eternal. just might change the course of history or influence the next person who. do never give up hope because year standing to the soldiers of giant now it's our turn to carry the torch. thank you for your time and i look forward to your questions. [applause] i see some microphones out there any questions? yes, sir. >> could you talk about the high command, like specially unhuntser liggett some' people think he was a much better tactical and operational commander than pershing was. >> hundreder liggett is going to be asked to take over the army, the first army commander in mid-october, and hunter liggett asks torii freeway gets his armed around the situation. per shipping had his hand fill, trying to handle the strategic issues with general foch and george clemens, the frenc