teague than yourself? >> yes, because planning department had some kind of an i a groement which i was not -- had some kind of agreement which i was not privy to, and it became apparent that two wouldn't be bedrooms because of the egress, and then that violated with planning by changing to a library and study. >> are there obvious issues from a d.b.i. stand snoint >> i don't see anything insurmountable for habitability. >> perfect for me. any other questions? >> many mr. teague. >> thank you. >> good evening again, commissioners. cory teague. the property is 461-463 duncan street. and it currently contains approximately 2200 square foot single family home including a garage within the rh2 zoning district. somewhat oversized lot as most of the lots in this block are. the subject building permit was filed in august of 2017 after a few rounds of design review and comments from the residential design advisory team and underwent section 311 neighborhood notice in july and august 2018, and the project proposed t

cory teague planning department staff. planning department recommends that the commission grant the appeal and deny this permit for various reasons. the subject permit was filed and issued on april 4th this year. however, it was in aid when it was submitted. which means it never came to the planning department for review. it does require planning department review additionally replacing windows even though that have not visible by the street. it requires certificate of appropriateness from the historic preservation commission. additionally, in october of last year, the appellant filed a black book notation on this property to be notified any permits that were submitted for this property. because the permit did not come planning department and we did not provide that innovation to th--notification to the neighbo. as you seen, just address this issue as well, it appears the glass of the existing window is to some degree, privacy glass. this was they do talk about certain types of issues with privacy. i feel confident in this

teague at the start of the hearing and would be happy to give those to you, too. good evening, again. i am here to ask you to preserve the battle front facade of the mediterranean revival style house. this is a design issue, an issue of aesthetics. the project sponsor states in his brief that i rely too heavily on mary brown's report, but her report is important because she goes beyond describing homes as just marina style, but as specific and distinct styles like 463 duncan, which is a battle front mediterranean revival. in reading her report, i was educated. it was never my intent to challenge the cad-x. i know the ceqa document should be appealed to the board of supervisors within 60 days of an i a prooufl. i fully understand this is not an historic with a capital h resource, nor did i ever claim it to be one. it is an original 1927 facade, intact, and extremely attractive with details that are specific to the san francisco style of vernacular architecture. at the d.r. hearing, i testified about the importance of this style of san francisco residential dwelling

kim k., chrissy teague are fans.the scoop on how the brow transplant works. >> hair is taken with the back of the head where there's a good hair source. >> what's the pain level on eyebrow transplant? >> very minimal. we numb you up. the initial numbing is like you go to the dentist. >> you're conscious the whole time. >> we'll give you medicine to make you sleepy and groggy and relaxed. >> first you have to get the hair. it takes about five hours. >> you have to place every single hair, hundreds of little hairs in a perfect way. it takes time. >> and money. it will set you back an estimated 7,500 bucks. but you only have to do the transplant once. >> permanent results. that hair will grow for the rest of your life. >> dr. diamond is says had results are immediate, but don't be alarmed in the fair hair falls out. >> the shaft will fall out and can take months to grow in. >> i get it, but i'm on the fence with this one. there is risk of bleeding, minimal bruising and/or swelling. just be careful. >>> let's move on the

teague? >> come on up. >> hello again. just jumping quickly to the privacy screens. so the planning commission didn't provide guidance on a height. they basically minimized the depth of the deck and made it clear that this needed to be a -- there needed to be a privacy screen. they didn't recommend materials, they didn't recommend a height. my recommendation was it needed to be solid, not a planter box or whatever, and it needed to be at least 6 feet tall. because it was in the buildable envelope, you could do whatever you wanted in reason and not trigger conditions. you could have it be 6 feet, 7 feet or some other dimension. >> but there's no other restriction? we can say 6 or 7? >> yeah. just another quick issue i failed to mention before. there's been a lot of discussion just kind of like the neighborhood and meetings and to that effect. i did want to point out that there were these two d.r.'s filed on the original permit, but on the d.r. packet, it indicates that the department receive no other public comment on this permit, either in opposition or support of th

cory teague, zoning administrator with the planning department. just to give the planning department perspective there. the city attorney's office is not involved with the vast majority of our enforcement cases, because they tend to be more minor. the more egregious cases we absolutely do coordinate with the city attorney's office. they also do work themselves to stay abreast of these situations. we have a lot of interagency coordination with d.b.i. and the city attorney's office for these specific types of enforcement cases, for example, illegal demolition. the city attorney is -- they have the ability to take civil action. and basically take the enforcement further than we can through the planning code, the planning code actually specifically states that our enforcement procedures and penalties are not designed to be punitive. they're purely designed to bring about abatement of the violation. so we're very -- there's a lot of due process, there's a lot of work that just tries to make the problem be fixed, as opposed to penalizing the parties who

have been detained or questioned since the president was forced to step down in april but speak to a teague who was a journalist and joins us via skype from strasbourg process then continuing 18 weeks now but we're kind of in limbo at the moment in al-jazeera in algeria i'm sorry. kind of a. lot it's the 18 friday of protest and gets pied the chief of staff warning huge to modes ocurred today all around the country we are talking about more this 1000000 and a half people gathering in the center of the algerian capital algiers but it's also happening all around the countries for example constantine alarmed and also in batman beat up some very message important demos so that means that after the holy miles of down and things went low low and low things massively are back on the on the streets of algeria and people want now that they're released from this little discussion to find out a solution of the political about coming up here as it is we've got these former officials charged with corruption and. lots of arrests but what about the the current ruling elite i mean are we likely to see any

sitting up front is corey teague the zoning administrator. we have burney curran and leo plasios. department of public health, we have patrick and jennifer callworth. the board meeting guidelines are follows. the board request that you turn off and silence all cell phones. please carry on conversations in the hallway. appellants and department respondents are given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal. members of the public who are not affiliated with the party have up to three minutes each to address the board. please speak in the microphone. to assist the board and the accurate preparations of minutes you're asked to submit a speaker card when you come up to speak. if you have questions about the requesting a rehearing the board rules or hearing schedules, please speak to board staff during break or after the meeting. we're located at 1651 mission street room 304. this meeting is broadcast live on sfgov tv, cable channel 78 and will be rebroadcast on friday at 4:00 p.m. on channel 26. now we're swear in all those who intend to testify. any member of

office allocation report that you were given two months ago, three months ago 10 months ago, by cory teague on the office allocations. the pending small-cap projects on the pending large-cap projects are not in the c-3 at all. i summarized them up there. four of the small caps are not in the c-3. the ones that are in the c-3. a lot of 4999 ft. . depending large-cap projects, 10 of them are not in the c-3. when i say c-3 r, ost. they are not in the downtown core. what that means is that the whole transit system that was talked about in the downtown plan, the fees that were put on their, were not relevant to what is happening right now. one of the things that i am pleading with you to do, is to really take cognizance of the jobs housing imbalance. this comes out on page - page 9 of your report. you start talking about the jobs in the housing balance. the jobs housing balance is really bad right now. it is because we have an assumption of how much housing was needed in 1985, and it's not the same as 2019. you have office development at the allocation and sit on it. one of the ways you have to

. >> his rivals have rushed to disagree teague up a likely conflict at their first debate only three 1994 crime bill, it did contribute to mass incarceration in our country. >> reporter: but 25 years ago this summer -- >> let us roll up our sleeves to roll back this awful tide of violence. >> reporter: the bill was a compromise between democrats and republicans. supported by many members of the congressional black caucus, big city black mayors and clergy leaders alarmed at soaring crime rates. so what did the crime bill do? formerly known as the violent crime control and law enforcement act, the bill was a sweeping $30 billion package. which put 100,000 new police officers on the streets, created the violence against women act and an assault weapons ban. the bill also expanded the federal death penalty and created dramatically harsher sentencing laws, including three strikes. mandatory life terms for people with at least three federal violent crimes or drug convictions. one of the most controversial aspects, granting states billions to build prisons if they pass their own tough sente

[cheers and applause] >> so, some -- since we were last teague with him. just like you and me he is human, too. he has faced some sadness and some challenges, too, this past year. he and julie, worst mark's dad, jack, and mom, norm yaa in a few months there is a modest bench in this odder -- odder toum that bears their names. . >> it overlookes the beautiful green valley below that faces the pacific. the same view shared by president reagan's own gravesite. he's taken on a lot of work. it's super human effort to produce and perform as much as he does and as well as he does every day and he does it for us. his levinnites, for his country. that he loves so much. [applause] mark, i think it's no secret we here in california have been busy, too. while you were writing you best-selling books and producing brand new shows, we were busy in the great state of california, the same state that twice made ronald reagan its governor and its 40th president, becoming number one in so many things as well. since you were last with us, mark, just think of what we have achie