research is from the physical technical university where we worked in the laboratory of the. private company here in germany we managed to secure significant funds from investors and. company other implications produces millions of chips for the medical. research to create a unique chip to be used in the industry of optical computer interconnections. different place. the. project. with a proposal to set up production facilities. chips using. something unique. to take. his company's among the global elite quantum dots or confine semiconductor crystals electronic. discovered in the one nine hundred eighty s. physicists. are great advantages in laser applications. for more amplitude and. relative noise. benefits. on the basis of company's latest invention. through it. one hundred gigabits. you see everywhere today just a few. several dozen times. many hundred times. think of the. data coming out of your computer. today the options are basically either building a new road. or waiting in traffic with the data. says adding lanes to the same highway sending information on the same f

research projects at the danish technical university, has conflicted to national danish cycle planning and has been involved in european union projects on zero and low-emission vehicles as well as cycling benchmarking. he has been the coordinating of a car-free cities conference and another conference in copenhagen. nils. >> i'm very happy to be here today and i'm going to talk about planning for a wide range of users, not just for the strong cyclists. i'm not too familiar with this. it's very easy. just keep to the right. in our cycling policy, we present a starting point for the policies for cycling, what we call the transport quality and we are looking at safety, of course, which are the statistics, but we also very much looking at the sense of safety or the sense of security that you feel safe, that the cyclists feel safe and that's not just the strong cyclist, but cycle groups, different cyclist groups should feel safe when they cycle in traffic. then we look at the traveling speeds which is important because we are competing with the cars and public transport. we are looking at h

thousand and three a team of researchers from the physical technical university where we worked in the laboratory of the nobel laureates of go to a unique opportunity to set up a private company here in germany we managed to secure significant funds from investors and this. company other implications produces millions of chips for the medical. research to create a unique chip to be used in the industry of optical computer into connections. to different place now. submitted a project. with a proposal to set up production facilities. a factory that ships using. something unique. to take knowledge is referring to is called quantum dots. where his company is among the global elite quantum dots or confined semiconductor crystals with unique electronic and optical properties discovered in the one nine hundred eighty s. by physicists. quantum dots are great advantages in laser applications. to control for lasers. and for more amplitude and. relative noise. benefits. on the bases of a company's latest invention. make a chip that will transmit many channels through its. one hundred gigabits. yo

universities u.k. oppose the cuts in higher education funding upon which we have set this debate. mr. speaker, you said last night that votes technically today is on a narrow issue. but behind it is the most profound change. it is the ending of funding for most university degrees. it is a huge debt on graduates. is an untried, untested, and an unstable market for students. england enjoys a world-class university system. world-class in research. a richness in higher education to compare with the best. the risks are so high and the consequences are so unclear that no one would rushed through without proper debate or discussion. today, we do not have the white paper to tell us how. >> will be broached the principle of free education. will he apologize? >> nouri insure the that policy did not come into for another ad been the general for the reelection. -- until there had we ensured that that policy did not come in to fork until another general election had been held. he did not say they were world- class. he did not praise what they had achieved. he could only knock them. the second most popular destination for overseas students in the wo

pointing out, prya, is that we need some way of very quickly accessing the government and university and industry technical expertise for the government. that's not in the current national contingency plan. >> i think that is right. for example, as you said, the national labs and the department of energy played an important role in the response but they are not mentioned in the national contingency plan. a time to figure out how to bring a man and make that work. >> picking up on this thread, i think continues it plans are important, but what we have learned is that it is important to exercise the capability. and we had spill response capability that was unprepared for the scale of challenge, and not wast no ever -- was evergreen to deal with the challenge before us. fran mentioned noaa. that is so important to directing where the oil might go, where the sensitive environments are and how to strategize and be prepared for reducing risk. we discovered in our research, the staff research, that they had actually planned a model that looks dead subsurface the discharges almost -- that looked at subsurface disc

university for skills for increasing employability and increasing income. it should also be about rotter benefit to society, enriching society both for technical advances and also cultural advances us well. >> crucially which courses they choose. >> students at the moment are not only going to the university to improve, they are going there to study a subject that they love. without personal development, both in academic terms and personal terms. however, there'll be a rising tuition fees, the majority of students who are now going to university to improve their future guilt of income and improve their graduate prospects. >> i'm worried about the nature of this policy, which does seem to me like a rather huge gamble with a few hedged bets, if you like him in a progressive direction around the edges. the campbell which the government itself can't be sure how it's going to turn out. they are throwing him to estimate individual choices of students but the outcomes may be. we can plan for the various outcomes. we can conjecture, to market analysis. we can to plan budgets for the next two years. redoing all of those things, but we do feel this is an unnecessaril

university to the policy. mr. speaker, you yourself said last night that votes technically today is on a narrow issue. but behind it is the most profound change in university funding since the university grants committee was set up in the 1920's. it is the ending of funding for most university degrees. it is a huge burden of debt on graduates. it is an untried, untested and unstable market for students. although there is always room for improvement, england enjoys a world-class university system. world class in research. a disproportionate number of the best universities. a richness and diversity of higher education to compare with the rest. the risks are so high, the consequences are unclear that no sane person would rush it through without proper debate or discussion. but today we don't even have the paper that tells us how it's meant to work. i give way to representative of one of those leading research universities. >> i thank the honorable gentleman for giving way. when he talks about fundamental changes, will he talk about his party who voted to introduce fees ands broke the principle of free edu

university for skills for increasing employability and increasing income. it should also be about rotter benefit to society, enriching society both for technical advances and also cultural advances us well. >> crucially which courses they choose. >> students at the moment are not only going to the university to improve, they are going there to study a subject that they love. without personal development, both in academic terms and personal terms. however, there'll be a rising tuition fees, the majority of students who are now going to university to improve their future guilt of income and improve their graduate prospects. >> i'm worried about the nature of this policy, which does seem to me like a rather huge gamble with a few hedged bets, if you like him in a progressive direction around the edges. the campbell which the government itself can't be sure how it's going to turn out. they are throwing him to estimate individual choices of students but the outcomes may be. we can plan for the various outcomes. we can conjecture, to market analysis. we can to plan budgets for the next two years. redoing all of those things, but we do feel this is an unnecessaril

technical??? approaches that make it possibl for many different browsers,ñ? proprietary browsers to browse websites in their own wayñññ? because there's universal? are and bring them back together. it is a solution that works elsewhere. you need to have a certain type of approach we referred to as medved data tagging approach. it will be geeky but on the road there has to be geeky stop to make it work. there has to be in infrastructure for la and authorized users and will be authorized users access to the data tags in an appropriately. what it doesn't require, number one, it does not require a central national database of everybody's health information, not a good idea, doesn't require it. what it doesn't require is national patient identify years to make such a system work, not necessary, not even a good idea. but it doesn't require it is for everyone to discard their insisting systems, but rather, to be able to build a layer on top of the systems to translate in and out and over time as the systems are updated and revised, the providers of those systems can build into rather than on top of these types of standards. what are the kind of teacher

technical??? approaches that make it possibl for many different browsers,ñ? proprietary browsers to browse websites in their own wayñññ? because there's universal? and bring them back together. it is a solution that works elsewhere. you need to have a certain type of approach we referred to as medved data tagging approach. it will be geeky but on the road there has to be geeky stop to make it work. there has to be in infrastructure for la and authorized users and will be authorized users access to the data tags in an appropriately. what it doesn't require, number one, it does not require a central national database of everybody's health information, not a good idea, doesn't require it. what it doesn't require is national patient identify years to make such a system work, not necessary, not even a good idea. but it doesn't require it is for everyone to discard their insisting systems, but rather, to be able to build a layer on top of the systems to translate in and out and over time as the systems are updated and revised, the providers of those systems can build into rather than on top of these types of standards. what are the kind of teachers? w