the form of a personal service contract which has two names, the respondent and somebody named ted gullickson, and then, a second one with dale carlson. is there a reason that you don't attach a signed copy of these contracts, assuming they were signed by the parties to them? >> when the investigators requested these documents from the respondent, this -- these were the only records that the respondent had with particular reference to these contracts. >> commissioner kopp: available from the respondent? >> yes, that's correct. >> commissioner kopp: these are nowhere -- well, in the investigation, wasn't the signed or executed copy of each requested? >> from the respondent and as well as the documentation of these individual committees themselves, that they reported on their campaign, form 460 reports. >> commissioner kopp: what's that mean? >> means that these committees that the respondent worked for did also report his salary as campaign expenditures. >> commissioner kopp: i understand but i'm looking for a signed copy. what i've been provided is an unsigned copy of each contract. is it imp