only 45% use telegram in russia.t is not surprising, the most popular is whatsapp, according to various data, 72 to 88% of citizens use telegram in our country. therefore, telegram, as a platform, as a method, as a messenger for exchanging information, is absolutely dangerous for ukraine, since it occupies a dominant role in the market. it cannot be given to foreigners. a citizen and also a russian one the origin of the monopoly on the information market of ukraine. we are dealing with the mythical trojan horse that was brought into the city and then an enemy army came out of it in the middle of the night. similarly, the russians brought us a telegram. and the president of the council accepted it as a gift, which should save his rating. only this is an illusion. at some point, the russians will be able to make sure that the information they throw in is much more than zelenskyi's entourage can pay for. will attack him personally, and there will not be enough budgets to do them, because they are russians, and not the p

directly telegram, maybe yes, maybe not, maybe telegram will answer positively, will reveal ownership and will respond to the remarks of the ukrainian authorities, as well as to the remarks of the russian authorities, because president putin directly said that he is grateful to telegram for cooperation, and they closed more than 400 channels before the russian elections, because ukraine does not have this, it can be related to politics and russian ipso, we see this directly, but it can also apply to other areas, for example, yesterday the lviv agency ngl media... published a large study about how closed groups in telegram engage in adolescent bullying, demand money for to make a video of humiliating teenagers, and additionally money to find out who exactly posted this video, ads for the sale of drugs are placed in the comments, obviously all this poses a real threat to both our national security and the security of the state in general, and to leave it in such a situation as it is is in principle unacceptable, and by the way, it is a threat. the head of the main intelligence departmen

why was telegram removed? i communicate with him through whatsapp, why did you delete telegram, you are there i already corresponded with her, here is a photo from a deleted correspondence with her, entry was denied. journalists of the authoritative publication the washington post got access to kremlin materials, which claim that telegram's audience in ukraine has already grown by 600% in 2023. according to the results of the internews study, in 2021 telegram was used by 20%. in 2023, meszher already covered 72% of domestic users. because of the great war, his popularity more than tripled in two years. to promote their narratives in the ukrainian segment telegram, russia has already spent 250 million dollars. if you take the mass telegram channels of ukraine's millionaires, unfortunately, they are interchangeable companies that mutually advertise each other, and it is very easy. to track who and when they brought them a certain cache for certain information, because it is immediately duplicated by everyone, ev

, we perfectly understand where telegram, so to speak, is located, literally telegram servers, we perfectlynderstand the possible consequences, and those measures that have already been taken on , to date, such a public discussion and proposals are taking place in the yaroslav committee. is being actively discussed now in order to start regulating it, and here, in my opinion, there are no differences in how different factions look at this issue, including in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, now that enough information will be gathered and analyzed, in principle, it is now just in the stage of analysis and consultations with our european partners, because in this case there are also certain standards in the european union regarding how it is regulated. internet media, and we here have to honor our obligations and go to in unison with our partners, to date, as far as i know, such good, effective consultations are quite, quite frank, which, including the permit , allow our european partners to better understand this issue and more effectively propose methods of regulation at the pan-european lev

directly relate to telegram, maybe yes, maybe not, maybe telegram will respond positively, disclose itsownership and will respond to the remarks of the ukrainian authorities, as well as to the remarks of the russian authorities, because president putin directly said that he was grateful to telegram for cooperation, and they closed more than 400 channels before the russian elections, because there is no such thing in ukraine, it can relate to politics and russian ipso, we see it directly, but may apply to other areas as well, for example, yesterday the lviv agency nggl media published a large study about how closed groups in telegram engage in teenage bullying, demand money for shooting videos in which teenagers are humiliated, and additionally money for to find out who exactly posted this video, in the comments there are advertisements for the sale of... drugs, obviously, all of this poses a real threat to both our national security and the security of the country in general, and to leave it as it is, in principle is unacceptable, and by the way, the head of the main intelligence depart

telegram is not mentioned in the bill. the bill is about platforms. access to information, that is, a signal, for example, is a messenger, because it simply transmits a message from one subscriber to another, and telegram, facebook, youtube, these are sharing platforms where people can receive news, follow news, for a creative product, so to speak, and if video platforms in our country were regulated earlier in the media law, such as youtube, for example, then a whole series platforms that provide both video and text were not regulated, it is somewhere... what is surprising, because technologies are developing and even youtube is now not purely a video messenger, there are also text messages and a text news feed, just like in telegram has a video picture, so obviously everyone information dissemination platforms should be put on the same page and the same should be demanded from them. what does the law offer? the law essentially copies the european digital act, the european rules of cooperation with sharing platforms , and

diana's telegram, yes, well, first of all, there are a large number of anonymous telegram channels that we don't know who is behind... what is their purpose, you can only research and build versions there, but in addition, there is an opportunity to work in telegram for all kinds of possible criminals from all over the world, and well, if law enforcement agencies recognize it, that drugs are traded there, and various services are offered, information is exchanged there, which may not always be, well, let's say so , which can harm one or the other. that is, there is this gray area or dark area, and no one knows what to do with it, because telegram is built in such a way that it is difficult to do anything about it, unless those who created it, those who administer it, are involved today, here, and therefore the country should take care of its citizens and its national security, and actually, what decisions should be made here, this is of course a matter for discussion, but it seems to me that what we can do ... first of all, it is, of course, to limit officials, and such military personn

durov said that the telegram messenger quickly found itself in the field of view of the fbi. however, according to durov, the greatest danger for the telegram was going out not at all from some world governments, but from transnational corporations. apple and google constantly put a stick in telegram , threaten to remove the application from their platforms, or dissolve all sorts of things. this can be said by people with very limited knowledge of where telegram comes from, they can be encouraged by our competitors who see this as a good way to discredit us. well, you know, there is something ironic about it, on russian government tv channels. tell tv channels that cooperation with the russian government can discredit someone, you know, even i can’t comment on it, somehow, it’s already self-evident, so-and-so such-and-such a fixed thing, that is, they still understand that cooperation with the russian government discredits anyone, and at the same time they talk about it through the mouths of russian propagandists on russian tv. channels, and you know, well, it’s hard not to s

a telegram for america. one union is proud of its record through the first hundred years, a record of service and progress, which in the needs of today and plans for tomorrow, keeps pace with a tempo of fast moving age. good evening everyone and welcome to atlanta history center. my name is claire haley. i am vice president for special projects here at the atlanta history center. it is absolutely my pleasure to welcome you to tonight's

uses personal data, there is a huge advertising market in telegram and other social networks. black zone, we do not receive taxes from it as a state, we now also need income in order to strengthen our defense capability and the economy. look, ms. irina , well, we understand that there are certain social networks, in addition to telegram, yes, these are also those social networks that belong to the meta group, instagram, facebook, we also have viber, we have tiktok, chinese, we understand, what is very poor social networks, but you just mentioned that there are ads, yes, there are ads, maybe even those that shouldn't appear, because they are not allowed in ukraine, but they are there, but it is interesting to understand, but how in other countries, do they also regulate social networks, or will we be the first country in the world that wants to regulate the work of social networks and equate them with the media, well, just in europe, these rules began to apply this year, and implementation of the rules for... until 2027 of that european union or only individual countries? this

i have heard from people that telegram is part of the russian government.s can be said by people with very limited knowledge of where telegram comes from, they can be encouraged by our competitors who see this as a good way to discredit us. well, you know, there is something ironic in this: on russian government tv channels, state tv channels, to tell that cooperation with the russian government can discredit someone. well, you know, i can't even comment on it, somehow, it's already self-evident, such and such a fixed such thing, that is, they still understand that cooperation with the russian government - it discredits anyone, and at the same time they talk about it through the mouths of russian propagandists on russian tv channels, and you know, well, it's hard not to see some kind of very active here. the kremlin's attempt to form a network of literally its agents in the western world, which includes russians, like durov, and americans, like tucker carlson, and ukrainians, you know, bloggers like masiychuk, and a mass-mass of some people they pick up, yo

, we are fine we understand where telegram, so to speak, is literally the telegram servers, we understandfectly. possible consequences, and those measures that have already been taken, to date such a public discussion is taking place and the proposals in yaroslava's committee are now being actively discussed in order to proceed with regulation after all, and here, in my opinion, there are no differences in how this issue is being looked at by various factions, including in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, now, when enough information will be collected and analyzed, in principle it is... right now is in the stage of analysis and consultation with our european partners, because in this case there are also certain standards in the european union regarding how internet media is regulated, and we must abide by our obligations and go in unison with our partners, on today, as far as i know, such good and effective consultations are quite frank, which, among other things , allow our european partners to better understand this issue and more effectively propose methods of regulation at the pan-europ

i believe, for example, that the telegram channel deserves some trust, it must necessarily have some signature, well , at least people should associate it with some organization or structure, so that there is responsibility, and when there is no responsibility, then it will be difficult to trust such information, but that that now people trust more telegram channels. anonymous, where any information is thrown, this is a direct result of the absence of an effective telethon, the absence of any effective information policy at all. i believe that the telethon was necessary refuse, well, at least a year ago, of course, during martial law it is important to have some kind of censorship, but this censorship should only concern issues of a military nature, but when journalists write about military issues, of course, during military operations, there can be censorship, but if the matter concerns, for example, corruption, some issues related to the transparency of the government. so why is there this censorship there, what forces the authorities there to introduce the rules that are introduce

country, but he also retained russian citizenship, it is obvious that people who use telegram to spread this information are worried about it, if they do not break the law, obviously no one will move them, they can limit the access of state officials and the popularization of this service in the state so that there are no leaks, because if you have telegram in your phone and you give access there, for example, to your contacts from your location, then obviously the owners of this platform... will have access for to follow you, if we do not have a guarantee that it does not depend on russia , and we see, putin says that they are cooperating with telegram, during the election it was blocked, hundreds of sites on telegram were blocked that called to vote against putin, on the other hand, when the ukrainian control bodies apply, they receive primitive messages from no one knows who, and this is an absolute problem, so it is a matter of national security, and what to do with what we... but now at the level of society use unverified news, that we have a media system in the country, not only h

with telegram, it's not only telegram is concerned, there are countries where public officials are prohibited use tik-tok, for example, in china they now ban american chips in government computers officials, even chips so that their information does not get anywhere and to be ready for their actions that they want to do, so it is more of a law about national security, telegram is not mentioned in any way, but it is obvious that how many people use telegram in ukraine 72%, 72% get information from there, this network was founded by a russian citizen, russian citizens work there. although he now lives in another country, but he still has russian citizenship, it is obvious that people who use telegram to spread this information, they are worried about it, if they do not break the law, obviously no one will move them, they can limit the access of state officials and the popularization of this service in the state so that there are no leaks, because if you have a telegram in phone, and you give access there, for example, to your contacts and your location, then obviously the owner... of this platf

tool that is quite actively used by the russians in the fight against the ukrainians, it is the telegram messenger, which was created by former russians, however, there are no former russians, i do not believe that there are former russians, and this was confirmed by... the head of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense, kyrylo budanov , who spoke during the kyivstatcom forum, and he said that the telegram network in many ways has a destructive effect inside the country, but at the same time it allows information to be delivered to people in the occupied territories. let's listen to what general budanov said. with from a national security perspective, this is definitely a problem. this must be understood, despite the fact that i am absolutely against oppression of freedom of speech, but well , this is already too much, that is, in our country any person can create a channel, start announcing on it everything he wants, absolutely everything he wants, and , and when they start doing something, they cover themselves with the fact that it is the freedom of the people, bu

not television, not facebook, but tiktok and telegram, there was a lot of talk about telegram during the last month that the ukrainian authorities should keep in touch with those who administer and promptly resolve issues regarding these channels that work against ukraine, that conduct a very large information sabotage work, now they are talking about tiktok, the center for countering disinformation at the national security service. together with tiktok will block dubious accounts, this was announced by the deputy head of the department alina bondarchuk, let's listen to mrs. bondarchuk, we gave there is already a list of tiktok accounts that should not be viewed, it is on our website of the center for combating disinformation and on all social networks, we have given this list and then we will move on to blocking, literally just a couple of days and we will already start blocking them in the blocking system, there is one thing but there is a reaction based on the phone number and according to the correspondence, i.e. if this content is there or they tiktok sees that this content has

is it still necessary to insist on the responsibility of the telegram channels themselves?, first of all, look at the draft law that i initiated, it was signed by the representatives of the ruling party, the chairman of our committee, mykyta poturaev, yaroslav yurchyshyn, head of the committee on media freedom, he is not against. of any particular network, he is not against telegram, and he is not against telegram channels, he is for the state, he allows the state to check whether through this or another service that provides information, it can be telegram, facebook, tiktok, whoever, who owns it, how it is financed, whether russia influences what is disseminated there, whether through it russia can collect personal data that ukrainians themselves provide there, the ukrainian state has the right to ask all these questions, and they... to answer, and if they do not respond to both telegram and other networks, then it should be forbidden to use it, first of all , to government officials and those who distribute personal data, you go into action, there are a lot of chatbots in

channels, not from marathon. not from television, but from telegram channels.l, this is the verdict of the national marathon. and i would not say that this is a very good and pleasant verdict for everyone, because telegram channels, if they are anonymous, they have a completely irresponsible attitude to the information that they make public. and can be used by anyone. i believe, for example, that the telegram channel deserves some trust, it must necessarily have some signature, well, at least people should associate it with some organization or structure, so that... there is responsibility, and if there is no responsibility, well, then such a person should be trusted information will be difficult, but the fact that people now trust telegram channels more, anonymous ones, where any information is thrown, is a direct result of the absence of an effective telethon, the absence of any effective information policy at all. i believe that the telethon should have been abandoned at least a year ago. of course, during martial law... it is important to have some kind of

, or still insist on the responsibility of the telegram channels themselves?well, look, first of all, i have a bill, where am i who initiated it, it was also signed by the representatives of the ruling party, the head of our committee, nikita poturaev, yaroslav yorchyshyn, head of the committee on media freedom, he is not against any particular network, he is not against telegram. he is not against telegram channels, he is for the state, he allows the state to check whether through this or another service that provides information, it can be telegram, facebook, tiktok, whoever, who owns it, how it is financed, or does russia influence what is spread there, or can russia through it to collect personal data that the ukrainians themselves provide there, the ukrainian state has the right to ask all these questions, and they are obliged to answer, and if they do not answer and... and other networks, then it should be prohibited to use it, first of all, the state network officials and those who distribute personal data, you go into action, there are a lot of chatbot

i have heard from people that telegram

channel wrote, the telegram channel did not write, the windows were closed, the windows were opened,and this is a story that, god forbid, if it happened, any accident there could drag on for decades and centuries , or again, or what? in the dnipro on are you reacting to this, is there any kind of preparation for possible, possible emergency situations, because again, i remember, living near kyiv in the 80s, there were constant trainings even among schoolchildren on the kyiv hydroelectric power plant and on chernobyl, well, how it turned out then it was necessary, yes, regarding the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, in principle , this danger is permanent in us and the relevance of this topic remains, unfortunately, it can be said that dnipro and zaporizhzhia live on... a new barrel, well, and more- less so even close ones oblast, well, of course, zaporizhzhia is even more fun, let’s say so, but dnipro is also very, very close to it, as experts say and, in general , experts with whom it was discussed, that after all, it is very planned architecturally and infrastructurally, a nuclear power

, there was a lot of talk about telegram during the last month that the ukrainian authorities should. touch with those who administer and decide promptly questions about these e-channels, which work against ukraine, which carry out a very large amount of informational, subversive work. now they are talking about tiktok, the center for countering disinformation at the national security council, together with tiktok will block questionable accounts. this was stated by the deputy head of the department alina bondarchuk. let's listen to mrs. bondarchuk. we... have already given a list of tiktok accounts that should not be viewed, it is on our website of the center for countering disinformation and on all social networks, we have given this list and will move on to blocking, literally just a couple more days and we let's start blocking them, there is one thing in the blocking system, but there is a reaction based on the phone number and according to correspondence, that is , if this content is there or they tiktok sees that this content has already appeared. then they can also block such v

currently, telegram has at its disposal. this is not about banning telegram, it is about regulating its work. we are dealing with the mythical trojan horse that was brought into the city and then an enemy army came out of it in the middle of the night. despite the martial law and hostilities, ukraine is gradually restoring metallurgical production in all cycles. in the first two months of the year , the production and consumption of rental cars increased by 52%, compared to the unsuccessful 2023. during the same during the period, cast iron production increased by 42 percent, so this allowed ukraine to return to the twenty largest world producers. such indicators for metallurgists were provided by mining and ore companies that do not stop mining ore even under enemy fire. one of the largest mining and metallurgical complexes in ukraine is the enterprise of the ferrekpo company, the poltava and yaristiv mining and smelting combines, which produce iron coils. but iron has a very long way to go before it becomes solid. the raw

oleksiy, or maybe you were also sitting there, read this telegram channel or that article on the internet, and already , as the head of the committee of voters of ukraine, you are preparing for the elections. well, sign some kind of ceasefire and go ahead to the elections in a year, that's what's going around on the internet, are you preparing for the elections? you know, there is a lot of walking around, there is a lot of walking around, but i read the constitution and i trust official sources, that is, for me, the key sources are experts in constitutional law, not just those who have the academic degree of candidate or doctor of legal sciences there, not just good lawyers or bad lawyers, namely... specialists in constitutional law, their position is unambiguous: we have no right to hold either parliamentary, presidential, or local elections, no matter how much we want i didn’t want to, and by the way, now this is a very important thesis, because moscow has already started throwing in, for several months now, putin said that after may 20 there will be no one to negotiate with in ukraine,

said that they check information, that is, they compare what they read, for example, in the same telegram channels, with information from other sources, and only after such a check they form for ourselves, let's say the degree of trust in one or another source of information, and actually this is such an alarming trend, which, as we understand, opens the way for various information manipulations, disinformation campaigns, emotional and psychological operations, yes, since people form in the vast majority, or purely subjective, whether they personally like what they read in the same telegram channels, or simply, well , if they check whether what they see and the information they they see in the same telegram, or there in this or that channel, whether it corresponds, so to speak, to their internal views, or to their own subjective vision of those trends that, if only they, they see. events at the front, and if there is a match, then the respondents say that they are this the source is trusted, i.e. if it says what people already believe and accordingly reinforces, so to speak, the point of

press, it is a little different, it is called another way, you know, this discussion about whether telegram should be in ukraine or not, and how russia uses this messenger in order to obtain information, including from ukrainian territory after massive missile attacks, when the ukrainians send pictures to where the missiles hit, or inform the russians about the movement of the military, this discussion reminds me of a discussion that took place 8 years ago when classmates talked about the need to ban russian social networks vkontakte, remember, then there was a lot of talk, and it will be inconvenient when these social networks will be closed, because how will we live without them? thank god the networks and vkontakte and classmates were closed and nothing like that happened. people's deputy of ukraine mykola knyazhytskyi prepared the draft law number 1115 on the regulation of the activities of shared access platforms, which have already been called the law on banning telegram. but the author himself explains that it is about all social networks that distribute information as media and no p

blocks chatbots, telegram, let me remind you, founded by who, a russian? in the telegram there are also pages of the sbu and gurim of ukraine and many of our official officials, as well as law enforcement agencies, that is , they are so stupid as to open their pages there, well, here it is just a trivial question, a good question, in fact, it is a good question, how safe is it, for ours, if there is one these pages are on this social network, and apparently appropriate conclusions have been made, whether we should open them or not, we can use them. there facebook, for example, or some other social network, and limit yourself only to it, but no, telegram was also covered, mr. oleksandr, thank you for the discussion, oleksandr kovalenko, a military-political observer of the information sprot group, was in touch with us , dear friends, we are now going on a short break, we will be back, and i will tell you good news, because we have already passed the mark in 1,500 uah, now we have 1 million uah 505 uah 278 and 40 kopecks of the 2 million needed, stay with us

we see how the russian special services are trying to play with telegram and trick ukrainian citizens into giving up ukrainian positions and many, many other things. er, in this messenger, we see, among other things , the creation of fake news and er, those fears, which are then multiplied in ukrainian society. er, what to do with these challenges, what to do with the information sphere, what to do with the branch of the russian orthodox church? is there the authorities now have a clear understanding that these influences are not needed... because the war will end, but this entire agent network, agent networks will remain and the influence will also remain, well, let me somehow move on from the previous question, we did not have the opportunity or time, there was not enough , that answered him, actually you correctly said that one of the enemy's narratives is a failed state, yes, that is, a country that did not succeed, could not, and so... part of this narrative is that that absolutely all the aid there in ukraine is stolen and so on, and that's by the way spread abroad as well, and

it is also necessary to clean up in the virtual space about telegram with... i am talking now, it will be acted upon, it will be closed, it will not be closed, any restrictions, any mechanisms you see that can be implemented to at least control what gets there, what ukrainians read, what , what they are flooding us with, well, in fact , ukraine, which has joined many decisions and is on the way to european integration, that is, there are those mechanisms that can be implemented in the european union, but even by telegram, well, we see. that it is a tool in powerful hands to control the media space together with the telethon. our ans network held a separate event with media experts who almost unanimously said that there is no need for ukrainian taxpayers to waste resources that could go to drones to continue the telethon and sponsor, including oligarchs, because there are oligarchic channels in the telethon . therefore, if we talk about the information space, as a part of national security, and the fact that there is now growing anxiety, increasing despair amon

channels, well , not so on tiktok, but telegram channels of russian soldiers, well, because you have to know the enemy from the inside, then for me, for example, if will close such accounts, that's bad, where will i look, laugh, laugh with solovyov, with kabeeva, but i know that my work there is harmful, and maybe, as they said in the soviet union, give milk for... давать yes, but i know about myself that i am a prepared person and i will not fall for their delusions, and about many of my compatriots, well, we have no other people than the ukrainian people, i am talking about such people simply so as not to offend them , i say naive, yes, we have many naive people who can be easily deceived, and they launch and pso, there are even, i would say high-quality ones, in relation to the mobilization there, but they are dispersal. it's a betrayal of a traitor that the majors don't go to war, i saw what they launch in telegram channels, well, it's quite clear that expensive products worked well on it, there are, of course, terrible ones with blunders, but there are also normal ones, well, i

a holy war against ukraine, we see how the russian special services are trying to play with the telegram and trick ukrainian citizens into surrendering ukrainian positions and many, many other things, we see it in this messenger, including the creation of fake ones news and... those fears that are then multiplied in ukrainian society, what to do with these challenges, what to do with the information sphere, what to do with the branch of the russian orthodox church, do the authorities now have a clear understanding that these influences need to be neutralized, because the war will end, but this whole agent network, agent... networks will remain and influence too, well, let me somehow move on from the previous question, i didn't have the opportunity or the time to answer it, but actually you said it right, that one of these topic, so the narratives of the enemy, this is a failed state, yes, that is, a country that did not succeed, could not, and part of this narrative is that there in ukraine absolutely... aid is stolen there and so on, and by the way, they spread it and outside, and let's

and again, he refused to do that and a telegram list. i'll forget once you've been blocked or i'll show for 2 years, but of course so horror it is quick. they realize that they, it's quite hard to block something these days. i'm sure as you are, but knows as well with r t. so telegram returns and people do, of saw to, to leave russia in pursuit of his freedom of speech. he tried various countries before the united states. he tried single poor, he tried germany as well in germany. they don't work out for the practical reasons because he wasn't aware that your regulations require you to hire local as far as even if he can find it, even if you can't find any one. and then finally, as the realize that us was a disaster, it was, he got marked in san francisco and he settled and the u. a. but he seems to be happy. so in his proceeds to provide this platform that offers the, you know, a voice that if every person, regardless of use how they succeeded. yes, he calls it a neutral platform and that they only supposedly sensor child pornography or

but was, you know, the funder of the telegram social media platform? people do it all has broken his silence to the american journalist tucker carlson, giving his 1st interview in years. speaking of his office into by the russian born entrepreneur, explain why setting up shop in the united states was a no go a. we got too much attention from the, the, at the i, the security agencies, wherever we came to the us. i brought an engineer that is working for telegram and there was an attempt to secretly hire my engineer behind my back by cyber security, off officers or agents that were trying to persuade him to use certain open source tools that he would then integrate into the telling us code that the mind, the same would serve as backdoors would allow the us government to spy on people who use telegram the u. s. government to maybe any other government because of backstory is a back door regardless of who is using it. so many interesting things that he mentioned, especially the fact that he had this b, i, agents, as he said, show up at his doorstep inquiri

one more question quite important, this is telegram in ukraine. and we had yaroslav yurchyshyn, head of the specialized parliamentary committee on freedom of speech, on the air. we talked with him, we started this conversation about whether it is possible to block the telegram media platform in ukraine, since russians are involved with this media platform, and where there are russians, there is necessarily the fsb. what does yurchyshyn say? he says that... the ukrainian authorities are now studying the experience of imposing sanctions against social networks in the united states and spain to block telegram, he says yurchyshyn, there must be a clear rationale for the decision of the national security council regarding sanctions. for example, and for this there must be some serious critical situation with a leak of information. we would really hate for that to happen, so we have to make a choice. in the near future, the center for combating disinformation will initiate a discussion on the development of a new draft law that will establish uniform ru

well, let's talk about telegram, which is at the stroke of a baton, so to speak. stupid comrade tooknd disabled several important, strategically important telegram bots today, so to speak, this is one moment, well there is more the moment is moral, i generally don't like too much, you know, to fall into all the moral-ethnic ethical comparisons, but it's unpleasant when a state that has been attacked by russia is somehow equated with the aggressor state, so what is your assessment of the situation? telegram has once again shown that it cannot be a reliable partner, here is all the previous information of the security service, the main intelligence agency, that the russians have a significant influence on decision-making in this network, in my opinion, these events, when important e -e chat bots, and then an absurd explanation is given that, you know, it was done by mistake and now everything works, clearly shows that ah, it's very important not to give this network uh, important information, it's important to try, using what is most likely produced and controlled the enemy, to underst

the church, through information resources, through messengers, in particular, regarding the use of telegram, this week, or rather, at the end of last year, the head of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense, general kyrylo budanov, spoke , and it is clear that... the range of issues and problems facing ukraine is quite large, but russia was and remains the country that influences and tries to influence the internal situation in ukraine, perhaps corruption is also a part of russian influence, because wherever it is sold and bought, of course there is russian money, including, mrs. yevgenia, we... have already seen over the past few days how the russian orthodox church declared a holy war against ukraine, we we see how the russian special services are trying to play with telegram and trick ukrainian citizens into giving away ukrainian positions and many, many things, in this messenger we see, including the creation of fake news and those fears that... then are multiplying in ukrainian society, what to do with these challenges, what to do with the information sphere, what

telegram is the fastest way to adjust hits on some objects. that is why, or to limit the influence of the telegram, i introduced the corresponding bill. this is not about banning telegram, it is about regulating its work. we are dealing with the mythical trojan horse that was brought into the city and then an enemy army came out of it in the middle of the night. a lever of influence or a decision that will anger ukrainians, minister of foreign affairs dmytro kuleba shocked men abroad, because in a few days, citizens of ukraine will stop providing consular services outside ukraine. the most important thing today at 21:15 in the project is spoken by velikiy lviv, a platform where everyone gets a say and everyone is heard. on the air of the espresso tv channel. information, but this is not enough, i subscribed once and donated two, here is a qr code, by the way, it appears on the screen immediately, it regularly flashes here, and you can also find the page, please donate it it is necessary, by the way, we have already collected more than 15,000,

so is there a nearby cannot on telegram read ortiz channels. if you are a rush and, and in other countries, you can. but that in itself shows and proves that telegram is not unusual and they're going by what e u officials want them to do? actually, the most pressured who received was not from the country is government agencies. it was from apple and google, and let's not forget that some ports in the why, because you need apple or google to download telegrams. so this is what he had to say about the pressure.

banning telegram, it is about regulating its work. we are dealing with the mythical trojan horse that was brought into the city and then an enemy army came out of it in the middle of the night. ex-intelligence officer roman chervinsky is waiting for the court's verdict on the matter, let's talk with his lawyer. american aid to ukraine already in european warehouses, how quickly and most importantly, safely they will be able to deliver it to the front and what it will affect, we will talk about that today, but let's start with the consuls.

what is telegram all about? and he alludes in this interview, that they will probably trying to find a way to control him or control or control the app. and then he also says that any time he'd be outta us airport, he would always be questioned by the f b i. and then he talks about the incident that occurred after january 6, the us capital attack there 2 months after the defeats of donald trump. we saw the protest there. and he said that he got letters from us congress from both sides of the party, demanding different things this like less than after the events of january of the 6. uh, we received a letter from uh, i believe, uh, clinic with many of the democratic side. and they requested that we would share all the data we had in relation to what they called this uprising. the letter seemed very serious and the letter said, you know, if your fail to comply with this request, he will be in violation with the us constitution or something. 2 weeks after that, where we got another letter and knew whether from the r

, and you know, for a long time... we have discussions about whether telegram is bad or good, it russianly, well , yesterday, pavlo durov, the owner and actually the person who created telegram, gave an interview to tucker carlson, the same person who just interviewed vladimir putin, and apparently , well, how did i take it first, tucker first took an interview with putin, then a lot... he talked about how it should be to literally be on the same side with russia, and now he interviewed pavel durov, the owner of telegram, well, quite by chance, you know, a coincidence of circumstances, completely by chance these things coincided, and it was so coincidental that this interview was literally about did not have time, it even spread widely, as russian propagandists began to advertise and promote it, i will continue. pavlo durov. this is durov's first video interview in seven years. it is about such important and sensitive things for russia and the world that even the kremlin promised that they will definitely watch the conversation by the evening. well, why do they watch it, it seems that th