so you've indicated that thought 50 tenants that are i guess there are 61 tenants so 50 other whether tomorrow or, you know, promptly or 10 years from now are going to have to move on you look at that and has there been an analysis of the square footage of the tenants that may want to downsize or may be able to downsize vs. the 20 percent vacancy in the other building how many square feet i've heard from the tenants there's not nearly enough space in the other building and that means not everyone can go there are other displaces of employment in that building. i've heard from birthday representatives i forgot there's one hundred vacancy square feet of category in the area i don't have no more specifics has this analysis happened >> yes. we have stacking the 2 hundred and 45 square feet of conversion to office how this that will take is roughly a 7 year period with multiple phase. this building is occupied today under any circumstances that's not simple to take the tenants from the tenth floor and replace them and i it's sprinkled. one space allocation need for the tenant that's the de

at the same time, we have existing tenant that are asking for contraction of square footage. so we have that as an interim process but we will make every effort to accommodate all of these show rooms from the galleria we'll do everything we make sure they have a home in the design industry this will be from show rooms to designers we actually have more traditional offices in the this and those users who want to stay in the district we'll make sure they're linked up with landlords >> okay. so a couple more questions i have for you. you know, i guess so my next question is what you be amenable to limiting the number of floors that the building can convert to office space at the two or three >> i think at the maybe address first, the landmark issue. it's my understanding that again, what's before us is the landma landmarking i don't think we can be bifurcate and by spending 15 months on this now, one of the first questions we ask planning staff is the loss of space of the pdr. knowing we're preserving 20 percent of the entire building as pdr and at the same time preserving one h

another question came up about tech sector tenants and how we market to them. we don't have a specific incentive program or recruitment effort for tech center tenants. aside from, you know, our maritime tenants, we want to maximize port revenues so the extent that the tech sector does that, we'll gladly take their money. however, because our space often has this industrial look that seems to be desirable by tech center tenants we have become the home to a number of nationally renowned tech center companies such as auto desk as well as others. the last question had to do with how we charge for views. relates a little bit to the classification of our space. sometimes we have class c space, but class a views so how do we reflect those views within our rates. within the rent schedule there's a view rate and a non view rate and the agricultural building in pier 35, a mark up for the view is anywhere between 25 and 60%. the big mark up on the agoly cull so the relative value to the base facility condition is pretty large, that's the 60% increase. 35, the condition's

i'm a tenant on the messing necessary level with the construction. i'm also a homeowner in district 10. i strongly recommend this project because it will create well over one hundred jobs for workers. i recommend an approval on the project i think it's important for people to look forward to the future and with a plan of interest coming in what happiness over the next 5 to seven years it will create for construction jobs and also jobs in the technology industry quarter and also people that will live and work in district 10 myself being one of them >> thank you. thank you very much. next speaker. >> good evening. i'm you here and i wanted to say i support this project. i look forward to the new design technician jobs and the new industry i support this project because we want to see this building thrive and this is a great way to grow this san francisco >> thank you very much. >> good evening supervisors. my name is rudy corpus i'm currently a resident in district 6 and also an operator of violation prevention program working with hundreds of kids. i'

tenants do their improvements. >> yeah. what an allowance we'll carpet it for you. >> commissioner brandon and yeah. i had a couple of questions you gave us the unpaved land but didn't discuss parking. so i see from our report 89 hundred and 80 thousand square feet of unpaved land and 9.9 million of paved land and 8 hundred and 31 thousand this the the budget of our space is parking part of that configuration of all those numbers and what's happening with parking we didn't get a report on the parking side. >> thank you commissioner the parking that's subject to the perimeter rent schedule is generally, the stalls of the parking we lease on an individual basis like port employers like 3 hundred stalls we manage on the seawall lots those are through a competitive process. >> i guess at some point we'll proposed it as an informational item it's a breakdown exactly again but to refresh us again in terms of how the real estate sort portfolio whether that's a direct lease or how the real estate is putting forth and the components

santiago, how do you -- do you advertise it or do the tenants advertise for additional tenants? >>> i don't even know. if the roommate moves out, because mr. fisher takes charge of that. he's the one that goes out and look for the replacement roommate. and he just sends us the whole [speaker not understood] amount, down payment. >> also in the briefs, when he moved down he said there was someone living in the room prior to him being in the room? >> i don't know. i really don't know. >> from 2003, is mr. fisher the primary leaseholder since 2003, or were there recommend inapt people in the unit prior to when he moved in? >>> when he moved in, he was with a group of other roommates that rented the whole house. >> i'll ask mr. fisher. >>> yes ~. he was the last of the remaining tenants of the whole place. >> okay. >>> so, i don't know what he did to juggle the people around. >> okay. >> are you finished? would it be fair to say that if 7 people lived in the single home as long as you got paid the rent, you're fine with that? >> the thing is i cannot [speaker not understood] money f

i'm a tenant at 2386 30th avenue. i'm here to contest the permit in question, number 201 4 042 04 598 on the basis of -- >> would you mind speaking into the mic? >>> i'm sorry. >> thank you. >>> on the basis that it is listed as a single-family dwelling and there are indeed two separate and distinct units and tenants. number two, the respond end did not complete box number 24 on the permit application indicating whether the proposed changes would result in a change of occupancy, which it would. it would result in our eviction. and most importantly, neuberger berman three, no notice of violation has yet been issued by the department of building inspection instructing the respondent to perform the requested changes on this permit. 2386th 30th avenue since 2003 of july 15. the first department i ever had, i've been there since high school. my present roommate [speaker not understood] has lived with me since june of 2011 in the upstairs tennessee ant who is also present has lived at 2386 30th avenue for more than 14 years

investigators weren't so sure. >> the tenants advised us that they had not signed those documents.ctually looking at them to see if they were forged. >> document experts compared signatures from the documents to known signatures of the tenants. the signatures were exact matches. >> he was too good at it actually because the signatures were too much alike if he had varied them in some way, it would have been a much more difficult case to resolve. >> the signatures weren't forgeries. they were duplicates of signatures from other documents the tenants had signed. >> the signatures are what we determined to be a layover. they were an act replica of an authentic signature which indicates to us that it was placed there by some other means and was fahd you u lent. >> one of these signatures stood out. it was from sunday's mother -- mary alorout. in the document provided by the landlord, her name was spelled out. but at the time, mary could barely write english. >> she was still signing her name with an x though she was undergoing training by a church-sponsored teacher to learn how to read

including light to the living room windows at that tenants unit. staff made a visit and looked at it, you know, checked out the windows looked through the windows and the light court and revisited the design team again and reviewed all the evidence and also a pact which you have from the adjacent tenant and the tenant basically described they're concerned and included a photograph showing the current light from their living room to the light court. and our evaluation is this light court the adjacent apartment building is part of the light off the building and that provides adequate light to those units surrounding the light court it serves as part of the driveway allowing vehicles to go through and pausing behind the apartment from and to 27th street. the light core and the project sponsors pact you can see the dimension about 18 feet long around the common sideline and about 16 feet wide. that's why we believe this light court provides the light to the surrounding unit. it's self-sufficient and the proposed building will not have significant impac

hello, i'm a tenant at the pier hotel. the elevator there is - i have not been to many s r organization with elevators but this one many particular the capacity the weight capacity is like 6 hundred pounds like a guy near my size getting on the elevator the elevator will not operate it will go very slow and stop at all floors you've got to stand in places in the elevator to make sure it works it's like a dumb water for a hotel of 80 units. the buttons are a lot like a single call if you're in an elevator and someone presses the button before i basically the variety is so antiquated it should be some way to improve that elevator. i mean it's like a car, you know, like a you make improvements on our car your television you get a better television with a flat screen and get rid of the 5 foot tall television that was sold in the 30s. so i guess want to see something the owner spend make some type of investments in upgrading the elevator its ridiculous. if he can't with cal osha or whatever the mid-level management the staying

can you please look at that lease and make sure the tenants are taken care of there. the other thing that i would like to address which i don't think i have time to, but i want to thank you for your time. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, supervisor, kim obispo services. i'm here to speak with you particularly on two wishes today. first, i'm urging you to recognize that the contract which the human services agency is offering acs to continue our shelter work where we provide shelter to 534 people every night and everyday is about $760,000 short of services. ecs can make up $300,000 through private fundraising, but it's essential we cover the remaining $460,000 gap in order to continue providing safe and dignified shelter for folks. so far hsa is unable to do so and opieu local 3 and budget justice coalition join me in urging you to include this in this year's budget that added $460,000 and i can echo and our colleagues and many in of the community have talked to you about in regards to requesting an additional $1.5 million increase for d

usually it goes out when there's a tenant, right? >> once you put a restaurant there, it can be any restaurant. but the initial approval would have to be notice -- >> huh? >> i would imagine -- >> that neighbor notification would normally go out when that building is built but when there's a tenant with that notification so you would know the type of restaurant. here we're

however, because our space often has this industrial look that seems to be desirable by tech center tenants we have become the home to a number of nationally renowned tech center companies such as auto desk as well as others. the last question had to do with how we charge for views. relates a little bit to the classification of our space. sometimes we have class c space, but class a views so how do we reflect those views within our rates. within the rent schedule there's a view rate and a non view rate and the agricultural building in pier 35, a mark up for the view is anywhere between 25 and 60%. the big mark up on the agoly cull so the relative value to the base facility condition is pretty large, that's the 60% increase. 35, the condition's a little bit better, the view isn't as good. that concludes the specific questions that were asked two weeks ago, but're available to answer any further questions you might have. >> so moved. >> second. >> okay. are there any public comment? no public comment? commissioners comments? >> yeah, i just had a question. i mean, i understand that we don't g

full scope representation would represent the tenant throughout the whole case start to finish. thank you. >> thanks very much. any other members of the public that wish to comment? >> good afternoon, supervisors, debbie with the san francisco human services network. hsn is a member of the budget justice collaboration and we urge your support for vulnerable residents of san francisco. i'm here to focus on the cost of doing business increase. we appreciate the mayor's inclusion of a 1.5% in his budget we're asking the board of supervisor to match that amount. we shouldn't have to be here today. it's long time to institutionalize -- they have do not cost escalateers and there -- during a recession, we had no increase for four years along with budget cuts, then for the past two years, we have had small increases and we appreciate that the board has helped with those increases but the last time non profits had an increase that equalled cpi was in fiscal year 2007-08 and over the seven years, cpi has gone up by 20 percent while non profit contracts has gone up by 5%. every year witho

two, clients have access to tenant counselors. and three, clients have a lawyer when they're facing eviction. we have proven through door to door outreach in our clinic oakland model, we coordinate neighbor to neighbor know your rights outreach, in area that are vulnerable to displacement in oakland. this includes 35,000 educational pamphlets with valuable resources and participants have increased their confidence and decreased fear of actually approaching the court system and defending themselves and their housing. this can happen in san francisco with your support, with city support. cdjc also serves as a link between vulnerable tenants in san francisco and lawyers. clients facing unlawful eviction come into our office seeking direction. having been that link in between the eviction and the lawyers is crucial so, therefore, we support this and hope that you will support it, too. please support door to door outreach tenant counseling and full legal representation. thank you so much for your time. >> thank you. next speaker. >>> m

the impact of the rent increases and the oci and the earlier survey this year to confirm the tenants to move into the building and this is done in close collaboration with the non-profit organization that represents the shipyard artist and whose mission it is to maintain affordable space at the shipyard. and all artists respond that they wanted to move into a new building and many of the artists will be happy to sign a lease as soon as possible. and for some artists approximately a third the rent increased poses a problem and they requested smaller studio sizes as an order to be able to afford the rent and as a result. oci requested to provide more small studios in the new building and the ibi group that will replacement studios and the architect to adjust the plans for more spaces in order to address the artists of the affordability concerns and as part of the survey and the subsequent follow up conversation with the artists a small group of less than ten, indicated that they would have the difficulties with the new, rent, but they were not interested in increasing the studio size a

. >> many tenants are not aware of their rights.a largely hispanic community. some fear retaliation based on the immigration status. >> urc mass displacement. it has been the fabric of this community changing. massu are seeing a displacement. it has been the fabric of this community. >> he says rent stabilization was a core rinse on which east palo alto was founded. >> it is part of who we are. we made a commitment. i was city government will look after the most vulnerable people in this community when it comes to housing. recentlyty council had passed a new housing ordinance. it's is designed to prevent landlords from threatening behavior and delaying repairs or harassing tenants in the small community that feels under siege. bloomberg, east palo alto. can or should people do to help communities like east palo alto? my guest joins me in the studio. a nonprofit that provides counseling and financial services. he has lived in the east palo alto area for 14 years. >> thanks for having me. >> people don't realize unless you're getting

without where it is actually going to reduce the tenants gas and electric bills. and finally, working on a new ordinance for solar and new construction projects. we also on the legal side of things are working on improving, code compliance which in some sectors means helping contractors and inspecters actually improve the projects so, permitted projects actually achieve the intent of the code. and then the second part of it is getting non-permitted projects to actually take out a permit and comply with energy code. and these are things that we are using grant funds to perform. and on this renewable side, just going to briefly touch on solar. we operate the, or the staff, and the solar task force that had been started by the tax assess ors office several years ago and we worked on a number of purchasing strategies using employee groups, or types of buildings, like private schools. and we provide some technical assistance and we worked on multy tenant buildings and the strategies, and we do the targeted out reach and aggregate and then we educate the contractors abo

and we have been a very good tenant, and the amendment will allow them to continue the tenantcy for anl 5 years and also give them an option to extend for an additional five years after the first five years is up. and in all, it will generate, almost 1.5 million in grants. and we strongly urge your support for this amendment for several reasons, and they have been good tenants and no issues with the grants or maintenance issues the rent is complicated in the area and they are paying the rent towards the high end, comparing with the nearby tan ents and additionally, we have more in the garage, and we have more interest, and we have the open spaces and, the sfmta board aproefd this resolution that in march of 2014. and i am more than happy to answer any questions that you may. >> see no questions, right now, mr. rose could we go to your report right now on item five? >> yes, mr. chairman, supervisor avalos has shown and table two, and that is on page 11 of our report. and this resolution to exercise a second five year option and that is of june first of 2014 through may 31st in 2019 will

when a tenant is evicted, maintenance often removes the entire doorknob from the evicted tenant's apartmentor and replaces it with a doorknob from another apartment. >> so that the person who moved out can't come back later with a copied key and enter that apartment again. >> unfortunately, they didn't keep good records of which doorknobs were swapped, meaning, the doorknob from the basement unit could have come from any apartment in the complex. in fact, there's a new victim of identity theft every...three...seconds. so you have to ask yourself, am i next? one weak password could be all it takes. or trusting someone you shouldn't. over 100 million consumers had their personal information stolen in recent retail store and online security breaches. you think simply checking last month's credit score can stop identity thieves now? that alone just isn't enough. but lifelock offers the most comprehensive identity theft protection available. as soon as the patented lifelock identity alert system detects a threat, you'll be notified by text, phone or email. ♪ your response helps stop thieves befo

mean necessarily we'll also improve but the building would be specifically we'll be looking for a tenant to pit their capital in is what i'm trying to suggest not like we go ahead and we're not going to predo anything by the way, we don't know what is tenants want and i understand commissioner thank you. >> the other question when would we be able to hear a report for pier thirty and thirty 32. >> it's on the calendar to get back on commissioner president katz request how much it will cost to target it's august. and on loot 330 and 32 reuse we're working on all the ideas that have flooded in as well as consulting with the mayor's office i don't have a timeline but hoping for july or august >> that might be aggressive but that's our goal. >> commissioner brandon. >> i have one item i'd like to request under new business recently they've been stories out and there's a not able effort to encourage the port to formerly band exports of oil and there was a story in the examinerer that followed on the heels of portland that would have brought in revenue for the port of oakland. the port staff h

for example, tenant petitions two years ago went down 4%. but guess what? this year it went up 24% so we have a 20% increase in tenant petitions orbv the last two years. our other major category of work is landlord petitions, of course ~ and the good news is those went down 1% this year, however, they went up 37% last year. so, we have a net increase of 36% in landlord petitions as well. the next category is ellis and we're not going to talk about ellis. we all know way too much about ellis these days. in addition, in addition, this chart shows you -- this list are all of the legislative changes that have been effectuated just in the last year. basically you guys are killing us. not without very good cause, mind you. now, some of these initiatives are not going to require a tremendous amount of additional work for rent board staff. the more or come on condo conversions will require no work on our part. every other piece of legislation requires some additional effort on the part of rent board staff ~. it can be a database search for [speaker not understood]

convert that if you start as rental you'll not likely convert it there's a possibility to clear the tenants out and convert some but it seems like we're giving up 33 percent for the 35 years i don't know if you want to comment on that the project sponsor just on the i know it's not code your taking advantage but to give up up 3 percent rolling the dies. >> i think the intent is to lock down rentals in the city he that's typically built today in a multi apartment context with the kind of product that's under the construction has the ability to convert to a condominium but in this cycle we are early. >> last kindly. >> certainly conversions. >> 10 or 5 years after. >> it depends on the developers like to wait 10 years to avoid statutes and in our case given the function of our company we're a long term owner and operator of agreements to the long term commitment to the city to maintain that as quality on site affordable housing is something if the commission wants to see or they didn't want that agreement to be entered into for an additional 3 percent of affordable housing on site we'll be op

cdjc also serves as a link between vulnerable tenants in san francisco and lawyers. clients facing unlawful eviction come into our office seeking direction. having been that link in between the eviction and the lawyers is crucial so, therefore, we support this and hope that you will support it, too. please support door to door outreach tenant counseling and full legal representation. thank you so much for your time. >> thank you. next speaker. >>> my name is -- graft, my name is flor. [speaking through interpreter] i'm here with my family [speaker not understood] in this place. i want to request to all the supervisors [speaker not understood]. to help and assist all the homeless families. because one day you will have a reward. [speaker not understood] i am facing an eviction. supervisor mar knows the way i live. he knows the hotel in which i live. the situation in which i live with my two children. now i'm facing an eviction. and i'm very distressed. i am considering sleeping in a car with my children because i have no alternative. this is johnny. he has grown in th

first of all, we would like to compliment and thank director huey who provided help for all of the tenants appearing on the radio station or actually tv station channel 26, the chinese journal that was aired on june 15th to explain some of the dbi's processes, and permit reviews. and especially, the newly passed board ordinance, and enabling owners to voluntarily legalize their illegal inlaw apartments. and so, he urged viewers who own soft story buildings also to comply with the school reforms under the new soft story ordinance, so since the september deadline are quickly approaching and so i wanted to thank director huey for that and we also wanted to thank robert chung who hosted a dbi table on the housing expo this year, which was held on january, i am sorry, june 14th, from 11 to 3 at saint mary's cathedral, almost 1,000 people attended and many asking questions about again, the legalization of those un-law units and recommend the retrofit program and so those are important things that our staff has done. and we also, received a special thanks to dbi senior housing inspector allen dav

to speak under. >> we had our other tenants in unit one. >> if she's a tenant she's got to - i think that she could speak under public comment. >> go ahead sorry. >> even now the plans for the roof-deck are different than what they sent us on june 11th because on june 11th when patrick the owner on bay street there was no mention or sightings of a fire pit. which is over there. i want to say is that i thought with the work stop stock brokerage shortage that no work was going to be done i personally respect to file the stoppage on behalf of the owners. this as we shouted this has no bump out. on april 14th. that's may have this year. i have to what >> (inaudible) and i'm sorry i'm not the deaf that's april 14th this is may fifth. this one which is the completion of the bump out of the lighting is june 4th you see it's not that small but importantly they continue to do all the work and the inspectors came out a couple of times and rob called to say they're continuing the work and now it's completed they've done with with the bum out and doing that and on the plan all of a sudden we hav

don't want to enlarge the elevator slaft because it will have a large impact on the space like the tenants we move out and the reduced number of unit seismically we have to upgrade we'll work out with all the tenants and the groups and, you know, come up with a recommendation afforded by next month and submit to you but meanwhile we'll give you more insight by my staff and rosemary to give you more details >> thank you. can i just clarify you said one hundred and 61 s r o hotels have elevators and only 5 are broken >> that's right. they're not working but sometimes they maybe the commission is not working but they fix it >> ize. okay >> thank you. >> good morning board members housing inspector to clarify what director hughie said elevators get raider and break and get repaired and break new parts have to be made and it creates details in 2014 we've written as the department of building inspection 14 nos o notices of violation on elevators not being fundamental in hotels and a cough of those residential hotels because of the elevator situation and other violations those cases were referred

bring the technical stakeholders together to have a discussion this was krurnl going on while the tenant were experiencing things we hope to take surveys and enter second that with our audit so that audit will definitely have future applications so the state having this jurisdiction we have a couple of distinct conversations the first was when we write 90s notices of violations can we send them that so they'll have the data so when they're in a process for having a property owner failing to do the maintenance specifically the elevators could very send information regarding that when they've asked elevators to be commissions if they could send us this information. it's obviously going to take more discussion because that's not something rethey have win for their regulation. what's been addressed by carla and decorating huey when you do piecemeal repairs you're not doing a complete remnant it gets more and more difficult for the state to apply various regulations. the original elevator might be under group 2 visions and any replacement could be under another regulation so a property owner