you know and i tell you if tennessee williams was in freud in therapy and i asked him. at the linear union therapist i said what's your ideal dream. of an upstate new york and brando comes that much so and i've got to twila plunger that it grabs out of my hand or force me to that would be very core. area i don't want to know what that's about that. words are going through. and these would light and we would talk about the movie soon talk about using your imagination whoever the young girl is and girl in the basement maybe you can give a shout out here judd because she must've had to use your imagination because the fact is that. everyone was great and all the actors were great in fact i was incredibly impressed with the younger kids because they play the characters that are the children that i have with my daughter and these are people that grow up never seeing the sky never seeing the sun never taking a bath never walking up stairs never having a friend you know it's like. incredible and i don't know how you begin to build those kind of characters but all these kids we

tennessee williams was a world-renowned playwright, the son of brown county mississippi once wrote the violence in the mountains have roped in the rocks. what he meant was simply the decency, kindness, empathy and goodness always win even when facing hardened opposition. that is happened here in our state, in our time. we have seen courage and compassion beat the forces of chaos and destruction here at home. the victory isn't final but we can see it every single day. that victory is visible in the long hours of nurses, teachers and first responders. it is visible by ordinary heroes administering care, physical, emotional and spiritual on a daily basis and our state. it is because of those people that mississippi was able to move forward when the rest of the world came to a hault. in mississippi, we never stop working. we never shut down farms and they never shut down factories. when we did slow down we opened up as quickly and as widely as we possibly could. we've been cautious and never panicked. we have been safe but not stubborn. life cannot be lived in perpetual idleness and -- we

. >> seth: i believe he was reciting a monologue from the tennessee williams play, "a street car namedou can stay for the rest of the "closer look," but it's all down hill from there. what's that? you want me to do a scene from "a street car named deliar?" i couldn't okay "we've had a long journey, trump and i. from the saltmarshes of charleston, to the river boats of mississippi, to the sparkleberry swamp mee-maw says, he was just a figment of my imagination. but to me he was real. as real as a glass of peach tea on warm chattanooga night. god, i hate it to end this way but sometimes life comes up and bites you, like an appalachian salamander on a meth bender. end scene. [ laughter ] well, it won't surprise you to learn that graham almost immediately did a 180. he probably thought that by calling out trump's bad behavior one time he'd get to co-host a podcast with obama and springsteen. "fellas, i'm looking at my spotify and i cannot believe i am finding out like this well, count me out!" "uh, you can't be out when you were never in. "yeah, linds." oh i tried to get two rock'n rollers

1797, about a decade after our country had ratified our constitution, there was a greater from tennessee, william blunt, who was caught conspireing with the british to try to sell florida and louisiana. ultimately, president adams caught him. he turned over the evidence to congress. four days later, the house of representatives impeached him. a day after that, this body, the united states senate, expelled him from office. so he was very much a former official. despite that, the house went forward with its impeachment proceeding in order to disqualify him from ever again holding federal office. so the senate proceeded with the trial, with none other than thomas jefferson providing. blount argued the senate couldn't proceed because he had already been expelled. here's the interesting thing. he expressly disavowed any claim that former officials can't ever be impeached. unlike president trump, he was very clear that he respected and understood that he could not even try to argue that ridiculous position. even impeached senator blount recognized the inherent absurdity of that view. here's what he sai

in 1790 you had former tennessee senator william blount, he was tried in senate after he was ouf office, and secretary of war william bell knapp in 1876. i said we had a third surprise here, when we thought we may not get a final verdict today. the trial kind of spun off the rails for a couple of hours as the senate voted to consider witnesses. but the senate finally worked out an agreement to enter into the record a statement by gop washington representative jaime herrera buetler. herera butler spoke of what she learned ability a shouting match between president trump and house minority leader kevin mccarthy during the melee in january. a separate investigation continues at the capitol into security failures and faulty intelligence, and we should get information about what the new security standards would be, at least the first report on that, sometime in early march. griff: chad, i want to ask you as we wait for the house managers' press conference to hear what they have to say, you mentioned minority leader mcconnell's harsh remarks. and, of course, his acquittal vote. what does this

about a decade after our country ratified our constitution, there was a senator from tennessee by the name of william, who was caught conspiring with the british to try to sell florida and louisiana. >> stephen: florida and louisiana to the british? that's crazy. republicans know a great president offers to trade puerto rico for greenland to denmark. now, keep in mind, these constitutional originalists are arguing that you can't impeach someone once they've left office. well, neguse curb-stomped that with the founders' own boots. >> four days later, the house of representatives impeached him. a day after that, this body, the united states senate, expelled him from office, so he was very much a former official. despite that, the house went forward with its impeachment, proceeding in order to disqualify him from ever again holding federal office. and so the senate proceeded with the trial, with none other than thomas jefferson presiding. >> stephen: wow. jefferson himself presided. that's going to be tough for the defense to refute. it's like t.j. said, "all men are created equal, except for the 45th p

about a decade after our country it ratified our constitution there was a senator from tennessee by the name of william blunt who was caught conspiring with the british to try to sell florida and louisiana ultimately president adams caught him he turned over the evidence to congress 4 days later the house of representatives impeached him a day after that this body the united states senate expelled him from office so he was very much a former official despite that the house went forward with its impeachment proceeding in order to disqualify him from ever again holding federal office and so the senate proceeded with the trot with none other than thomas jefferson presiding . now blunt argued that the senate couldn't proceed because he had already been expelled but here's the interesting thing he expressed slee disavowed any claim that former officials can ever be impeached and unlike president trump he was very clear that he respected and understood that he could not even try to argue that ridiculous position even impeached senator blunt recognized the inherent absurdity of that view here's what he said i

despuÉs de un senador de tennessee, llamado william blondet, fue atrapado colaborando con los britÁnicoseron frente al argumento este? el senado no debatiÓ esta pregunta por dos horas, el senado debatiÓ este asunto por dos semanas. el senado pasÓ dos semanas adicionales deliberando sobre las preguntas jurisdiccionales, como terminaron esas deliberaciones, ellos decidieron que el senado tiene jurisdicciÓn, y que puede proceder, que tiene que retroceder a juicio pleno, es y bel yo, a diferencia d. el presidente trump, no fue llevado a juicio polÍtico por conducta indebida, sino por incitar una insurrecciÓn violenta. una insurrecciÓn donde personas murieron aquÍ mismo . una insurrecciÓn que. si el congreso meramente no actuara, encaramos un crimen tan extraordinario contra la repÚblica, invitarÍa a otros a usar, y a cualquier presidente usar su poder sin tener que pagar por esto. no importa nuestro partido y nuestra polÍtica. quieren eso. jorge: mientras el congresista de colorado esta dando sus argumentos, regresÓ brevemente con Ángel leal. una historia interesante en 1797, cuenta el congr

1797 about a decade after our country ratified our constitution there was a senator tennessee by the name of william blunt. who was caught conspiring with british to try to sell florida and louisiana. ultimately, president adams caught him. he turned over the evidence to congress. four days later, the house of representatives impeached him. a day after that, this body the united states senate expelled him from office so he was very much a former official. despite that, the house went forward with its impeachment proceeding in order to disqualify him ever againlink federal office . the senate proceeded with the trial with none other than thomas jefferson presiding. now, warren argued the senate couldn't conceive because he had already been expelled but here's the interesting thing . expressly disavowed any claim that former officials can't ever be impeached. unlike president trump, he was very clear that he respected and understood that he could not even trying to argue that ridiculous position. even impeached senator blunt recognize the inherent absurdity of that view. here's what he said and i cert

and my 1st guest tonight is dr william schaffner he is professor of preventive medicine and health policy at vanderbilt university in nashville tennessee for sheffer it's good to see you again this number 500000 deaths as one of the highest deaths to death tolls per capita in the world do you agree that this could have been prevented. you know this number is so high it's so devastating. it's painful and yes i believe that majority of those people in fact the substantial majority of those people could still be alive today if we had had a coherent nationally directed science based policy about coated from the very beginning with that gift of hindsight dr schaffner i mean what were the biggest mistakes. i think from the beginning there was the mistake of not accepting this virus for what it was not understanding that the virus was in control that it was not going to disappear number 2 putting political considerations before scientific and public health considerations and number 3 not communicating clearly and in a sustained fashion to the public what needed to be done to contain this virus we needed a national policy not one that was sent

my 1st guest tonight is dr william schaffner he is a professor of preventive medicine and health policy at vanderbilt university in nashville tennessee by the chef it's good to see you again this number 500000 deaths as one of the highest deaths to death tolls per capita in the world do you agree that this could have been prevented. you know this number is so high it's so devastating. it's painful and yes i believe that majority of those people in fact the substantial majority of those people could still be alive today if we had had a coherent nationally directed science based policy about coated from the very beginning with that gift of hindsight dr schaffner i mean what were the biggest mistakes. i think from the beginning there was the mistake of not accepting this virus for what it was not understanding that the virus was in control that it was not going to disappear number 2 putting political considerations before scientific and public health considerations and number 3 not communicating clearly and in a sustained fashion to the public what needed to be done to contain this virus we needed a national policy not one that was sent

we have william in nashville, tennessee.hat is your perception of what is going on in tennessee and in your area? caller: [indiscernible] host: are you there? we will move on to middleton in west virginia, who has been vaccinated already. is that correct, sir or ma'am? caller: good morning. . yes -- yes. i got my first shot wednesday and i will get the next on march 3. they are bragging on west virginia, but they are just seeing a surplus. they are not getting underneath because i know two people, families, the husband got the shot but the wife did not. that's not right. they live together, but they cannot get the shot together? they are separating people like this and their families. host: so, middleton, tell us more about your experience. you say you have gotten one shot. you are waiting for your second. what was your experience like? where did you go and what was it like for you? caller: i signed up with my county health department and also -- i didn't know. i went online. i filled out the form. and you don't know that yo

and my 1st guest tonight is dr william schaffner he is professor of preventive medicine and health policy at vanderbilt university in nashville tennessee by the schaffner it's good to see you again this number 500000 deaths as one of the highest deaths to death tolls per capita in the world do you agree that this could have been prevented. you know this number is so high it's so devastating i it's painful and yes i believe the majority of those people in fact the substantial majority of those people could still be alive today if we had had a coherent nationally directed science based policy about coated from the very beginning with that gift of hindsight dr schaffner i mean what were the biggest mistakes. i think from the beginning there was the mistake of not accepting this virus for what it was not understanding that the virus was in control that it was not going to disappear number 2 putting political considerations before scientific and public health considerations and number 3 not communicating clearly and in a sustained fashion to the public what needed to be done to contain this virus we needed a national policy not one that was

and my 1st guest tonight is dr william schaffner he is professor of preventive medicine and health policy at vanderbilt university in nashville tennessee by the shepherds good to see you again this number 500000 deaths as one of the highest deaths to death tolls per capita in the world do you agree that this could have been prevented. you know this number is so high it's so devastating. it's painful and yes i believe that majority of those people in fact the substantial majority of those people could still be alive today if we had had a coherent nationally directed science based policy about coated from the very beginning with that gift of hindsight dr schaffner i mean what were the biggest mistakes. i think from the beginning there was the mistake of not accepting this virus for what it was not understanding that the virus was in control that it was not going to disappear number 2 putting political considerations for scientific and public health considerations and number 3 not communicating clearly and in a sustained fashion to the public what needed to be done to contain this virus we needed a national policy not one that was sent ou

1797 about a decade after our country ratified our constitution there was a senator tennessee by the name of williamblunt. who was caught conspiring with british to try to sell florida and louisiana. ultimately, president adams caught him. he turned over the evidence to congress. four days later, the house of representatives impeached him. a day after that, this body the united states senate expelled him from office so he was very much a former official. despite that, the house went forward with its impeachment proceeding in order to disqualify him ever againlink federal office . the senate proceeded with the trial with none other than thomas jefferson presiding. now, warren argued the senate couldn't conceive because he had already been expelled but here's the interesting thing . expressly disavowed any claim that former officials can't ever be impeached. unlike president trump, he was very clear that he respected and understood that he could not even trying to argue that ridiculous position. even impeached senator blunt recognize the inherent absurdity of that view. here's what he said and i certa

about a decade after our country had ratified our constitution, there was a senator from tennessee by the name of williamth the british to try to sell florida and louisiana. ultimately president adams caught him. he turned over the evidence to congress. four days later, the house of representatives impeached him. a day after that, this body, the united states senate, expelled him from office, so he was very much a former official. despite that, the house went forward with its impeachment proceeding in order to disqualify him from ever again holding federal office. and so the senate proceeded with a trial, with none other than thomas jefferson presiding. now, blount argued that the senate couldn't proceed because he had already been expelled. here's the interesting thing. he expressly disavowed any claim that former officials can't ever be impeached. unlike president trump efrhe wa very respectful that he understood he couldn't argue that very position. even impeached senator blount recognized the inherent absurdity of that view. here's what he said. i shall never contend that an officer shall first commi

williams. she is an author, poet, and observer of all-things political. at vanderbilt university in nashville, tennesseed bill crystal, author and writer and thinker and veteran of the reagan and bush administrations and editor-at-large of the bulwark. bill, for this segment, republicans get to go first. especially, the life-long kind. let's talk about ted cruz. never popular, often wrong, never in doubt. i guess, we won't be swearing him in as president in 2024, first of all, it's always a cold day. and second, we've never moved the oath to cancun. >> yeah. you know, it's sort of like the caricature -- i would've said used to be -- maybe not so much anymore. the republican party was heartless, rich people. couldn't care less about other people's suffering. just watch out for themselves. and -- and a contemptuous. if this were a second-rate sort of tv series about politics, you think it's a little bit much, right? on the other hand, it's not funny, obviously. donald trump's behavior, with respect to the pandemic i would say. you know, a really fundamental lack of concern, apparently, for his fellow citi

about a decade after our country had ratified our constitution, there was a senator from tennessee by the name of williamaught conspiring with the british to try to sell florida and louisiana. ultimately president adams caught him. he turned over the evidence to congress. four days later the house of representatives impeached him. a day after that, this body, the united states senate, expelled him from office. so he was very much a former official. despite that, the house went forward with its impeachment proceeding in order to disqualify him from ever again holding federal office. and so the senate proceeded with the trial with none other than thomas jefferson presiding. now, blount argued that the senate couldn't proceed because he had already been expelled. but here's the interesting thing. he expressly disavowed any claim that former officials can't ever be impeached. unlike president trump, he was very clear that he respected and understood that he could not even try to argue that ridiculous position. even impeached senator blount recognized the inherent absurdity of that view. here's what he said.

tennessee governor, the courageous united states senator, the vice president on inaugural address so much that the secretary of state at the pump down by the coattails, along with such notable words as gary colbert, william wheeler, animal hamlet, and old ridge gary, vice presidents all i might add. nobody can forget an assassin would've shot abraham lincoln, and in the place of the great emancipator, make a lifelong slave holder president of the united states. no i do not criticize johnson in every way. he was patriotic, he was incorruptible. his idea of how to reconstruct the union was a president should do it by executive action and that it was none of congress'business, and then a very good reconstruction could be made simply by ignoring the former slaves rights beyond a simple mere freedom out there. and so, when congress tried to put through a silver rights bill, johnson killed it. and when they put through a bill to provide aid for refugees, johnson vetoed it. and when congress proposed the 14th amendment, he couldn't veto it but he tried his best. it could be said as a result of this, congress made it decision they can make new deal with the, president they should make a reconstruction of their o