housing element has in some cases than a tool for advocacy organization to pressure those places the tenta be resistant to development, to actually allow for multifamily and affordable housing development to come into those places, in those situations the housing element requirement tied to the arena allocation is a tool for advocacy; i think that, in terms if there are restrictions to zone the college for the arena housing allocation they would not be a consequence in the never being in affordable housing in the place in terms of the process, influencing who receives a higher allocation i believe that is part of your question -- the last time happened a little bit differently because of the way that different jurisdictions have participated in a sustainable community strategy has characterizedby whether they're willing to have a large priority area. [indiscernible] yes, we believe the growth in our cities viable and transit oriented and plan for it in this pda; therefore we will get a higher allocation in the arena. conversely falsehood did not plan to get-- got a lower arena allocation.