under 26 c, the government's tention runs only until they make a determination whether or not to remove the individual. if the governmenmas the determination not to remove, the 1226 cbligation ends instantl >> assuming we think it would not be iosble surprising, and difficult for the executive to comply, isn't that a nseration we should take into account in trying to figure out if shao meets chow? general stone: i do not think so. shao means shao, the 1226 has a variety of other inter-textual cls at suggests this shao especially means shao. it is extremely tight restrictive, possie lease provision. more importantly cones , considered this exact excuse. in the transition rules following ira, where congress gave the executive twoea saying, if the executive in any given 1226 case believes it does not have the enforcement ability or the resourcesth will excuse mandatory detention. after two years, the executive went back to congress and asked for renewal of that. core said, no, and immediately the clinton administration acknowledged the obligations under 1226 c became mandatory. >> but, the