. >> commissioner terman? commissioner kingsley was talking. >> no, i just sort of jumped in. >> go ahead. >> thank you for the very thorough report. would you like to take a moment and introduce the rest of the folks in your staff here, it might be helpful for us. >> thank you commissioner terman it was on my list to do at the conclusion of all my remarks. i'm going ask you each to stand up as i announce your names. first eric, our acting chief investigator, donna, our chief coordinator, sam our attorney, sherrie hall who is an acting senior investigator, dennis max on who is a senior investigator, inez vargz who as you know is the chief trial attorney. there are two missing members of the management team including ed mcman who is on, he's a senior investigator. he's on a leave of absence and manny foert who is also on a leave. i want to thank, well, chris wiz nuksey. who is our information technology guru and we wouldn't know what to do without him. i want to thank you all. >> i want to thank you all for you

. >> commissioner terman? commissioner kingsley was talking. >> no, i just sort of jumped in. >> go ahead. >> thank you for the very thorough report. would you like to take a moment and introduce the rest of the folks in your staff here, it might be helpful for us. >> thank you commissioner terman it was on my list to do at the conclusion of all my remarks. i'm going ask you each to stand up as i announce your names. first eric, our acting

terman? >> is there is a prioritization difference in known suspect cases where there is an identified issue of whether there is consent or not and there is an issue as to whether or not it's an act. is there a difference between those two? >> captain fox would be the best to address that commissioner. >> yes, in suspect cases where the suspect is known to the victim, if there is any discrepancy about whether any sexual act occurred, absolutely, that dna is prioritized to the level of an unknown suspect because we need that to move forward to get justice for the survivor as quickly as possible. that would be request from us to the lab to place that in his cue for testing. in the case for the known suspect where the survivor knows her attacker, a lot of times evidence for the dna would not be incriminating because both parties admitting that they have contact with each other. those are not prioritized testing because the probe ative value of that test is really low and it's not needing to make

. >> commissioner terman? commissioner kingsley was talking. >> no, i just sort of jumped in. >> go ahead. >> thank you for the very thorough report. would you like to take a moment and introduce the rest of the folks in your staff here, it might be helpful for us.

terman? >> is there is a prioritization difference in known suspect cases where there is an identified issue of whether there is consent or not