for the cruise terminal, we're looking to complement that by having the cruise terminal then deliver the south side of pier 23 and the north side of pier 19. that would enable the aprons on 19 and 23 to be improved. in addition, for pier 27 and 29, the connector building between pier 19 and 23 is a non historic structure. there is an opportunity to create major views in public access to the bay. that is included as part of the proposal, too. the improvement of 19 and 23, the removal or modification of 19.5 are part and parcel of our thinking about -- run that transferred of development in the funding strategy that has been discussed. if we were able to accomplish those planning process these that i just described in the previous slide and be able to identify an alternative open water basin location by 2015, we would be able to effectively replace the removal requirement there is a kin time when all of this needs to take place. visually this is what we're talking about, 1923 and 19.5 connector. those are the public access areas off site, as well as on pier 29 and a half side. similarl

for the cruise terminal, we're looking to complement that by having the cruise terminal then deliver the south side of pier 23 and the north side of pier 19. that would enable the aprons on 19 and 23 to be improved. in addition, for pier 27 and 29, the connector building between pier 19 and 23 is a non historic structure. there is an opportunity to create major views in public access to the bay. that is included as part of the proposal, too. the improvement of 19 and 23, the removal or modification of 19.5 are part and parcel of our thinking about -- run that transferred of development in the funding strategy that has been discussed. if we were able to accomplish those planning process these that i just described

the terminal lease would not exceed 10 years. teatro zinzanni would be required to sign a and approved boilerplate with no substantial changes. the premises would can -- consist of percentage rent. we would participate. the rent would be paid, the greater of the minimum rent or percentage rent that amount to be determined. the lease would provide other standard policies, such as rules and regulations for restaurants, a good neighbor policy as well. this site on broadway is contemplated in the 34th america's cup and also in the cruise terminal environmental impact report, required under ceqa. the court requires that teatro receive a significant appropriateness from the planning commission. the project must meet the criteria found in the preservation in the preservation of historic architecture. the proposed design for teatro will undergo review by the historic preservation commission. we anticipate that to happen in march, 2012. in compliance with the mitigation measures, the historic preservation commission will review and must f

it will be reconnected in phase two of the cruise terminal project. while this is in mitigation of the cruise terminal and the america's cup event, it is a legacy benefit. it is going to continue to operate and improve our quality of the shipyard for as long as it is operating. >> also a question about the financing. i am a little confused about what appears to be short-term borrowing of $5.7 million. i don't understand. do you have all the money in the bank in order to start it? >> that is a very good question. we are working with you to develop a schedule of payments that will be necessary for the project. when we finalize that discussion, i think we will see less borrowing from the back plans project. there is a need to pay an initial deposit to the contractor to get work started on the new equipment that is being designed for pier 70. that will be an obligation. we hope not to use the full 5.7 from the back plans project, only what is necessary to get started and carry us through the time when the long-term debt proceeds are available to carry us

some of which were historically cited in the terminal.udes major sculptures by the international artists. as a collection, these art works tell the story of the vibrant arts scene in the early 1960's through the mid-1980s's. the illustrate san francisco's cultural center and a place of innovation that is recognized and the love throughout the world. one of the highlights is a series of three left tapestries. they are on view after being in storage for 20 years. these tapestries representing various gardens. from his years of living in san francisco. hydrangeas, chrysanthemums, and whilst dahlias in rich, deep shades as they make their way to the baggage area. they can access behind-the- scenes information and interviews with the artist through an audio to work. it features archival audio as well as interviews with living artists. he can be accessed on site by dialing the telephone numbers located near the artwork or by visiting the commission's web site. the public art speaks volumes of san francisco as a world-class city with world-class

the facility can be used for a third cruise is the terminal.e have met with a race official, bob, and we have told him our expectations and to have members work at existing terminals. we are asking that the members work where there will be race boats and spectator boats docked. anything short of this will be a blow to our legacy and a rich history on the waterfront. on a leap of faith, we supported the america's cup altman this process, and we are still supporting it today. the america's cup, getting to finalizing their contracts for labor, we a expectations that this will be met. thank you. president chiu: 80. next speaker. >> good afternoon, president, members of the board. i am the secretary/treasury -- treasure of and local that provide security services to terminals and crews facilities. we credential all of the vehicles accessing marine terminals. on behalf of the members, i am here to support the america's cup development agreement today. i have been here many times. i cannot tell you how many times i've been here to speak. i have been t

some of which were historically cited in the terminal. it includes major sculptures by the international artists. as a collection, these art works tell the story of the vibrant arts scene in the early 1960's through the mid-1980s's. the illustrate san francisco's cultural center and a place of innovation that is recognized and the love throughout the world. one of the highlights is a series of three left tapestries. they are on view after being in storage for 20 years. these tapestries representing various gardens. from his years of living in san francisco. hydrangeas, chrysanthemums, and whilst dahlias in rich, deep es

there are some writes about the city retains to terminate, and those have to be fairly extreme in nature. the payment stream is a little bit complicated. there is a base minimum guarantee of $63,000 per year. there is an initial bonus payment of $30,000 made during the initial execution of the permit, amortized over an initial term, and then there is a percentage, 35% of any net over $180,000 per year that they might receive from advertisers, and then there is a tiered system we created, where in the course of negotiations, we learned that the elimination rights to the board were not documented to the degree that we thought they were, and in consultation with the planning department to see that the board does not have the right to be a eliminated, said there is no light at night. that $63,000 number i gave you is, perchance, the permittees should secure in the future the right to light to the board, the rate automatically bombs up -- bumps up over $100,000 per year, so we can capture that additional revenue we are not sure we will see that, but we wanted to condition this based on that.

resolution approving the terminal 3 news and specialty store lease between hudson group retail, llc, and the city and county of san francisco, acting by and through its airport commission. supervisor chu: thank you very much. we have caffeine whitener. >> -- cathy widner. >> thank you. we are requesting a new lease for the hudson retail group, comprised of two newsstands and one specialty store lease in terminal 3. the proposed lease is a revolt -- result of a competitive request for lee's processes. there were six proposals that resulted in hudson being the highest ranking responsible bidder. it includes the combined amount of our standard grant formula gross sales area or a minimum annual guarantee of $711,000. the airport revenue development staff estimates, based on projected growth revenue for hudson, that they will be paying on the percentage rent for these spaces. about $774,000 per year. the budget analysts recommend approval of the leasing and that would be happy to answer questions. supervisor chu: with no questions from the committee at this time, let's go to harvey. >> ma

a new wall on the end of the pier, and that work is not in the existing contract for the cruise terminal. i have talked about the piers 30-30 to work. starting with the public access improvements, we have a need to substantially rebuilt the pier 19. it is red-tagged, and it is supposed to be dedicated permit a public access. we estimate the cost of the project at $3 million. we are having to deliver pier 19 to the event authority by july 1, 2012. this construction activity is necessarily going to extend beyond that timeline. we do not have a firm completion date, but part of the purpose of the ordinance is to speed up our ability to get into a contract for this work so that we have less overlap between our construction activities and the event authority occupancy of the pier. the same issue relates to the pier 23 handrail on this slide, a $700,000 project. again, related to public access and making sure that people are safe. we would like to complete those construction activities as soon as possible. they are going to overlap the event authority's occupancy somewhat, but we would like to

i was terminated within a year of filing those charges. yet, the harasser still works, like it is nothing. he has arrest other women who are afraid to come forth. something has to be done at the sfmta. commissioner campos: thank you. >> united public workers for action. this is an example of the systematic harassment and retaliation against mta employees. the effect of this has not been addressed by supervisors and the mayor is a serious question. why aren't they being addressed? women are being harassed sexually, discriminated at the airport. sexual harassment is going on. these workers are being retaliated and are being told to shut up. where is the action by workers on the city board? additionally, there have been people murdered in san francisco on the buses as a result of criminal negligence by the mta management. they are putting on bus drivers without proper training. for you supervisors that want to reform you me, part of that is having confident management that does not put drivers on a line where people get killed as a result of

the other special area plan amendment associated with the cruise terminal and mmx are in the facility of $20 million. -- ammendments are in the vicinity of $20 million. the improvements would be things like apron areas and add to the functionality of those of the adjacent peers. with respect to the america's cup, i think we were calculating this morning there were either a special area plan of them it's a major permit requirements associated with the america's cup that might total as much as $9 million to the project cost. >> that were not envisioned initially? >> yes, when we went to the board of supervisors, we did not reject any additional cost, but that was largely a projection of port staff rushing as we were in not thinking through the regulatory requirements. >> just one other comment. there is a narrow agenda. and some of the things you mentioned on your slide, in terms of the joint objectives, and i think you listed establishing and implementing funding sources, i am wondering whether there is more discussion to be had, since we should be collaborating in sharing, but it is e

would like to get into some of the history of the bids that the court has undertaken for the cruise terminal project and how we would hope to use the ordinance to deliver very specific improvements at the various sites. supervisor chu: before you start, do you happen to have any hard copies of the presentation? >> no, i did not. i apologize. i will get that for the clerk. i do have hard copies for the public of the amendment as a whole. supervisor chu: for whatever reason, when the presentation is plugged in, our screen roles, so we did not get to see what is on there. if you could perhaps ask your staff to send it to committee members. >> or if you e-mail it, we could open it up. >> i think i have the only copy of the presentation. i think i could take a moment to e-mail it to you. supervisor chu: i think that would be great just because we are not able to see it otherwise. >> ok, there. i hope it went through. it was a rather large file. supervisor chu: ok, we will look for it, and perhaps you can begin. >> ok, should i go ahead and start? supervisor chu: yes. >> could we have the computer

even authorities reimbursement, for the port commission for the development of a mixed use cruise terminalt pier 27. chair chu: thank you. with a report, we have elaine forms. >> good afternoon. elaine forbes, support staff. this is to have money for the budget, but the reason for this item is to address the timing of the cash. there are three sources in the supplemental. the first is in the amount of three-point for under 48 million. -- $3.448 million. we need the funds appropriated earlier. the second source, the 2010 port revenue bonds. we have $1.10 million from the pier 35 project. this project is delayed. we are taking funds and reallocating this to the pier 35 project. there are bonds of 700,000. this is from a roof project that came in under budget, and we want to capture that source for the project. the final source is shoreside power. as you know, be the authority is reimbursing for moving them. the supplemental would recommend both the source and the use of that funding. i will note, as you are aware, the dda has a change, and it is coming back to the board of supervisors at the

the reason is construction of phase one of the cruise terminal, which is starting now. one of the first up in the project is decommissioning the shore power facilities so they can undertake demolition of the pier 27 shed it. as a result of the construction activity and the america's cup village concept, shoreside power will be out of commission from basically this month, february 2012-october 2013 when phase two of the cruise terminal construction project can start, along with reconnecting shore power at that location. that obviously creates a lot of air quality impacts and sequa process quantified those. they found impacts to be significant. we had significant public comment from our environmental partners and regulatory agencies to look at these issues. as a result, the planning department through the environmental review officer impose a mitigation measure requirement to install shore power at pier 70. i really want to credit jay hawk who took the lead on the pier 27 project, and he was the person who identified the opportunity and have been talking with you over tim