and here, i forgot who said the word territority. i'm going to be wonky but simple. candidates out there are all talking about a territorial tax. what will territorial means is within your territory. if you do it here, you tax it. well, what a dumb thing to do. i mean, we have a very high tax. why would you only want to tax things done in america? especially if you want things to be done in america? what you really want is border adjustability. you want it not to matter whether it is done in china or done in america. and what you do with border adjustability is as soon as it hits the border, you impose the tax on the value as it comes in the border. that way, you don't discourage production in america. so three big advantages. first you define, get rid of the opinion about income. secondly, you cut compliance costs dramatically by reducing the number of taxpayers and third, you stop this discrimination we have about producing in america and your question was how do you get 4% growth. i think that's where the hanging fruit is. >> anyone have a reaction to that or the