good >> i understand the mayor had of principle of requiring they contribute to other terroc. my concern is if we are talking about $300 million worth of assistance to the city, at some point someone is going to have to pay for the. it could be the city. it could be employers, and that is troubling. i am wondering how do you respond to that? >> one of issues we negotiated a round was the fact that under the new affordable care act that is how we did that. we also looked at the average of that going forward. we tried to negotiate a going forward example, knowing that charity care may be smaller due to the fact that more people will have insurance. >> we continue to hear from cpmc that they view these commitments as a floor. they hope to provide more overtime. the contract itself frames a lot of these commitments as ceilings. you have carryover requirements cannot allow any excess to be used in a subsequent year. was that the intent of what you wanted to do? >> not at all. i would not agree with you that the 40% cac is a maximum. cpmc said u.s. -- i can only take them on their w