host: terry severino, are we likely to see a replay of that exchange? guest: i hope not because listening to some of her comments she said she's bound by supreme court precedent. it was of the appellate level pitch wouldn't be in this case. she may still try to take it but i don't think senators should allow her to say she's bound by it. she's not. every one of the nine has said multiple -- has a multiple times overturned former precedent. on top of which supreme court precedents doesn't speak to how many justices around the court. everyone agrees that something that can be changed by congress and has been changed multiple times so it's a question of do you think these ideas of a partisan motivated packing of the court, adding justices for the goal of shifting the balance of the court, are you in favor of that were opposed. many supreme court justices have spoken about this. there's no rule against a sitting judge or justice commenting on it. while i know she will want to say that, i hope we don't have four days of simply i'm not today answer that, i ca