antin, i recommend everyone to take the materials of tetyana nikolayenko's article, and you will receive exceptional answers with documents, with names on all questions , written by simon schuster, because his language is language... designed for a lower average and western reader, listener, that is, what is used in everyday life as materials for persuading a neighbor and an acquaintance, for conversations in the kitchen, and so on. and congressmen, sir roman, maybe it was aimed at morally unstable congressmen or rednecks from the republican trumpist environment, and we understand what a big debate is going on now, and here, you understand, he threw his spoon, the intellectual level of parliamentarians, whether ukrainian or american, then we like him we understand, we know, because, as the classic of ukrainian politics said, the parliament is the face of any nation, this is enough to understand that including this article was used to add... or subtract arguments, but as for me, a person who has worked in the parliament for 15 years, there is no evidence, materials, there are conclusions

who allowed all the things he says about, i say once again, not shuster, but tetyana nikolayenko, because if you read her materials, there are proofs and testimonies of who did what, who bought eggs for uah 17 per piece , who signed the contracts according to which unfulfilled conditions, non-delivery of weapons, ammunition, and they are not going to fulfill them, why did it happen that those who are responsible for the implementation and conclusion of these contracts, after the change of the minister of defense, were appointed again by the ministry, to carry out the same operations, you understand, when you understand that these materials are owned by the congress, and these are not shuster's articles, it is very serious. not factage, because you remember, earlier, the director of the cia came and informed the president, as you and i have said more than once, about these nits that are in the offices and that rub on at the front, as you can see, for the last six months he has not even bought a ticket to the front, that is, he is not even going to go, because everything that was...' has be

antin, i recommend everyone to take the materials of tetyana nikolayenko's article, and you will receiveeptional answers with documents, with surnames, on all questions that simon schuster writes, because his language is a language designed for the lower average, and the western, reader, listener, that is, what is used in everyday life as materials for persuasion a neighbor, an acquaintance, for conversations in the kitchen and so on further. and the congressmen, mr. roman, perhaps it was aimed at morally unstable congressmen or rednecks from the republican , trumpist environment, so we understand what a big debate is going on now, and here you understand, he threw his spoon, the intellectual level of parliamentarians... that ukrainian , that american ones, we understand it well, we know it, because, as the classic of ukrainian politics said, the parliament is the face of any nation, this is enough to understand that, including, this article was used in order to add or subtract arguments, but as for me, a person who has worked in the parliament for 15 years, there is no evidence, materia

said, and in particular your transmissions, the transmissions of other colleagues of yours, tetyana nikolayenko's materials, where the evidence, evidence, surnames and so on are laid out. now, material, general. with what it should be compared and why a colossal methodological error is made when the analysis is on the level, shuster zaluzhny, i ask everyone who will hear us now, please take the article signed by general zaluzhny and general zabrodsky dated september 9, 2022, these two there are articles analysis, a serious and deep analysis in the first case of the results of the military campaign of 2022 and plans for the 23rd year. where everything was explained in great detail, what concerns the current article is the summary of 2023 and plans for 2024. if you compare these articles, it becomes clear that talking about who is more to blame in this situation is completely meaningless. and i will not explain all this now, because it is at my level. emotions in relation to the conversation now shuster is useless, this factage, he, he is absolutely, well, unnecessary, from my point of view, becaus