abe nrbef eoleeromomh pecpleeoneoeo soxa r azo ana anata, a cad .st.ver,hey ty s sleas sas ance t tex s . ln'rit your yiber l oipocse, h are dng oi .e. you comyoe cnd vot yotouotoualrs anngour proessivees y ypondcs w at w hap wns, y yll ni uur into ioalifa. howholistic ilisicicha thr tishr tt.hr t look geoiand a the esidenti votin hason goneon ther but buts ls leseexas,as, ida, tenne tss t,, bit o o o a o buillockagck. in california, it is simply too easy to raise taxes and do it through public referendums and people seem to vote tax incomes. people say it's much more difficult in texas, florida and tennessee to do that sort of thing through the legislature which is much more difficult. i think that's one reason, anticipating higher taxes in places like california, new yo york, these companies are going to states like texas and florida. paul: kim, i think one lesson here, i wonder if you agree, the dangers of having a one-party government, the california republican party essentially collapsed, a real minority in the state and you have the vetoproof majority in the democrats in sacrament