thatcher!] hm... [airey] good night, margaret. oh... my money's on the filly to win. [laughs] oh... thanks, airey. good night. [explosion] no! no, no! no! airey! airey! [man] the irish national liberation army has claimed responsibility for the death of mp airey neave, margaret thatcher's spokesman on northern ireland. [airey] if you want to change the party, lead it. if you want to change the country, lead it. you've got it in you to go the whole distance. now, as the test draws near, i ask your help. - [applause] - that together we can shake off the shackles of socialism and restore to greatness this country that we love. and the only way is for the conservative party to win! [applause] [man] is she gonna get there? watch those blocks rise... go, maggie! [♪] [woman] it's friday the 4th of may, a historic day for britain, a conservative government led by mrs. thatcher is set to lead... [man] mrs. bandaranaike in sri lanka, mrs. gandhi in india, but never in the west has there been a woman prim

thatcher!] hm... [airey] good night, margaret. oh... my money's on the filly to win. [laughs] oh... thanks, airey. good night. [explosion] no! no, no! no! airey! airey! [man] the irish national liberation army has claimed responsibility for the death of mp airey neave, margaret thatcher's spokesman on northern ireland. [airey] if you want to change the party, lead it. if you want to change the country, lead it. you've got it in you to go the whole distance. oo, yeah. are you ready for a rush? yes, yes i am. you're in for a treat. fast play is the new way to play fast and win instantly from the pennsylvania lottery. pick a game, get your ticket and see if you've won. i won! pretty fast, huh? fast play. play fast. win instantly. now, as the test draws near, i ask your help. - [applause] - that together we can shake off the shackles of socialism and restore to greatness this country that we love. and the only way is for the conservative party to win! [applause] [man] is she gonna get there? watch

i think we are seeing that consensus, that margaret thatcher established in1979, is that margaret thatchershed in 1979, is beginning to crumble and i think there is every chance next few years of a labour government coming to power which will transform this country in just the way margaret thatcher and clement attlee before it transformed britain. what this election contest reminded me of was the spirit of michael foot, and he was the most radical leader, not jeremy corbyn, was revived, and without the countervailing voice of margaret thatcher. nobody was doing the critique. nobody was saying what is wrong with this position. so apart from attacking him personally. his history was too extreme in their view. they did not take on the argument at all. let's talk about the question of where this takes us. the next question is a deal, some sort of arrangement with the democratic unionist party in northern ireland. a lot of people watching in this country and around the world won't really know very much about the dup. the only thing they might remember is ian paisley junior. as the founder of th

we we re ago, she is no margaret thatcher.were about to bring in david college green but we will do that at a moment, he is not there yet, but the irish times, we will look at that. you mentioned the pressure on her in the cabinet in the uk and england but let's look at the island issue pressure on may as talks continue over deal with the dup. indeed! a relationship that she is said is one that has been there for a long time and is amicable. but the whole issue of ireland and the other parties in ireland, how they digests this new relationship, is not going to be easy. under the famous good friday agreement which brought peace to northern ireland, the british government is meant to be an honest broker and not to close to the nationalist or the unionists. at of course if the british government is being propped up either dup, which is considered by some to be extremely socially conservative, anti—gay rights, anti— abortion rights, can they really be seen as an honest broker, especially if on this so—called confidence and supply

they got a higher proportion than margaret thatcher, which won her famous landslide.e smaller parties collapsed, this is why this has happened. i really want to make a point about the vision. i think this is a repudiation clearly of anything it is of the politics of focus group and message control and public relations and advertising slogans. this is finally a return to ideological politics, which is probably a healthy thing. but the cynicism of that period, when every political message had to be manipulated and controlled and it was all about the manipulation of public opinion, that was sickening. and i think now we really have seen a repudiation of that. and was that what the conservatives were guilty of? yes, i am afraid so. thomas, you have been watching elections in this country for a very long time. what did you make of it? well, i think i agree with the janet that this was the worst i have seen and it is more at the astonishing because when theresa may became prime minister, when she was put in that position, she went outside and give her famous speech which so

i would ask him to say what he thinks margaret thatcher, jeremy corbyn, or any other british politician could hope to achieve in those circumstances. host: thank you from scotland. guest: nicholas, you make a good point. this is a difficult negotiating position. it is no accident that article 50, which is part of the european treaty, which provides withdrawal from a country, is set up to make it hard on the withdrawn country. the leverage is on the 27th remaining members of the eu, and they have a political objective. their top objective is they want to make sure burden is not seen as benefiting from the withdrawal because should it be the outcome, other countries might consider withdrawing. while the british objective in which i offended you is political, they want out from the state in brussels, the european one -- the europeans want to make it clear that a country with drawing will not have as good a deal as countries within the eu, so that is a tech circumstance that the british find themselves in. throughless, as we get the major part of the exit negotiations in the calculation of

all the headlines were the next margaret thatcher.will give theresa may the power she needs to turn the country around. >> it may have started when she decided not to debate corbin. she had the lead going in and that's when she called the snap election. it's problematic for the markets over there and problematic for the markets here. and things being consistent, we are thrown into the air. charles: with the initial brexit vote, the city in london and wall treat were rooting against brexit and perhaps going into this elect they were rooting for theresa may to win. >> i think this it part of what's going on for markets. they are look at everything political around the world trying to figure out what's going to go on. most of the bets are wrong. this is an example of the betting being off. the markets adjusted to this very well. the futures are fairly strong, relatively speaking to what could have happened. we had a great market day today considering what's going on over there. the markets are resilient globally. charles: we are on the c

and george bush being america had more to say than margaret thatcher. but that said, i think what's left without doubt, we have now the best germany that's ever been as a result of helmut kohl. and arguably the best europe. so those are two big things that helmut kohl has done. but then we come to the fine detail and the situation now. and a lot of things have gone wrong. but basically i think is a starting point, we have those two things. melinda: those two things were deeply linked in the mind of helmut kohl himself. we have a quote from him that pretty much sums up the words that he used to convince the skeptics when it came to german unification. >> let us be good neighbors and dependable partners. let us remain german europeans and european germans. then we'll have good prospects for a future in peace and freedom. melinda: alan posner, you said in your opening statement that chancellor kohl squandered -- sorry. you said that chancellor merkel squandered kohl's legacy. she was in fact mentored by helmut kohl. she would not be where she is today if i

was when neoliberalism was born maggie thatcher and her little handbag carrying around a copy of. freedom freedom book really set the china that was advertising this is going to be a tough new world where tough love is going to be the rule and the perspective i think was always that it's a bit like a cost royal used to be regarded it tice bad but it's good for you when you grow up you'll appreciate it well the. had thirty years of this now it tasted bad its effect is being bad you can no longer cite this is will what will happen with me and plot the now living what has happened to apply neha liberalism and it hasn't been successful the u.k. has gone backwards in international comparisons reduced its manufacturing sector and now the public has really said they've had enough and they got going the opposite direction because the finally been presented with somebody who's willing to offer that opposite direction and that is. and then i recalled an ok well we'll get back to it we'll get back to him marcus same question here but maybe if i can add to it here there seems to be a crisis o

in this country believe in children haitian they don't believe in society margaret thatcher said there was no son to his own and this is not just a movie this is kane moche this is dennis paul this is the postman what this is just saying to the chains this is a show clone creativity documentary film camera and get on people tell the truth for some in this country put on a screen expressing the human cost of the housing crisis on the big screen this documentary explores the cats struck phase that led to a chronic shortage of social housing. essentially we've had. simply haven't seen the full social housing it may be coming in. senior producer peter bennett's there i'm outside the ground fell to our north kensington in london now with the director of dispossession the great social housing swindle paul first of all just your reaction to. be here lots of the mainstream media cameras here anymore. looking at the building obviously you can't really comprehend what went on. when i found out about i was in sheffield and i was seeing the images on t.v. and initially like my space where you just

but unlike thatcher, he was strongly pro-european. in 1984, during commemorations of world war i, he held hands with french president franÇois mitterrand. he was instrumental in the introduction of the single european currency. kohl served 2 terms as chancellor of west germany. then, in 1990, in the first free time german elections in years, he returned to power in a landslide victory. but his popularity waned as the reality of our unified germany set in. unemployment rose and government spending was cut. after his fourth term as chancellor, kohl suffered a heavy defeat in the 1998 election. resigned defeat, kohl as leader of the cdu, but his retirement wasn't quiet. he fought off allegations that he accepted illegal donations for the party. in 1999, he admitted to taking cash from but refused to name the donors the follow-up of the scandal helped angela merkel rise to party leadership. there were difficulties in kohl 's personal life, too. in 2001, his wife committed suicide. her death led to speculation in the normally reticent germ

i would ask him to say what he thinks margaret thatcher, jeremy corbyn or any other british politician could hope to achieve in those circumstances. host: nicolas from scotland. charlie ries. guest: you make a good point. this is a very difficult negotiating situation the british rn. it is no accident that article 50, the part of the article treaty that provides for withdrawal is sick -- is set up to make it hard on the withdrawing country. the leverages on the part of the other remaining members of the eu, and they have a political objective, they want to make sure that britain is not seen as benefiting from withdrawal, because should it be that was the outcome, other countries might consider withdrawing. while the british objective and withdrawing from the eu is also political, they want out from underneath the sort of nanny state of brussels, the europeans want to make it clear that a country withdrawing will not have as good a deal as countries that are in the eu. that is a tough circumstance that the british find themselves in. we get throughs the major part of the exit negotiatio

that is what happened under thatcher and thatcher is more like trump than reagan because reagan never threatened the left into the united states. he defeated communists but not at stanford. trump is a mortal threat to the left. the left under thatcher went crazy and by her third election in '87, the news media referred to them as the loosing left. do the democrats keep drifting into this insanity representing a world view that is 25% of the country? the second question is do the republicans get their act together and not just get things done but communicate them. we have done so much on veteran's reform and have such a weak communication system nobody realizes the house, senate and president are the best pro-veterans team we have had modern times doing real things that are working and they cannot communicate them. they have to learn to do things that matter and break through the media and make sure everybody hears them. if they saw that and if the left keeps going crazy we could have an election where they gain ground, not lose ground. >> somebody all the way in the back this time. >>

as well in a combined period of thirteen years of new labor they built few houses in total than thatcher's government averaged every year so it's it's an issue across both parties and it's a policy now life it needs to end because we do have a housing shortage you know we do have problems with council housing but continuing to sell off that still cannot replace is just senseless and you tackle the issue of labor councils up and down the country blaming. councils blaming central government for. housing storms yeah i mean that's the thing i mean it's very it's very easy to blame central government and say this all comes down from the states but local authorities do have to be a bit smarter i mean obviously their budgets have really been cut to the bone by you know announcing things as in the case of lambeth council where they announced the demolition of pressing gardens on twitter you know that's not very clever that's actually deeply insensitive it's actually an offensive so you know not only do councils have to communicate better but they need to explain why they do in these three developm

the thinking with margaret thatcher was, i wasn't a thatcherite but... won't you? no.. but she did know how to work with the best brains of this country. whether they were academics of civil servants, she knew had to use them. theresa may doesn't. she will be there for a while. let's look at the express. boris says tory mps must back in may. there were couple of her clients money, yasmin, that suggested that boris were either being encouraged or running towards prime minister. people get crossed that he is reduced to one lane. “ one name. —— one name. he is responsible for all sorts of tricks yunis. it is a bit like a shakespeare play, you have to read into the words and into the opposite of the work. i think, this is the problem. boris or reza? who would rather... goodness, theresa may any time. you don't need any challengers at the moment do they? you have the ‘s speech next week, brexit negotiations in nine days' time. the same day as the queen's speech. you don't need any more upheaval. no. iwill repeat what i have said, she will be there for a while, let the dust

says that this has happened in the past, figures from the past, like the challenger to margaret thatcherher pomp, but name names, ben, who is it? and he can't. this is becoming quite a story. the eurosceptics have warned that any attempt to keep britain in the customs union and the single market, any leeway from getting out of the european court ofjustice isn't acceptable. well, actually, those items, per se, were not on the referendum paper. i recall my days on the telegraph, michael —— might colleague, william deeds, he said to me about 22 years ago, he thought that the european issue, this was post—maastricht, is going to split the tory party and he asked whether it would survive. i hope he's listening up there because it is really a very big issue. this is the issue, where mrs may is in great difficulty, she cannot curb the hard isolationists, as i call them, who really wa nts isolationists, as i call them, who really wants to... it is more than the tail wagging the dog. this is a real problem for the tory party because as long as this goes in they will be in a poor state to fight a

then we had the landslide for mrs thatcher in 1987.r edward heath. so, from that point of view, if you‘re going to call theresa may one of the winners here, in that she got more seats than any other party, she is not a convincing win at all and she might even be out of a job soon. who knows? but there is a line of defence. i‘m going to show you how we can look at this slightly differently. let‘s go back to edward heath in the 1970s and the percentage of the fancied he got when he won. it was 46% of. we are coming off the period where the two main parties shared may be 90% of the vote or more. we have mrs thatcher winning with 45%. we are in the 40s now. and then it starts to decline as emma ukip are on the pitch and the lib dems are stronger, and the greens and so on. we were starting to think in 2010, maybe you will never see the big hearties go above 40%. so, 2010, cameron came first, with 37. not a convincing win at all. and still in 2015, he didn‘t have 40% of the vote. so, have a look, theresa may has got 40% of the vote. that rat

will the government and i think her steadfast support, as i have said, channeling her in a margaret thatcher, is in this they of tragedy will help her in that regard. host: thank you for stopping by. with the grandow corporation serving as the international vice president and a representative in a number of countries, including grace. the story from london -- the death toll at 7, 48 others injured, and the associated peopleeporting that 12 have been arrested. we want to get back to your phone calls on the terror attacks in london. 202 is the area code. 748-8001 for republicans. (202)-748-8000 for democrats. if you are an independent, the number to call is (202)-748-8002 . the british prime minister speaking to reporters earlier today, and last month after the terror attacks in london, she had this to say. [video clip] weresa may: these images hold in our minds should not be those of senseless slaughter that of the ordinary men and women who were concerned about their own safety and put it to one side and rushed to help, or the men and women of the emergency services, who worked to bring comf

and the british prime minister margaret thatcher gave up her otherwise stubborn resistance after kohlsed her a peaceful germany in a united europe. the u.s. was already on his side, after kohl assured washington a reunited germany would remain loyal to the west. >> neutrality will be the wrong road for germany to go down. >> at the time, the prospect of a confident, reunified germany was a nightmare for the soviet union. one of kohl's biggest political achievements was his ability to overcome the calgary shots -- gorbachev's reservations. germany celebrated reunification in 1990 with the approval of its european neighbors and the rest of the world. [singing] christopher: we are to get the perspective of german historian andres who joins us from dressed in -- dresden. helmut kohl, a giant figure in history, what will he be remembered for? >> the longest-serving chancellor of germany yet. but more than that, the decisions that were taken. german unification in combination with european reunification -- german reunification and european unification. christopher: he is always called the f

i recall that prime minister margaret thatcher said back in the '80s during the rash of the airplane hijackings, where she said, we must rob them of the oxygen of publicity. is there a point as this goes on, if these continue, where it would be appropriate to not react and to ignore it and just not give them the satisfaction, you know what i'm saying? >> i think that there's something to that. my only concern is that you then can sort of normalize that sort of behavior which can have byproducts that aren't healthy for society. also, what margaret thatcher was referring to, there are so media outlets, that i don't know it's possible to starve them of attention. so i'm not sure you can ignore it and it will just fade away. >> do you think the university of maryland and american university, the incidents there, and i'm not talking about the stabbing of that poor man. i'm talking about the nooses and the hanging bananas. are the universities doing enough to quash that or to make people afraid of doing that? >> well, you know, that's a very open question. some universities have better cul

prior to joining us on heritage at the thatcher center he worked at a nonprofit in washington dc as aicy analyst as well as on the advisory board company as a research associate and associate director. please join me in welcoming daniel carmack. >> thank you john and thank you this morning. is available wednesday in washington were honored today to be joined by mark moyar was book "oppose any foe: the rise of america's special operations forces" was described by national review as an invaluable and highly readable overview of special operations forces history, not just those who are newly joining its ranks but also for anyone who seeks to know more about these glamorous and little understood forces. our author mark moyar is director of the center for military and diplomatic history here in washington dc and he has served as professor at the us marine corps university and a senior fellow at the joint special operations university. he has advised the senior leadership of several us military commands as well. he holds a ba, summa complot from harvard and a phd from cambridge. in addition

prior to joining us here at heritage in the thatcher center he worked for a nonprofit in washington d.c. is a policy analyst as well as on the advisory board company as a research associate in the associate director. please join me in welcoming daniel kochis. [applause] >> thank you john and good morning everybody. this beautiful wednesday in washington. we are honored today to be joined by mark moyar whose book "oppose any foe" the rise of america's special operations forces was described by national review as an valuable and highly readable overview of special operations forces history not just for those who are newly joining its ranks but for anyone who seeks to know more about the glamorous and little understood forces. mark moyar as director for the diplomatic -- in washington d.c.. he has served as professor at the u.s. marine corps university and a senior fellow at the joint special operations university. he has advised the senior leadership of several military commands as well. he has a b.a.'s chromosome lot and the b.a. from cambridge. in addition to the book we are talking abo

theresa may, within your taking over, we were told she was the new margaret thatcher. there was talk there would be total dominance for 20, 30, 40 years. now the tories are unable to win a majority, forced to form a coalition with the extremist party. ironic that theresa may ran a campaign where she accused jeremy corbyn of effectively being allied with terrorists, supporter of the ira, hamas, has the law. she is going into coalition with a party that is still tied to loyalist, terror groups in northern ireland. how ironic and housing are critical, so might say. amy: where does this leave jeremy corbyn? the british labour leader suggested election results indicated rejection of right-wing populist waves we've been today. -- stripping today. >> it shows the determination to do something very differently in this country. and take a different stance towards the rest of the world. amy: though the holes indicated sweept was going to be a for theresa may, by late last night, and look like, well, it was possible that jeremy corbyn could become prime minister. talk about where

chris: margaret thatcher. >> thatcher is a great example.ential for a group to gather around the foreign secretary who has wanted to be prime minister, and the pressure on her. chris: johnson. >> or the secretary minister who is negotiating brexit has a real shot here. i think his name is davies. there is a very real possibility that she is going to face some kind of confidence vote probably not -- i mean, brexit is going to move forward on schedule. but probably in the next two months there is a real face that she will face a no confidence vote. chris: will she survive that or not? i mean, have you looked at your pretickets. >> she will survive the confidence vote, but that may not be enough to have the parliamentary conservatives hold her in power. that's what happens is they will hold the government up. they don't want another election. she loses a no confidence vote in parliament government falls. what will happen is they will sustain her there but they will say it's time for you to go. she will go. whether it's boris johnson. i took for

it's funny, prior to that, one of the first -- even before margaret thatcher, saw gorbachev, think brian mulroney, then the prime minister of canada, had a meeting with gorbachev, and he came back. of course in the oval office, reagan said, tammy duckworth shows. that was the first question he asked. when rooney said, i thought he brezhnev in a $1000 suit. he couldn't have been more wrong. it is just funny that somehow, mulroney didn't capture , wasn't able to figure gorbachev out in the same way that ronald reagan was. once there was a -- meeting. reagan is now chief of staff. reagan said -- boys. the president wants to lighten up on gorbachev. he does come hell and you want us to. the question was, in 1989, why didn't you do it? gorbachev said through a longtime translator, still translating. -- youev said, michael must understand, your father and i shared christian morality. said, when i was growing up, my grandfather was a big communist in our town, but grandmother was always a believer. we had a communist meeting, and applico pictures of stalin. as soon as the communist left -- they

50, it was portrayed in parts of the media as an act of steely leadership, comparable to margaret thatcherak and so. when, in reality, what she was doing was triggering a sequence where she was passing control of the manner of brexit to the rest of european union. that is the dynamic as outlined in lisbon treaty of which article 50 is a part. she can come to summits and it's not her weakened position here in the uk, and it is very weak, that has brought this about. it is the dynamic of brexit as defined by article 50. even if she had arrived with a mandate bolstered... if she had won a majority by 200, it would still have happened. she went to the council, said look, here's an idea. one of the things they said is we have devolved this. this is negotiation that the commission will handle. the commission has outlined their terms, you can google it. other search engines are available. on lots of levels she has not got the leavers because of the way, this would apply to any country wanting to leave, because of the way this dynamic will now be played out. i agree with you in terms of the mechan

blue for thatcher, red for blair, back to blue for cameron.ve views of the dup anti—abortion, anti—gay, are not palatable to all political conservatives. that is horrifying. as a tory supporter, how do you feel about this? as i said, i can‘t... i can‘t. i hope the murder mystery might be easier to solve. ahead lies a journey into brexit negotiations few would have imagined. theresa may says nothing will derail them. really interesting hearing people's voices. very much what we are trying to reflect. coffee has just arrived. 0ur eagle eyed fillip spotted earlier that lou has a blanket around her legs, because there is a d raft. as you can see we d raft. as you can see we are d raft. as you can see we are at westminster this morning, a special programme reflecting and looking ahead to what lies ahead in terms of theresa may‘s administration. tell us what is important you. we will try to get some of those questions answered. stay with us. the headlines are coming up. hello, this is breakfast with charlie stayt and louise minchin. coming up before

it's funny, prior to that, one of the first -- even before margaret thatcher, saw gorbachev, think brian mulroney, then the prime minister of canada, had a meeting with gorbachev, and he came back. of course in the oval office, reagan said tell me about gorbachev. that was the first question he asked. he said, i thought he was leonid brezhnev in a $1000 suit. he couldn't have been more wrong. it just -- it is just funny that somehow, mulroney didn't capture, wasn't able to figure gorbachev out in the same way that ronald reagan was. >> once there was a -- meeting. don regan, he was a catastrophe as chief of staff but i like him, he said, the president wants you to lineup on gorbachev. he said, like hell he does come and you want us to. the question was, in 1989, why didn't you do it? he said, i think this fellow gorbachev is different from the others. think he is serious about getting out of afghanistan. this had not been in the "washington post." i had not heard anybody speculate that gorbachev wanted to get out of afghanistan. down,echwriters locked what do you do when ronald reagan go

which will notjust take us out of the eu but also harm our economy by taking us out of margaret thatcher'single market as well. how do the party's approaches to brexit compare? on trade, theresa may says we will leave the single market and customs union, pursuing new trade deals with the eu and abroad. labour accepts that but would negotiate to retain the benefits of both, while the liberal democrats want to stay as members. the snp want scotland's place in the single market to be protected. on legal matters, the conservatives said they would end the jurisdiction of the european court ofjustice. labour would keep eu protections on workers‘ rights and the environments, while the lib dems would hold a referendum on the final brexit deal before it was put in place. after last night‘s debate, labour also want to talk about brexit today. jeremy corbyn says theresa may‘s approach would risk a jobs meltdown. i‘m very clear that we will negotiate tariff—free trade access to european markets so our manufacturing industryjobs are defended and supported, and we have a growing economy as a result of t

it reminds me a little bit of the atmosphere in the final days of maggie thatcher after the poll taxolitics is about a narrative, and once your narrative as a leader or a politician changes, that is a very difficult force to escape. but more than anything, her narrative was i am strong and stable, instead she is showing to the people of britain that she is not strong, not stable, not even compassionate. she is unable to meet the people that have lived a tragedy and hug them, like jeremy corbyn did. not only has she lost her narrative, but she is unable to provide another one. they might not have wanted hugging, but people clearly want answers, and still, people clearly feel in that part of london that the answers haven't been given. the overall feeling in london is that the government is losing control of too many things. the brexit talks are starting on monday and we still have no idea, and in brussels they have no idea, what the british government actually wants to achieve in these negotiations. which is fine, because the government has no idea either, it would appear! everything h

did you really know about margaret thatcher did. the daily angle how close are you to cable in general really and how politics of the friendship really i mean we talked about that you're just saying really like like really work we're close we talk all the time she's been busy i've been busy with her book tour coming on your show. and so when we talk we just talk you know about certain things we've we've gotten into it politically before you know off camera. but i've always been able to say. that's how you feel that's how i feel we fight first second and then we let it go and play a round of golf so it's you know. there's two are just going to say there's too much hate going on right now that it's that what we as a community especially the l g b t community should be fighting each other we have so many wars to wage with people attacking us you know they mean you used to book form in drag do you miss it i still do it. i still put on a heel and hair piece and do full makeup and i do my one woman show i love it i'll never give up perfor

never parental left in the united states so like badger he is a mortal threat so the left under thatcher went crazy so the news media routinely referred to them it is the democrats keep drifting into this insanity 25% of the country. they have done so much on veterans administration and reform with a weak communication system air the bet one does the best veterans' team of all times and they cannot communicate any of that. and then to learn to break past so every american hears them despite the hostility. if they saw that in the left keeps going crazy spell curate sure owe intellectual giant but just to play devil's advocate is it possible he becomes like mccarthy that was known as a demagogue it took a few years but it got there in to give the framework with the robert mueller investigation you don't think he will find anything with russian money? as they pay triple of funding and flynn you don't think they will be indicted as the senate voted 98 / 24 russian sanctions? there is a lot of evidence whatsoever but also thank you for the advertisement for the event that will be hearing tues

when michael heseltine said he could not foresee circumstances where he would stand against mrs thatcher an anyone but boris campaign going on. there is a sense that he is flaky and unreliable, those things that michael gove, as he flagrantly stabbed him in the front and back la st stabbed him in the front and back last year... and the site! and the head and everything, he said he was not reliable. those allegations will resurface. certain allegations from the past will come back towards him, i think, and i think there will be a really tight campaign if it is him against david davis. apparently, amber rudd's majority was too slim, only 300 or so, so she is out of the running. i would only 300 or so, so she is out of the running. iwould not only 300 or so, so she is out of the running. i would not say that boris is on the way to coronation, it is not a done deal because there are people in the party who do not trust them. the conservative party is thinking, we need a leaderfor the future who can take onjeremy corbyn, who did surprisingly well. it isa corbyn, who did surprisingly well. it