thdavis, that was los angeles versus lyons. >> don't you think it's unrealistic to say leave it to congress, as though you're sending it back to congress for congress to consider it ould wer should we not have provision. that's not what it's going to be. it's going to be these provisions are in effect even though you -- a lot of you never wanted them to be in effect and you only voted for them because you wanted to get the heart of the act which has now been cut out. nonetheless these provisions are the law and you have to get the votes to overturn them. that's an enormously different question from whether you get the votes initially. to put them into the law. there is no way that this court's decision is not to distort the congressional process whrks we strike it all down or leave some of it in place, the congressional process will never be the same. one way or another, congress is going to have to reconsider this, and why isn't it better to have tem reconsider it -- what should i say, in toto rather than having some things already in the law which you have to eliminate before you can move