the answer." that's your portion of that first email. >> yes, it was an a.t.a.-related question and i wanted the staff to do the analysis. >> so you have been intimately involved in a.c.a. implementation questions, including whether or not somebody would receive a waiver, whether or not somebody under current law could or could not be forced to do something they did not want to do, is that correct? >> i've been involved in answering questions about how the rules work, and that's what this exchange is about. it was not about what rule the policy makers ought to adapt. >> and one last time, the information underneath here, if it's not 6103, you certainly would agree that we should know what it is, and it is 6103, then it is something you said you've never done, which is to transfer 6103 information to political appointees at the white house. >> i'd have to refer you to the people who did the redactions. >> no, i just -- >> i don't know what's underneath, sir. i'm somplee >> neither do we. neither do we. i now recognize the ranking member. >> you can watch all of o