the age of 89. up next, will be heading to the cannes film festival. al gore has been speaking about film, an inconvenient sequel, truth to power. that is next. ♪ next you all think i'm at the beach today, sipping champagne with the stars. actually i spent quite a bit of time doing this. i thought it was very challenging and provocative. >> i just thought it was a very excellent movie with dustin hoffman. >> it is funny. >> that was one of the most beautiful experiences of my whole life. ♪ >> there is harm, thriller, romance, and film calling for action, like a film from the former u.s. vice president al gore. his documentary change the public's perception of climate change. >> the most criticized scene in the movie was showing that the accommodation of sealevel rise and storm surge would flood the 9/11 memorial site, and people said what a terrible exaggeration. >> it flooded the world trade center site. ♪ >> al gore, hello. filme at the cannes festival. do you think people at a festival like this care about climate change? >> i think the answer is definitely

yearse: it's been 10 since an inconvenient truth, the al gore film. why haven't we done more? ecause the science is impeccable from intergovernmental power and climate change. there are many data points that -- it's the most significant scientific achievement that we have ever achieved or undertaken. however, the communication of the science to the greater populace has been miserable. threat,een focused on gloom, and the idea that if we get people to act if we scare the p out of them, actually doesn't work at all. then you shame people and make them feel guilty about what they are doing and not doing. indifference,ss, and you get people saying -- charlie: even you said, if you don't do something about 2050, we are in a very bad place. >> it says the most conference of plan ever proposed. first of all, it's the first plan that's ever been proposed to reverse global warming. there has been no plan up until now. second, we did not make the plan, we found the plan. every solution is failing. practical. we know how to do it. we know the cost. we know the profits and losses on doing

charlie: it's been 10 years since an inconvenient truth, the al gore film and book. haven't we done more? paul: the science is impeccable from intergovernmental power and climate change. 2.5 billion data points since the last assessment. it is the most magnificent scientific achievement humankind has ever achieved or undertaken. however, the communication of this planet to the greater populace has been miserable. it has focused on death and gloom. the idea that we will get people to act if we scare them has not worked at all. you take doom and gloom and then shame people. how they live or how they do not live, you get numbness, indifference, and you get people saying -- charlie: if we do not do something by 2050, we are in a bad place. paul: we are doing something. it says the most comprehensive plan ever to rude -- to reverse global warming. it is the first plan. there has been no plan up until now. second, we did not make the plan, we found the plan. every solution in there that we modeled is failing, it is well in hand, practical. we know how to do it, we know the

is your central complaint about, it's been ten years, i think, since an inconvenient truth, the al gore film and book. >> yeah. >> rose: why haven't we done more? >> because the science, this is what i feel. the science is impeccable from the intergovernmental power and climate change. it's two and a half billion data points that inform the last assessment. it is the most magnificent scientific achievement humankind has ever achieved or undertaken. however, the communication of the science to the greater pop liss has been-- pop louse has been miserable because it is focused on threat, on gloom, the idea show that we'll get people to act if we scare the pee out of them hasn't worked at all. because you take threat, gloom and doom and then you shame people or make them feel guilty about what they are doing, not doing, how they live or don't live, you stir together real well and you get numbness, you get indifference and you get people-- . >> rose: but even you suggest, if we don't do something about by 2050 we're in a bad place. >> what i'm saying here is actually we are doing something. it sa

one of the most earthbound films to be shown was an inconveniency will. it was al gore'sed at cannes 11 years ago. the new film has more action than the original. it is wrong to louis bisson! —— pollute this earth. the original. it is wrong to louis bisson! -- pollute this earth. they went to wear ice is melting, where they have been destructive storms, and the summit conference, and some hopeful solutions for the climate crisis. the trump administration does not appear to be that interested in climate change. would you like president trump to watch a film? yes, i would. you like president trump to watch a film? yes, iwould. i don't you like president trump to watch a film? yes, i would. i don't know if he will or not. i have criticised his policies and many of his appointment. —— his film. i have not engaged a dialogue him. and i still have hope that he will decide to keep the us in the paris agreement. —— this film. we have learnt in the last several months, however, that not one person, even the president, can stop this climate movement. the next generation will be jus

one of the most earthbound films to be shown was an inconvenient sequel: truth to power, former vice president al gore's, an inconvenient truth, which premiered at cannes 11 years ago. the new film has more action than the original. it is wrong to pollute this earth! it is right to give hope to the future generation! al gore is seen globe—trotting, going to places where ice melting, where there have been destructive storms, going behind—the—scenes at the paris climate conference, negotiating deals — there's an emphasis on hopeful solutions for the climate crisis. the trump administration, i don't have to tell you, doesn't appear to be that interested in climate change. would you like president trump to watch your film? yes, i would. i don't know if he will or not. i've criticised his policies and many of his appointments, but i haven't engaged in a dialogue with him, nonetheless. and i still have hope that he will decide to keep the us in the paris agreement. we have learnt in the last several months, however, that no one person, even a president, can stop this climate movement. the next generation woul