but the challenge for us is, again, just to tee up the issue, what is the american public's appetite for if we go to 17% secure systems that nobody can access ever. are we comfortable with that, even in the course of an authorized investigation in the course of trying to protect public safety or in order to prevent an attack, are we comfortable with that? and that's really the, i think, underlying question. >> okay. and that's a great place to end on. thank you so much for joining us. >> thank you. [ applause ] >>> now for round two. we've just had a conversation about the law enforcement's views on the encryption debate, and now we will include some other views as well into the conversation. we have next to me matt blaise, one of the leading cryptographers out of the university of pennsylvania. we have jon callas, chief technology office at silent circle, an encrypted communications firm. and we have kiran raj, senior counsel to the deputy attorney general at the u.s. department of justice. so thanks to you all for joining me. we will, again, have some questions. we will open up to t

so we try every day tonight sure that we are building trust with the american public. we have to. nd that's what the rule of law is based on. trusting the folks that are carrying out investigations, and prosecutions and the like. so it it is an important value to us. >>. >> any other questions? yeah. i loft y i lost you there. my question is for the government official. the issue is about conflict of law. and the situation where some tech companies may find themselves when they have to comply with a foreign law to hand over data, that would bring them in to conflict with laws that make them liable for crimes for breaking u.s. laws. how do you resolve this? where increasing businesses are global and have to can deal with multiple sets of law. how does the doj address the issue? what are your views on that? >> no, it's a good question. and it's a question that companies are facing more and more every day. i guess the point i would make, just generally on that issue, it's broader than going dark and encryption, we deal with it on a daily basis. so, the companies work through those iss

mislead the american public over ♪ all of our legendary racing heritage. d the american public over all of our pioneering four wheel drive experience. come together in one amazing new vehicle. this is the all-new gle coupe. a mercedes-benz suv with the heart and soul of a race car. prospered in the town ofe hattington. never flashy, he only made the classic bowler. then suddenly the day's trend became preposterously tall. his raymond james financial advisor reminded him that focusing on the long term is always fashionable. the fad was indeed a passing one. his patience paid off, allowing him to one-day hang up his hat with confidence. life well planned. see what a raymond james advisor can do for you. ...is as easy as it gets. wouldn't it be great if hiring plumbers, carpenters and even piano tuners... were just as simple? thanks to angie's list, now it is. start shopping online... ...from a list of top rated providers. visit angieslist.com today. verizon now has one simple plan. just pick a size. small, medium, large and extra large. if you need less data,

that is something that the american public and folks should understand. people need to know that. and that again that is the discussion that we have to have. >> i will admit that i'm flattered by the fbi's stake in my ability and my field's ability to produce these super secure products that you are worried will be warrant-proof, but frankly i'm puzzled by the underlying assumption that we have any chance of actually doing that and that the internet that we have today is adequately secure for just about any purpose you could imagine. i mean, i think we're in a national security and public safety crisis as we rely on this horribly fragile, horribly weak infrastructure. the problem that we're facing and i think it's pretty close to an emergency. >> we do have another audience question. on the side here. and now my question. it's one thing that is often missed in the debate is that assuming that everything was encrypted, meta data will still be available to law enforcement when they serve companies a lawful order. >> it is showing that it is committing federal felony and the phone fac

so we try every day tonight sure that we are building trust with the american public. we have to. nd that's what the rule of law is based on. trusting the folks that are carrying out investigations, and prosecutions and the like. so it it is an important value to us. >>. >> any other questions? yeah. i loft y i lost you there. my question is for the government official. the issue is about conflict of law. and the situation where some tech companies may find themselves when they have to comply with a foreign law to hand over data, that would bring them in to conflict with laws that make them liable for crimes for breaking u.s. laws. how do you resolve this? where increasing businesses are global and have to can deal with multiple sets of law. how does the doj address the issue? what are your views on that? >> no, it's a good question. and it's a question that companies are facing more and more every day. i guess the point i would make, just generally on that issue, it's broader than going dark and encryption, we deal with it on a daily basis. so, the companies work through those iss

clinton might be surprised and later did the obama administration try to mislead the american public hey babe, last one home cooks? ♪ ♪ ♪ another tie. order in? next time i drive. the right-sized nissan rogue. ♪ >>> impact segment tonight, it is perceived in some circles that donald trump is not kind to women in general. >> whenever he is pressed about the things he says about women he he says he loves women. in fact to quote him, he cherishes us. well, if it's all the same to you, mr. trump, i would rather you stop cherishing women and start respecting women. [cheers and applause] >> but, according to a new "the washington post" poll, which asks republican female voters who they support, trump comes out on top with 29%. ben carson 24%. marco rubio 9. jeb bush 8. ted cruz 7. a cnn poll breaks out republican women voters as well. their donald trump gets a whopping 33%. ben carson 22%, jeb bush 10%. ted cruz 7%. joining us now from washington katie pavlick and here in the studio kennedy who hosts her own fox business. >> what's surprising by the cnn poll is trump actually has higher su

clinton might be surprised and later did the obama administration try to mislead the american public isis? we have a factor investigation upcoming. ...as a combination of see products.. and customers. every on-time arrival is backed by thousands of od employees, ...who make sure the millions of products we ship arrive without damages. because od employees treat customer service... ...like our most important delivery. od. helping the world keep promises. all of our legendary racing heritage. all of our pioneering four wheel drive experience. come together in one amazing new vehicle. this is the all-new gle coupe. a mercedes-benz suv with the heart and soul of a race car. >>> impact segment tonight, it is perceived in some circles that donald trump is not kind to women in general. >> whenever he is pressed about the things he says about women he he says he loves women. in fact to quote him, he cherishes us. well, if it's all the same to you, mr. trump, i would rather you stop cherishing women and start respecting women. [cheers and applause] >> but, according to a new "the washington p

the media covers trump because the american public are looking for somebody who's big and bold. they don't want small. the problem with all of the other republicans is that they seem small compared to donald trump. >> to pick up on matt's point, bill, donald trump will start to fall only if he gets warning -- >> look, we did a poll of weekly standard readers, only 15% are for trump. our readers aren't that pro-trump. we also asked them, are you happy or unhappy that trump is in the race? 64% are happy in the race. people happy he's shaking things up. i think the one -- there are three outsiders are running. trump, ben carson, carly fiorina is one of the three of the outsiders who's a plausible nominee. >> what matt said, what is big in american politics? a billionaire bully beating on big politics. i predict that trump will never become boring. but i think he's reached his limit. with all due respect to donna, ben carson is quiet. he's a certified extremists. he wants to bar immigrants -- >> it's not that, where the american public and the gop voters are now and this idea right n

the understanding that most americans do not support the zenofaux bibb nationalist arguments presented by most of the republican candidates right now. >> let's look at this poll indicating the american public'siew on this, who they could vote for based on various categories. catholics, 93% say they can vote for a catholic, a woman, 92%. black, 92%, hispanic 91%. jewish, 91%. now to the next drop, below the 90s. that's mormon at 81%. that became relevant four years ago during romney's campaign. gay or lesbian, 44% would vote. evangelical christian, 73%. muslim down at 60% which is right above athiest and 58% and the very worst thing you could be is of course a athiest socialist. >> bernie sanders, at 47%. >> so, again, this is one of those things that only the republican campaign could have walked in to. >> yeah. you know, it's really perplexing because the american public has moved past this. i mean, those -- poll results were very striking. we talk about mitt romney being a mormon. it was a nonissue in 2012. we have past this because of a country. not because everybody knows article vi of the constitution prohibits a religious test of a higher office but because we have grown as a people. s

president obama and the vast majority of the american public do acknowledge it's real and that's why the president has put forward a common sense but effective strategy for dealing with it in a way that's good for our economy. >> josh earnest from alaska, looks gorgeous there. thanks for joining us. >> thank you, chris. >> some late breaking news in the brewing mckinley gate scandal. president obama wants to change the name of mt. mckinley to denali after more than 100 years. a great insult to ohio. i will change back, exclamation point, make mckinley great again. >>> is the schedule rigged to give hillary clinton the edge? who is openly and unabashedly criticizing the leadership coming up. i hate cleaning the gutters. have you touched the stuff? it's evil. and ladders. sfx: [screams] they have all those warnings on 'em. might as well say... 'you're gonna die, jeff.' you hired someone to clean the gutters. not just someone. angie's list helped me find a highly rated service provider to do the work at a fair price. ♪ everyone can shop, but members get more with reviews, live customer s

he grabbed the hearts and minds of the american public that went down through the laundry list of thes in the room. he said the economy will stay on a steady course, growth will be at a medium to high rate. the service sector, he says, has enormous potential. calledck market concerned, he said it is the duty of the government to make sure panic is contained. on the devaluation, he said their efforts have achieved initial success, no basis for continued depreciation. he is against any sort of competitive devaluation or currency war. he won't lower its to boost exports. a greater will play role in the allocation of resources, it will open up a basic state policy. and, the most contentious issue he will have to deal with, allegations of cyber theft. he says he is a strong advocate of preventing cyberspace crime. crimes must be punished in accordance with international treaty. this is what the president had to say about potential cooperation. the international community should, on the basis of mutual respect, work together to build a secure, open, and cooperative cyberspace. china is read

it will not be blocked, but the president is not winning over the american public. ording to a new cn cnn/orc poll. 59% of americans say they disapprove of the way the president is handling the relationship with iran. i'm joined now from washington. you know, many voters in this poll, they simply don't trust iran to hold up its end of the deal and they're wondering why the president trusts iran so much? >> that's absolutely right, john. there's deep pessimism in these poll numbers just released today by cnn/orc, showing a lot of skepticism from the american public that iran will indeed up hold its end of the bargain. i want to show you the latest numbers just released. 60% of americans, according to this poll, believe iran will indeed violate the terms of the nuclear agreement. that's compared to 40% who say no. but even more interesting in this poll is what americans say they believe the united states should do if iran violates the terms. 64%, over a broad majority of people, believe the u.s. should respond with military action. but john, as you point out, this is a

president obama and the vast majority of the american public do acknowledge it's real and that's why e president has put forward a common sense but effective strategy for dealing with it in a way that's good for our economy. >> josh earnest from alaska, looks gorgeous there. thanks for joining us. >> thank you, chris. >> some late breaking news in the brewing mckinley gate scandal. president obama wants to change the name of mt. mckinley to denali after more than 100 years. a great insult to ohio. i will change back, exclamation point, make mckinley great again. >>> is the schedule rigged to give hillary clinton the edge? who is openly and unabashedly criticizing the leadership coming up. well, just put on a breathe right strip which instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than cold medicine alone. shut your mouth and say goodnight mouthbreathers. breathe right verizon now has one simple plan. just pick a size. small, medium, large and extra large. if you need less data, pick small. if you need more, go with extra large-- a whopping 12 gigs for $80 a month plus $20 per phone. pick a

the bipartisan majority of congress and the american public have concluded it will not improve our safety, our security or our stability. the partisan minority in congress who support the deal acknowledge its shortcomings, and the litany of flaws raised throughout this debate should invoke serious concerns about our entering into this agreement with iran. the tens of billions of dollars that iran will receive once the sanctions are lifted will only increase its ability to sponsor the syrian regime, support hezbollah and threaten our allies. the president has said that sanctions will go back into effect if iran violates this agreement, but let's be clear, reversing course will be next to impossible. when i visited the middle east this spring, i heard firsthand from world leaders and our troops on the ground about the dangers posed by a nuclear iran. iran is the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism. this is the same regime that is currently holding four americans prisoner. its supreme leader said last week that he believes israel will no longer exist within 25 years. the regime has al

trump all of them want to stick it to wall street in some of their tax plans and want to show the american public're going to stand up to wall street. do you understand why they're running against you? >> yeah. we had a crisis, a lot of people got hurt and the average american looks at what happened and they kind of blame wall street which is generally true, a lot of us were part of that problem and washington. and i would tell the american public it wasn't all banks. not all banks failed. a lot of these banks, what we did, we were so steadfast we lent money to everybody at the same price when the market wouldn't. so they couldn't get it here, they got it from us including illinois, california, new jersey, cities, school, states, hospitals, companies, you name it. so we were there in the bad times and all the -- but banks did bad things and people generically blame them. so we've -- i think it's a good sign when people admit they made a mistake -- which we have, we're part of making mistakes. >> you were a big supporter of the clintons over the years, in 2007 and 2008. will she make a good presid

i wish it got more but that they are making the case to the american public what they're going to do y become president. that's not what the republican side of the aisle is doing. they're sucking up all the oxygen. that's the media landscape we've got. and so we're seeing lopsided coverage. there's no way we're going to compete with what donald trump is doing on a daily basis. >> here is one of the ironies, the paradoxes of this race. the more competitive the democratic race is, in some ways it's worse for hillary clinton because it's more competitive but in a way the coverage is better because to the extent that it's not competitive and she's treated as the nominee already or already treated as two years into her first term, that coverage is back. and so in a weird way, i actually think it's in her interest. we will give you an update on that scoring card soon. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. >> thank you, chris, my friend. thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. happy monday. there's lots of news going on today including a lot of stuff that has been breaking late

important and so we try every day to ensure that we're building trust and maintaining trust with the american public because we have to, and that's what the rule of law is based on -- trusting the folks who are carrying out investigations, prosecutions and the like. it is an important value to us and something we strive every day to earn the trust of the american people. >> any other questions? yes? >> hi, russell, a law student. my question is to the government official. the issue is about conflict of law and the situation where some tech companies may find themselves when they have to comply with a foreign law to hand over data, but that would bring them into conflict with u.s. laws that basically would make them liable for breaking u.s. laws. how do you do this where tech companies are doing business globally and have to comply with multiple standards and laws? how does the doj address this iss issue, or what are your views? >> it's a really good question, and it's a question companies are facing more and more every day. i guess the point i would make generally on that issue is that's much broade

and the final linchpin, the american public. they have socialized risk. american public is holding the bag. >> is that what the fed has done? >> it is it a combination of factors. it is what the fed and regulators haven't done and wall street encouraged them not to do. >> too big to fail exists at that point. >> charlie, you are sounding like bernie sanders and i never thought i would say. that here's what bernie. >> don't get carried away. >> and here's what bernie said. it is time to break up the banks and the casinno gambling diverted all income. >> bernie sander ares wants to socialize the banks. and i would say this, banks should be smaller and what is a free market way to do that. government insurance. if you will want to be risk taking and customer deposits, we'll not insure your deposits and when you do that, banks will break up and be smaller and manageable. and they will break up. bernie sander ares wants the federal government go in there and basically own the banks. >> thanks for the clarification. >> and a lot of free market. it is antifree ma

that can use a powerful tool, the most powerful tool is the pulpit, the ability to speak to the american public and cast a vision for what society should be and this president has used a lot of his ammunition and he will, to cast a vision for the greatest problem that concerns america today, climate change. you can be for or against what the president wants to do, but i would make the argument that a power to who use his cast that vision, to cast a vision on how we can help could bestruggling and of theinto lives because decisions that parents made, into lies that will lead them -- lives that will lead them to jail or a nonproductive career because they are not getting the support they need to get education they need. i think if we focus more on what is a real situation of what seems to be generational poverty and chronic abuse of drugs and things like that, that is a bigger problem and that is something that is here and now and we can do something about it. there are lots of examples and i , it takes a called family, and they read about how communities can come together, not government, but co

understanding what is happening around the world, couldn't have been more in tune with where the american public is today. poll after poll shows the american public is deeply disquieted with the way in which the united states is viewed around the world, with our position as vis-a-vis other powers, including russia and china, and our allies, and are also worried about the increasing instability, increasing violence around the world, particularly with the rise of the radical terrorist organization isis, and a lot of people are thinking that when we elected barack obama in 2008, this is not where we were supposed to be. this is a position, by the way, which the obama administration has come to as well. today's paper, online -- "wall street journal," big front, page article why obama just doesn't seem to be getting a break. here he was, came into office hoping to promote more stability and peace around the world, wanting to built a new relationship with iran as a partner in the middle east, wanting to deal with climb change, wantings to restore normalizees relations with cuba and also to diem fa sit

it seems in recent poor numbers that the american public as well as the american usual public tend to be leaning towards support of this agreement. there really is at this point no better option. >> kimberly, in washington, thank you. and still to come on this news hour we'll have the latest on a deadly sandstorm moving across the middle east. the jordanian hospital that is providing reconstructive surgery to the victims of war. >>> and the martial arts from myanmar, which is fighting for international recognition. >> i've been asked to keep my voice down cause we are so close to the isil position >> who is in charge, and are they going to be held to accout? >> but know we're following the research team into the fire >> they're learning how to practice democracy... >> ...just seen tear gas being thrown... >> ...glad sombody care about us man... >> several human workers were kidnapped... >> this is what's left of the hospital >> is a crime that's under reported... >> what do you think... >> we're making history right now... >> al jazeera america >> we're here to fully get into the nuan

i think the american public needs to understand and i think they mostly do, and best thing in a greatn company is not the same as wall street. >> from trurchl's perspective, this is old news. we beat that already. this is not the most important thing. >> not the hedge fund. >>. >> we went after that. >> that's -- >> there's an issue here that never gets discussed. hedge funds don't exist primarily for millionaires. yes, there are a lot of millionaires. they work for college endowments is for hospital endowments, for pension funds. they make this money to allow people to retire and to get education, to get -- they're not a bunch of pirates and maniacs just stealing from the poor. >> some are. >> their job is to help charitable organizations. he. >> all right. i want to thank them. they still can't beat a september to remember for making money. after this. >>> stocks, it's a good september to remember. charles -- >> talk about great. >> increased consumer spending. >> stick with them in the long run. you'll be a happy guy or gal. >> charles, you like this? >> i like -- you shaky now? >>

party about establishment coniest politicians and i think this is sort of the frustration that the american publicls and also the reckoning within the republican. charles: what's i think we see somehow it manifests itself at the ballot box and we have to tell the american what you exactly is going on. by the way, once both at the largest market cap of any stock in the world when herniated the company. this guy has been a bad ceo in my mind anyway. jack welsh made this money into the greatest company in the world and, you know, he's going around trying to make favors. >> well, this is the irony too is that democratic about wall street and evil banking men when it's the democratic party that is most in bed with this kind of crony capitalism, this kind of money shared with corporations who then share in the governing of this country for their own benefit. and it's the same people who are doing this who are screaming about, you know, the banks or hedge fund people or wall street. it's the height of irony. >> all while sticking their hands out for more. >> exactly. >> . charles: these guys are huge, th

military expert, but i wouldn't say it's over 1,000. >> david corn, there doesn't -- i don't think the american publicing to have any confidence in any plan announced here since there's nothing in the american record in these kinds of interventions to build confidence. >> i think you're right. i think to the public it seem answer intractable problem. they just want someone to make it go away. they don't want to think about these things. i think the political challenge is that whatever obama would impose now, if it's what will said, will be attacked by someone for not being enough without anyone coming forward with a better alternative. and it's probably going to take years to have an impact. >> up next, a conservative new hampshire newspaper now wants joe biden to run for president. ♪jake reese, "day to feel alive"♪ ♪jake reese, "day to feel alive"♪ when you're not confident your company's data is secure, the possibility of a breach can quickly become the only thing you think about. that's where at&t can help. at at&t we monitor our network traffic so we can see things others can't. mitigating risks a

. >> what changes now, is the american public watching the 15 crusade around the country ready to payhat incremental higher cost if they think workers they do business with every day is treated tore paid better? >> there's a deeper issue here. it's not just the price of the burger. first off, fast food industry is growing faster, despite the fact we've had minimum wage increases affecting that industry. that industry has been adding jobs at one of the fastest rates every month, it continues to grow. it's not so simple that raising wages automatically leads to pricing increases. >> i'm going to have to leave it there. peter, professor of business. william, professor of economics at howard university. great to have you both. i'll be back with a final thought on life in the work place and pendulum swings. stay with us, it's "inside story". advancing toward the crowd here. >> ferguson: city under siege. >> it isn't easy to talk openly on this base. >> and america's war workers. >> it's human trafficking. >> watch these and other episodes online now at aljazeera.com/faultlines. >>> in busi

the united states has said and has actually emphasized that they hope that this visit would be a milestone, putting our relationship firmly on a positive trajectory. betty: americans and the american public still have a mistrust of the chinese. a pew center poll recently said 54% of americans view china unfavorably, so how does the president plan to change that perception? mr. yang: the results of opinion polls change from time to time and from place to place. my understanding of american society is there is a deep awareness of the importance of nurturing a better relationship between our two countries, so i believe that the american people attach a great deal of importance to the visit. of course, we have had some early harvest of this new model of the relationship between us. for instance, the trade between the two countries has grown quite a bit, and there are more student exchanges between us, and on the international scene, there has been good coordination between china and the united states, from the middle east to some parts of africa, from afghanistan to the korean peninsula, so a better relationship is in the interest of both of our peoples and the world. of course, a relationsh

the american public is willing to give business the benefit of the doubt until you have a gigantic blatant crisis. >> start going recreational swimming and they encounter something and then it will be on the front pages and there will be some pressure to act. john, i'm glad you did this issue. maybe it will start waking up the public as to what is going on out there. in a perfect world -- >> a lot of members of the public that are not too aggressively friendly to epa and their position what's the case against the epa taking jurisdiction and the answer is it's an incremental step of management from hog waste lag goons to micromanagement of farm and businesses in america that borders a waterway or watershed. >> what are they going to do about the lagoons? >> with china's economy in trouble will their appetite for imported pork shrink? >> i used to live in china and they eat a lot of pork, not bacon. bacon is not known in china. i lived in china a decade ago of pork. >> were you with the magazine? >> the daily telegraph. >> which do you prefer? >> i prefer who i work for now, i can honestly s

bust nr reverse, read every single item, demand every single thing in this document, make sure the american public know what a bad deal it is and it's being passed over their objections and the objections of both houses of congress. at this point in time i want to see them tattoo this thing across this presidents and john kerry. this is a bad deal and in the next ten years -- >> do they have the guts and leadership? >> they better. you've done your part and you certainly have done your part. this is a bad deal and we will live to regret it and our allies in the middle east will live to regret it. >> rich, your thoughts? >> i would be on board for all of that. very unlikely to happen. what happened here was impossible stuff once they reversed the usual standard for the standard approving treaties, you usually need two-thirds to approve it, in this case you needed two-thirds to disapprove it. >> and let's be clear, the leadership knew what they were doing. they put themselves in this position. this was a -- this is a scam on the american people by the republican party. >> well, the problem they had

we're also increasingly reaching out to the american public. as our transparency principle two says, we need to be proactive and clear with transparency. because we're trying to help the public understand what we do in their name. it's why we've declassified and published so many significant documents. the tumblr site has a review. that's a big reason why this spring we sent our national intelligence counsel to the south by southwest festival to engage the diverse group of people there and get them to help us identify themes to include in our next global trends report. it's also why this summer we published a huge tranche of documents we'd collected during a raid, probably later than we should, but we got to it. by the way, our publication of bin laden's book shelf gave us about as much web traffic in just two days, 750,000 site visits, and two million page views, as our website received in all of 2013 and 2014 put together. and if you ran a google search for bin laden, di.gov was the number two search behind only wikipedia. tomorrow i'll be on

remember, the american public by a measure of better than 2 to 1 are against this agreement right nowlet's get it to 3 to 1 and make them feel the heat on this. >> with all of the opposition to this agreement throughout the country, that opposition is failing to gain any traction. why do you think that is? tell us how this vote plays out and what this looks like come september 16th. >> i think that the reason that there is such difficulty is because the way in which the administration is personally working the phones here, especially on the senate side, and i think that what people are ignoring is the fact -- is that people are saying, well, iran is going to change. iran has not changed after this agreement. the ayatollah already gave a speech the other day in which he said we are not going to change our adversarial position with the united states nor with respect to israel, nor yemen, nor syria, nor iraq. in other words, they are going to continue their aggression. the other element of this that people are not focusing on is this $100 billion that is going to go out of escrow and bac

those arguments are not completely resonating with the american public. ll numbers show that half are listening to the arguments of the white house. this may not be the perfect agreement but many americans see this as the best option. >> thank you. in the u.s. baltimore officials have reached a tentative $6.4 million wrongful death settlement with the family of freddie gray. the african-american died in april from a neck injury suffered in police custody. the death led to days of protest and rioting. the settlement is still pending approval. >> chinese experts and incidental ports contracted in august. it's hitting the country's spending power. now there are people in hong kong who are feeling the effects of that weakness in china's economy. ron mcbride has this report. >> the photographers along hong kong's waterfront are a good barometer of how much visitors are spending. the news is not good. business is down more than half. >> we are facing a hard time. the mainland chinese are not spending as easily as they did before. >> at the airplane the arrival h