how does the american public react do that? onight, approve, 54% now with the president sending troops to syria. and if you take a look at the breakdown in parties, democrats, republicans, and it lines up. pretty interestingly. democrats approving, 62% of the president's moves go to quinnipiac. do you think the united states and its allies are winning or losing the fight against isis? losing, is the big winner there. 66%. and who do you blame for the rise of isis? going to war, which do you blame, going to war or removing troops. there you see the breakdown. judge, anything surprising there? >> yes, i'm surprised at the large number of people that approve. i'm surprised at the large number of people that agree with some of the donald trump's more controversial statements, which is that it was the misguided wars in afghanistan and iraq that gave us rise to isis. a lot of people believe that. but i'm surprised that the american public number is so large. i think that the president's drip-drip-drip. 50 troops is going to do nothing

to be the eyes and ears, because obviously the police can't be everywhere, and they do want the american publicat least be vigilant and be on guard, but continue with their plans over the holiday. >> and the latest polls seem to indicate that americans are not only growing accustomed to the threat, but think that there may be something that may happen, but the president yesterday going out of his way to point out that things that have happened in the past have not stopped the american way of life, 9/11 did not stop the american way of life and several other loan wolf attacks. he said yes, they occupy the headlines today, but tomorrow we're talking about something else. is it a situation that you are seeing that americans are somehow adjusting to what we have been saying for years, that this may be the new normal, which is that the threat is always going to be there, but the realistic possibility of something happening is much lower than that talk? >> absolutely. obviously if there's intelligence chatter that they pick up, or information, then they will become more concerned, and they are monito

how does the american public react do that? st out tonight, approve, 54% now with the president sending troops to syria. and if you take a look at the breakdown in parties, democrats, republicans, and it lines up. pretty interestingly. democrats approving, 62% of the president's moves go to quinnipiac. do you think the united states and its allies are winning or losing the fight against isis? losing, is the big winner there. 66%. and who do you blame for the rise of isis? going to war, which do you blame, going to war or removing troops. there you see the breakdown. judge, anything surprising there? >> yes, i'm surprised at the large number of people that approve. i'm surprised at the large number of people that agree with some of the donald trump's more controversial statements, which is that it was the misguided wars in afghanistan and iraq that gave us rise to isis. a lot of people believe that. but i'm surprised that the american public number is so large. i think that the president's drip-drip-drip. 50 troops is going to do

the american working age americans without a job. they have stopped looking. they have given up. trade issues. there are a number of economic issues that matter to the american public that we will get into. i suspect the candidates will be about more forthcoming debut have seen them before. trish: one of the things that they have to do is show the american public that they can get something done. talking about lowering taxes to spur more growth. are they with the ones that can actually get us to that place? isn't that part of it. putting forth a candidate that they believe in. >> they can establish that trust in the belief in the candidate coming up tuesday night. it will be quite remarkable. as neil was talking about earlier, it is all about hope. it is all about trust. these folks right now, leading to 30% in the polls. this is a donnybrook. this the polls are starting to show some. no one is doing anything other than talking right now. we have to make a lot of consumptions about what they could do about the economy. two administrations and four congresses have not been able to do it. trish: we need leadership. i think americans are looking for that leader. who i

an exclusive interview with msnbc that we are at war with the group.gr >> how can you assure the american public that there is indeed a strategy and that the leadership role america is taking fully addresses the threat it t poses? >> we have to defeat isil. we will defeat isil. you see the barbarism associated with this. so, it is something that must be defeated. >> deso, you agree with the french president that we are f at war. >> i think francois has said it very well. the entire t interview at 6:00 a.m. on msnbc on "morning joe". >>> and ice hasisis released a picture which they say say is a soda can which ccontained explosives. nbc news has not verified the photo and we're learning more about yesterday's deadly raid on a apartment in france. >> good morning, the paris prosecutor announced at least two l suspected terrorists were killed in that massive early mornling raid on an apartment building in an area called saint-denis. they have not yet confirmed a report that the alleged ring leader of the attack, abdelhamid abaaoudbd was mungamong the dead. about f 5,000 rounds during the hour's lon

the president well later today make public his intent to sign the document and that will initiate the 60 day clock for the american public to consider text of the agreement. the president does intent to sign it after the 60 days are up. there would be a longer process for congressional review, 90 day or so opportunity for the public to consider it as well. it is rather complicated. kevin: you said earlier that it did not seem like such a good idea for congress to take a whole year to look this over. give me a timeline you think it would be -- you think would be appropriate. mr. earnest: it is up to congress. it does not fit my definition of fast, but it lays out a clear path for consideration and our expectation is congress will follow that path, as they should, careful consideration is necessary. we want people to take a look carefully at the details. there is no reason it should take a year to get that done. kevin: give me an assessment of the president's confidence level that this will ultimately happen. mr. earnest: we succeeded in building a bipartisan coalition over the summer to pass legislation that would

i think it's still news when the president deceives the american public. either he knew at the time that was b.s. and that's a lie, or he did know it was -- and that's naive. they talked about how it was not a strategic change and shift, so they seem to be spending all their strategic thinking on how to spin these conflicts, and knolls as much time explaining the real strategy and how they'll either keep us out of the syria, out of these conflicts or win them. >> begin by understanding there are no good four choices, there are four barely functioning states. now the president is being accused of, i think john mccain's phrase, grudging incrementalism. that's probably true, but what is the choice at this point? liz says a caliphate has been established and we have to take the ground back. i don't know what the antiseed cedent of that pronoun is. from saudi arabia, egypt -- they're perfectly capable of dos this with our assistance, whether 50 special forces controllers to make or air force and navy aviators just that much more effective, whether that will have

americans. they did not know about the english and the turmoil and certainly for the larger american public, it heir exposure to this chapter of american history for the first time. anchor: his story taking him to broadway. plenty of analysis on our top story and what happened to the russian plane. that is on our website. do take a look. for myself and the team, thank you for watching. we would love to hear from you. from all of us here at world news america, have a great weekend. see you soon. >> make sense of international news at bbc.com/news. >> funding of this presentation is made possible by the freeman foundation, newman's own foundation, giving all profits from newman's own to charity and pursuing the common good, kovler foundation, pursuing solutions for america's neglected needs, and sony pictures classics now presenting "truth." >> what's our next move? rexam i have something for the election. >> the president may have gone awol. >> he never even showed up. >> parts of the file being tossed in the wastebasket. >> we have no information. >> we will start an investigation. >> this is ba

be a better country and a stronger congress if we had more people just explain the truth to the american public, even when they know that it might be a popular back home. do you think that the american public understands? you serve on the armed services committee -- do think they understand the needs of veterans? >> everybody supports veterans today, and i have tremendous respect for the vietnam generation, had to come back from a tragic war and phase even more tragedy at home. they were treated poorly just for their service. i feel lucky as a veteran of the iraq war but i have been treated well. but the problem is there is a line between the half of 1% who served in our war and the other 99.5% who barely even realize there is a war going on. it is not that americans don't want to care about veterans, but i do think we need to do a lot of work to restore the understanding between veterans and the rest of our country. likeat was that service daviddavid transfer -- patreus during the surge >>? he is a fantastic academic. >> he is a fantastic academic. he can talk about the politics and policies.

feeling,this inflame upset the american public? ?ouldn't this open old wounds we don't see an enemy. the focus is on the individual soldiers and their inner psychology. they're rushing toward the center supporting grant. the monument, as a whole, consummates a team effort. themonument, placed in center of union square, facing lincoln across the mall, was meant to convey the idea of unification after the civil war -- wouldn't these graphic images of men in battle open old wounds? how was the american public ready to accept this? in searching for a better understanding of the grand memorial, i read a dissertation written in 1987. he makes a convincing argument that in many ways the grand memorial was more about what was happening in america than actually about the civil war. it was important to show that had this -- war preparedness this was an important concept. in a fascinating book, "monument wars: washington, d.c. and the transformation of the landscape" reinforces the idea that monuments are more about the president then the event

what can you tell the american public this morning about any specific threats out there and how concerned are you? >> chuck, let me reiterate what the fbi director and i have said before. we have no specific credible intelligence about a threat of the paris type directed at the homeland here. we are always concerned about potential copycat acts, home born, homegrown, violent extremism of the type that we've seen in recent months and years, and so the exercise today is reflective of where we think we need to be and so this is also something supported by the department of homeland security through our grant making activity and so we want the american public to know that we're on the job, we're vigilant, and we're continually re-evaluating our security posture. >> mr. secretary, what can you tell me about brussels? the fact that the threat was so imminent that they shut down the subway system, the u.s. embassy said shelter in place. i assume there's been some intelligence sharing here. how serious is that brussels threat and how concerning is that that it's somehow related to something that

i think it's still news when the president deceives the american public. he did say there would be no ground troops. either he knew at the time that was b.s. and that's a lie, or he didn't know that it was b.s. and that's naive. they talked about how it was not a strategic change. it was a shift. but those are synonyms. so they seem to be spending all their strategic thinking on how to spin these conflicts, and not as much time explaining their real strategy and how we'll keep us out of syria, keep us out of these conflicts or win them. >> let's begun by understanding there are no good choices in a region in which there are now four barely functioning states. yemen, syria, libya and iraq. now the president is being accused of, i think john mccain's phrase, grudging incrementalism. that's probably true, but what is the choice at this point? liz says a caliphate has been established and we have to take the ground back. i don't know what the antecedent of that pronoun is. the conventional forces of our sometime allies in the middle east, from saudi arabia, jor

the department of health and human services owns the american public answers. republican or democrat our , constituents deserve nothing less than a full accounting of what has happened with this program. the co-op program was included in the aca to purportedly foster exchangesn in the new by federally funding the startup of 23 nonprofit health insurers. to get them off the ground, taxpayers loaned them to $2.4 billion. after less than two years, the program has a failure rate of over 50%. the first failure, headquartered in iowa but majority of subscribers in nebraska, was arguably the messiest because members of the program lost their health plan in the middle of a plan year. co-opportunity have bee awarded $145 billion of taxpayer loans. the new insurer had garnered about 10 times the number of enrollees and was seemingly successful. despite ample funding and obviously far more enrollees, on december 16, 2014 -- the iowa insurance commissioner place it under his supervision order. by january 23, the iowa insurance commissioner deemed it rehabilitation and poss

how was the american public ready to accept this? in searching for a better understanding of the grand memorial, i read a dissertation written in 1987. he makes a convincing argument that in many ways the grand memorial was more about what was happening in america than actually about the civil war. it was important to show that america had this -- war preparedness this was an important concept. in a fascinating book, "monument wars: washington, d.c. and the transformation of the landscape" reinforces the idea that monuments are more about the president then the event a are commemorating. he writes, at the beginning of the 20th century, taste increasingly commanded monuments of the civil war contain figures that are recognizably american, in facial and physical appearance, but true to the american spirit. that spirit was one inviting strength and a willingness to sacrifice one's life in service to the nation. when you look at this monument and explore it visually, you realize it is so much about the individual experiencing pain, suffer

they've got to start reminding the american public what their programs have metropolitan. when kids in kentucky are hungry, we're going to feed them. the governor-elect wants to give up health care for 100,000 kids, with eoar not going to let that happen. that's not a family value. yet democrats aren't saying it and they wonder why they lose races. >> kay bailey hutchinson, you mention there's a frustration on both sides of the aisle of. if you look at the poll numbers on this, 69% of americans agree with the following statement, i feel angry because the political system seems to be only working for the insiders with money and power. there is bipartisan agreement. and anger seems to be an incredibly animating, motivating factor in this election. do you think democrats have harnessed that sense of frustration. >> i think the democrats have been losing not only in these off election years, but remember in 2014, republicans took over the senate. and so now they control congress, but they don't have the veto pen. the president certainly has done a lot with his power, of course.

part of obama care out because it is a lot that has no cash and put it with what works with the american public with the federal government overreach on health care. we need to take a break but when we come back we received a lot of questions and concerns, and people feel they have not received the care they need provided through the government. talking veterans and mentally ill. rick santorum >> welcome back to the iowa forums. mary from cornell and mother of know what your plan would be, less guns and deal with the real problem. senator rick santorum live from cedar rapids and obviously a lot of folks concerned about the treatment and care of the mentally ill. how do you address their question? a very complex issue. we have a child with intellectual disabilities. i'm somewhat familiar but that world. can take it into two parts my first, the area is growing, area of addiction drug and alcohol addiction, some serious problems. and most programs don't work as well, the nih can really help, and we have to start developing better treatment and more effective treatment for people who have these typ

the president had no news to share with the american public. mark: to reassure people during a holiday time when a lot of people are traveling, they are talking about things to reassure the american public and to try again to sell a point that he is frustrated is not getting through, that he has built a broad coalition of countries around the world who will fight isis and that there is a plan to deal with them. and finally, an ongoing effort to hit the right tone. parking area. he is trying to have another do over on that from the immediate aftermath. some people close to him felt erik: it wasn't quite right. say was word he did not more. he talked about stepping up coordination. that is not actually dropping more bonds. i think people assume the airstrikes will increase and still, the ball is very much in support of the french and the british to say, what do they want to do? tois still an opportunity have better coordination. it is not just a matter of pr and that he doesn't want to admit or technology change in policy. he believes negotiations

now the american public demands that? ne is the encryption we know that the terror cells can communicate with impunity and complete anonymity. they know who they're talking to. that is one of the things we tried to work with private companies as well it is very frustrating we cannot do that at this point. the other is the waiver program we send a letter to the president yesterday to say we need to tighten restrictions event understand this could endanger citizens. charles: thank you very much. we hope you come back soon with good news. >> it is a dangerous world i look forward to that. >> with self radicalization is a lot we want to defend ourselves somehow they are winning the recruiting war we will find out why. no matter how the markets change... at t. rowe price... our disciplined approach remains. global markets may be uncertain... but you can feel confident in our investment experience around the world. call us or your advisor... t. rowe price. invest with confidence. is it keeps the food out. for me before those lit

there is a much better way to ensure the safety and security of the american public. to continue to operate the facility. so congress will receive something that is thoughtful and carefully considered from the administration about what we propose to do and it remains to be seen whether or not congress will thoughtfully and carefully consider it. >> i want to put out the appropriations process specifically whether delaying the fiduciary role or changes to .-dot frank rise to the planned parenthood level of vetoing a bill. >> we have tried to be as clear as we can about how this process should play out. and our view is that the appropriations process should not be bogged down and controversial, divisive, ideologically driven writers that is exactly what the proposed planned parenthood writer would do. any effort to defund planned parenthood is because of concerns that people may have about abortion are ideologically driven primarily because we know that planned parenthood does not use federal dollars to perform abortions. it is a law that has been on the books for quite

the things the american public was willing to put aside, that changed this weekend. the individual candidates, lindsey graham to send thousands of troops to iraq and syria. donald trump would likely close mosques if elected. arrorism is not suspected in break-in at an army reserve center in massachusetts. the fbi is not sure when the burglary occurred, but several weapons are missing. to the weather now, people are cleaning up after a rare twister touched down in california. it left a path of destruction. roofing and walls were torn from homes, trees and power lines toppled. it is part of a strong storm system moving through the area. expectedditions are throughout the day. time for a check of our local forecast with doug hill. beautiful weather here. out west is where the active weather is. here, enjoy the sunshine. it will change. beach, maryland, looking at the resort on the bay. 63 degrees. a light breeze out of the southeast. across the region, it will be spectacular. clear skies. clouds will be coming. eventually, some rain. wednesday, thursday, a good bet is th

so i'd love it if ab in bev, sab miller were to embrace craft brewing and give the american public and global public the kind of beers that we see coming from blue jacket. i can't get blue jacket where i am in new york. i can get a lot of other good beers, i can't get blue jacket. i'd love it if the innovative distribution systems that these brewers have developed would act to the benefit of craft brewing. i don't know if that's going to happen. i do know that if the merger goes through it will let the merged entity control over what that industry looks like. >> greg do you think there's any reason to believe that these big brewers can learn some things from the beers that are becoming more popular? that a bud arguably might be a better beer in three years or five years because it's played by the same brewer as stella and they might trade secrets and tip and techniques? >> these brewers are incredible breweries, they are the finest breweries in the world. the sab miller brewers the 12 different ab in bev breweries in the united states there's not much they don't know. so it's not as if

information such as this, on such a profound scale, should definitely be in the custody of the american public. this will inform us, this will help us. there is no reason why this information should not be made public. sharyl: we contacted the white what they offered was a statement from a year ago saying they requested that the office of the director of national intelligence review the 28 pages for declassification. that office, they say, is currently coordinating the interagency review and it is ongoing. ahead, one person, one vote. that is the american way. but we found is a little unsettling. sharyl: you may not notice, but the campaigns are in full swing. it just less than a year, americans go to the polls to elect a new president. the online chicago is vote early, vote often -- the old line in chicago is vote early, vote often. >> like many americans, every november, i vote. i take it seriously. but last year, after moving to virginia, i learned our voting system has some serious flaws. >> a registered by valid -- registered my ballot, got my signature. two hours later, i was at my old p

approach, but i would take issue with one i'm not prepared to say he was actually lying to the american public irnts wasn't he told by a lot of people. >> there was a difference the opinions. this is a prelude to a negotiation. a negotiation will determined by facts on the ground. facts on the ground in that part of the world are increasingly determined by boots on the ground, s s the previoio strategy wawa to try to support some moderate alternative. that was an unmitigated disaster. what our intelligence servrces are doing is more effective, but not enough, so we're now tries to support the kurds, who are effective on the ground. so all this will play itself out and eventually there will be more stability and we can have a negotiaiaon, but it's a very complex place, it's a mess, and for anyone to imply there's an easy, simple solution, i think that would be somewhat naive. >> a prelude to negotiations, negotiations are under wayright no timetable for assad to leave. how do you think these negotiations will end up? >> i think they probably are onn a track bakleyey to end up in a place that is

i am not tied to a dog in the fight but i would tell the american public if we don't do this now it may be very difficult we should find the answer and i am willing to compromise where it needs to me. >> the number that secretary will say he has fired 2200 but about half of those were probationary people they did not workout's why don't count those although technically they qualify. absolutely times are changing the american public wants accountability from us as members of congress. you can hear that right now people are angry because they don't think there federal government is serving them well and is taking advantage of them. they want people who want to do the right thing and work but those who want to work can go do something somewhere else there are people willing to come into ruth the v.a. to work. yes. >> bank's breuer excellent questions. [applause] >> you can do anything you want to. if you get paid after due the first lady is supposed to do. but you can do anything that you want. is such a great opportunity solidifies the first lady to do what she wants to do she will be cri

what we see from experienced folks in government is that what they are doing is not serving the american public well. it's hard to make the argument that the policies that president obama ex-parliament housed led to greater general prosperity. argument. >> it's policy. >> should the person who takes the top job. do you want that to go to someone with no experience, being a public servant. >> we had a pop singer in congress, and that sit significant was beaten. the legislature is different to an ampure president. >> americans are sick and tired of what happened. was there an art? >> the problem for what is happening is not because the folks who are there had experience in government. there are systematic structural problems with washington. there are problems around campaign finance. we need to have conversations about public financing, matching grants. outcome. >> can we change that system. outside. >> someone from outside. you can't run a campaign, with the possible exception of donald trump. endorsement. >> let's talk about what fixes the structure and the system. and not pretend that someone

betty: the american public still have a mistrust of the chinese. a pew center poll recently said 54% of americans view china unfavorably. how does the president plan to change that perception? >> poll results very from time to time and from place to place. my understanding of american society is that there is a deep awareness of the importance of nurturing better relationship between our two countries. so i believe that the american people attach a great deal of importance to the visit. we have had some early harvest of this new model of the relationship between us. for instance, the trade between the two countries has grown quite a bit, and there are more student exchanges between us. and on the international scene, there has been good coordination between china and the united states, from the middle east to some parts of africa. from afghanistan to the korean peninsula. so a better relationship is in the interest of both of our peoples and the world. of course, a relationship cannot be free from any problems. even people sometimes do not see thing