the american public has been duped into believing that no violence offenders get released it is the same tactic over and over again the majority of people are getting out 90 percent get out we have a conscious choice when they return to our society we have to start warehousing people expecting people to come now does help the individuals it doesn't matter if you go when his non-violent but you will have to resort to violence at some point to survive the experience so they have used that language for so long that to me it is no longer even relevant i think we just need to be honest about what is happening we are coming home and we are getting out that no matter what you have been convicted of that when you get out you can get out in the healthiest way possible so might challenge os/2 politicians to be honest with the american public but this is what makes the book so important because you get the insider's look of how we can fix it of what really works and how to produce better outcomes so the idea of nonviolent curses while defenders is nonsense. >> you are an inspiration after reading t

what a senior white how official is saying about how they use the media to get the american public behind the plan. what we now know and what it says about the obama administration and maybe some of his friendly reporters. i'm terrible at golf.

did he give iraq back, but then when he finds there's a problem in syria a, it's hard to get the american public behind him when he says, okay, well, let's see, let's start over again in syria. after we lost 4,000 guys and ten times that with injuries, severe injury, so, the problem that he has is this war has to be fought in the middle east. and you know, whether it's securing again iraq or going into syria, it's going to cost american lives again and his job, if he wanted to do his job, would be get the american public behind that and they are not behind it right now. >> can you see the american public getting behind another large scale troop operation? >> if there was an attack. >> if the president described why we need to be over there, this is what the other mistake that president obama has made in this gradualistic approach. he hasn't explained why he's sending troops. at least ash carter has the decency to call this a combat death, which is what it was. we've seated the middle east to iran, whether it's iraq, lebanon, syria, and the next president is going to have to deal with this and it

i'm a little shell shocked we're now on the verge of the american public choosing the two most unpopular politicians in america to be the standard bearers for the two major parties. this is uncharted territory. we have never been in a situation like this. donald trump is a unique candidacy without giving you the description i just gave you about the two nominees. without donald trump, hillary

plap billions are spent to confuse and, dare i say it, flummox the american public. "save 16% on car insurance." "switch now..." well at compare.com, we say enough's enough. so we constantly scrutinize millions of rates... answering the question once and for all, who has the lowest. just go to compare.com and get up to 50 free quotes. choose the lowest, and hit purchase. so you can get back to whatever it is you civilians do when you're not thinking about car insurance. compare.com plap. >>> bernie sanders clobbered hillary clinton in west virginia primary winning that state 51-35. 35%. even before the polls closed anticipating defeat, clinton's campaign manager, robby mook sent out an e-mail. it reassured them there's nothing that could stop hillary clinton tr winning t ifrom winn nomination. even if senator sanders wins each of the remaining nine states by 30 points, hillary clinton will still earn majority of pledge delegates and popular vote. end quote. mark, we have said, that clinton can fight a two front war. did west virginia change the reality of what a possi

deal with secret information, showing it could get the information, distill it and describe it to the public and bringing to the attention of the american public the importance of the issues that we'd focused on, i think was a very, very great accomplishment. and i do know that never since then has there been anything like it either in this country or anywhere else. >> let me break down the impact into several big areas and have you both taught ilk about it. let's start on the congress itself and its over sight responsibilities for intelligence. what happened as a result of the church committee's work? >> perhaps the two most significant things is they set up a permanent intelligence committee. prior to the church committee over sight was the bailiwick of some of the senate lions, the chairman of the armed services committee, the majority laeader and minority leader. there were eight senators who were talked to and that constituted the over sight. after that there was now a permanent intelligence committee and it was going to have to wrestle with all of the issues that frits was just talking about, getting information, keeping it secret

reporting to bend to the whims of policymakers making questionable judgments on issues important to the american public. judgments often made far from the battlefields. in earlier significant american wars, the government, with official censorship, took upon itself the burden of deciding what news was fit to print. what information gathered by reporters in the field might harm the security of military operations or what might not. in terms ofessage achieving the overall objectives and keeping the support of the public at large. but not for the war in vietnam. an enterprise deemed too -- let mepolitically say that again. an enterprise deemed too sensitive to justify censorship. so from the beginning, as early as june 1962 when i arrived in saigon, assigned to the ap bureau, the beginning of the credibility gap waiting media and military relations that only worsened as the years went by. in the course of our discussion this afternoon i know we will track this evolved situation that continues to plague american media relations. these initiale remarks by quoting a letter sent to president kennedy on june 1

could deal with secretive information, it could get the information, distillate, describe it to the public, and bring it to the attention of the american public, the importance of the issues we focused on, i think, was a very, very great accomplishment, and i do know that never since then has there ever been anything like it in this country or anywhere else. host: let me break down several areas. let's pick up on the themes. let me go to the congress responsibility for oversight. what happened with the church committee's work? mr. maxwell: they set up an oversight committee. prior to the church committee, some of thet was senate lions -- the chair of the armed senate committee -- there were eight senators you talked to and that constituted the oversight. after that, there was now a permanent intelligence committee and it would have to wrestle with all of the issues that he was just talking about. keeping it secret and trying to decide how much to disclose. and there was a requirement that covert action be notified to the intelligence committee, and there is one other piece that for me was particularly interesting. i had written a paper

the american public has the opportunity to go and look at a 92 page financial disclosure he filed with the sec. most in the american public know what's in the tax return, he is wealthy. you can look it up. 92 page federal election commission disclosure. >> there's a lot not disclosed. >> that's been a red herring. >> that's not audited, it is unverified. he can put what he wants in that disclosure form. that's very different than a tax return. this is interesting. not only did he say that he would get it together, he said i'll release them when hillary clinton releases transcripts for goldman, sachs speeches. then it was i'm under audit. the story changsd many times. if he has been under audit goes back several years, he knew that. he didn't find out he was under audit three months ago, he was well aware of that. it is just donald trump changing his story. why doesn't he want to release tax returns. what's the problem. there could be a treasure trove of information there that could be damaging. let's not forget when he sued a "the new york times" reporter that questioned his net worth,

and today, the expectation is that these interactions will be so safe and reliable that the public really doesn't have to think about the risk that's involved. they, the american public, and you should associate this safe level of transportation with a job that we do every single day at phmsa. phmsa is a relatively new and unique agency, established in 2004 by the mineta act, the creation of phmsa brought the regulation of the movement of hazardous materials by all modes, including pipeline, under one domain. today, we house these two different programs, and yet interconnected safety programs all under one roof. our office of pipeline safety regulates the designs, construction, operation, and inspection of pipelines that transport oil and natural gas across the country. it's also what powers our homes, cars, and the economy. the office of hazardous materials regulates the transport, packaging, and labeling of all hazardous materials. and provides training to emergency responders who deal with transportation incidents involving hazmat. there are over 2.6 million miles of pipeline in the united states. this is enough pipe to circle the globe 104 times. phmsa set

whether or not these costs and benefits are true, most of the american public believe this narrative. 70 percent think that immigration is a burden to us society. is a public opinion polls taken of mostly white americans. 62 percent think they add to the crime problem. 59 percent think immigrants take jobs away from nativeborn americans. finally, the two political parties have distinct positions on immigration. republicans have a much more restrictive position on immigration. whereas, democrats either are agnostic on immigration or tend to support a more inclusive or progressive form on immigration reform and policymaking. so in summary, we make the following argument in the book: whites see the uss changing racially and ethnically. many believe immigration is driving negative changes. and so for many, this is a powerful motivation to defect to the republican party. of course, we have seen this partisanship before. we only need go back to the 1960s to see how whites essentially defected from -- defected to the republican party in support of civil rights in the 1960s. we also seeing im

he doesn't want to explain how he told congress and the american public one version of events and "new york times" another version of events diametrically opposed. the second reason he was a no-show because he was invited to attend. who in their right mind would accept that invitation when you don't want to go? deirdre: i feel like invited means, you better show, just like polite, you better show up. >> if the republicans hat courage of their convictions and they have some very good points to make here and political points to score they wouldn't invite him, they would subpoena him which has force of law which would force him to attend. he can invoke the fifth amendment if he wants but he will be there. in my view he has no fifth amendment to invoke. he has no right to remain silent and he has no executive privilege to claim because he waived all of this when he spilled the beans to the "new york times"! deirdre: when you to on record, right with the "new york times" or any publication you waive your right to executive privilege, right? >> okay. executive privilege is the right of presi

the american public right now, as we look at our polling, particularly on the republican side, is veryrned about terror. you have a candidate who is very popular on the republican side who talks about how we've been soft to our enemies, and i think this was a political vote that the white house just, you know, knew that it was going to lose. >> back to primary day coverage. kayleigh, you are graduating from harvard law school within days and you have talked to professor jack ol ddsmouth. what is the argument? >> i haven't spoke to him on this matter i did take his course and studied what he thinks about it, they thinks it violates international law. there's a concept sovereign implunty where nation states are immune from prosecution. he's a conservative. worked for george w. bush. he points out the very real legal concerns that, when you set a press den you can sue saudi arabia, saudi arabia citizens can then sue the united states on several matters legality set on a collision course with morality. hard to look at victims ins a unanimous vote and say you cannot get remedies when you de

the allegation is that the administration told to the american public that it's advisable to do this deal now because there's a more moderate government in iran but i can attest directly that the obama administration in the person of then state department spokeswoman victoria nuland, of whom i am very fond, flat outside lied to me in 2013. i asked pointblank are there any direct talks going on between the u.s. and iran of any kind and she said no at a point when the talks had been ongoing for eight months. but here is the real point, bill. we need to distinguish, it seems to me, between lies about the timing or the origins of the nuclear deal and those lice that have been told about the substance of this deal, especially when congress was reviewing it, and here ben rhodes was central. he told cnn on camera in april of last year under this deal, you will have anywhere, anytime, 24/7 access to iran's nuclear facilities. well, that turned out to be fatalities and secretary of state kerry later testified that anywhere anytime as he put it was never part of the discussion we had with the i

and whether or not the actual costs and benefits are true, most of the american public believes in his narrative. 70% think that immigration is a burden to society, these are public opinion polls that are taken mostly of white americans. 62% think they add to the crime problem. 59% think that immigrants take away jobs from nativeborn americans. and, finally, along with a prevalent threat narrative, the two political parties have distinct positions on immigration. republicans have a much more restricted position on immigration, whereas the democrats that are agnostic on immigration portend to support a more inclusive or progressive form on immigration reform and policymaking. so in summary we make the following argument in the book, that white's said the u.s. as changing both racially and ethnically. many believed that immigration is driving negative changes, and that the republican party offers stronger opposition to immigration. and so for me this is a very powerful motivation to defect to the republican party. now, of course, we have seen this partisanship before in our past. we only

i don't want to see the american people voting for thele lesser two evils. >> does the american public want another option? one of the poll numbers about a third party candidate might surprise you. >>> british prime minister david cameron talks about donald trump. is he willing to meet with the presidential nominee before the election? >>> here's the best. >>> let's get right to politics and the new polls. while the washington post abc poll shows donald trump beating hillary clinton 46% to 44%, the nbc "wall street journal" poll shows clinton ahead of trump by three points, 46% to43%. both polls within the margin of error. never in the history of the nbc news "wall street journal" poll have the two major party nominees been viewed as poorly as clinton and trump. 54% of voters view clinton negatively, compared to 58% for trump. voters have a better impression of sanders, whose positive rating is 46%. ramping up his attack against debbie wasserman schultz. >> let me also say this. in all due respect to the current chairperson, if elected president she would not be reappointed to be chair

spoke to the lawyers and somebody who has better intoer pags than him, and that is fine, but the american public has a opportunity to go to look at the 92-page financial disclosure with the fcc and most of the american public know that he is wealthy and -- >> i don't. >> well look it up. >> there's a lot not disclosed. >> that's been a red herring. >> that's not audited, it is unverified. he can put what he wants in that disclosure form. that's very different than a tax return. this is interesting. not only did he say that he would get it together, he said i'll release them when hillary clinton releases transcripts for for her goldman sachs' speeches, and now all of the sudden, it is i'm under audit and if he is under audit for several years, and he knew that and he didn't just find out three months ago and he is well aware of it, and it is donald trump continually changing the story, and why doesn't he want to release the tax returns? is what is the problem? because there could be a treasure trove of information in there that could be damaging. let's not forget that when he sued a new york time

there were others who said, we needed to get press attention to this issue and get the american public to take notice. in order to help us achieve our legislative goals which we saw coming down the pipe. i am sure we will talk about those later. a congressional hearing is a moment that provides an opportunity for congress to focus national attention, and in using that weapon did that. >> to wrap up with this whole issue of the colby hearing, what was the legislative result? >> it was limited. he was a limited success. from the early stages, there were staff devoted to developing what we call charter legislation. charter legislation was an effort to legally defined exactly what these agencies should be doing so there was -- the cia already operated under a charter but it had violated the charter by developing these domestic surveillance programs and some members of the committee were focused on, how can we revise the charter to make the cia more effective and prevent these things in the future? there was a parallel effort to establish a charter for the fbi. those were always seen as leg

because members of congress use congressional hearings typically as a way to educate the american public about a particular set of issues that they think are important. sometimes to shape public opinion, sometimes to shape the opinion of members of congress. and typically because they have a legislative recommendation in mind down to road and they want to use that situation with the press involved to let the american public know what's going on. so there was some internal debate about the usefulness of that dart gun, internal debate among members of the committee as well as the staff. should senator church weld that weapon in front of the cameras. of course there were hundreds of photos taken. those photos were splashed across newspapers across the country and played very well on the televised hearings. and i think that ultimately because it was the first public hearing of the church committee, and the church committee had been investigating for months, at that point five or six months. had been devoted to uncovering the programs and they were angst and getting pressure from the media an

return to the world with new clarispray. >>> why wouldn't trump not want the american public to see hiseturns, and is it none of of the public's business? we'll get reaction to that from libertarian presidential candidate gary johnson and talk to him about his third party hopes. ♪ ♪ (laughing) there's nothing like making their day. except making sure their tomorrow is taken care of too. financial guidance while you're mastering life. om chase. so you can. >>> welcome back. i'm frances rivera in for alex witt here at msnbc headquarters here in new york. as donald trump runs for president, he continues to face questions. >> it's none of your business. i fight very hard to pay as little tax as possible. >> do you believe voters have a right to see your tax returns before they make a decision? >> no, i don't. when the audit ends, i'm going to present them. it should be before the election. i hope it's before the election. >> our legal correspondent ari melber discussed why he would want to keep those returns private. >> the audit excuse is something that donald trump has put forward but isn

this is about how you present information and choosing the emphasis. >> it's laughing at the american public for buying into the stuff they were selling and the complete media with the exception of right wing media, fox and outlets saying, hold on, we are not sure it's a good deal. we are not sure iran won't back out of the deal and cheat. >> that's a different issue. >> not really. how many times have you heard, oh, fox news, the echo chamber on the right? guess what, it was on the left and fox news was raising the flag. >> that's cool. i believe strongly in reporters challenging the powerful. i love it. that's what the whole mission is. >> not in being in duplicity. not in this. they treated the morn public like, aw, shucks, charlie brown. the bottom line is they were thinking it was funny and talking about it. i think he purposely did this thinking he's better, smarter and brighter than everybody else. i can run around them and do whatever we say and tell them to think. that's it. >> the last word, i think where ben rhodes might have caused problems for the white house is capitol hill. se

. >> think the american people are tired of the type of campaigns that have been run. at the same time, the american public went through a traumatic experience when nixon was president many years ago. how much of a right do the american people have to know about your character? is it fair for someone who might vote for you to wonder about your character and ask questions and how much should we be allowed to investigate your past? >> of course, now. let me ask you a question. is it unfair for me to wonder why you don't write a balanced presentation. let's assume you find -- well here is the good, the bad, the beautiful, the indifferent. are you trying to present a balanced picture of a candidate, leave me out of it or are you trying to play gotcha journalism? i'll rest my case. i'll take any balanced piece that comes out. i don't claim to be perfect. nobody -- look, i don't care what you do. just have fun. get raises and bonuses. play gotcha. i don't care. but the point is, i want you to know that what i'm about is what i just said and i care about this country and i care about the american people and i lov

credituality of the american public? >> no. i think all four people assert the absolute innocence of their behavior. i don't know that anyone is speculating about any relationship between mr. broadhurst and the woman he was hiring, but there was none and to my knowledge, is none. i think the focus came to me for offers reasons. the point being that it is possible for modern times, whether people are 50, 60, 70, or 20 or 25, spend time together and not be intimately involved. this society is changing. let me -- well i'll answer your question with another question. i am not -- person. i make mistakes. i said i was going to. and i z. i might make some more. i won't make this one. i'm a human being. believe me, if my intent was to have a relationship with a woman, particularly a very attractive woman, i certainly wouldn't have gone about it this way. >> what would you have done? how could it have been different than to spend this time alone with this woman in this house on weekend where your wife is out of town. >> at my house in wa

you'll learn a lot. billions are spent to confuse and, dare i say it, flummox the american public. "save 16% on car insurance." "switch now..." well at compare.com, we say enough's enough. so we constantly scrutinize millions of rates... answering the question once and for all, who has the lowest. just go to compare.com and get up to 50 free quotes. choose the lowest, and hit purchase. so you can get back to whatever it is you civilians do when you're not thinking about car insurance. compare.com i was talking to doctors and patients and i have to tell you, it just brought tears to my eyes. people who are getting health care for the first time in years. people who are dealing with problems that they just had to ignore. people who feel healthier, more productive like they can put in a good day's work because they now have the treatments that they deserve and need to have. >> that's a live picture from hillary clinton talking about health care, child development, real down home close to the person concerns of hers, not theory. she's holding a campaign event in louisville. t she's spen

now a republican lawmaker claims that the american public has only gotten part of the story on iran'sg of u.s. sailors. earlier this year it happened. the classified details will shock us all. congressman randy forbes, member of house armed services committee, was briefly, fully he said on the shameful incident and had this to say on "america's newsroom." >> i can't give you details because of the classified but let me tell you when you see details what happened and how it happened it will be very, very concerning to you, both what the iranians did, which there will be more there than what you've already said or seen but the second thing is, our entire response to handling that would be very, very concerning. i think to you and to the american people and to members of congress. harris: the images of american sailors held prisoner by the iranian military paraded around for the cameras, still sting all the months later especially one point one of the sailors said this. >> it was a mistake. that was our fault and we apologize for our mistake. harris: and as the searing images were still

the right questions. we americans were afraid to use the word propaganda. but there was an immense propaganda campaign to build american public opinion for the war. i'm confident those that stood up at the time in the face of that. peter: the first gulf war changed the whole nature of foreign coverage. it represented the american , certainly the one that cnn and ted turner was creating in the 1980's. they decided to expanded the restraint beyond american interests to cover the other side. to look at both sides of the story. this happened happened in the past. -- this hadn't happened in the past. saddam hussein and his people invited cnn to stay. other media were included. but it was cnn that decided to stay in baghdad. why did we do that? one was the vision of ted turner, that believed that cnn could be a vehicle to get both sides of international stories. the other is that we had the technology to actually effectively do live coverage of a war theater. this hadn't happened before with 6-7 satellite. this was from your own tom johnson, who had taken over cnn a few months earlier. he used his contacts to use one of the first c

the american public is duped into believing they do and it is hogwash those of the policies they usedto abuse the office over and over again. >> 90% are released. 90% we have a conscious choice of what kind of men and women returned to society. we have to start warehousing people expect them to get out is healthy human beings if you end up in prison you have to resort to violence at some point to survive even if you're a non-violent offender. we have used that language for so long that to me it isn't any longer relevant and we just need to be honest what is happening we are coming home and we're getting out and we need to insure that if you get out of prison basically in transit in the healthiest way possible so my challenge is always to politicians in the american public and the likelihood of that happening but it is what makes the book so important because gillette get what is happening in the system and what really works and how to produce better outcomes so that idea of violent offenders doesn't work. >> you are an inspiration and after talking to and reading the book one of the m

kentucky and the oregon primaries. billions are spent to confuse and, dare i say it, flummox the american public. "save 16% on car insurance." "switch now..." well at compare.com, we say enough's enough. so we constantly scrutinize millions of rates... answering the question once and for all, who has the lowest. just go to compare.com and get up to 50 free quotes. choose the lowest, and hit purchase. so you can get back to whatever it is you civilians do when you're not thinking about car insurance. compare.com >>> we're just a few minutes away now from the top of the hour when polls will be closed across the state of kentucky. first results of the night coming up. nbc live coverage of the kentucky and oregon primaries continue after this. >>> welcome back to msnbc's special primary night coverage. hillary clinton's challenge as she pivots or hopes to will unite the party. that means she'll need to bring the most die hard people with her. let me go to john out in vegas. i was abruptly led to you. put it in perspective. it looked rough. you heard from roberta lange that chairs were thrown, terrib

the american public will not read her response as a direct response. >> that's an interesting point. co rubio weighed in on facebook to make some news in the race and we'll bring you that news if you don't go anywhere. we'll be right back. allergy spray from the makers of zyrtec®. powerful relief from nasal allergy symptoms, all day and all night. try new rhinocort® allergy spray. create your own seafood trios you can try something new with every bite. pick 3 of 9 all-new creations for $15.99. like baked lobster alfredo chimichurri shrimp and crab cakes bursting with crab meat. just hurry in before it ends. billions are spent to confuse and, dare i say it, flummox the american public. "save 16% on car insurance." "switch now..." well at compare.com, we say enough's enough. so we constantly scrutinize millions of rates... answering the question once and for all, who has the lowest. just go to compare.com and get up to 50 free quotes. choose the lowest, and hit purchase. so you can get back to whatever it is you civilians do when you're not thinking about car insurance. compare.com shos

and can't you agree that this really stretches the credituality of the american public? >> no. i think all four people assert the absolute innocence of their behavior. i don't know that anyone is speculating about any relationship between mr. broadhurst and the woman he was hiring, but there was none and to my knowledge, is none. i think the focus came to me for offers reasons. the point being that it is possible for modern times, whether people are 50, 60, 70, or 20 or 25, spend time together and not be intimately involved. this society is changing. let me -- well i'll answer your question with another question. i am not -- person. i make mistakes. i said i was going to. and i z. i might make some more. i won't make this one. i'm a human being. believe me, if my intent was to have a relationship with a

. >> think the american people are tired of the type of campaigns that have been run. at the same time, the american public went through a traumatic experience when nixon was president many years ago. how much of a right do the american people have to know about your character? is it fair for someone who might vote for you to wonder about your character and ask questions and how much should we be allowed to investigate your past? >> of course, now. let me ask you a question. is it unfair for me to wonder why you don't write a balanced presentation. let's assume you find -- well here is the good, the bad, the beautiful, the indifferent. are you trying to present a balanced picture of a candidate, leave me out tv or are you trying to play gotcha journalism? i'll rest my case. i'll take any balanced piece that comes out. i don't claim to be perfect. nobody -- look, i don't care what you do. just have fun. get raises and bonuses. play gotcha. i don't care. but the point is, i want you to know that what i'm about is what i just said and i care about this country and i care about the american people and i love t

which one do you think resonates with the american public and the tear rights themselves? >> trump is calling for something immediate, something to be done now. hillary keeps talking about what she'll do as president. egg she is sphraig intelligence sharing to partnering with partners on the ground could have been done when she was still part of the administration with other terrorist groups. so she is situation she's going to do when she wins the elect, but she is not talking about the immediate threat. and what trump did today, he know what resonates with certain audience. by coming out ahead and saying this is terrorism, it resonates and make people feel comfortable that he's at least looking at it and would be prepared to do something about it. charles: it look like another terror attack. the airplane departed from paris. great hate and sickness. >> we are cared, we are pissed off, we are annoyed and we want something done. president obama has done nothing for 8 years but withdraw from iraq which created the problem. hillary clinton has been in the foreign poll $i mix

she bank and it's not the beginning billions are spent to confuse and, dare i say it, flummox the american public. "save 16% on car insurance." "switch now..." well at compare.com, we say enough's enough. so we constantly scrutinize millions of rates... answering the question once and for all, who has the lowest. just go to compare.com and get up to 50 free quotes. choose the lowest, and hit purchase. so you can get back to whatever it is you civilians do when you're not thinking about car insurance. compare.com >>> it's not every day sergeant ernie goodno gets a call about a >> the subject was described as being dressed like a tree. like you'd see in a christmas i immediately went out with my >> and what other location but the elm street branch would a tree find the most fitting to want to stick around in that >> the people in line aren't distressed by the tree among but someone working at the bank >> the bank teller put in a dye he dropped the entire bag of could hear a voice from the just said, jim, i want to talk he cracked open the door, looked dealing with some alcohol but he said he actual

the american public want to have the troops back home. the troops have signed up for the duration, volunteered for the duration, and there is an enormous demobilization of the american military immediately after the war. the number of divisions falls rapidly, the number of warships and this is encourage by new military technology because the new technology, the atom bomb was dropped in japan in 1945, improved america could actually ensure its interest in a very inexpensive way, and i suppose one of the keys to american policymaking in the entire period of 1945 onward wish to have a great power inexpensively. they used to refer to american policy is cheap, but the point is the american public did not want to fundamentally change the living standards and fund the alteration of their constitution to match the situation of being repaired for world war iii. no one asked the soviet population what they wanted, so it is just as well not to. stalin goes on to hand his executions right up to the end in 1953. eisenhower is in charge of the army, of

>> all these attacks about his tax returns, the majority of the american public they could care less. >> wrong. >> the most of us couldn't even understand his tax returns. the bottom line is that donald trump has been a very successful businessman, he's got multiple busi bu businesses. hillary clinton has been untruthful on so many issues, she is throwing out the rhetoric and now she has 50% of her party supporting bernie sanders and bernie sanders is saying she's unqualified so we need a job crat create or and donald trump is going to draw from both sides of the party. >> governor graham. >> quickly when she calls hillary clinton untruthful when you take a loo k look at the political fact checkers, donald trump has over one thousand piniocho, they created a new category that he got the biggest in 2015 of the year because of all the lies and thrths oere's all saw, he refused to go to a debate that megan fox was -- people need to look at -- people are saying what these candidate are saying and evaluate donald trump. he is not -- he is deceitful, he is dangerous, he is not going to -- h

. >> one of the things that continues to surprise me and concern me is how the american public really seems to be asleep , the fact that we are making such a major investment and escalation now in iraq as well afghanistan, syria and the only thing we seem to be really paying attention to is isis. are we putting too much emphasis on that and it does isis in your estimation represent a real extensional threat to the united states? >> no, it does not. i mean, what is isis? it's a movement at this point that-- around 25 thousand fighters. they are vile. they are vicious. they don't have a air force. they don't have a navy. they don't have math-- weapons of mass destruction. they don't have any significant resource base on which to draw up your good on the allies and they are what, 7000 miles away? is no doubt true that an organization like isis can inspire people to embrace jihad -ism and initiate small-scale attacks. it could be that his explanation for the incident in san bernardino. is not the case that isis poses any large threat to the united states of america and to your point it se

keeping of secrets by candidates when the media and political opponents believe information should come out. if you did a public opinion poll, do you think the americanwould demand this? he releasesd that tax returns? i think if you ask in a certain way, the american public would believe he should do it. that is it a voting issue? for candidates like former governor romney, it can issue that became damaging because of the suspicion he had not paid any taxes. about trump loves to talk how he has gamed the system and uses the rules in his favored of have the same problems there. i feel you can probably get that answer from a pole. wes not clear -- i think have a way to go in this campaign before becomes an issue that hurts them. speaking of issues that could or might not hurt candidates, let's talk about where the investigation of hillary clinton's e-mails is going. talkingdirector today to reporters, saying he is staying close to the investigations and making sure it is handled the right way. notcandidate herself as been asked to come in but aides are bringing in the issues. do you think it's going to have any impact on the convention or the nominatin

. >> people in the american public looking at your relationship with this woman, knowing that you had thrown down gauntlet as it were to the press corps saying follow me, that was a risk. would you say it was risky what you did? >> i didn't think so, of it at the time in terms of as i say, going to din e inviting these people into my house to see it and me going out that afternoon having worked all morning on the speech that i gave yesterday. any of those individual actions is risky. looking back on it now, if someone had said ahead of time, if you did this, if you did this, if you did this, and if you did this, could that be interpreted this way? obviously. but i was tired. i didn't think about it that way. i was not calculating anything. i just did what seemed to come naturally because it was innocent. >> senator, when we had the conversation on the plane where you said follow me, i have two questions. one, there was a young woman on the plane who is described as a friend of mr. broadhurst. was that donna rice. >> what plane were we on? >> the plane from austin to denver. >> no. the

pointed out.e that is why the american public is upset. this man that came into office with the promise of making things better has made it so much worse and has stirred up so much hatred between the races. i have never seen anything as disgusting in my life. thank you and god bless our country. eloquentrtainly very remarks. i think the point that donald an exceptionally successful business guy is a big part of his appeal. time he has been outside the political system like the caller suggests and that is to create jobs and opportunities. he has made himself fabulously wealthy, but a lot of other people, too. americans like that. i have seen no evidence of discrimination of any type inside of his organization. he seems to be surrounded by a lot of people that think highly of him with a diverse background and points of views. he is certainly not the traditional republican. no doubt about that. people always said they wanted someone who does not follow party lines. here is a guy that does not follow the party lines quite often. i think we will

commitment to engaging with all of you and answering your and being accountable you to and the american public he's making.ions if there's ever a day you walk think room and say i we've heard enough from the president today or we've gotten all kind of questions we have been able to ask the question, it's the day you've stopped doing your job. supposed to ask, why can't we have more access to the president. that's your job. supposed toyou're advocate for and that's the nature of our arrangement here. really is, question not whether or not the white house press corps will be ofisfied with the number questions the president has taken from the press corps -- you shouldn't be -- i think the aestion is, is there commitment institutionally on the part of the white house that to answering top as many questions as possible and spending the time necessary people and american the journalists who cover the white house the most understand here.y what's happening >> the u.s. government filed a lawsuit against north carolina transgender bathroom law. governorit comes after pat mccrory sued the justice depart

>> well, my answer is that i don't know how this happened but i do understand the anger of the american public about the decline in our country, the economy is stagnant because we haven an anti-business environment and the democrats are anti-business. we have our standing in the world and national security is at stake here, and our allies don't trust us, our enemies don't fear us. we've got to have somebody who will make an enormous change in direction in this country. that is -- that's the issue. now, how we got to trump to be that person, i think, is a question i can't answer. >> senator chambliss, one of the points that tom friedman was making there, he thinks there's a group of voters who think we're stuck, that our politics is just stuck, you know what, do whatever it takes to unstuck it, even if it means arson. what do you think of that theory? >> tom makes a good point there. people aren't tired of sending folks to washington who make all of these promises, make commitments and then, you know, nothing happens. trump is -- he's come out and he's touched every hot button on the minds of n

my challenges always to politicians is to be honest with the american public. the likelihood of that happening is probably nonexistent but this again is what makes the book so important because you get an insider's look of what is happening in the system, how we can fix it, what really works and how we can produce better f outcomes. so the idea of nonviolent versus violent offenders is a bunch of nonsense to me. >> host: you are an inspiration, oprah said that after she talk to, after reading the book it was one of the most powerful conversations that she had ever had. high praise. thank you for writing this book, thank you for all of the important work that you are doing now in the effort and the beautiful struggle for a better evolve criminal justice system. reading this book, "writing my wrongs", it may mean a better better person, thank you for writing it. >> guest: thank you so much. i i really appreciate that. your insights into the book are really amazing, and heartfelt, i really appreciate it. i appreciate the interview and thank you for checking out the

it doesn't make sense to make the american public stand by and wait for an alternative while they remain susceptible to fraud. traditional credit and debit cards account for the overwhelming majority of all transactions in the united states today. credit cards be the preferred method of payment for consumers for years to come. we must ensure we are using every credible means to safeguard those transactions now. that means embracing chips and pins. i would like to try over to camille fisher. she is the policy advisor with the white house economic council. she will speak about what the administration is doing to protect consumers. thank you. camille fisher: thank you. it's a pleasure to be here with you to talk about the security initiative. the hallmark is that every step the administration took the private sector ran with. the could not be here today without your commitment. i hope our cooperation lives on. i think our initiative can teach the next guy a thing or two. we launched our cyber security plan. we needed to take a hard look at our infrastructure and update security. some of you

> all of the remaining candidates are on board with legal otherwising medical marijuana and the american publicpproves about it. and i love they spend time talking about the heroin epidemic and talking about real drugs there. and it is great for policy. >> kimberly is so upset. i don't think she's ever smoked weed. >> ever. >> and feast your eyes on these genetics. that is what happens when you are winning. >> hanging out with a stoner and laugh track. >> the bus was not ventilated. >> and richard is obviously a pot head. and wanted to it know how to get in touch with the tour guide. >> i reject all of these comments. in all seriousness. i think one, i am happy we are having the conversation about drug abuse because weed isn't. and we should legalize it. when we put people behind bars for selling a doim bag. >> only in shapes like that. >> that is notes inially true. in parts of the country, you can go to jail for having a roach. >> not familiar with the term. >> what is a roach? >> smaller. >> eye little one with. >> i am very innocent. >> i reject that. >> that's why we are the better party.