the community advisory board. the second provision would have the ti board making recommendations to the ti mma board during the budget and work program approvals annually. the idea would be for the transportation authority board acting in the capacity of the treasure island mobility management agency to govern it basically this project and to be able to work with tida board caliber tivoli throughout the implementation phase. in terms of next steps commission this item has said the board of directors, to come back to you with recommendations regarding the formation of this new entity, this new role for the authority, as well as the first-year operating agreements that we would be negotiating an authorized to negotiate through this action by march of next year. with that, i am happy to answer any questions. there are representatives from tida and ticd here as well. supervisor mar: thank you. i did want to say that i think this is a critical entity. timma will have to manage significant increases of people. i think it says that it is 8000 new units of the development. i know supervisor campos district -- i think i was there three times over the last five days -- i know supervisor kim's district, i have bee

last year the authority board took action to commit regional improvement authority project to plan, downtown extension in the transit terminal, and the central subway transit. in total we committed funds to the projects on page 21. you can see that we have made pay down already. that is $150 million we are making to the project. we have reaffirmed our commitment and take some action to make doyle drive the commitment. this was done to help facilitate the close between the project and questionnaire on phase 2 of the project under the public- private partnership. the timing of this is also very important, consistent with the california transportation commission issues that register , for that reason, with 10 million available, there is an amount of money that helps to fund agency staff support with 10 million proposed for the parkway. the interesting part of this, we are also proposing to request an advance of $34 million from our next two years to fully fund the project. we think that the timing is great to support the public- private partnership. this does not delay the funding for the other

we will make a more formal presentation of the findings to the public draft to the authority board and committees during the public circulation period. the other important thing, we met with caltrans. we got the ok on the feasibility on the brt project on van ness. that clears the way of sorting through the final design exception with them. as you recall, van ness avenue is a state group. that is another major milestone. unfortunately, i had to miss that. some great ideas coming out of the netherlands. some good news on -- boulevard. that is also a state route. caltrans is restricting the boulevard to turn it into two lanes instead of three. bike lanes and safer crosswalks. matter warnings for drivers for people crossing the street. caltrans has already issued a procurement on that. this is between everglade and 19th avenue. we are reaching some milestones on some other studies. the bay shore intermodal access study has also seen a complete draft report. the final report of the study that was presented to the city council, which has a major stake in terms of land use position that will

the next significant action is for this board and the transportation authority board to decide on a locally preferred alternative. in a design alternatives current what should the city move forward with? we are targeting data for march of next year. this sly gives you a breakdown of some of the major components of the project budget. we had to revise this slide so i will speak to the key points in this. the information has changed slightly since this slide was originally prepared. the brt improvements have would be made, depending on the options, it would range from $67 million to $210 million. in are a number of things the need to be implemented, including new bosses, the repaving of the street, the overhead system, in the 49 commission uses as well as upgrading the signaling system. when all of those elements are taking into nomination, the projects range from $162 million to $216 million. we have a variety of funding from many sources, federal, state, and local. totaling about $175 million. depending on the alternative that is chosen, we either have the funding or we have a small gap tha

the authority board allocated $120,000 for a portion of this project. every time there is a construction project at the end of this year, they will likely begin the fourth quarter of 11 or 12, with a budget expected to be complete by 2013. >> good evening, commissioners. i will briefly be talking about the allocation requests. $85,000 in funds for the station, the project involves the paved area of the station. design work will be completed during 2012 or during design work, with construction of the project at $500,000 to be completed as a quick schematic. p.s. 78 is requesting $20,000 for the addition of class to bike lanes from 13th street to 19th street. creating room for by civil disabilities, the neat thing about this project is that after that part is completed, all of the way from the embarcadero, bike lanes will be done by the summer of 2012. finally, the sf mta has requested 1200 for a bike way on jfk drive. in april they allocated additional funds for planning and design work on the project after learning of further coordination necessary for s

yesterday, the bay area toll authority the board okayed the purchase of this -- authorities board okayed the purchase of this -- this and the metro commission would move from the oakland headquarters after a seismic update is finished. >>> ahead -- we'll show you more of this tricky situation at sea involving a ship and a lot of cargo. >>> it's a great day around the bay and it could be getting a lot better. rosemary is up soon to tell you how much better. >> i want her out of the school. we want her fired. >>> plus -- controversy at a bay area school. ahead -- why these parents were protesting a few hours ago and a call for a principal to be removed. [ screaming ] [ zapping ] there goes dwayne's car. oh, man. there goes dwayne's house. whoa! whoa! and there goes dwayne. man, that thing does not like dwayne. [ male announcer ] state farm's got you covered. nice landing. it was. [ male announcer ] get to a better state. >>> salvage crews are trying to determine if it's safe enough to transfer fuel from that crippled cargo off new zealand's coast. the ship ran into a reef eight days ago. t

the past has made amendments to what sort of notice should be required for wireless antennas. the board has passed resolutions asking the planning commission to consider changing the sighting guidelines. it is completely within board authority to amend the planning code to establish further regulations. you could buy ordinance legislate where the preferred citing would be. this is a contentious issue, as you know, with appeals coming before you. if somebody wanted to tackle the issue and legislate it differently than how the commission has handled it, i am sure that would be appreciated. supervisor cohen: thank you. supervisor mar: i was going to ask ms. rogers if you could respond to the appellant's effort to get data at themselves -- that they themselves, documented in attachment a, which seem to show good coverage for horizon. i will say my coverage is spotty. it seems their data contradicts what the design engineer of verizon provided that you relied on. i wonder if you could respond to the other data that seems to neutralize the main data you used to say that was necessary. >> you are correct. this is new information that was not presented at the planning commission hearing. it was provided just last week. it is more y

>> if the authors are agreeable, if you would be able to add everybody on the board's name to the resolution. >> that sounds great. welcome to the process, ladies. that was good. roll call, please. >> [roll call vote] five ayes. >> nice job. [applause] >> thank you for coming out, you have to go home now. we are going to go back to item p severed for board discussion and immediate action. several items were pulled. >> during comment on this particular item, k4 about professional development and how it was going to be delivered, and you know what the questions were. if you could just address those questions. >> what did the dollars include a? it includes teachers stipends for saturday. three days of training on saturday. it also includes training and a coach that will be working with the teachers to implement in the classroom. this is training that has been going on for 34 years. it is promoted by first five. >> the next item is item k6 through 11. can we vote on them all together? >> it's better to vote on the -- president mendoza: we move this one already? roll call on item k4. >> [roll cal

the declaration. six votes of the board are required. our appeal of the conditional use authorization involves an analysis of whether the planning commission's determination to authorize the project was appropriate. this hearing is quasi--judicial and nature and may require due process. to overturn planning or to authorize the conditions, eight boats of the board are required. while both hearings involve distinct analysis, they relate to the same project and the consideration of many members of the public that may wish to speak on one or both of these issues. under consideration of the appellant, the board, and itself, i suggest we consolidate into a single hearing. in order to ensure that the project sponsor and others receive a full opportunity to address the appeals, i propose that we conduct the hearing as follows -- first, the appellate will have up to 10 minutes to present their case for the appeal. the appellate will then have 10 additional minutes to appeal the conditional use application. next, members of the public to support either or both of the appeals, meaning you want t

item six, i recommend to the treasure island development authority board in the san francisco board of supervisors the designation of the authority as the treasure island mobility management agency to implement the treasure island transportation program. all there is the executive director to execute a -- execute a memorandum of agreement between the authority and tida. of wright's executive director to negotiate initial operating contracts and develop timma formation of documents. supervisor mirkarimi: discussion? none. public comment? public comment is closed. so moved. thank you. next. >> 7, authorized executive director to enter into a funding agreement for the presidio parkway project with the california department of transportation and the golden gate bridge highway and transportation district to negotiate agreement -- agreement terms and conditions. action item. supervisor mirkarimi: discussion? none. public comment? public comment is closed. same house, call? so moved. next. >> item number 8, accept $750,000 from the civic center, and associated llc to waive the lease extension

campos: if we move this forward, is still more opportunity to get more information from the full authority board. >> exactly, chairman. first of all, i want to point out that i have the same reaction. [unintelligible] there was a specific set of circumstances there. the prohibition of parking makes the convenience factor for the residents along the street much less significant. this is a significant elimination of parking. i suggest we have an opportunity, next week, to look at what you requested earlier. asking members of the community to be at a board meeting. we can hear from them as well. supervisor wiener: i am happy to move this forward, the understanding that we will get more information before the full commission hearing. there are other ways to get information. i do not think it was spelled out clearly enough in the packet. >> fair enough. we will provide the extra, additional information to you. supervisor chu: i think that when you remove a significant number of parking spaces, it should be something that is thoroughly reviewed. i just want to know what that process was and how intens

resolution authorizing designated officers and employees of the city and county of san francisco to examine sales or transactions and use tax records of the state board of equalization pursuant to california revenue and taxation code section 7056. item #3. resolution authorizing muniservices, llc, to examine sales or transactions and use tax records of the state board of equalization on behalf of the city and county of san francisco pursuant to california revenue and taxation code section 7056. supervisor chu: thank you. we have our controller. >> good morning, supervisors. benjamin rosenfield. consistent with practices of most other cities and counties in the state, we routinely worked to audit with the state board. a standard practice. we were contacted for this service. it has been more than 10 years. state law requires the board of supervisors approval in cases where officers and contractors with the government are required to examine confidential taxpayer information. that is what we are here asking today, access for the comptroller's office. someone in this case needed access to this confidential information. i will be happy to answer any quest

and in the other resolve, change -- building on what commissioner mendoza said, the the board of education authorizes the district to participate in the work that the mayor's office, blah, blah, blah. the second one says will get the staff to work with everybody else. we should just say supports this kind of a term of art, almost a legal give money to any public arena. >> i agree, i can completely understand how that could very easily be misconstrued. i know if i can think of any -- something else to put in there right this moment. >> the whole thing is to urge everybody to work together, authorizes feels so "we'll let you." can we say encourages or urges the district? >> [inaudible] >> that's fine. >> the board of education -- the sentences could unified school district adjoins the work? how about that? >> he mentioned that we can say supports the idea of, let's say, the design, the launch. what've we added those and to make you guys seem like you would join the process rather than just supporting it right away. i understand support is a crazy word. adding the words that you gave us, when that make

what you may not know is that he along with the rest of the board of supervisors said also as the board of the san francisco county transportation authority. in mention that because they are providing the majority of the funding for this initiative. so i want to thank the board in their capacity as the transportation authority for their leadership and the funding support to enable this to happen and ask eric mar to come up and say a few words. >> thank you, everyone, for being here. i rode my bicycle from where i live, and i see that people are speeding by in the mornings even as parents are dropping their kids off. i know this simple policy change will actually save lives. i think these signs and community education that the mta and police department and all of the city family will be working on in the 200 different sites and schools will help save lives. i also wanted to say that as a parent, i know that as we get to work quickly, sometimes we do not understand as drivers that we share the road with people who are pedestrians and also bicyclist as well. i think signs like this -- even reducing speed in of the sensitive spots, maybe seni