. >> under the hard-line security era of bolsonaro, the bar association decided to triple its staff devotedn rights. the political opposition includes less than a quarter of lawmakers. they tried to block governments and institutes -- initiatives, before the christmas break they launched a new offensive, 20 five left-wing lawmakers corrected a parlrliamentary grop devoted to human rights. democracy is today under threat from an absolutely retrograde, violent, devastating government in n the field of social rights. groot, ag up the new congressman -- the new group, a congressman works with 25 civil society organizations. >> the army does not need to send saying -- tanks into the , and the derek -- and there is the death of the young black people, the indigenous people, we are the country with the most human rights abuses in the world and a government that supports police violence. >> congratulations, count on us. >> today the opposition believes that the far-right government is trying to undo all of the social gains lawmakers achieved, the latest battle was over a pension reform. so f far, t

let me start on the presentation. 11964, before the sheriff's department got involved, the san francisco bar association established the unrecogny distance project through cash bail. this was established by judges and the bar association and others, i believe, and the former sheriff was a part of that involvement and this was established to address individuals who are held pretrial on minor offences and it was already san francisco was thinking about ways not to overincarcerate and it was, again, important for the bar association that this be an independent nonprofit and it's been contracting with the sheriff's office since this time and it says work to divert -- at the time it was established to divert mis misdemeanor clients. in 1994, the service and pretrial established supervised pretrial relief program which extended pretrial relief by providing the court with post random case management and supervision alternatives and then supervised pretrial relief is a case management. in layman's terms, this is saying that we are managing now people with higher level charges. and, perhaps, david could speak to

let me start on the presentation. 11964, before the sheriff's department got involved, the san francisco bar association established the unrecogny distance project through cash bail. this was established by judges and the bar association and others, i believe, and the former sheriff was a part of that involvement and this was established to address individuals who are held pretrial on minor offences and it was already san francisco was thinking about ways not to overincarcerate and it was, again, important for the bar association that this be an independent nonprofit and it's been contracting with the sheriff's office since this time and it says work to divert -- at the time it was established to divert mis misdemeanor clients. in 1994, the service and pretrial established supervised pretrial relief program which extended pretrial relief by providing the court with post random case management and supervision alternatives and then supervised pretrial relief is a case management. in layman's terms, this is saying that we are managing now people with higher level charges. and, perhaps, david could speak to

senator thurmond spoke to the bar association and he identified with a very recent decision from judge merely forbids segregation. this is the claim that it is not incumbent upon school districts to take firm steps to bring about mixed or the schools. it just wipes off from the books the formal racial segregation. so, we might not think of senator thurmond as being attuned to what is happening in lower courts, but this is only weeks after the decision was handed down. and people said ah, yes, there is a way to get around the dreaded interpretation of brown versus board of education, which would have led to integration. people also spoke about voluntary segregation. senator sam ervin again, he made a claim, as the southern manifesto was introduced -- it was a really remarkable claim. he says, "while the supreme court decision is deplorable from the standpoint of constitutional law and ought to be reversed for that reason, it is not as drastic as many people think." it's deplorable, but not as drastic. i'll talk more about that in a moment. he says with judge parker, it doesn't require t

chief operating officer of the more than bar associate, the first -- bar association is, the first woman to hold these positions in each role. until conversation with jill tonight is maya wiley, a nationally renowned expert on racial justice and equity. she has litigated, lobbied the u.s. congress and developed programs to transform structural racism in the u.s. and south africa. maya is currently a university professor at the nearby new school university. she is also a legal analyst for nbc news and msnbc. i just also want to thank brodie from sterling lord for being in the audience, wonderful agent, and i want to give a big shout-out to c-span for being here tonight. [applause] so without further ado, please join me in welcoming two pioneering women, jill wine-banks and maya wiley and "the watergate girl" to the strand. [applause] >> thank you and good evening. thank you for being here. i am so excited to be able to be in this conversation with jill who is my sister-in-law. [applause] yes, she is. okay, that's not literal, just in case anyone got excited. [laughter] but in spirit. and

newspaper every single day, every german or austrian in the united states unless known by years of association should be treated as a spy. the illinois bar association declared lawyers sent a draft, it was unpatriotic and unprofessional and of course the german language in many places, nobody taught it anymore. sauerkraut was renamed liberty cabbage and so forth. this kind of thing became very important in what happened later in the course of the disease. that was going on in the largest society, 40% of all doctors and nurses were in the military so the civilian healthcare disappeared. when we started out, this was also a contest between science, scientists and the virus. and if you think scientist in 1918 were backwards you need to rethink that. they focus on a group of half a dozen or so, extraordinary men and one women. one of them in 1966 won the nobel prize for work he did in 1911. another of them, the head of reconciler institute, an interesting guy, and they take kids and they did this to him as a teenager, a plumber refused to take him on as an apprentice because he was such a troublemaker but he got a job as a pharmacist, the ph

it was a finalist for the american bar association's silver gavel award and short listed for the phi beta kappa ralph waldo emerson award. professor driver as a distinguished record in the nation's leading law reviews on all manner of subjecting relating to education, race and constitutional law. among the other prizes -- excuse me. he has also written extensively for general audiences. you might have seen his pieces in "slate," "the atlantic," "the new york times," "the washington post" and "the new republic." he's a member of the american law institute and american constitution societies academic advisory board. professor driver received his b.a. from brown university, a masters in modern history from brown university, a masters in modern history at oxford, where he was a scholar and a law degree from harvard law school. after graduating from harvard, professor driver clerked for judge merrick garland, justice stephen brier and justice o'connor, sandra o'connor. i don't know where this ranks on the list of professor driver's accomplishes, but professor driver or as i used to know h

newspaper every single day, every german or austrian in the united states unless known by years of association should be treated as a spy. the illinois bar association declared that lawyers who defended was unpatriotic and unprofessional. and of course the german language in many places, nobody's taught anymore. sauerkraut was renamed liberty cabbage and so forth. in this kind of thing ultimately became very important and what happened later in the course of thepp disease. so that is what was going on in the words of society, not to mention that 40% of all the doctors and nurses were in the military so the civilian healthcare system basicall disappeared.sa when i started out i said this was a contest between science, not just the largest of society but scientist in the virus. if you think that the scientist in 1918 were backward, you need to rethink that. the book does focus on a group of half a dozen or so extraordinary men and one woman. i will give you a sense of how good these people were, one of them in 1966 won the nobel prize for the work that he did in 1911. another of them he was the first head of the rockefeller institute, a ve

deal, john davis, a famous attorney, infamous in some respects, official spokesman for the american bar association writes an article he says the federal government is not [indiscernible] ie what is all of this new deal stuff? it is not with the government should be doing. couple that with what you see if you look in the newspapers of the time, january 22, the new york times, communists were pouring into -- boring into negro labor. october 22, 1926, the banner headlines, san francisco examiner, third terror thugh caught, confesses four beaten with hammer in strike riots. one month before whitney, new york times, american legion issued a report. condemning radicalization of the public schools, submitting it is out of place for discussions tending to create disregard for the united states government to be had in an educational institution supported by taxes especially when the organization concerned is identified with a parent body. think moscow, whose aims and objects are undermining our form of government. another opinion, the president of the civil legion saying college trained men and women are t

charles hughes justified the expansion of government power in a speech to the american bar association. the importance of hughes' arguments will be explored by professor matt waxman one week from tonight. now all of these issues presented constitutional questions. but not all of them came up before the court. nor with one exception did they involve members of the court. presidents often spoke with members of the court about policy matters. in world war ii, for example, roosevelt consulted freakily with three members of the court, felix frankfurt and robert h. jackson and douglas. in the first war, however, wilson had only one member of the court whose advice he so trusted. and he became one of wilson's closest wartime confidantes. picking up our story from that late afternoon, the matter that concerned wilson involved railroads and the seeming inability to move raw materials to plants or desperately needed finished supplies to atlantic ports so they could go to the troops in europe. they took over the rail lines and join them into a unified system and then give one man the necessary au

republican candidate in 1916, justified the expansion of government power in a speech to the american bar association. the importance of hughes'arguments will be explored by professor matt waxman, one week from tonight. now, all of these issues presented constitutional questions, but not all of them came up for the court. nor with one exception, did they involve members of the court. we should keep in mind that in -- until fairly recently, presidents often spoke with members of the court about policy matters. in world war ii, for example, franklin roosevelt consulted frequently with three members of the court. felix frankfurter, robert h jackson, and to a lesser degree, william o douglas. in the first war, however, wilson had only one member of the court whose advice he so trusted. and louis brandeis became one of wilson's closest wartime confidence. picking up our story from that late afternoon in december 1917, the matter that concerned wilson involved railroads. and their seeming inability to move raw materials to plants, or desperately needed supplies to atlantic ports, so they could go to the tr

i work with the bar association of san francisco. i'm here to speak on behalf of those attorneys and also on paf of patty l -- behalf of patty lee, and she asked me to address you in her capacity as the chair of the working group to close the youth guidance center. i share everything that judge mahoney just said to you. there's a reason you have so many c.b.o.s and stakeholders today, because of our frustration of the experience. i want to thank supervisor mar and mayor breed for coming to the rescue. the advocacy that we've undertaken in the last month or more have not been well served. i agree we need to solve this. the kind of transparency that edgewood has exhibited to every stakeholder in this room should be commended. we would kill for this kind of remediation, oversight, and accountability. they are to be commended, and as we move forward, we must support agencies like this so that we don't continue to use the criminal justice system as a dumping ground for all the failed social programs and mental health programs. this is how

davis, famous attorney, infamous in some respects, official spokesman for the american bar association, writes an article where he says, the federal government is not an elimosery institution. i.e. what is all this new deal stuff? it ain't what this government ought to be doing. couple that with what you see if you look in the newspapers of the time. january 22nd, 1926, "new york times." communists were boring into, like worms or something, negro labor directed by the communist internationale in moscow as part of its worldwide propaganda. october 22nd, 1926. banner headlines. san francisco examiner. third terror thug caught. confesses. four beaten with hammer in strike riots. april 18th, 1927 one month before whitney. "new york times." the american legion issued a report. condemning radicalization in the public schools, quote, submitting that it is entirely out of place for discussions tending to create disregard for the united states government to be had in an educational institution supported by taxes. especially is that true when there is so great a presumption that the organization

she's operating off the american bar association, the first woman to hold these positions in each role. in conversation with joe tonig tonight's smile widely, nationally renowned expert on racial justice and equity. she has litigated lobbies, the u.s. congress developed programs to transform structural racism in the u.s. and south africa. maia is currently a university professor at the nearby school university. she is also a legal analyst for nbc news and msnbc. i also want to think brody for being in the audience, wonderful agent. i want to give a shout out to c-span for being here tonight. [applause] without further ado, please join me in welcoming pioneering wom women, jill quine banks and maia wiley in the watergate girls to the stand. [applause] >> thank you and good evening. thank you for being here. i am so excited to be in this conversation with joe who's my sister-in-law. [applause] yes, she is. okay, that is not literally. but in spirit. it is such a pleasure to read this book and i hope you all have purchased this and if you haven't, you will. i just wanted to start with the

time, there's plenty of alcohol abuse in the legal profession. 6 months after peter died the american bar association in the treatment center came out with a landmark study of 13,000 lawyers across the country and asked about substance abuse and mental health and the striking thing about that survey was very high levels of drinking and high levels of anxiety and depression, but 3 quarters of attorneys skipped over the questions on drug abuse, they asked answer though the questions weren't there. when i was researching in the new york times i call the lead investigator on the study, he has his own consulting firm that works with law firms to help them address mental health and substance abuse issues and i said do you think it is just that peter was a one off and there isn't any drug use or abuse in the legal profession and he said 75% of lawyers gifted because they were afraid to answer and this is a group of professionals that are used to looking for problems, they are very suspicious, not particularly trusting and that is part of their legal training. they weren't going to answer the question even o

general and deputy attorney general of the state of illinois chief operating officer from the american bar association the first woman to hold these positions in each role in conversation with jill tonight is a national expert to lobby the u.s. congress and develop programs to transform racism in the us and south africa currently a university professor at the new school university and also a legal analyst for msnbc and nbc news i also want to thank our agent for being in the audience and a big shout out to c-span for being here tonight. [applause] so please join me to welcome our guest to the strand. [cheers and applause] >> thank you and good evening thank you for being here. i am so excited to be in this conversation with jill who is my sister-in-law. [applause] that is a literal. [laughter] but in spirit and in such a pleasure to read this book and i hope you all have purchased it and if you haven't, you will and i just want to start with why write it not just an important set of stories but why did you write it she let me know just recently she started 2008 in case you thought she just started it

they spoke about the virginia state bar association, and he identified with a very recent decision where judge parker wrote a decision in the briggs versus elliott case saying the constitution does not require integration, it merely forbids segregation. this is a claim that it is not incumbent on school districts to take affirmative steps, it just wipes off from the books the formal racial segregation. so u you will not think of senator thurman in lower courts, but this was weeks after the decision was brought down, but yes, there is a way to get ud around. senator sam irvin, he made a claim, he used with constitutional law and ought to be reversed for that decision, it is not as drastic as many people think, right? it is deplorable, but not as drastic as people think. he says it doesn't require the immediate sintegration of the schools. senator irvin says people attend different places of worship and we can have a similar think in relation to our schools. they say whatever is working in new york city and other parts of the north, we'll get that going down here as well. whatever they're

and the last contract is the justice and diversity bar association of san francisco. this is actually ongoing services but it is a new agreement following solicitation that was just completed. this contract does add legal work to help clients effectively document their disability claims and help them get back their disability claim -- helps them to be success nfl obtaining their benefits and provides advocacy in assisting them if they have challenges in order to attain those benefits or be reinstated. again, it is an ongoing contract that we just did an r.s.p. >> commissioners? >> an any questions from commissioners on the contract support? >> i believe that is the final contract, correct? >> we have two memos. >> but the two memos are separate items. >> a right. >> so commissioners, i am going to first check to see if we have any public comment. moderator, do we have any public comment for this item? >> any public comment? no, no public comment. so you all can vote on as a whole on this item and so ewith would need a motion for that. >> is there a motion to i a prove

about six months after peter died, the american bar association, and the treatment center came out with this landmark study, a study of 13000 lawyers across the country and asked them about substance abuse and mental health. in strikingly enough, that survey was that very high levels of drinking and high levels of anxiety and depression. in about three quarters of attorneys questions on drug abuse. it acted like the questions were there. so when i was researching my story for the new york times, i called the lead investigator on the study and he had his own consultant firm now. and he worked for the law firms to help them deal with mental health issues. i said you think peter was on off and really is not any drug abuse in the legal profession he said no, i think 75 percent of lawyers they were afraid to answer. it's a group of professionals that are used to kind of looking for problems, they are very sufficient, not particularly trusting. and then as part of their legal training. they worked point to answer the question. they probably did not believe it was truly anonymous. so they did

chief operating officer of the american bar association, the first woman to hold these positions to making conversation with jill tonight is maia, a nationally renowned expert on racial justice and equity. she has litigated the congress and develop programs of racial programs in the u.s. in south africa. mine is currently a university professor at the nearby school university. she is also a legal analyst for nbc news and msnbc. i just also want to think and grow dave from sterling for being in the. she's wonderful agents and set want to give a big shout out to c-span for being here tonight. [applause] >> without further ado, please join me in welcoming pioneering woman, jill and maia and the watergate girls. [applause] >> thank you and good evening. thank you for being here. i am so excited to be here in this conversation with jill, who is my sister-in-law. [applause] yes, she is. okay, that is not literal, but in spirit. it was such a pleasure to read this book. i hope you all had purchased it and if you haven't, you will. and, i just wanted to start, jill really with why you wrote it. i

scott bolden, former washington, d.c., democratic party chairman, and former chair of the national bar associationk. great to see both. scott, i'm going to start with you. the candidate on your side of the aisle, you formally a litigator. what would you ask joe biden at this point? speak on the former sex crimes prosecutor, as well. what i would ask him, he has answered already. he has denied the allegations. with the women's group won't want them to do, but they want him to do is address it more fully. from a political standpoint, that's up to him and his advisors, whether they want to go further down that road. it's a 30-year-old allegation. it's been denied. you look for corroboration in these cases, and what we know from witnesses, the corroboration has been somewhat inconsistent. the difference between biden and kavanaugh is the president always needs to get more votes than the next guy. he doesn't have a disqualify or qualify review on this. kavanaugh did. kavanaugh is going to deal with these issues from the supreme court. >> harris: wait a minute, i've got to step in there. if it's only ab

about 6 months after peter died, the american bar association and treatment center came out with the landmark study, survey of 13,000 lawyers across the country and asked them about substance abuse and abuse and mental health and the striking thing about that survey was that there was high levels of drinking and there were high levels of anxiety and depression, but about 3 quarters of attorneys get questions of drug abuse. they didn't even answer. they acted like the questions weren't there and when i was researching the stories i called the lead investigators on the study patrick and he's now has his own consulting that works with law firms to help with mental health and substance abuse. do you think that peter was a one-off and there isn't drug abuse in the legal profession. no, i think 75% of lawyers skipped it because they were afraid to answer and there's a group of professionals that they are used to looking for problems, they are very suspicious, they are not particularly trusting and that's part of their legal training, so, you know, they weren't going to answer the questions

with jonathanem, furey working with the new york state bar association, are asking for volunteers. lawyers to help with the myriad of issues. they will coordinate it. they need the legal volunteers first. and then they will put them together with the client who come forward -- clients who come forward. -- a one time thing andthose on unemployment how is that being distributed? continue through period,od, the 39 month and then potentially after december 31, there can be an additional 600 after that but we are waiting. the 200 million dollars that was announced yesterday? gov. cuomo: the snap funding. that will go through the normal process. that will go out immediately. reporter: in a similar way to the on employment system? similar, we have not had any issues, . --orter: gov. cuomo: that is on one hand flattering, on the other hand irrelevant. it is the extent that flattering, i appreciate it. i would to keep politics out of this. been veryas andicious of government government officials, politicians. it is always about their politics, they are always trying to take the next step on

land life time appointment after six months on the federal bench was found unqualified by the american bar associationn't just a matter of filling a vacancy. he wants to fill them with his friends, family friends, former staffers and those who will pledge loyalty to his agenda. >> let me also get your reaction, sir, to the president's senior adviser and son-in-law jared kushner about what he had to say about this pandemic. take a listen. >> we're on the other side of the medical aspect of this, and i think that we've achieved all the different milestones that are needed so the government federal government rose to the challenge and this is a great success story and i think that that's really what needs to be told. >> what's your reaction to that? do you see this as a success story? are we on the other side of this medical moment in history? >> no responsible public health expert would back up what jared kushner just said. we don't know where we are today. it's been painful to go through this experience for all of us, certainly those who have lost their jobs, worried about losing their businesses, thos

the court system, with jonathan furey working with the new york state bar association, are asking forolunteers, lawyers to help with the myriad of issues. they will coordinate it. they need the legal volunteers first. so they are asking the lawyers to come forward, and then they will put them together with the clients who come forward. anyone have anything more on that? >> -- a one time thing for those those,ployment, and for how is that being distributed? gov. cuomo: who wants to answer that? rob? the $600 will continue through the period, the 39-month period, and then potentially after december 31, there can be an additional $600 after that, but we are waiting. >> the $200 million that was announced yesterday? >> which $200 million? >> the $200 million that was announced yesterday? gov. cuomo: the s.n.a.p. funding. >> that will go through the normal process. that will go out immediately. >> in a similar way to the unemployment system? >> similar, we have not had any issues. >> [indiscernible] gov. cuomo: "democrats would like to see me replace joe biden on the ticket." that is, on t

the court system, with jonathan furey working with the new york state bar association, are asking for volunteers, lawyers to help with the myriad of issues. they will coordinate it. they need the legal volunteers first. so they are asking the lawyers to come forward, and then they will put them together with the clients who come forward. anyone have anything more on that? >> -- a one time thing for those on unemployment, and for food, how is that being distributed? gov. cuomo: who wants to answer that? >> the $600 will continue through the period, the 39-month period, and then potentially after december 31, there can be an additional $600 after that, but we are waiting. >> the $200 million that was announced yesterday? >> which $200 million? >> the $200 million that was announced yesterday? gov. cuomo: the s.n.a.p. funding. >> that will go through the normal process. that will go out immediately. >> in a similar way to the unemployment system? >> similar, we have not had any issues. you consider doing that? gov. cuomo: "democrats would like to see me replace joe biden on the ticket."

i don't know how he balances being a high-powered attorney, having been chair of the bar association and being chair here. he is such an amazing leader for this agency and so many others and i'm proud to call him a colleague and a friend. and then really looking forward to the day we can officially name the heineke cross-over and the port yachal station. thank you for everything and wish you well as you move on to your next endeavor. >> well, thank you very much. >> i want to say something, too. >> please, art, go ahead. >> i think i'm the only one who knows malcolm anyone currently on this call because malcolm began as a fellow in the california state senate and served with the distinction and followed gavin newsom. now here malcolm followed this, as well. i'm grateful that malcolm welcomed me with open arms and gave me a good addition and understanding of the transit issues in sanfrancisco whe san i came on the board and i'll always be grateful for that counsel and advice. i look forward to seeing that plaque, that tremendous asset that you've helped to protect and hopefully dedica

the court system with chief judge janet de fu ry working with the new york state bar association are asking for volunteers. lawyers who are volunteers to help with a myriad of issues. they'll coordinate it. they need the legal volunteers first. so they're asking for the lawyers to come forward. and then they'll put them together with the clients who come forward. anyone have anything more on that? >> governor, was the extra 600 a one-time thing for those on unemployment, and also the $200 million you've announced for low-income households in food. how is that being sdrnt distrib and what can they expect? >> the 600 will continue through the period for the 39-month period. and then potentially after december 31st, it would be an additional 600 after that but we're waiting for that. >> [ inaudible ]. how is that being distributed? >> i'm sorry, which? >> $200 million that was announced yesterday, the day before -- >> the s.n.a.p. funding. >> oh, that's going to go through the normal process through the agencies. that will all go out immediately. >> also back up in a similar way to the u

bars. the whole nature of a bar is to associate, so it will be a fundamentally different world. frankly, i feel that governor newsom and the state have kept their promises, it's the federal government that made promises, and they have not done anything, and we are furious. >> and rightly so, glenn, i really appreciate your time. i understand your frustration, inc. you for sharing your story. obviously we know that you clearly are speaking on behalf of many other business owners in oakland and beyond. so thank you, best of luck to you as you wait for federal assistance to come in. that is glenn kaplan, the owner of a bar in west oakland. good luck. >>> all right, a beautiful day around the bay area with temperatures warming up. sky fox was over san francisco earlier today for clear bluein tamayo, and mark, you did it, you delivered picture perfect weather on my birthday, so thank you. >> oh my gosh, happy birthday to you heather, you deserve a nice forecast. beautiful tuesday out there, as you mentioned with lots of sunshine and temperatures in the 70s and even a few spots in the

the phone. i was a summer associate studying for the bar, and this all happened in maybe 35 seconds. there is this quality of, somebody just pulled a prank on me. >> i don't know if this happened. instead the next hour trying to figure out where you go to confirm thurgood marshall has just made you a job offer? [laughter] prof. kennedy: i had a similar telephone call. i remember the first time i met justice marshall face-to-face. i was very nervous about it, very nervous because -- the reason i was, it was a big deal anyway. >> a justice, someone you will work for. but it was even bigger than that for me because i had heard about thurgood marshall all my life. i third -- i heard about thurgood marshall all my life because my father in columbia, south carolina went to see justice marshall argue a case, rice versus elmore. he was one of the last of the white primary cases. and throughout my childhood, i heard my father talk about the importance of that case for him. my dad didn't really, didn't know what the legal issue -- the state action issue, but he didn't pay attention to that. th

university of oklahoma and university of college of law, and is a member of the cherokee nation and oklahoma bar association. chief hoskin, we welcome you to this stage and to this community. [applause] i have one little controversial word i have to say. as i was researching the history of virginia many, many years ago, there was one brief little corner way down in southwest virginia that, it appeared, i am not going to disagree with anyone, but it appeared that there were cherokee people who lived in that one little small area of virginia. very small. but chief hoskin, since the cherokee did live in virginia, according to my little recognition, welcome home. [laughter] [applause] we have a guest for chief hoskin from the virginia indians and the reservation virginia. [applause] hello to the chiefs and to virginia. what a wonderful opportunity it is to be before you. i am so honored that the cherokee nation has been asked to be a part of this. i think it speaks highly of the history association and virginia preservation that you would include the indigenous aspects of the history of this great state and thi

the court system with chief judge janet de fu ry working with the new york state bar association are lawyers who are volunteers to help with a myriad of issues. they'll coordinate it. they need the legal volunteers first. so they're asking for the lawyers to come forward. and then they'll put them together with the clients who come forward. anyone have anything more on that? >> governor, was the extra 600 a one-time thing for those on unemployment, and also the $200 million you've announced for low-income households in food. how is that being sdrnt distrib and what can they expect? >> the 600 will continue through

keep those areas open as you mentioned has been an escalation of the number of cases associated with these particular areas where the bars in the pubs are we had 62 cases linked to one particular area called line by phone and this is as a result of people being number one the bands and guests at those particular premises now this will stay in place now for 2 weeks we can't have a number of various social distancing measures in place we've got time many's and cinemas they'll be closed for another week but as you mentioned we've got 802 cases so far but the concern once again like china is they'll be a 2nd round of the infections as a result of people moving back into the city and the bars and clubs and pubs remaining open and as a result the government increased or escalated those measures to try and curb a spike sorry clock in hong kong thank you sara for that update now europe has reached another grim milestone with the death toll now passing 30000 health systems across the continent are increasingly under pressure with many overwhelmed needs baka hazily it's. a window on the worsening crisis in this paris intensive car

but you take the time to go to bar associations, state law schools, and travel. what goes through your mind? do you feel that's important for you to do what justice o'connor started pretty much? and you both have been doing. >> the most important thing is the court's work and i don't let outside engagements interfere with the time that i must reserve to read the opinions below, the briefs, prepare for the oral arguments. so while the term is ongoing i try to limit the amount of my distant travel. but we do have visitors at the court all the time. we have school children from second grade to the graduate level coming. many of the groups that i speak to i speak to at one of the court's conference rooms. >> what i'm getting at is why do it? why do you give that much more, justice sotomayor, why do you give that time to the people that you go to visit to talk to? >> well, you asked, i know this is true for justice ginsburg. it certainly is true for me. you do give up a sense of privacy. and there virtually is no place in the united states that i can travel without peo

the newspaper every single day. they should be treated i into te illinois bar association declared lawyers they were unpatriotic and unprofessional and of course the german language in many places nobody taught it anymore. this kind of thing ultimately became very important in what happened later in the course of the disease so that's what was going on in the larger society not to mention 40% of all the doctors and nurses are in the military said the civilian healtso the civilian healthcarey disappeared. now when i started out, i said this was also a contest between science, not just the larger society that scientists and the virus. if you think they were backward, you need to rethink that. half a dozen or so extraordinary man and one woman and they give you a sense of how good these people were. one of them in 1966 won the nobel prize for what they did in 1911. another of them who is the first hit of the rockefeller institute is an interesting guy, a juvenile delinquent. the program scared straight these days where they take kids and walk them through trails his father actually did this to him when he was a teenage

broward circuit judge dennis bailey making a plea to the local bar association. e lawyer was shirtless during a zoom conference. another was still in bed. what do you think about that brian? [laughter] brian: i think it's about time. the courts are getting on my bandwagon. i just want people to get dressed and get going and now i'm just asking people to wear pants. i'm not even asking to get fully dressed. just wear pants. steve: we're seeing a lot with these zoom conferences, indeed. jillian, thank you. ainsley: no shirt for a zoom conference. sorry. steve: that's just a little crazy. exactly right. brian: a lot of chest hair. steve: l.a. law enforcement sounding the alarm as thousands of inmates are set free to prevent the spread of covid-19. >> we are adding to the mix. it's unchartered territory that we are headed into. steve: we're going to speak to one new york sheriff fighting to keep inmates in his county in the jail. our members understand social distancing. being prepared and overcoming challenges. usaa has been standing with them for nearly a hundred ye

he's an elected member of the american law institute and american bar association and serves as a justice on the supreme court of the shy yep and arapahoe tribes. please join me in welcoming lindsay robertson. [ applause ] >> it is an absolute delight to be here. what didn't get mentioned is my dad's family is from charlottesville. my mom's family is in the tided water and i went to law school and i did my history doctorate at the university of virginia. so i am back home in a sense. i have been a proud oklahoman for 22 years and my kids identify as oklahomans. they don't really remember when they were very young they lived in virginia but my oldest child is now a first year law student at uva. she is back and connecting with her roots. we'll see what happens in her life. but i think she feels like she's back home too. i am truly honored to be here. my thanks go out, i would be remiss if i failed to say to preservation virginia which has been a fantastic organization to work with. those of you with spare change should contribute mightily to them. they're doing important work. also to the

and the last contract is the justice and diversity bar association of san francisco. this is actually ongoing services but it is a new agreement following solicitation that was just completed. this contract does add legal work to help clients effectively document their disability claims and help them get back their disability claim -- helps them to be success nfl obtaining their benefits and provides advocacy in assisting them if they have challenges in order to attain those benefits or be reinstated. again, it is an ongoing contract that we just did an r.s.p. >> commissioners? >> an any questions from commissioners on the contract support? >> i believe that is the final contract, correct? >> we have two memos. >> but the two memos are separate items. >> a right. >> so commissioners, i am going to first check to see if we have any public comment. moderator, do we have any public comment for this item? >> any public comment? no, no public comment. so you all can vote on as a whole on this item and so ewith would need a motion for that. >> is there a motion to i a prove