had to come to me and essentially borrow a million dollars from sentcom funds so they could get in the blaim, just get in the game in terms of information warfare, counteracting measures, public campaigns of information in countries throughout the globe, particularly the middle east. and that will be much, much worse if we proceed down this path. and we will not be enhancing our national security. if the isil measure -- message, rather, is unanswered, if they are able to attract adherence from around the globe because all they can really hear is this grotesque discussion of isil and what they propose and there is no counterarguments, no countervailing points, we lose that information warfare, and that's not just -- we have to make these investments in both defense and nondefense. as i said before, if we stick with these b.c.a. caps, our non-department of defense programs will suffer. and in addition to that, the needs of the american people will suffer. we will not be able to invest in adequate transportation and water infrastructure. we won't be able to do things that provide adequate and