are not affiliated with the parties are have up to three minutes, but no rebuttal and to assist the board in the accurate preparation of minutes, members of the public who wish to speak on an item are asked to submit a speaker card to the staff when you come up to the podium. >> the board welcomes the comments and the suggestions and the forms on the left side of the podium. if you have a question about a rehearing, or the schedules speak to the board staff during a break, or call the board office, and it is located at 1650 mission street, room 304. and this meeting is broadcast live on san francisco government television channel 78, and dvds are available directly from sfgov tv, we will conduct our swearing in process, and if you intend to testify at any of tonight's hearings, and wish to have the board give your testimony evidentiary weight, please stand and raise your right-hand and say that i do after you have been sworn in or affirmed. >> any member of the public may speak without taking this oath, pursuant to the rights under the sunshine ordinance in the administrative code. thank

okay, seeing none, we will move to item three, which is the board's consideration of the minutes, for the october 8th, 2014 meeting. >> the changes and corrections and revision and deleting? is there a motion to accept the minutes as submitted. >> so moved. >> public comment on the minutes. >> seeing none, if you could call the roll please. >> on that motion from commissioner honda to adopt the october eight, 2014, minutes, fung. >> the vice president is absence. >> president lazarus? >> aye. >> wilson. >> aye. >> those minutes ar dopted, next item is carole brown, verses the department of building inspection, protesting the issuance on june 26, 2014 to scott dylewski to alteration permit to a new deck to the rear main level of the existing house to exterior stair to the rear yard and new doors to the main level and replace windows and incorporate new hallway. this was held, for this case, on september 17th, 2014 and the matter was continued to allow the time for the permit holder to submit the revised plans and the written consent from the adjacent neighbor, regarding the firewall is

. >> impede to the october 8, 2014, meeting of san francisco board of appeals presiding officer is commissioner president lazarus and she's joined by commissioner fung commissioner honda and we're pleased to welcome bobby wilson the vice president will be absent to my left is deputy city attorney robert bryan for legal advice and victor is the legal have an opportunity i'm cynthia goldstein we're joined by representatives from the department that have matter before the board socioskoonlz is the zoning administrator representing the planning commission and jeff is the senior building representing the department of building inspection jean is from the department of public works and joined by sherry categorizing from the city attorney's office to advise the department of the public health mr. pacheco go over the board meetings guidelines and swear in. >> the board requests you turn off the cell phones and pager please carry on conversation in the halfway appellants and department representatives have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttal participant affiliated must complete t

>> welcome to the meeting of the san francisco board of appeals, the preceding officer tonight is board president, ann lazarus and she is joined fung and honda, and hurtado is absent, to my right is the deputy city attorney who will provide the board. >> and scott is here on behalf of the zoning administrator and the planning department and representing them on the cases before the board. if you would please go over the meeting guidelines at this time and then conduct the swearing in process. >> the board requests that you turn off all phones and pagers so that it will not disturb the proceedings and carry on the conversations in the hallway, apell tents and department representative haves 7 minutes for case and 3 minutes for rebuttals people in these cases must include the comments in the periodses, and member of the purpose that are not affiliated with the parties are have up to three minutes, but no rebuttal and to assist the board in the accurate preparation of minutes, members of the public who wish to speak on an item are asked to submit a speaker card to the staff when you come u

right of the board of education to exercise our spending of our own rules in fast tracking those changes it's duly my right asia citizen and executive director of the parents of san francisco schools to voice any opinion on this collective decision that's been made by our board of education t p.s. has been in the field for 15 years working with parents we have been the driver and tens of thousand of parents staying in san francisco and believing in public schools because of our with work we have a long-standing partnership with the district we parents for public schools have removed barriers that are prevented families from enrolling if and engaging in our public schools pr the decision this evening to fast track this process after 15 years of partnership is discouraging on so many levels not showing a process also messages something you all or p p.s. wants to say perpetuated that parents are an afterthought and community partners are an afterthought 3 times parents for public schools of san francisco has not been comes up up front on the student assignment matters i urge y

this is approval of the board minutes of the regular board meeting of september 9, 2014, motion and second please. roerment. >> ms. sonata mr. haney mr. chin ms. maufass ms. mendoza-mcdonnell dr. murase ms. norton ms. wynns president fewer 6 i's thank you presentation to the board of education superintendent carranza thank you and this coming saturday we'll be having our second reinforcement conference on denman school it brings together families to be involved in air children's education and 10:00 a.m. the conference begins martha will, our keynote speaker about ways to have teachers resilience in the early education our equality department and office of family and community lead and annexed our community partners in organizing this great event please note that r.s.v.p. is for childcare you can go to the website family conference or call 415241 6185 for spanish or or english and another one for chinese this saturday september 27th at 9:00 a.m. james middle school i wanted to announce at the beginning of the school year this is a story that is important for our public to know a student at

for mentor me when when i become the clerk of the board as well even though you have a week before the retired i'm still going to it can take you up on the exit interview we're going to miss you and the great work with with the departments you've helped us craft the legislation motorcycling through the board of supervisors thank you in kind kindly for everybody and at least it someone you've worked closely with our controller. >> thank you board members i'll be brief one of the great things about monique she likes solicitations so we'll have other opportunity so one of the great juicy have i'm one the few people that gets to work wefrd monique from that seat and my observations of mammogram this is remarkable the work she does spovrt the boards and mayors as it is the work she does in entry-lev entry-level accountants and on behalf of the controller's office we like to join the board in congratulating mammogram with that, ma'am. >> so it's been a long time coming and the time is here and i'm happy about that thank you members of the board for your kind words of me and of the controller

and commissioner norton has a question and one public speakers >> therefore, be it resolved that the board of education of the 70 unified school district has determined the hearing held on september 23, 2014, each pupil in the san francisco unified school district has the textbooks and materials for the science and associate studies and english including the adapted program for the english and be it resolved further that each pulling pupil has the instructional equipment available related to the science core classes as indicated on the science survey. >> thank you commissioner norton. >> oh, mr. kelly i think you signed up as a public speaker on this section would you like to speak? thank you really i don't know if we're in agreement thanks so much commissioner norton >> are you had your mr. kelly i wouldn't want to interrupt you (laughter) too late. >> so my question is i'm i have a question about a couple of things i've been trying to get an we are to one question is there or is there not a common core alliance textbook for 7th grade? >> all of our instructional materials are adapted hav

. >> they said it was not pending in the ordinance and bans that the department feels that the board should uphold the appeal and the application we do agree that in order not to prejudice at&t that the one year prohibition does not apply, however, the retroactive does apply the ordinance requires that the board uphold the appeal and at&t file another permit to install that on, on that note i'll say while i think that supervisor wiener has made it clear his ordinance was addressing some of the concerns raised by many of the applications put forth by at&t the law was not designed to target one entity and many other entities are subject to the smf ordinances we've met with other services providers that have to install smf and are subject to the permit and given the draft dwp order i'll dispute the discertification that was designed to target one entity many concerns raised in particular about at&t surface mandatory facilities is the stipend to effect all applicants for surface mount facilities in public right of ways in san francisco. >> and lastly i'd like to read into the record our a

the board several times before but the new facts some are not that new last year after the board took action to deny the permit the department of public works orientated a tentative map of approval 9 set back line open the 1962 subdivision prevented the building and subject to that action the department of public works with drew it was accurate for the other departments to look at the application and it was subsequentially refiled we reviewed the historic records that were difficult to relocate more than 50 years ago the planning commission acts were not noted in the action no specific come a time to go back to so it took research to go back and find the minutes from the commission hearing and going back additional looking hearing by hearing to find the hearing and able to piece together the history that information lead me to condition the approval with reiterating what the department of public works had found the first time around no development under the terms of the subdivision that was issued in april 30th of this year by the department of public works at the bottom of that lette

every member of the advisory board will be a volunteer. so, there's no compensation paid to the members of the advisory board committee. like yourselves, they're going to be members -- residents of the city who care about this issue and so want to volunteer their time. in terms of the cost to the human rights commission, because this legislation doesn't go into effect until the soonest nine months, we plan to work along with our co-sponsor supervisor kim who we put this legislation together with through the budget process this coming year to adequately staff the department to be able to adequately enforce this law. >> commissioner riley. >> hi. >> hi. >> you mentioned that you have not determined what kind of data you're going to collect. so, once you decided that, would you come back and show it to us? >> sure, absolutely. after the -- we're happy to do another presentation after the equal pay advisory board comes up with their final recommendations. we can also perhaps ask the board -- the board chair him or herself to come and present th

the requested actions that the board of education san francisco school district rectify the memorandum of understanding mous and facilities use agreement f a for the 2014-2015 school year negotiated with the cheater schools by the superintendent for his designated need. >> no public speakers for tonight any comments or questions. >> so i have your card there's a time during public comment that we will speak mr. steel please make sure she has a card so thank you very much no public speakers signed up board questions or comments superintendent steven i think we're ready for a vote. >> ms. sinatra mr. chin mr. haney ms. maufas ms. mendoza-mcdonnell dr. murase ms. norton ms. wynns president fewer that's 6 i's and this has on we have a motion and a second already recorded to the last board meeting by the budget community chairs they moved that without recommendation this is one 48 dash 12 s p one authorization to deny or approve the charter school will you please read the resolutions mr. davis. >> authorization to grant in the alternate of deny the chapter school whereas pursuant to the edu

so the recommendation from the civil grand jury that the board of supervisors should request an audit conducted by the budget and legislative analyst and payments made on behalf of the sheriff's department for workers' compensation claims and related overtime costs. i would also like to note in this request, we have actually made that request and so this has been implemented and i'm sure that the sheriff's department, as well as the department of human resources will be contacted for this particular report. and so the task for this particular response entered into the record that the government audit and oversight committee on september 25, 2014 supervisor london breed requested the budget and legislative analyst to prepare a report on payments made on behalf of the sheriff's department for w claims and related overtime costs during the last several years. as the department of human resources notes it and the sheriff's department may be able to correlate workers' compensation claims with increases in overtime costs and quantify the impact. so that is the recommended board response and

so that is the recommended board response and at this time, i would like to entertain a motion to table the hearing. >> so moved. >> okay. without objection, this hearing is tabled. [ gavel ] and i would like to entertain a motion to amend the current resolution to insert the proposed recommendations into the record. >> so moved >> without objection, this item moves forward -- excuse me, these recommendations are inserted into the record and amended in the current resolution that has been provided. [ gavel ] and so is there a motion to move this item wholly as a committee report to the full board as recommended. >> yes, there is. >> that you, with, that the motion passes and this item goes to the full board for positive recommendation. thank you. [ gavel ] okay, madame clerk, can you please call the final item. >> item no. 5 is a hearing on the recently published 2013-14 civil grand jury report entitled "survey of san francisco commission websites." >> okay. so from the civil grand jury we have mike, you are coming up again for this item? >> good afternoon. chairperson breed, and superv

in terms of what can be done for the board in the future? one of the things that has been clear to me today is that if we had a little horn, like you have, that would be great. when your time is up, it goes off and that would be really nice at the assessment appeals board. my anticipation of what is going on in the next three years, the cases are diminishing. there are fewer cases coming forward, because we're improving in and our economy is looking better, but there is an expectation on the part of the taxpayer that they get the same treatment they have gotten for the last five years. so they are going to be back and they are going to be disappointed and i think that the load on the board side is going to be heavier because they are not going to be happy hearing hearings officers saying no and they will go to the board. i would like to be there to handle some of them. >> any questions? none. thank you very much. any public comments on this item? seeing none, public comment is now closed. supervisors, your thoughts. supervisor tang? >> item

but after talking to the director felt rent board we don't feel the board has the capacity to handle to level of enforcement and have concerned with the conflict of interest as the rent board and as a supervisor of the metrics law judges that decides those cases for that reason we moved the enforcement power to other you departments that has the housing authority in mind after conversations with the process we decided unnecessary for charging a landlord fees therefore i'm make an amendment removing the free provision specifically rovmd language on page 7 line 16 to 20 when appropriate i ask the committee to make that motion and we have another technical amendment to change 90 days to one hundred and 20 days on page 14 line 10 this is also at the request of the rent board we'll get to those amendments later on in the hearing so mr. chair i don't know if you or any member of the committee has questions or comments in not why don't i we'll open this up for public comment and i have a number of speaker cards i'll ask the speakers to line up on our right our left and just come up a

the board will. >> ready yeah. is he ready thank you >> he now resume the regular meeting no closed session appendixes this evening another informational item the staffing report for the gift of the month of august 2014 this meeting is adjourned >> welcome to the september 17, 2014, meeting of the san francisco board of appeals the proceeding officer is our vice mayor commissioner hurtado and joined by commissioner fung arrest commissioner honda the commissioner president lazarus will be absent this evening one seat vacant on pursuant to the chapter when a vacancy exists they may overrule the votes 4 votes are not required we're joining by deputy city attorney and at the controls is victor the boards legal assistant and i'm cynthia goldstein the board director we're joined by the pokes that have cases before the board scott sanchez that representing the planning department and jean ask here from 9 department of public health as well as chris buck and carla from the public works bureaucracy you urban forestry and we

of the case the board of education by a vote of 6 i's one absent commissioner mendoza and in the matter of cal 2 hundred and mark vs. sfusd case the board of education by a vote of 6 i's one absent commissioner mendoza gives the district the approval to settle the case and if there's no other items this meeting is adjourned thank you very much >> good afternoon i'll bring the hungs to order. >> good afternoon regular hearing welcome to the meeting for october 1, 2014, please be advised please silence all electronic devices. and when in any way, shape, or form. >> president hasz commissioner wolfram commissioner honda commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioners first on your agenda is general public comment at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction poovshg povshg the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may i have no speaker cards. >> any member of the public wish to speak please come up to the podium. >> good aft

russ johnson da's office you're asking the commission to - that's what the board members have to decide. >> and i'll say that already our enforcement is we can already show in our projects on the proposition 39 request we're project over 88 over 88 that's due to the recruiting we're doing right away for next year including being at the enrollments fair for the folks we found there and as well as the other work we're doing with our open houses and other things so we're - >> san francisco residents. >> yes. yes. because 80 percent now all contract are san francisco residence this is a big change for the school. >> any other comments commissioner wynns. >> i do want to point out one thing that's when this charter was did understand the first thing the petitioners came to us and said we're not going to have a negative impact we're going to recruit all over the community so we won't be effecting our financial situation i think so there are lots of you know sort tensions to consider all those things but you know and i will take one second to say that's why i don't think that charter schools s

nolan, chairman of the board, and mr. reiskin. i'm so glad to see that you are promoting the safety issue and driver. they are so happy. there are 170 drivers, but a know, you have 1800 muni drivers. 170 is only 10% of your workforce for the driver fleet. they are the most safety. if driver of the taxi is only 10% safe, we are way out of business long time ago already. but we are fair employment. we have to drive, be more careful than the muni driver. muni driver [speaker not understood] no dui, go home. you are cut off from everything. they make a mistake, mostly they are nice drivers. i know that. but the thing is that is you have to concern about our taxi business also. yes, safety, everything you're talking about safety, i'd like to talk about safety also. you are promoting a bike lane, bicycle, whatever it is, that may make people more in danger because not everybody like mr. nolan biking on the street -- i'm a biker -- [speaker not understood] because i'm biking, biking, biking. but the thing is not safe. i don't do bike. wha

chair, members of the board, members of the staff and public. we're going to start off today with some special recognition awards and first i want to ask our real estate manager christin mcgary to come forward to recognize ken yee. >> good afternoon, [speaker not understood]. >> good afternoon, chair nolan and board members. i'm christin mcgary senior manager of san sfmta. [speaker not understood]. for the finance division's real estate section. ken's management and problem solving skills, computer and multi-lingual communication talents and his california real estate broker's license have been put to good use at the mta on several major projects, including managing the tenant improvements of facilities and moves to and within 1 south van ness, 14 55 market street for the transportation market management center, 1508 ban croft avenue, 15 28 to 38 yosemite avenue, and 26 50 bayshore boulevard in daly city for the sustainable streets shops and toed vehicle. acting as a key member of the central subway project real estate team to acquire the right-

and now, i resume the regular meeting of the board. this is an announcement of the closed session items. read out of the closed session 9914. public employment. the board by a vote of 7 ayes approved the contracts of one principal, one program administrator and one supervisor and other items, there are none tonight, and the meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> a lot a ton with the community and we say to ourselves, there is this one and this one. we all compartmentalize them, we have our own agenda. our agenda is to create great work. if you are interested in that, you are part of our community. >> hello and welcome to brava theater. >> we are trying to figure out a way to make a space where theater and presentation of live work is something that you think of the same way that you think of going to the movies. of course, it has been complex in terms of economics, as it is for everyone now. artistically, we have done over 35 projects in four seasons, from producing dance, theater, presenting music, having a full- scale education program,

just to trying to envision and having been involved previously with the hotel vitali when i was on the board of supervisors to the idea of the transit museum and muni and transit and combining that with a relatively low height hotel i think i would see that as somewhat analogues situation. i think there are some similar tease if i'm not mistaken to that. today was an informational presentation. it was a treat for us to have you all come and speak today and appreciate the passion. we would love to have a tenant back in good standing and i for one would come back and see more from teatro zinzanni to come back and see some of your special appearances. perhaps jonathan if you can run through the next steps and this was informational for us and then it will go to the board of supervisors. >> they will, the city admin code 2.6-1 is something only the board of supervisors can wave. there has to be a resolution heard and heard by the board at that point we'll bring an exclusive negotiating for their approval once the parties agree on the terms to that and that will launch a protsz -- process to desi

. >> thank you i would urge the board to consider whether this dispute between the neighbors about noise is really something for capital hill at this point to continue to meet we're fairly clear that in terms of the noise are ordinance the board of supervisors made a number of choices that take that out of the realm of a dph public health noise consideration in terms of the actual violations that is equipment on the roof that no one what hear this is on ongoing legitimate dispute between neighbors but maybe in the form of a nuisance suit or some other mechanism is it roll for the city do i hear a motion to approve the minutes? to continue to keep roller-coaster tail in a position based on a noise violation no one can hear to have to tale with and extend more money with a dispute with the neighbor you i'm not they're no dispute and the ladies concern is not serious but the department of health did the right thing consider the alternative if the department of public health does not grant a variants then roller-coaster tail wi be required to - rooster tail has done what we've asked that is

>> in other words, the board will vote and if the charter is denied the board has to at some point state what the grounds are for the denial of the charter. >> got it thank you and then the question i have for mr. mccombloven is the question of the success of the school year in the light pattern our choosing as commissioner wynns stated to open a school in the mission we've seen enrollment growth we feel we're having some balance in terms of the opportunity there some improvements can you speak to the success of the school opening in the mission in light of those questions around enrollment and demographics. >> surely i'm going to give a quick answer and then i'm going to turn it over to talk about his experience but quickly joy to be clear we're looking at facilities across southeast san francisco and, in fact, we're in negotiation with the excelsior we don't have to be in the mission so the first point and second point is that you know the polluter it of our charter are from the bayview hunters point so from the bayview or the mission or excelsior has a pretty well-rounded population o

and i want to submit this hearing request to the clerk of the board. and you our response as a result of that would be this has been implemented -- has not been implemented but will be implemented by the end of 2014. supervisor london breed submitted a hearing request for the clerk of the board of supervisors for the mayor's office on housing and community development -- the office of economic and workforce development and planning department to evaluate how they will improve the relationship between market rate and affordable housing and track regional housing achievements? so with that, supervisor tang, do you have any other additions or any comments to that response? >> no, i think you covered it and i would be happy to support a motion to amend our resolution to include what you just read into the record. >> okay. so before i do that, i would entertain a motion to table the hearing. >> so moved. >> without objection, the hearing is tabled. [ gavel ] and i will entertain a motion to amend the current resolution to reflect the input of what i have jus