the federal fiscal control board proposed by the u.s. congress would be staffed by individuals who do not represent puerto rico's interests. this federal fiscal control board will have only one task, ensuring the payment of a multibillion dollar debt at the expense of our people's quality of life, stated josie patoho, fem i.n.s. spokesperson. the preek company women's movement has sent a letter to many of our colleagues requesting that they vote against the current version of h.r. 5278 which impowers the fiscal control board to supersede and veto the decisions of publicly elected officials in puerto rico. and they go to list the caribbean institute of human rights, feminists and activists denounce that the imposition of such board represents a serious human rights violation against the people of puerto rico, expressed by the spokesperson of the collective. should h.r. 5278 pass in the senate, it will bring untold hardship to the most vulnerable sectors, the elderly, children, poor, women and the works class. with a poverty rate of 46%, wh

and they have no oversight over the control board. either the governor nor the legislature can exercise any control, supervision, oversight but they get to pay the $370 million and they have to live with all the dictates of the control board, even though they don't have representation. and to further make sure that the control board is even more omnipotent, they put in a no liability clause. the oversight board, its members and its employees shall not be liable for my obligation or any claim against the oversight board or its members or employ employees or the territorial government resulting from actions taken to carry out this act. so they have absolute immunity. wow. wouldn't we all like to have that? so my amendment is targeted to improve the most egregious flaws of this legislation. my amendment would ensure that the people of puerto rico have a voice in their future. the current legislation denies the puerto rican people any, any representation on a board that effectively replaces the decision making powers of the legislative and

i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san ancisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's office effort to respond to community concerns about the loss of a parking space on west portal, it's a challenge for us as supervisors because we have no authority over those issues and we have to go through the mta board or staff for those issues, but i know supervisor yee worked very hard and his staff to respond, but i think as we appoint mta commissioners, we're looking at people that support strong community engagement like lee does and i know when he met with angelina from my staff, that was a key theme of ensuring that neighborhoods, merchant associates are listened to and that's a

and then to the full board. that would add time. how much time that would add, a lot of it depends on how quickly we could get to a commission. as some of the heart-as todd mentioned earlier, looking at three departments with three very very different workloads going all into a single commission. as we have inundated the board on some of our bad projects with 14-15 bond issuances and things like that, trying to meet a deadline for leveraging outside funding, that process would have to go through a particular commission and, again, the whole question of whether that commission has the capability and capacity just physically to address all the actions that would be covered under this particular charter amendment the multiple departments. it would be a question. the other question we really have is the question of the expertise. in terms of the commission appointments could only two out of the five are going to be community development or housing, the work that we do, is very technical and we would really want to ma

good afternoon members of the board and guess locally my name is mr. cohen we are a coalition of local san francisco affordable housing organizations that build affordable housing manage properties and provide advocacy. for the most part the position if you will comes from our coalition and the governor and assembly member bloom and the governor endor blooms bill but they put some serious policy on the board this year and it is some radical stuff and it is one-size-fits-all and is moving too quickly and it hasn't been designed well enough. there's 482 cities and 52 counties and it is a huge state and there's no one set of policies that play out the same in any city. if you lobby on behalf of the city which is only one of 482 we acid that be made clear. i think it's interesting to hear the supervisors that are here to say that the board of supervisors is the policy body for the city for both executive and legislative and that you folks are representing the policy body. it's nice to hear the opinion of other folks here are but they are not lobbying you. t

fundamental purpose of the board? the fundamental purpose of the board to make sure that finances are straight or to make sure that there's a path forward in economic growth? i think to the extent the board should of people representing all those pretty used to be frank with you because those are complementary. otherwise 1 10 years from now we'll be revisiting the same problem because how do you get out of a negative zero of an economy that needs be, intended to sustain its ability to function as a productivity problem at a shrinking tax base that doesn't put the resources necessary to sustain? >> why do we go him one more round. -- why don't we go one more round? >> one very tedious thing about the board in puerto rico is for the most part the politicians are against it, but when they pull the individuals, 70-80% of the people in puerto rico for it. because they are desperate. they don't see the politicians and solving the problems. they just talk about status of this and that instead of giving as you said administrat

. >> how are you >> good evening, and welcome to the san francisco board of appeals. wednesday, may 18, 2016, the presiding officer is commissioner honda and we are joined by and joined by vice president commissioner fung and commissioner ann lazardus. >> commissioner swig commissioner bobby wilson that be absent to my left is thomas owen for legal advice at the controls is gary the boards legal assistants boards legal assistants executive director. we're joined by representatives from the city departments that have cases before this board. at the table in front is senior building inspector joe duffy dbi providing the advice for the department of building inspection and joined when i scott sanchez the zoning administrator who will be representing planning department and planning commission and carli short the bureau of the department of public works as well as chris buck forecast with the the public works please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other electronic devices are prohibited. out in the hallway. permit holders and others have up to 7 minute

as well as the ta board. omorrow night at 6 p.m. the authority citizens advisory committee we will seek input on the new revenue measure. the last two is innovate v one. we have ideaed such as telephone town halls. they may be the most effective way to reach a lot of people in the short timeframe. at the plans and programs committee [inaudible] several of our colleagues in other counties seeking sales tax mesers have done this approach which involves getting phone calls and remindsers there would be electronic town hall where you dial in at dinner time and participate. it sounds boring and like who would do this, but the results have been

i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san ancisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's office effort to respond to community concerns about the loss of a parking space on west portal, it's a challenge for us as supervisors because we have no authority over those issues and we have to go through the mta board or staff for those issues, but i know supervisor yee worked very hard and his staff to respond, but i think as we appoint mta commissioners, we're looking at people that support strong community engagement like lee does and i know when he met with angelina from my staff, that was a key theme of ensuring that neighborhoods, merchant associates are listened to and that's a

committee and the urban advisory board also known as spur he also served on the black leadership forum and gateway high school and the list going on served as the miscellaneous board additional university of san francisco advisory group, san francisco delinquency prevention and the action on the coalition of aids wow. what a career. >> (clapping.) >> and to be quite honest this on the resume so many to say about doctor moses career i can't fit it into the board meeting i hope you'll join me tonight as well as the host of my of the doctors friends it stand up and recognition his auspicious career and not a better location than 18 hundred oakdale this man is tremendous to my personal growth a community man hike an uncle and sand he was is leaving an official capacity but grateful he will continue to serve this man is an incredible father and i hear wonderful husband that is what alma tell us he 1e78g9d that he raised four children that grew up professionals and with the warmest most filled heart that i want to present this proclamation to doctor moss i for his mentorship

is there a question from the board? public comment? public speaker: good afternoon, commissioners, clarence vonsky, retired city employees. the only thing that i really have a question about because i do appreciate neal's explanation of where the $9 came from and how it's being calculated. i think we are missing the rates that have the medicare member plus the non-medicare member. as i recall we would usually have the more of the rates that included that balance with other non-medicare members because otherwise these rates, they are very good and we can see them, but we really don't know the impact on those members that have dependents that are non-medicare. it would have been nice to see that also since i think it would go with this presentation and not the one we have seen before. and later i will express to you my other concerns about the blue shield rate and how they deal with it. that's the only thing i'm looking for here. thank you very much. >> i will ask the actuary to please come forward and answer that question. >> yes, i woul

fundamental purpose of the board? is the fundamental purpose of the board to make sure that finances are straight or to make sure that there's a path forward in economic growth? i think to the extent the board should of people representing all those pretty used to be frank with you because those are complementary. otherwise 10 years from now we'll be revisiting the same problem because how do you get out of a negative zero of an economy that needs be, intended to sustain its ability to function as a productivity problem at a shrinking tax base that doesn't put the resources necessary to sustain? >> thank you. why don't we go one more round? >> one very tedious thing about the board in puerto rico is for the most part the politicians are against it, but when they poll the individuals, 70-80% of the people in puerto rico for it. because they are desperate. they don't see the politicians as solving the problems. they just talk about status of this and that instead of giving as you said administrative things, for example,

is there a question from the board? public comment? public speaker: good afternoon, commissioners, clarence vonsky, retired city employees. the only thing that i really have a question about because i do appreciate neal's explanation of where the $9 came from and how it's being calculated. i think we are missing the rates that have the medicare member plus the non-medicare member. as i recall we would usually have the more of the rates that included that balance with other non-medicare members because otherwise these rates, they are very good and we can see them, but we really don't know the impact on those members that have dependents that are non-medicare. it would have been nice to see that also since i think it would go with this presentation and not the one we have seen before. and later i will express to you my other concerns about the blue shield rate and how they deal with it. that's the only thing i'm looking for here. thank you very much. >> i will ask the actuary to please come forward and answer that question. >> yes, i woul

in the board denies the request for late jurisdiction the board will not on intersections deprived to rule on that question the reason we're here vigorously that judge jackson orders was clear if this is the issue and not the other issues the board has i think correctly decided so the questions that commissioner lazarus asked suggested perhaps the board not have the authority that's - >> what very, very contrary this matter. >> i'm asking about the set of circumstances to look at the permit if it comes back. >> it is obviously for another day in our view thank you. >> mr. collier you want to - we'll give you equal time. >> yes. thank you a few other points first of all, inform evidence any strategy plan on trying to - >> i mean i'm sorry this is sou sounding rebuttal. >> mr. saks argued that judge jackson we could seek jurisdiction before we still could he said and we sought that in our exhibit so he took a different position from the judge. >> i'm for public health department i'm not sure how are we commenting now. >> we are. >> i'll also punt we have litigations not fully implemente

>> good afternoon everybody and welcome to the san francisco board of supervisor's meeting for tuesday, june 21, 2016. madam clerk can you please call the roll. >> supervisor supervisor avalos. >> present. >> breed present. >> supervisor cam pos present. >> mar absent. >> supervisor peskin present. >> supervisor wiener present. >> yee present. >> there is a quorum. >> ladies and gentlemen can you please join us in the pledge of allegiance. >> pledge of allegiance. >> thank you madam clerk are there any communications. >> yes madam president. >> is there a motion to excuse supervisor mar colleagues can we take this without objection supervisor mar is excused. any changes to the may meeting minutes? seeing no names on the roster is there a motion to approve those minutes. motion by supervisor cam pos and colleagues can we take that motion without objection those meeting minutes will be passed after public comment. all right madam clerk please read the consent agenda. >> consent calendar. considered routine. >> all right seeing no names on the roster madam clerk please call the roll. >> b

currently as you know all 7 members of the board are in the mind by the mayor and conformed by the board of supervisors this chart amendment gives the mayor 4 nominees to this board to be subject to the board of supervisors confirmation from the board of supervisors - so we'll splitter the appointment for other divisions and also change the threshold of which the board of supervisors can reject the mta budget roadway it takes more than the majority of supervisors it takes 7 of the 11 and this proposal makes it set for the majority of board of supervisors to reject our proposal want to let you know the who chapters the board of supervisors has until the end of july to the ballot just wanted you to have those and we've worked closely with the mayor's office and also the board of supervisors on the chart amendment so we're happy to see that and excludes myself presentation. >> members of the public would you like to speak. >> can i talk about the masonic project i heard about the open house and i'm about 5 blocks or 6 blocks from that this was a pretty wide region and looking forward to thi

direct your remarks to the board as a whole and not to matter. speakers using translation services get up to twice the time. and if you need to put up a document on the overhead advise sfgovtv, and take it down when you are finished. as in the case with items on content new unfinished business or the reports items 1 through 32 director our remark to the board and speakers as a whole and not to individual board members, no one is required to comment on your matter. tshd document on the overhead advise sfgovtv, and take it down when you are finished. thank you first speaker please. >> supervisors today, i'm going to speak about justice for mario woods coalition and on july the 22 you supervisors unanimously declared that day to remember him so there's going to be to events one on the 22 july the 22 mark it on our calendar and the other one on july 23rd at martin luther king slash jc jones playground on third street and carol supervisors this man should not have been killed or murdered but he was and we do meet every thursday at 315 rhode island to d

i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san ancisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's office effort to respond to community concerns about the loss of a parking space on west portal, it's a challenge for us as supervisors because we have no authority over those issues and we have to go through the mta board or staff for those issues, but i know supervisor yee worked very hard and his staff to respond, but i think as we appoint mta commissioners, we're looking at people that support strong community engagement like lee does and i know when he met with angelina from my staff, that was a key theme of ensuring that neighborhoods, merchant associates are listened to and that's a

if the board does not act by that date the general plan amendment is deemed to be passed. if the board adopts it within that 90-day period it is adopted and if the board rejects it in that 90-day period it's deemed rejected so my question in so far as we don't have a full compliment of supervisors today if there's a five five tie, is it deemed approved or is it deemed not approved? >> deputy city attorney. i'm trying to get some consensus in my office. the charter on this states that the commission shall recommended that the board approve or reject and if the board fails to act within 90 days the general plan amendment shall be deemed approved and as you discussed i'm looking back to see what our previous advice has been. can't answer that on the fly but i will have an answer. >> i suggest we come back to this item and skip over item number 9 until we get some advice from deputy city attorney and his office. >> supervisor campos? >> i don't understand why there would be a question about that. if you don't have a majority of the supervisors supporting or approving an item t

i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san ancisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's office effort to respond to community concerns about the loss of a parking space on west portal, it's a challenge for us as supervisors because we have no authority over those issues and we have to go through the mta board or staff for those issues, but i know supervisor yee worked very hard and his staff to respond, but i think as we appoint mta commissioners, we're looking at people that support strong community engagement like lee does and i know when he met with angelina from my staff, that was a key theme of ensuring that neighborhoods, merchant associates are listened to and that's a

all right with that we'll go back to our regular business of the board. madam clerk, can we skip over and go to our committee reports? >> yes. items 19 and 20 were considered by the budget and finance committee and were forwarded as committee reports. >> roll call vote. >> would you like me to call the items separately? there are a number of them. >> call item 19 first please. >> 19 and 20 together? >> yes. >> item 19 was amended in committee with a new title designating san francisco print media to be the official newspapers of the city and county of san francisco. item 20 was amended in committee also with a new title designating sf weekly and san francisco bayview to be the periodicals for the african-american community and sf weekly to be the outreach periodicals for the hispanic community and central city extra for the tenderloin neighborhoods and marina times. >> supervisor peskin? >> thank you madam president. i rise to oppose the changes made in committee on item 19. i think it sets a terrible precedent and example when one of the bidders did not r

the premise projected assessment appeals board revenue is decreasing about $300,000. in the budget years. this is due it's a significant drop in the appeal cases at the aab due to stronger state markets expect that trend to continue in the budget year. on the topic of the assessment appeals you may recall that apartment received funding to alleviate backlog of appeals in this courier 13-14 and 15-16 were please to report the backlog has been tackled as of march of this year. i would like to thank us as her chew and her staff for their excellent and ongoing collaboration with other departments as the assessor stated earlier today, the assessor's office has initiated it davis 44 one the process which has helped to significant way minimize the number of appeals that are been scheduled by working with the taxpayer on better scheduling were negotiating which leads to a withdrawal altogether of an appeal. potentially. the city is also rolling out its ee signature capability this year. that combined with our rolling out of our online filing last year at the aab, we expect to

all right with that we'll go back to our regular business of the board. madam clerk, can we skip over and go to our committee reports? >> yes. items 19 and 20 were considered by the budget and finance committee and were forwarded as committee reports. >> roll call vote. >> would you like me to call the items separately? there are a number of them. >> call item 19 first please. >> 19 and 20 together? >> yes. >> item 19 was amended in committee with a new title designating san francisco print media to be the official newspapers of the city and county of san francisco. item 20 was amended in committee also with a new title designating sf weekly and san francisco bayview to be the periodicals for the african-american community and sf weekly to be the outreach periodicals for the hispanic community and central city extra for the tenderloin neighborhoods and marina times. >> supervisor peskin? >> thank you madam president. i rise to oppose the changes made in committee on item 19. i think it sets a terrible precedent and example when one of the bidders did not r

. >> the voters made the changes to the set aside and last year late last year the mta board and the board of supervisors approved the transportation sustainability fee that brought residential development and essentially go significantly increased the amount of revenue dedicated to transportation infrastructure that capitalized from new development that is happening and increased by more than 60 percent over the old transit development fee that was itch more narrowly focused so with those additional funds this is a lot more we've been to chip away at the deficit that the task force identified the prop a the goading go bond was organized and focusing on the reliability of street safety the blue on the chart shows the first issuance of the bonds that was done last year and from that some of the projects that i've talked about today that you've approved over the last year and including some have gone into the ground are market-rate on the streets in terms of physical improvements on the streets to reduce the relays and increase muni and more buses we're enjoying and the funding for calt

the item was referred to the full board with a positive recommendation at the full board last week therd heard the landmarking suppression and this was sponsored by supervisor avalos and the item passed first reading there were 3 introductions of note the first one were the in zoning controls that was sponsored by supervisor peskin and supervisor kim there was also an ordinance introduced by supervisor farrell and supervisor wiener that are the planning and administrative code to conduct codes citywide and similar to supervisor peskin ordinance and a planning amendment that deals with medical services that amended the planning code for change of use from a business or professional service to medical on the first floor below on the sacramento commercial district that concludes my remarks but like to thank the director for coming to any hometown there are thirty thousand units and adding 10 thousand more so - >> thank you good afternoon tim frye here to share a couple of things from the historic preservation commission the commission healed the second hearing on the landmarking for the m

currently as you know all 7 members of the board are in the mind by the mayor and conformed by the board of supervisors this chart amendment gives the mayor 4 nominees to this board to be subject to the board of supervisors confirmation from the board of supervisors - so we'll splitter the appointment for other divisions and also change the threshold of which the board of supervisors can reject the mta budget roadway it takes more than the majority of supervisors it takes 7 of the 11 and this proposal makes it set for the majority of board of supervisors to reject our proposal want to let you know the who chapters the board of supervisors has until the end of july to the ballot just wanted you to have those and we've worked closely with the mayor's office and also the board of supervisors on the chart amendment so we're happy to see that and excludes myself presentation. >> members of the public would you like to speak. >> can i talk about the masonic project i heard about the open house and i'm about 5 blocks or 6 blocks from that this was a pretty wide region and looking forward to thi

currently as you know all 7 members of the board are in the mind by the mayor and conformed by the board of supervisors this chart amendment gives the mayor 4 nominees to this board to be subject to the board of supervisors confirmation from the board of supervisors - so we'll splitter the appointment for other divisions and also change the threshold of which the board of supervisors can reject the mta budget roadway it takes more than the majority of supervisors it takes 7 of the 11 and this proposal makes it set for the majority of board of supervisors to reject our proposal want to let you know the who chapters the board of supervisors has until the end of july to the ballot just wanted you to have those and we've worked closely with the mayor's office and also the board of supervisors on the chart amendment so we're happy to see that and excludes myself presentation. >> members of the public would you like to speak. >> can i talk about the masonic project i heard about the open house and i'm about 5 blocks or 6 blocks from that this was a pretty wide region and looking forward to thi

direct your remarks to the board as a whole and not to matter. speakers using translation services get up to twice the time. and if you need to put up a document on the overhead advise sfgovtv, and take it down when you are finished. as in the case with items on content new unfinished business or the reports items 1 through 32 director our remark to the board and speakers as a whole and not to individual board members, no one is required to comment on your matter. tshd document on the overhead advise sfgovtv, and take it down when you are finished. thank you first speaker please. >> supervisors today, i'm going to speak about justice for mario woods coalition and on july the 22 you supervisors unanimously declared that day to remember him so there's going to be to events one on the 22 july the 22 mark it on our calendar and the other one on july 23rd at martin luther king slash jc jones playground on third street and carol supervisors this man should not have been killed or murdered but he was and we do meet every thursday at 315 rhode island to d

of the board of supervisors. we recommend that you approve this proposed resolution. >> all right. at this time why don't we open item 5 to public comment. any members of the public wish to speak? seeing none public comment is closed. [gavel] . if we could get a motion to amend item 5 and then send to the full board. >> okay. motion to amend and send the item to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> all right. we can do so without objection. thank you. item 6 please. >> item 6. resolution authorizing a lease between the city and county of san francisco, as tenant, and 200 paul, llc of office production and warehouse space at 200 paul avenue. >> hello again mr. updike. >> now it's good afternoon. john updike director of real estate. so this property is about the department of technology and the public safety division. you may recall four years ago we brought to the board for approval a renewal of the san francisco wholesale produce market and required 910 rincon the former location of the unit. they wer

all right with that we'll go back to our regular business of the board. madam clerk, can we skip over and go to our committee reports? >> yes. items 19 and 20 were considered by the budget and finance committee and were forwarded as committee reports. >> roll call vote. >> would you like me to call the items separately? there are a number of them. >> call item 19 first please. >> 19 and 20 together? >> yes. >> item 19 was amended in committee with a new title designating san francisco print media to be the official newspapers of the city and county of san francisco. item 20 was amended in committee also with a new title designating sf weekly and san francisco bayview to be the periodicals for the african-american community and sf weekly to be the outreach periodicals for the hispanic community and central city extra for the tenderloin neighborhoods and marina times. >> supervisor peskin? >> thank you madam president. i rise to oppose the changes made in committee on item 19. i think it sets a terrible precedent and example when one of the bidders did not r

with regard to the impact when the influence of the board of supervisors on the mta board and the decisions of the mta, i would say first of all, i don't believe that i've ever heard in my nearly five-year tenure of the time when an mta board member was not responsive to a member of the board of supervisors were actions of the board of supervisors as a whole regardless of who nominated them to sit on the mta board.. i don't think that i have brought to my board for a decision any major project that has been opposed by a member of the board of supervisors in his district that project resided. it's been a principal of mine that us members of the board of supervisors are the elected representatives the people in your district and it would be not responsible of me to bring something to my board for their consideration that you oppose. so we worked very hard to work with your offices, even on objects that are very controversial and about that what i will say is that as we are striving to implement your-this bodies transit first policy, this bodies climate change policy and other policies of the

we ask the board of pr visors invest alternatives to building a new jail. last year the full youth commission we supported to not have [inaudible] a lot of youth came out to the hearing we had from youth experiences who experienced parents of incarceration and how that directly impacted their lives. we came to the conclusion to oppose the detention center. so, for -there is adult young court which is established in the process of last year 2015 where from the ages of 18 to 25 year olds are accepted into the program. this excludes homicides, gang and gun violences offenses also. this is a way to invest in the youth and give them another chance which is a great way and alternative also. we want the city capital investment to reflect the values of young san franciscan responsible for paying for jails and jails would cost a lot of money. recommendations we ask the board of supervisors invest to alternative [inaudible] considering there are a lot of youth in the jail population. and also we provide need services for non detention settings and include minuteal hea

i would just like to make a friendly suggestion to the board. one of the topics should be "how to be your own advocate". like for instance sometimes certain medical test aren't provided for people and it can have a fatal result. i know a personal incidence of that. how to advocate, how to actually understand even though the diseases you may have, questions to ask the doctor. i think this should be interesting and i think this should be an on going aspect of the health fare. so people can real use this assistance to their advantage to get maximum medical care and especially important if you are retired. >> thank you very much for that suggestion. >> no others. we'll move to action item 10. >> >>clerk: action item 10. vote on whether to cancel july 2016 health services board meeting. >> we have in the past canceled this meeting because board of supervisors is on vacation. we will be meeting. the board of supervisors isn't on vacation. they are doing the budget. >> i move we cancel the july meeting. >> is there a second . >> second. >> universally s

it should be some further details coming back to the board. >> okay. o, to be clear, director, [inaudible] because you're objecting to. do you have a dollar amount on that? >> yes. it's two and $48,000 in the first fiscal year 16-17 could 181 in fiscal year 18. >> okay, because there's a lot of recommendations you. objecting to the 11 nine dollars in reserve? >> correct. >> we will amend that to accepting the la recommendation all that into reserve until we can provide more detailed and connect sources. >> okay. you're okay with everything except those,, the reserve amount, odyssey were putting forward the swim objections to the turk amendment. can we get clarity-if we ask our make sure were very articulate about what we are doing. >> you want specific-. so, were not agreeing to the 095320933 at $14,000. the additional reduction to professional services of $100,000 and the 0923 to the 2917 $32,000. we agree to the 1822, as long as we maintain a position of authority and the savings will come through attrition. >> okay. i tell you what i think there's a

why is the board merely applying the mayor to his security detail cause when the board could and should be demanding that he return all salary and benefits and expenses paid to in between his official announcement candidacy for governor and a withdrawal. he suddenly felt each and every one of those days to apply his entire time and attention to the duties of the office and anything less than his entire time and attention is his entire failure to serve. he should also be great salary and benefits and expenses for each day he failed when asked to categorically denied that he would be a candidate for governor. he should rebate salary and benefits and expenses reached a of his expected service when he was so disengaged from contact with our beloved city and county that there was no officially designated acting mayor. i would also ask the board to rebate salary and benefits and expenses for themselves and for their staff for each day of debate on this matter either in committee or full board when no member raise the issue of a possible conflict with the charter. i'd like to thank every membe

next the board heard the ord street to rescind the approval and modify it the modification limit the height of the planter boxed on the roof deck at the railing and amending the front and rear setbacks the boards voted to approve and finally the market street project which others board passed an first reading and no introductions of note this week >> that concludes my remarks. >> thank you board of appeals met 3 items maybe of interest to the commissioner first an appeal on the university of 22 noisz and penalties to 22 different properties and in this re-established a deadline of july 1st for publication of spectrum responses to comment with the draft eir at the hearing the board of appeals unanimously uphold the notice of violations penalties and those deadlines remain we're on track track to have those pushed by july 1st and on track for the certification on july 28th and lombard street he heard this is a mandatory discretionary review for a medical cannabis dispensary in the and i hypotheses was heard by you last november and community groups in opposition to the project at the h

i would just like to make a friendly suggestion to the board. one of the topics should be "how to be your own advocate". like for instance sometimes certain medical test aren't provided for people and it can have a fatal result. i know a personal incidence of that. how to advocate, how to actually understand even though the diseases you may have, questions to ask the doctor. i think this should be interesting and i think this should be an on going aspect of the health fare. so people can real use this assistance to their advantage to get maximum medical care and especially important if you are retired. >> thank you very much for that suggestion. >> no others. we'll move to action item 10. >> >>clerk: action item 10. vote on whether to cancel july 2016 health services board meeting. >> we have in the past canceled this meeting because board of supervisors is on vacation. we will be meeting. the board of supervisors isn't on vacation. they are doing the budget. >> i move we cancel the july meeting. >> is there a second . >> second. >> universally s

public may address the board for up to three minutes. each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except that public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. if simultaneous translation on items of interest o the public services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. the president or the board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes.members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting.for adoption without committee referencethese measures were introduced for adoption without >> [indecipherable] >>here you see his picture when he visits years and here is his picture at 74 years. i'm very proud to shake hands in egypt in oakland. and i think his wife and i would like for her to be

it's great to get the sell today and pelt like a sell but i want to know all the options and before the board and why is this the best value and not just told it's the best value option but i look forward to the continued conversation. i think there is a broader context with phase two that we need to acknowledge and not in today's presentation and i know it's an ongoing dialogue conversation. >> ed. >> yeah. i guess i would add for the reason the agency exists and the reason we're building the building and all the funding partners have put in some cases hundreds of millions of dollars and the city has puts it own balance sheet on the line to complete the phase one is to get the trains to downtown san francisco because i think everybody in the region recognizeslet importance of doing that the regional economy and accommodate the growth in the region so i think it's great and i appreciate the chair shifting the focus of the board now to phase two because that's the ultimate prize as great as phase one project is and i appreciate the staff work for the presentation. it was very comprehensive to

person must be approved by you and the others on the board of governors before taking office the fed were recently reappointed each and every one of these presidents without any public debate or any public discussion about it. so the question i have is if you're concerned about this diversity issue, why didn't you use either of these opportunities to say enough is enough. let's go back and see if we can but a qualified regional president who also contributed to the overall diversity of the fed's leadership. >> so we did undertake a thorough review of the reappointments of the performance of the presidents and that is the board of governors have oversight of the reserve banks. their annual meetings between the boards bank committee and the leadership of those banks to review the performance of the president and there were thorough reviews. >> by your tell me diversity is important yet you just signed up with all these folks without any public discussion about it. i appreciate your commitment to diversity, i have have no doubt about it, i do not question it. it just shows me the select

so i would hope that once this comes to the full board that the board of supervisors will engage in a good debate about this and i don't know what will happen i can speculate but i also think that there's value to having a debate at the further be it resolved or members of the board of supervisors so they can go on record and say where they are and people want to make it easier are harder to create housing put more obstacles in the way of building affordable housing and do we want more housing to our kids and grandkids can live in san francisco or make that has hard as possible to build hours so the average rent is $3,500 a month or people get evicted and have to leave san francisco for anywhere to live i'm happy to have that debate and my view that had happy again but a worthwhile i prefer to move the legislation how the commissioner nakajo is the author and i'll defer to her deserve my prefer to move the entire piece of legislation out both the mixed income and the 100 percent my understanding that supervisor tang is not moving both out it is a compromise so the conversation can mov