if the board is to consider this next week. >> the question to staff do we have it confirmed that the board of supervisors need this board to way in on this item before the final reading? my understand is that it is already out of committee there, but if it's not the case, i need to know. >> i believe it is already considered in committee. if they don't need additional information of the board, it won't be time sensitive. i agree with director romano. >> one of the issues with a charter like this, is the comptroller stated about the cost. if it's a 10 year amortization, to a five year, that would need to know. in terms of timing, i don't know how those deadlines are submitted and maybe to be conscious of the board and maybe to account for this at the next meeting as opposed to the august meeting which may help those who were involved in trying to establish this change. >> are you saying we can do it at the investment committee? >> i think we can do it. we'll have a meeting next week. >> >> i think as a matter of procedure we have to calendar it as a special board meeting. it can be at

by the board of supervisors. subsequential it was in trying by the voters as voter approved law that i put on the ballot with 3-4 of my colleagues. that was proposition e of last june. and that included safe guards that any amendments to the ever evolving field of behested payment regulation would require the review and approval of the majority of the ethic's commission that was not otherwise, involved in examining the law or changes there to and would require a 2 third's super majority of this board of supervisors the law that we passed last year that a lot of things it was not meant to smil giving but was meant to regulate it. along the way a number of our colleagues found instances where their ability to seek good philanthropic donations to everything from the school district to others were impeded. and the administration and certain nonprofits raised concerns all of which in a long back and fourth have cull monated in the legislation that you see here before you that indeed on august the 12th was recommended b

we do consider for it to be a positive matter for the board. financial information we saw was from 2019. we don't know the financial condition of the organization and therefore can't evaluate their ability to pay this back. >> thank you. let's hear from public comment. >> members of the public and joining us in person should lineup to speak. for those wishing to speak via phone please call public comment call-in 1 (415) 655-0001 / meeting id: 2494 575 9138 # # please continue to wait until the system has indicated that you are unmuted. seeing no one lined up in chambers, madam chair, we have no speakers in the queue. >>supervisor hillary ronen: public comment is now closed. >> i am supportive of this lease. it makes sense to me that the city would forgive a small amount of additional rent due to the on going challenges with covid. this is a wonderful venue and theatre of arts. if there are no other comments, i will make a motion to send this item to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> on this motion with a forward recommendation wi

and the board will accept written correspondence by us mail using the addressing. francisco board of supervisors, the number one, dr. carlton b. place, city hall, room 244 san francisco, california. 94102. send an e-mail to the board using the e-mail address, bos@sgov dot org. we're joined by partners by the office of civil engage and i ask each interpreter to introduce themselves and how to connect to the remote center to provide it in the language: we'll start with the interpreters. thank you. >> thank you, madam clerk. >> interpreter: [speaking foreign language] >> thank you. we thank our interpreters for being with us this afternoon and we know that they know to jump in once we have a speaker who does attend in language. all right. now to those who attended this meeting in person, please line up on your right-hand side near curtains to make your public comment. we ask that you adjust the microphone once you approach the podium and you speak directly into the microphone so that the system can speak, peck up your comments. we are sitting the timer for two minutes.

the other guy. including this board. uestion is not what is the navy going to do, because i have met with deputy-or assistant secretary james polici of the navy who rose to the rank of vice admiral. i met with assistant secretary, callten waterhouse. they are both on board. you guys as the board of supervisors have a overriding responsibility. none of this property can be forwarded or transferred without you. i need you guys to do your piece and stop allowing this stuff to continue to go through and everybody else will show up at the table when you do that. please trust and believe that and if you want their cell phone numbers, i will give you-- [applause] >> my name is (inaudible) talked about the hearing today so i have two points i would like to raise. one is, i do believe that you were saying something about the regulations, the rules. does that mean that this city cannot do anything until the epa or whatever the letter was, the organization from until they agree to what can be done in the bayview? because this young

this permit went to the historic landmark's board. went to variance sharing and the planning commission. and it was upheld. the rear structure that is questioned currently is based on a 1938 forecast that the former zoning administrator found that shows that back portion of the building. this is where the appellate is arguing. that permit was about to be issued and some work was done by appropriating the foundation below the existing structure and the -- building inspector came out there. looked at the steel or the contractor said, he does not want to move forward until the permit was issued. the permit was going to be issue in the a week. inspector went through the building and we went ahead the contractor went ahead and powered the foundation from the inspector's direction. that's less [inaudible] it does not create issues with the building code. additional low, they moved forward with the 219 permitings issued. they moved forward with the work and found deterioration in the back. this building -- this building started off with a pit

our first was preview in the june to the board. confirm as the lead agency for procurement and construction of the project and build the capacity of tjpa and partners to under take delivery. this recommendation and the board's consideration of it serve to satisfy task number 19 of the rail m oushgs, calls for the board to identify the lead agency for construction in the project. they have the existing legal authority for project deliver and he the ability to continue to [speaking fast]. [no audio] >> there we go. last one. thanks. this slide presents the study 4 primary recommendations more fully described in the 5 [inaudible] i will not read them out here. the first of the primary recommendation is utilize a collaborative management prop for project delivery including the formation of a core project management team from key agencies with a direct role or stake in project delivery. this integrated management team would be convened and lead bite project director and pip in the management level direction of the project. work ahead in

is there comment from the board? >> we'll have public comment at this time. >> thank you, president scott. in person comment will be first then virtual. if you near person approach the podium now. each allows 3 minutes enemies the president deemed time limits. all comments made concerning the item that is presented. call are may ask questions of the body but no obligation to answer. for on the line when i welcome you you are encouraged to scientist your name clearly. i will give you a warning when 30 seconds close to ending when 3 minutes ended you will be placed on mute and the moderator will unmute the next caller. remote viewing with sfgovtv and web ex. opportunity to speak are available dialing the number on the screen the number is 415-554-0001. again 415-554-0001. when prompted use code, access code: 2484 203 8219 ##. again access code: 2484 203 8219 ##. you will enter the meeting on the public comment call line and dial star 3 to be add to the queue when the system message says you are unmute third degree is yo

or send the board an email. in a great partnership with the office engagement, interpreters will be present beginning with the first public hearing on the item 17, 18, 19 and then during general public comment. and finally, if you have any questions accessing this meeting, please call the clerk's office. we have a clerk standing by to assist you. thank you mr. president. >> thank you, madam clerk. colleagues before we get started, just a friendly reminder to please mute your microphones when you're not speaking. we're now at approval of meeting minutes from july 26, 2022 regular board meeting and august 8, 2022 special board meeting. i don't see anyone on the roster, any changes to the meeting minutes. madam clerk, sorry, can i have a motion to approve the minutes made by supervisor preston, seconded by supervisor mannedalman. >> as minutes as presented. supervisor doersy. aye. mandelman aye. mar, mar, aye. milgaard, milgaard aye, preston aye, supervisor ronen. ronen. aye. supervisor safai, aye. >> and supervisor

will not be implemented by the board the board does not have jurisdiction and that the board urges the punishment of additional works to hold out reach and train with all chapter 6 departments by december 31 of 22 and report to the board by march 2123. r3 the burden submit evaluations in the data base by december 31 of 22. recommendation r4, that not implemented but will be and that the board will introduce an ordinance by december 31 of 22 amending the code to require all chapter 6 departments to consult presumption erperformance evaluations. recommend ace r5, requires analysis and urges the d. public wishes to report to the board by march 31 of 23. and feasibility of updates the data base technology to bench who is using the data base and when or to present alternative methods of accountability. r6 further analysis and urges public ws to report by march therein of 23 on the feasibility of [speak very fast]. recommendation r 7 the recommendation will not be implemented the mainlies of a dast base by puc social project partnerships does in the emped that our other department's ability

the other guy. including this board. uestion is not what is the navy going to do, because i have met with deputy-or assistant secretary james polici of the navy who rose to the rank of vice admiral. i met with assistant secretary, callten waterhouse. they are both on board. you guys as the board of supervisors have a overriding responsibility. none of this property can be forwarded or transferred without you. i need you guys to do your piece and stop allowing this stuff to continue to go through and everybody else will show up at the table when you do that. please trust and believe that and if you want their cell phone numbers, i will give you-- [applause] >> my name is (inaudible) talked about the hearing today so i have two points i would like to raise. one is, i do believe that you were saying something about the regulations, the rules. does that mean that this city cannot do anything until the epa or whatever the letter was, the organization from until they agree to what can be done in the bayview? because this young

the full board may by motion direct the clerk for a subpoena. the language is different in the gao to authorize that and it has been by a written motion where it was agendaized and the public can comment on it. i would advise you of the procedure and what it appears like if it were to be an enforcement. >> thank you. i would like to just make my final comment. thank you to all workers. it is shameful that i know we say kaiser is a non-profit, but it's not. it's a model that is actually not working for patients, it's not working for our workers. it is it's certainly working for the pockets of the executives who have been profiting quite a bit for quite some time now on the backs of the patients and on the backs of our workers at the expenses as we can see today from just heartbreaking stories. they are not just stories, they are real human lives. i think that is very unfortunate that kaiser, i'm ashamed to say this but it's true that they are putting profits before people and it's shameful and if we could as a city, we should exercise our rights

. >> my name is dan leung the assistance for the sheriff oversight board. on behalf of the sheriff department and oversight board we like to thank the staff at sfgovtv to provide technical assistance to broadcast the meeting. i will now call the agenda. lineitepm 1, roll call. welcome and introduction. informational. roll call. board member afuhaamango. >> push the button. bottom left. turn the pike mic on. >> hell o. okay. hi. here. >> thank you. board member afuhaamango is here. board member brookter. >> present. >> board member brookter is present. board member carrion is out of the country and will not be in attendance today. she is watching live though. board member nguyen. >> present. >> board member nguyen is present. board member palmer is also out of the country and will be joining remotely and just watching. board member soo. >> board member soo is present. board member wechter. >> present. >> board member wechter is prenlt. we have a quorum. also with us a kepy city attorney jana clark, sheriff office paul miyamoto. executive director paul henders

welcome to the retirement board meeting. this meeting is held in a hybrid format with the meeting occuring on live on sfgovtv, i would like to remind all individuals present and attending the meeting in-person, that all health and safety protocols and building rules must be adhered to. failure to adhere to these rules, may result in your removal from this room. we appreciate your cooperation in these important rules and requirement of everyone's health and safety. please also note that hand sanitizer station right side available throughout the building and all available upon request at the front desk. madam secretary please call the roll. >> commissioner brijds. bridges. >> present. >> commissioner--. >> present. sxwr. commissioner began deis absent. commissioner. >> present. >> clerk: commissioner safa s*i has not arrived saoer. commissioner tomas. >> present. >> clerk: we have a quorum. >> call the item. >> clerk: item 2 public comments. there will be an opportunity for public comment and there will be an opportunity to com

until we go through a staff press with the board. we will do that but after today, each meeting cause another delay. we were asking for it went to the commission and board in assessment. was through the end of january to give us this room to go through the 30-day hold on the legislation to go throughout committees on our legislation and get it passed as fast as possible. i know that the supervisors support its i believe the mayor's office support its. it was this was in the material provided. it was in the material provided to this commission in july. it was only in yesterday's provision the exception was excised we are asking for it to be put back in with a much smaller time frame and i believe that would be -- you know be allowed go forward as part of an amendment today. >> so, clarify for me, if this commission does not act the earliest the board supervisor rules committee would consider this would be october 17k how would that affect your rfq's with nonprofits? >> it would provent us between now and as we are now -- in october 17t

just to say that the boarding school, opening up the conversations that may be possible with boardingty to pivot the entirety of the relationship that the united states government has with the native peoples of this country. and because of the possibility of that pivot, that you need to actually move forward, not only with care, but with i would say some differentiation. and by differentiation, i would say that you recognize that there are different levels. there is a level of the individual, which would include the survivors, as well as the descendants. as well as the native peoples who are not actually accounted for in the boarding schools, but essentially, were cast into the diaspora. and so, they are no longer a part of any peoples that are officially recognized by the federal government. and may actually be dislocated by hundreds of thousands of miles. from their homeland. and they show up, they will show up in a community center or they will show up at a mental health clinic, or they will show up someplace. and they will say, i remember that i am of these people. whatever those

the full board may by motion direct the clerk for a subpoena. the language is different in the gao to authorize that and it has been by a written motion where it was agendaized and the public can comment on it. i would advise you of the procedure and what it appears like if it were to be an enforcement. >> thank you. i would like to just make my final comment. thank you to all workers. it is shameful that i know we say kaiser is a non-profit, but it's not. it's a model that is actually not working for patients, it's not working for our workers. it is it's certainly working for the pockets of the executives who have been profiting quite a bit for quite some time now on the backs of the patients and on the backs of our workers at the expenses as we can see today from just heartbreaking stories. they are not just stories, they are real human lives. i think that is very unfortunate that kaiser, i'm ashamed to say this but it's true that they are putting profits before people and it's shameful and if we could as a city, we should exercise our rights

>> >> evening, the regular board -- good evening, the regular board of education for august 23, 2022, is now called to toward. roll call. >> thank you, pre-lam. >> delegate anson. >> commissioner alexander? >> here. >> vice-president boggess? >> here. >> commissioner hsu? >> here. >> commissioner motamedi? >> here. >> commissioner sanchez? >> here. >> commissioner weissman-ward? >> here. >> president lam? >> here. >> thank you. >> at this time before the board goes into closed session, i call for speakers for closed session item listed in the agenda. they'll be a total of five minutes for speakers. are there any speakers for public comment? >> seeing none in person. >> please raise your hand if you care to speak to the closed session items. we'll have a total of five minutes and each speaker will have one minute to speak. i'm seeing no hands raised for virtual public comment. >> thank you so much. at this time, we'll go into closed session. [closed session] >> attendees who wish to provide public comment to the board and like an asl interpreter can use the q&a to type the handle and l

i think the board should rethink the goals. you want top prevent making a house with adu if you prevent them from building 3 and 4 units when than i build the husband their mack is a house with an adu when planning asked why did you not mixture myself with 4 units the developer can say this is the max density buzz you called mow a speck later. or -- is the goal to prevenn sham units or allow more units. make it more affordable or prevent the developer from making a profit? in my opinion you should relax [inaudible] and stream line the planning press so more housing built with a goal of increasing housing production with our housing develop. so that the rent will go down in san francisco. thank you. thank you and it looks like that was the last caller in the queue. madam chair yoochlt thank you. with this public comment is closed. okay. so -- would you like me to split the files first, supervisor machine man? and then amend ownership mendz and split it? i think supervisor preston. >> i can run through my requests of the committe

the board may not unilateral lea mend the contract. department may choose to bring back a different version but the board may not do that. >> right. so if we continue this item today and gave you, you know, time you needed to redo the contract so it's a shorter length of time, will that cause, you know, any problems with making payment to? st. vincent depaul. i want to understand real life implications of doing that. we do want to not have a retroactive agreement and make a payment for october services. you know, we can talk off line or we can talk about coming back in a week with a, you know, smaller term but i would want to make sure that i would want to have more discussion with our system and make sure that we're not since this is an op raying site. >> why don't you confer with your team and we'll bring you back up. >> okay, thank you. >> no problem, mr. clerk, please call item number 5. you know what, let me not call number 5. sorry, i'm going to give you more time. can you please call item number. >> clerk: item 7 and 8, approvin

the full board with positive recommendation. [roll call] >> we have 3 ayes. >> the motion passes unanimously. >> item 2 resolution supportingteneder loin neighborhood development corpination 730 stanyan associates lp and mercy housing agent applicant submission of application s under the infill infrastructure grant program to california department of housing and community development to receive program funds in order to construct 100 percent affordable multifamily rental housing development afoud fordable to low income house holds at 2550 urvening street, 730 stanyan street and 2350 18th street. members who wish to call 1-415-655-0001 meeting id: 2493 171 7009 # #, press pond twice. once connected press star 3 to enter the speaker line. when the system indicates you are unmuted that is your queue to begin comments. >> thank you. we have sheila (inaudible) >> good afternoon. >> director of policy and legislative affairs mayor office of housing and community development and we have a quick presentation to give you a overview what t

if the board thinks it is clear that the permit will not one way or the other, the board could deny the appeal the judgment allows the work to be done or grant the appeal because you think the gentlemen probabilities the permit from moving forward. consider it for sure. >> and if it is00 thooms we will not make a decision tonight and let them go become and get clarity on the subject this is just a clerical thing is this a call the chair because we don't know when this might come back. or is do we just postpone the decision to a fixed date. continue to the call the chair condition return once the parties obtained air decision from the court on the matter. >> thank you for this add vice. commissioner lemberg. >> i have a lot of opinions about this. i do strongly believe the court. if the appellates want their argument to succeed we need clarity from superior court on this matter. i you know i -- hear the planning department's position. i hear dbi's position they have to stay neutral and understand that and understand why. that being said, i you know -- as commissioner swig corrected me la

i came from a payroll listenic to help people who had issues and working with the board over the months to get board focused on student out come. focused on supporting our schools. with that, here is what i will ask you to do. and so be appreciated you coming out and rather than one question, one response i will not hear from as many. i will ask for your feedback we will gather and put in the report in the areas i described. we have post it's the same on each side and chart paper. think about to think about, what do you think i need ton and understand as we are developing our plans for the future and updating our vision, values and goals for students? we have post it's and pens. and so like culture and climate. curriculum and instruction. one parent was sharing, instruction. how are we including different cullures and perspectives and religions in our curriculum in this is where you make that note so we have it recorded. i will give you 10 minutes, 20 minutes we'll see with the crowd. at least 10 -- and may be 15 we will see how people do with documenting your thoughts getting them up t

the attendee needs a functioning camera to communicate with the board. the zoom host will promote the attendee to panelists and enable the attendee's video. translation, go ahead, please. >> interpreter: thank you. this is spanish and cantonese. this will be in spanish and cantonese. [speaking foreign language] >> cantonese interpreter, please. [speaking foreign language] thank you.? thank you. president lam, that concludes our translation services. >> thank you so much. >> thanks for your patience. i would like to reconvene to open session and report from the closed session. in five matters of anticipated litigation, the board gave direction to general counsel in the matter of student ll verses sfusd0h8 case number 2022050468. the board by a vote of 7 ayes gave direction to the general counsel in the matter of student am verses sfusd case number 2022051023, the board by a vote of 7 ayes voted a settlement and release agreement up to stipulated amount. in the matter of student et verses sfusd08h case number 20226137, the board by a vote of 7 ayes approved

schedules, mail the board staff at sfgov.org. public access is important. sfgovtv is broadcasting and live and receive public comment for each item on the upon agenda of sfgovtv is providing closed captioning. to watch the hearing go to sfgovtv cable channel 28. a link to the live stroll on the home page at sfgov.org/boa. upon comment provide by in personful, via zoom. click on the zoom link or by phone. call 669-900-6833 and enter webinar code: 881 2773 1840 ## >> sfgovtv is broadcasting and streaming the phone number and instructions on the b. stroll if you are watching the broadcast. to block your number dial star 67 then the initial listen for the public comment to be called and dial star 9 equals to raising your hand so we know you want to speak. you will be brought in when it is your turn. you may have to dial star 6 to unmute yourself. our assistant will provide you with 30 seconds different your time is up there it is a delay with the proceedings than what is broadcast. people call nothing reduce the volume on tv or comput