sfers through the retirement board and that is the roll of the board in, you know, weighing in the any way on the measure you provided a copy of the report and through the controller's office with sfers staff and - but beyond that it is really your own policies not supposed to be weighing in the any way certainly not one before the voters and then you look at that political memo and that also plays a roll in - the easiest way for the weighing in on contractor benefits. >> i add that - so the costing roll that is set forth in the san francisco charter is similar to um, reminded to others benefit plans in california and i think that is very easily entitled with our fiduciary because you are you're responsibility to make sure the competency to pay the promised you benefits and who better than the retirement system to provide the actuary costs anticipated to be to result from let's see - a benefit grant not opining on the benefit but this was granted by the sponsor here's what the actuary is saying the cost will likely be and understanding they fluctuate based on assumptions may or may not

in the board of directors, all the contracts were signed by me as the finance member of the board of directors and the ceo. it was a board resolution. all player contracts were signed by me and mr. khatir khatir , but the sponsors' contracts were not given to me at all. why, well, if you look at all of them now, they all have problems, you asked at that time, yes, the reason is the same the report we made and you got involved in the moreh board, one case is the same issue, with whom did you get involved, with the managing director mr. khatib yes and mr. sami himself who is now the supervisor , why did you come as a legal representative, you signed in my place, you have the right to sign. you didn't have it according to the minutes of the meeting, i should have signed it and the ceo and why did you get this check? as a lawyer, you don't know that this check should be inquired about, then it should be a check related to the company itself, why did you get a personal check, yes and why you didn't take legal action, then we didn't take legal action when the check was returned none of thes

with those enhanced processes in place, again, the board approves phase 1. as reminder, phase 1 is staffed under my direction. the opportunity to reup and allocate capitals with managers previously approved by the board and up to a certain percentage of assets and that level is different by each asset class. strategies above those limits or new managers or opportunities we continue to bring before the board over the last year. phase 2, would delegate funding strategies with new managers, still subject to all those limits such that any big investment that came above one of those pre-set limits would again, continue to compl before the board. that's review of why we implemented phase 1 and what phase 1 is. now i like to turn to slide 13 and we'll talk about the actual implementation over the year. certainly, please feel free to jump in and ask questions as we go along. when we talk last year, we not only in terms of rational but specific benefits. potential benefits of partial investment delegation. that is what we have here. it is exactly the words we put out

it was the approval of the board of directors . all the players' contracts were signed by me and mr. khatir khatir, but the sponsorship contracts were not signed at all. i was not given why. well, if you look at all of them now, they all have problems. the reason for the same report we did and you got involved in moreh's board is one case, with whom did you get involved, with the ceo mr. khatm yes and mr. sami himself now, as a supervisor, sir , why did you come to my place as a legal person, and you, who did not have the right to sign , signed the minutes of the meeting, according to the minutes of the meeting. the check should be inquired, and then the check should be made to the relevant company, why did he take the personal check? yes, and why didn't you take legal action? then, why didn't you take legal action? when the check was returned , none of this was done, and the contract with margoob kar was 10 years. they say that you apparently opened an account for work without the permission of the board of directors. one or two ,

>> the board, the fdic board, decided unanimously to invoke the systemic risk exception at that timeon. >> okay. >> i would agree, congressman, it was not an obvious candidate. that was one of the harder decisions i have had to make my life. candidly, i would not begrudge anyone who wanted to criticize i sometimes wonder if i made the right decision. i appreciate that. i know you do the best implement the laws. a lot of gray areas in that. let me ask a follow-up bishopric is it also true as ti risk exception for silicon valley bank that an important concern relate to the fdic was that it would be important to prevent money for going to chinese interest? what did the fdic do to analyze whether the fdic would be funding chinese interests and how the fdic go about preventing that? >> congressman, i can't speak to that. i would be happy to take that question back. that was really not something i was looking in at the board. at the time, what was central to my decision-making, we also had signature the same weekend. although it was not obvious to others at the time, first republic was rig

should become chair of the board? >> we did not take a position report about -- >> report does not address that ? because that is be ur >> it is beyond our mandate. >> absolutely. that means you are not recommending that board, are you? >> we are not taking any positions. >> you say they should be done expeditiously. you are not indicating it must be done expeditiously so the vice chair can become chair, are >> we are suggesting that are recommendations to be implemented expeditiously to improve the work at the fdic. t so a specific person can become chair? >> were not taking any position on who should become chair. >> in this toxic environment with five men at the helm, can you find a reason why a woman ould not become the next chair? in your reabsolutely not. >> it seems to me that the as he can to do what someone said about a fresh start. who made thatstta >> i believe that with me. a , in my opinion, should include bringing a womanacat the helm. a air. this can be difficult for my colleagues across the aisle to emb

members of the public may address the board on any matter. president, we need to do the expulsion votes though. yeah. i didn't wait, but we're i know, but we're okay. they're up . there at the top. oh thank you okay. thank you very much. sorry about that. i knew that there was i was okay. so vote on student expulsion matters. i move approval of the stipulated expulsion agreement for one high school student matter number 2023 2024. number 40 for the remainder of the current spring 2024 semester and the following fall 2024 semester through december 19th, 2024. can i have a second, second roll call? mr. steele? thank you. commissioner, commissioner. bogus. yes commissioner. fisher. yes, commissioner. lamb. yes, commissioner. sanchez. yes. commissioner. wiseman. award. yes vice president. alexander. yes. president. motamedi yes. seven no's, i move approval of the stipulated expulsion agreement for one high school student. matter number 2023 dash 2024. number 41 for the remainder of the current spring 2024 semester and the following fall 2024 semes

in accordance with budget policy--for the board and also for the public hearing. we did not receive any public comments, so with that, we are seeking board adoption of the final budget as presented in may with miner adjustments that i will be presenting to you in this meeting. overall, there is no changes to the fiscal 24-25 final budget compared to what was presented in may draft budget. includes a operating budget of $26.6 million. capital budget of $99 million for tenant improvement, portal capital maintenance repair and replacement and debt service of $15.7 million. miner change, which happened to the operating revenue is $56 thousand decrease to the bridge toll revenue as a result of recent projection of mm2 and rm3 allocation. as shown in the slide there is no change to the overall total operating revenue. the second adjustment has to do not just the budget but the reserve. with one time transfer of $1.78 million, bring the o & m reserve to 5 percent of the operating budget, which complies with the board reserve policy. so, that concludes all the adjustments

we want you to bring it to the mta board. we can do that. that will give you your notice on the second issue. if we only get one respondent, you could write into the policy. now you know, if we only get one person, then we are going to require, you know, approval by the mta board because you want to, you know, you want to understand the process or, or we include in that quarterly report, if there was only one vendor and we awarded the contract, we will specifically highlight that to you. and you can come back and say, why did this occur? how did this occur? the next time we cycle through on that particular agreement, like, you know, to give it greater scrutiny. so in in kind of government operations and situations like this, the efficiency measure is there's so much volume, there's too much time to scrutinize every single action. but we move it to an auditing function where there's reporting and highlighting. and in cases where you're concerned, you have the full ability to stop us and request us bring it to the full board at any time. so i c

so, your objection is the aggregate across the board 6.5 percent? >> yes. >> i think that is fundamentally different and the reason is, is because the-hf-the recalculation of everything and reallocation of everything seems like-- >> [indiscernible] >> i'm concerned how we-- >> maybe let me rephrase. accept as is, with the open to adjusting made to the fee in aggregate have impact of up to 6 and a half percent. >> can i ask the department, is that realistic for september 1 if we were to say up to 6.5 percent-legislatively,eme polk not-i understand the words, i understand the intention, not sure how that shows up legislatively and/or how that gets implemented on the september 1 deadline. >> deputy city attorney, the building can not amepd an ordinance. you can make-you made recommendation or considered items such when they make a final decision it is within what you considered, so if they go beyond or consider completely different legislation it has to come back here and that impacts the timeline. they are not mandated to do what the building inspectio

she worked for the lawu, she was a switch board operator and then secretary. and then founded an organization cofounded with somebody called congress of racial equity core. so the lin she came with was about equity, about young women, seniors at-risk youth having jobs. it was about more police guided. those three women to me left their legacy. >> supervisor elliot. >> when you think about the legislative and women legislatures, i think the tendency is to find a women issue that would otherwise won be covered. but so many of our legislatures women included have touched on so many faucets of policies. it's important to be seen through your life experiences how you identify and for a young girls, i think having women on the board is important because you get to see that you actually changed seat yourself in that power of decision. >> that concludes business for today. >> there was one where the fellows, at the time, they were arguing and i was the only women and only african-american, and i'm sitting there, thinking oh my god, it's a room full of people because it

i'm julie, the board's executive director. we will also be joined from representatives from the city departments that will be prenlting before the board. up front we have tina representing the planning department and kevin birmingham acting chief inspect or. we will also have matthew for dbi joining us via zoom. the board meeting guidelines are as follows. no eating or drinking in the hearing room. the rules of presentation are as follows. appellant and respondent each are given 7 minutes to present their case and three minutes to rebuttal. time may be limited if the agenda is long. our legal system will give you a verbal warning 30 seconds before your time is up. modify a determination or grant a rehearing request. please email board staff at board of appeals. now public access and captioner are paramount importance to the board. sf gov. tv is broadcasting and streaming this meeting live. sf gov. tv is also providing close captioning. so watch the meeting, go to cable channel 78. please know that it will be rebod cast on frida

and the board concurs. e call this proposition js, as that's the voter authorization that enables it. this item is that authorization for various services that accompanying the may 1st proposed budget. there's usually sensitivities to new proposition js that arise during the budget process. i'll note that for this item, there is no new contracting out proposals. these are all long standing ones. thank you. i'll be happy to take any questions. thank you. and it has now i believe really becomes a routine, no changes from the previous approve prop j contract. and so let's go to public comment on this item. yes. if there are any members of the public in the chamber today that wish to address this committee regarding this item number two, please approach the lectern. madam chair, we have no speakers. thank you. seeing no public comments. public comment is now closed. and, colleagues, i would like to move this item to full board with recommendation and the roll call, please. oh wait a second, second, second by sup

good evening and welcome to the may 29th, 2024 meeting of the san francisco board of appeals. president jose lopez will be the presiding officer tonight. he's joined by vice president alex lundberg, commissioner rick swig, commissioner john trevena and commissioner j.r. epler also present is deputy city attorney john huber, who will provide the board with any needed legal advice at the controls. the board's legal assistant, alex long. and i'm julie rosenberg, the board's executive director. we will also be joined by representatives from the city departments that will be presenting before the board this evening. up front is cory teague, the zoning administrator representing the planning department. and joining us via zoom is kevin birmingham, acting chief building inspector with the department of building inspection. in the board meeting guidelines are as follows. the board requests that you turn off or silence all phones and other electronic devices so they will not disturb the proceedings. no eating or drinking in the hearing room. the rules of presentation are as follows. for

and then lastly, we do need the mta board. you've been asking for a long time and it's taken us some time. admittedly but we will need the sfmta board to approve a joint development policy for the agency. there are state legal reasons we actually need to do that to exercise some opportunities. we have under state law, so we will bring that forward. we've started the process of drafting it, but we do want to have that conversation, i do recall when we had the conversation about potrero, your direction to me was to be as aggressive as possible with the site. we took that very seriously. we were taking that seriously with regard to some of our other maintenance yards and our parking garages. we have gone through the process of updating our facilities framework, which kind of looks at our 30 year forecast, including identifying additional sites at all of our yards that are potential for revenue generating development. so we will be bringing that forward to you in the fall. if there are any other topics of interest, let me know. i w

after the establishment of the sunni board of directors in the position of the board of directors, which consists of mohsen. and being the youngest member of the 12th parliament was recognized. the islamic council is on the way the excellence of growth and progress has and will pay attention to the improvement of the level of knowledge and technology in the country above all else . the first vice president and acting president, who was the special guest of this ceremony, referring to the actions of the 13th government and the services of martyr ayatollah raisi, said that one of the good things that our martyr focused on was the issue of water . if we did not do these strikes in the summer of 1401 , we would have faced problems in the summer of 1402. the minister of interior also presented a report on holding the elections of the 12th term of the islamic council. in this period the design and promotion of accurate systems for holding elections, in addition to the realization of electronic government in the field of elections , showed a new form of coordination between different levels of

>> the board, the fdic board, decided unanimously to invoke the systemic risk exception at that time based on a lot of analyses and discussion. >> okay. >> i would agree, congressman, it was not an obvious candidate. that was one of the harder decisions i have had to make my life. candidly, i would not begrudge anyone who wanted to criticize me for it. i sometimes wonder if i made the right decision. i appreciate that. i know you do the best implement the laws. a lot of gray areas in that. let me ask a follow-up bishopric is it also true as part of the analysis regarding the invocation of the systemic risk exception for silicon valley bank that an important concern relate to the fdic was that it would be important to prevent money for going to chinese interest? what did the fdic do to analyze whether the fdic would be funding chinese interests and how the fdic go about preventing that? >> congressman, i can't speak to that. i would be happy to take that question back. that was really not something i was looking in at the board. at the time, what was central to my decision-making, we

in this case the client was special review committee of the fdic's board. was the exclusive ethical duty we owed they understood that and also as a precautionary at the firm to separate out any lawyers who do banking work. we conducted our review in a way that ensured independence but also independence within thehe firm. but within the at the i see because there's a need for independence in that regard as well. >> there are some who have been distressed about the focus of the current chairman rather than his predecessor. during the course of your investigation significant issues were uncovered regarding previous chairs that contributet have been included in the report? >> we did notus on particular chairs or not as we make clear in the report the workplace culture issues were long-standing. they stand for many years acros different chairs. we address the conduct of the current chairman because public reporting leading to his conduct our public reported by the time we wereof appointed. what led to the need for opposeo a review led by management. which was co

that was for the assessment of appeals board. understand it is not the desire of the board to add costs to the city attorney's office. so we will remove that cost, from the board of supervisors budget. thank you. and we have mr. dan gonter. thank you, madam chair. i just wanted to make one comment i neglected to mention that we do have agreement with the city planning department. so i just wanted to provide that. thank you, thank you. okay so, with that, before we recess for the day, i just like to make some concluding remarks to wrap up this week's hearing and then also mention a few motions that we could anticipate and would like for colleagues for you to consider, thank you, colleagues, for your work on this committee. i think everyone may be getting tired of this, refrain from me, but if we don't ring in our spending, we would be facing an even larger financial challenge. as soon as january of 2025. but certainly in our outer years and we have exhausted all our one time solutions. i believe we have done some good work to shave

that was for the assessment of appeals board. and i understand it is not the desire of the board to add costs to the city attorney's office. so we will remove that cost, from the board of supervisors budget. thank you. and we have mr. dan gonter. thank you, madam chair. i just wanted to make one comment i neglected to mention that we do have agreement with the city planning department. so i just wanted to provide that. thank you, thank you. okay so, with that, before we recess for the day, i just like to make some concluding remarks to wrap up this week's hearing and then also mention a few motions that we could anticipate and would like for colleagues for you to consider, thank you, colleagues, for your work on this committee. i think everyone may be getting tired of this, refrain from me, but if we don't ring in our spending, we would be facing an even larger financial challenge. as soon as january of 2025. but certainly in our outer years and we have exhausted all our one time solutions. i believe we have done some good work to

the leather district itself was created by the board of supervisors and the mayor in 2019. we are governed by a board of directors and a staff of two, which i am one. we have a number of programs and initiatives which include street fairs, community organizations, public arts. we have to give a big thanks to supervisor dorsey's office for him help with many of our projects especially with public art projects as you can see in the photo of having the leather pride flags on light poles. this has been a heavy lift and i can't thank you enough. so thank you. the next photo on the left, we have a picture of gail ruben leading one of our walking tours, a historian for san francisco. on the right, we have the ground-breaking for the eagle plaza at 12 and harrison. this is the map of our district. we have 24, probably square blocks. the importance of the leather and lgbtqia+ community in soma is far reaching and the lgbtqia+ community has become an integral part of san francisco's fabric. a symbol of the city's legendary bringing millions of people from around the world and they sel

after the establishment of the board of directors, the age in the position of the board of directors, which is the combination of the best and the youngest elected. being the 12th majlis, the meeting was formalized. in the path of excellence, growth and progress, the islamic council has and will pay more attention to improving the level of knowledge and technology in the country. the first vice president and acting president, who was the special guest of this ceremony , referring to the actions of the 13th government and the services of martyr ayatollah raisi, said that one of the good focuses that our martyr was focused on the issue of water. after all, you know that there is a problem with water in some places. if we did not do these strikes , we would have faced problems in the summer of 1401 and in the summer of 142. the minister of interior also presented a report on holding the elections of the 12th term of the islamic council. in this period, the design and promotion of accurate systems for holding elections, in addition to the realization of electronic government in the field

members of the public may address the board for up to three minutes. 48 through 52 on the domestic and speak 52 on the domestic and speak to other general other general committee and excluding items which have been considered by a board committee. members of the public may address the board for up to three minutes. two minutes and welcome, welcome. >> this is a starting point. okay. >> i knew that was coming. you have to understand the idea of the entire team of wednesday 6, 12, 24 like commission on the final - what - this now we from going forward and this proposed itself you know what i'm talking about pay attention. because now you'll double down with the sponsorship and you certainly don't understand the depth of the education and you received by this unintention that any may receive and youry. >> yes. technology and television. yeah. >> going back to a long way during, you know, the - what you call that? >> technology revolution anyway i'm going to finish (bell ringing) >> i said the mayor is out because he refused to promote the (inaudible) throu

okay members of the board on june 7th, 2020 for the health service board voted to keep united health care rather than switch to blue shield of california. on june 13th, the health care board met and approved the rates and contributions of the united health care. could you speak into the microphone, please, plan approved by the board on june 7th. we were stunned to find out that the items did not pass. united health care rated higher than blue shield of california in all categories. related to quantity and service and care, which is extremely important to us at this special meeting of the health service board today. do not overturn your previous vote to retain united health care as the provider of insurance for retirees on medicare, please do not make cost your only concern when you cast your vote. we want united health care. thank you for your comments. your time is expired and we'll invite the next comment. and hang. your time has begun. good morning board. sfmta's employees and all a lot of other people i know is his microphone on. can't hear you. peter, can you hear me now? so i'll

(clerk of the board). >> supervisor walton. >> move to continue to the july 16th board of supervisors motion to continue to july 16th made by supervisor walton and seconded by supervisor safai any public comment on item 15 and the motion to continue to july 15th? >> make sure you make that better. basically. >> thank you and serging not other members of the public public comment is closed and we'll take the motion to july 16th without objection the item is continued until july 16th madam clerk read items 16 16 and 16 and and fees pursuant to the provisions of building code, sections 102a.3, sections 102a.3, sections 102a.3, 102a.4, 102a.6, 102a.12, 102a.16, 102a.17, 102a.18, 102a.19, 102a.20 et seq., delinquent charges for code enforcement violations and associated fees pursuant to building code, sections 102a.3 - >> okay. >> colleagues, we are now board of supervisors sitting as a committee of the whole for code enforcement the hearing is now open first hear from the building inspection. >> thank you president peskin mate a 28 year the building inspections for code enforcement trans

mta fees may only be waived by the mta board, and this legislation encourages the mta board to adopt a fee waiver consistent with this proposal. we are pleased by all of the collaboration with mta and other mentioned city departments and agencies around the scope and implementation of this program to evaluate the impacts on events and city resources in an ongoing way. the department's waiving fees would be required to annually report the events, receiving fee waivers and the amount of fees waived to both the board of supervisors and the mayor. this does not include public works, given the very limited intersection between public works permitting and neighborhood outdoor events. this waiver would also not exempt event producers from city requirements that involve expenses that are not considered city fees. so, for example, where required, event producers would still need to provide barricades, toilets, drinking water and ems services. additional limitations any block that would require a rerouting of transit service to be closed is only eligible for three total fee waivers per calendar

and the board concurs. e call this proposition js, as that's the voter authorization that enables it. this item is that authorization for various services that accompanying the may 1st proposed budget. there's usually sensitivities to new proposition js that arise during the budget process. i'll note that for this item, there is no new contracting out proposals. these are all long standing ones. thank you. i'll be happy to take any questions. thank you. and it has now i believe really becomes a routine, no changes from the previous approve prop j contract. and so let's go to public comment on this item. yes. if there are any members of the public in the chamber today that wish to address this committee regarding this item number two, please approach the lectern. madam chair, we have no speakers. thank you. seeing no public comments. public comment is now closed. and, colleagues, i would like to move this item to full board with recommendation and the roll call, please. oh wait a second, second, second by sup

in accordance with budget policy--for the board and also for the public hearing. we did not receive any public comments, so with that, we are seeking board adoption of the final budget as presented in may with miner adjustments that i will be presenting to you in this meeting. overall, there is no changes to the fiscal 24-25 final budget compared to what was presented in may draft budget. includes a operating budget of $26.6 million. capital budget of $99 million for tenant improvement, portal capital maintenance repair and replacement and debt service of $15.7 million. miner change, which happened to the operating revenue is $56 thousand decrease to the bridge toll revenue as a result of recent projection of mm2 and rm3 allocation. as shown in the slide there is no change to the overall total operating revenue. the second adjustment has to do not just the budget but the reserve. with one time transfer of $1.78 million, bring the o & m reserve to 5 percent of the operating budget, which complies with the board reserve policy. so, that concludes all the adjustments

i am supervisor myrna melgar, chair of the committee. joined by board of supervisors, president aaron peskin and vice chair dean preston. the committee clerk is mr. john carroll. today, i also like to acknowledge jeanette angeloff at sfgovtv for staffing this meeting. mr. clerk, do you have any announcements? yes. thank you, madam chair. please ensure that you silenced your cell phones and other electronic devices you may have brought with you into the chamber today. if you have any documents to include as part of the file, you should submit them to me. public comment will be taken on each item on today's agenda. when your item of interest comes up and public comment is called, please line up to speak along your right hand side of this room. i'm pointing it out with my left hand. alternatively, you may submit your public comment on writing in either of the following ways. first, you may email your comments to me at. john carroll at sf gov. org or you may send your written comments via us postal service to our office in city hall. the address is one doct

before the decision making body is the mta board. thank you for that clarification, also so i heard january 1 on the vacancy dashboard, thank you for that clarification and we're looking forward to that. because we have such huge vacancies that rightfully for the public has been on going area of concerns. we've made some progress, i was hoping that somebody from your team can outline some of the maybe a snap shot but efforts that you expect to undertake to continue making progress on vacancies across the department and how that is the extent. >> it's been a primary focus of the department to address the vacancies issued that have been called out by the board of supervisors and by the grand jury and by ourselves candidly having lost some significant ground during the pandemic and not experiencing that in a vacuum, it was a significant problem for many public agencies in the bay area in the california. we have largely covered from that, we have used experimental methods to recover. we've opened a career center and welcomed everybody to

the board by a vote of six ayes, one absent. anchez gives the authority of the district to pay up to the stipulated amount and in matters and two matters of anticipated litigation, the board by a vote of six ayes, one absent. sanchez, gives direction to the general counsel, and that concludes, reads. the report out from closed session. approval of board minutes. regular any regular meetings of february 13th, march 12th, april 16th and may 14th, 2024. monitoring workshops of february 27th, march 26th, april 30th and may 28th, 2024 and special meetings of march 5th and may 7th, 2024. may i have a motion and a second on the minutes so moved. second, any corrections? okay. no corrections. so at this time, roll call, mr. steele. thank you. commissioner. bogus. yes commissioner. fisher. yes, commissioner. lamb. yes commissioner. sanchez. yes, commissioner. westbourne. ward yes. vice president. alexander. yes president. motamedi. yes. seven eyes. okay. item number three. and i feel like i've been talking. i'm looking forward to, like, s

well, for the last 3 years , the head of the board said, "the next board, the next board, the next chairll definitely look for other people in the coming years, dear ones." who are serving their sid device, in addition to the fact that it definitely had this look and this distinction and this division that you mentioned is very, very valuable . how do you want to transfer this culture to the young generation ? the efforts of our friends in religious organizations in the organization of the delegation and religious organizations. that is, with the councils that they hold, with the events that they hold, with the art that the radio and television organization has to show this culture , we are certainly sure that with the grace of hazrat seyyed al-shahda, god willing, this culture will be institutionalized and the values ​​of our old age, god willing, will be important , god willing. what are our plans next year ? we have an art council at the dibel khazai foundation and now with the approach. now, the advertising organization will draw for us, god willing, in the coming years , we will go

. >> welcome to the san francisco city and county board of supervisors regular meeting this afternoon at 2:00 pm., tuesday, june 11, 2024. madam clerk, call the roll. >> thank you, mr. president. >> commissioner walton present. >> supervisor dorsey present and supervisor engardio present. >> supervisor mandelman present address the commission on matters that are within the commission's jurisdiction present. >> supervisor preston present. >> supervisor ronen present. >> supervisor safai for the present. >> xifrd present. >> and commissioner chan mr. president we have president we have quorum. >> thank you. >> unceded ancestral homeland of the ramaytush (rah-my-toosh) ohlone (o-lon-ee) who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco peninsula. responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. elders, and relatives of the ramaytush ohlone community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. >> colleagues please join me in the pledge of allegiance. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united state

dual reporting to the board and mayor twice yearly by inspector general. internal accountability through required reporting by inspector general with local enforcement entities, ethics, the city attorney and district attorney who receive referrals, as well as the ability for the inspector general to hold public hearings. and then the next series of slides, just compare us to other major american cities, new york, chicago, washington dc, new orleans and los angeles and you will see that san francisco right now does not have, but this would give us broad subject jurisdiction. it would allow to initiate our own investigations and you will see that virtually every other city ther has those powers. we have ability to accept anonymous reports as most other cities and already have whistle blower protections as do most other cities. if you compare the powers, we are the only city that currently does not have broad subpoena powers in that mandated position, and we are one of most cities have the power of search warrants in a inspector general position. we currently

we urge the board of supervisors to fund additional permanent subsidies forte and family. given dramatic increase in youth and families experiencing homelessness and that the mayor's-augmentation in the budget were for one time or short-term and emergency shelter. >> second it. >> second from haddix. could you state it one more time, please? >> we urge the board of supervisors to fund additional permanent subsidies for tay and families given increase in tay and family in the pit count, and given the mayor's augmentation included temporary initiatives. >> thank you. any discussion? >> i have a question. so can you define permanent? >> those are typically the flex pool subsidies that is what we call them, but they are basically a local section 8, so they-you pay 30 percent of your income and get supportive service but run in the private market and if you income goes above-you only get the subsidy while eligible, so if you--permanent, meaning it is- >> [multiple speakers] >> hard and fast deadline i mean hard and fast end time. >> any other discussion? >> so, let's say the fam

and what is the will of the majority of the board. that's all i'm just trying to facilitate the process here. so but the superintendent's asked for other let's what are the other. well can i just clarify. yeah. because i think it's a good question. but the dac did recommend that equity be weighted much heavier than the other two buckets. and that and then the, the district obliged and maybe you could talk a little more about that process. well let's see what the other okay. let's see. okay. let's see what other questions or concerns around this are. do you want to go. yeah specifically around kind of the equity piece equity audit, yeah. i think for me, it did feel that the in the past, as we look forward, the process pitted equity against some of these other things that are related to. and i know we kind of have made some adjustments to the process to kind of reflect that. that's not our intention, but i think it kind of creates a dynamic where people are picking equity versus other things. and i think that creates, obstacles for us to