the board it was clear he knew that unit was there when he moved in. the fact of that unit being there is not a surprise to him as the board illicited. i think the harm that the public speaker was claiming of is not valid because he knew what he was getting. he knew he was living above someone and to now say my goodness my privacy is being invaded. it's like moving into a multiunit apartment building. it's like saying, my god, there is

the board it was clear he knew that unit was there when he moved in. the fact of that unit being there is not a surprise to him as the board illicited. i think the harm that the public speaker was claiming of is not valid because he knew what he was getting. he knew he was living above someone and to now say my goodness my privacy is being invaded. it's like moving into a multiunit apartment building. it's like saying, my god, there is people next door. of course. you knew that when you moved in. lastly the permit issued, right above the signature there is a series of 4-5 check boxes, one is supposed to be checked regarding workers' compensation. considering the permit holders are obviously not around as admitted by the property manager. that box was not checked and there is no representation as to who is going to do the work or that workers' compensation will be provided if it's done by someone other than the homeowner personally. so i would suggest in addition that the board can look at the permit and on its face find it defective because that box is not checked. >> anything further from the departments? no. miss salas you have anot