the board voted against the department. there was an appeal of a building permit to establish a pharmacy at this property. the continue for the liberation of these drugs, in an area known as pill hill. that not have the votes to overturn the permit. a couple of members of the board supporting the project want to the conditions of approval as proposed by the police department. again, they did not have the votes that were needed for the permit. alternately, the board unanimously approved a permit. there was an appeal that was made by the adjacent property owner of the commission with the unanimous approval of section 309, and this project was also before the board of supervisors. they voted to uphold the decision. this includes both reports. unless there are questions. >> thank you for your report. on the telephone relay box issue, this was before the board of supervisors. what does this go through them rather than planning? is this the administrative code? >> this was an appeal of the environmental decision. >> thank you. >>

on january 19th, 2011, the board voted to deny the appeal and uphold the permit. on march 23rd, 2011, the board voted to grant the rehearing request and to set the rehearing for today. >> i apologize. there is another item i need to address before you began speaking. commissioners, the permit holder has requested that we designate the court reporter's transcript for this matter as the official record for this proceeding and we need a motion. >> so moved. >> is to any public comment? >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> thank you. the report will be the official transcript. >> thank you. i am appearing on behalf of the palate. -- on behalf of the appellant. thank you for agreeing to rehear this appeal. this is a complex issue that has far reaching implications for the neighborhoods, quality of life, and safety, particularly given the impact on families, use, children, and seniors. secondly, the pharmacy in this location is unnecessary and undesirable given the number of pharmacies that already exist in close walking distance. that was a letter to you from former super

lacking the four votes needed to pass, the motion failed and the permit was upheld by operation of law. on march 16, the board voted 4- 0-1 to grant the rehearing request and to set the rehearing for today. >> we can start with the appellant or her agent. you will have seven minutes. >> i am representing my mother. i'm not going to go into the history and background. i will bring the main points. we have been at it for long enough. in the brief, i just wanted to point out that the grievance letter is just the presentation of the fact that my mother has no education, no background knowledge. whatever her actions caught, it was about the lack of an education and knowledge in any of the matter. the second one, what i wanted to say, definitely because of lack of education, no schooling, she does not read in english, she can barely speak, she definitely did ask assistance from a third party. the third party ultimately did assist. my mother has never signed this letter. i don't know what happened in the process between the assistance and who took advantage of my mother's lack of knowledge of the process, but it is

we will have the full vote of the board on may 3. is that correct? after the committee as a whole. the vote on the twenty eighth is the budget committee's recommendation only. in may 3 will be the full board. everybody clear? gray. -- great. if you have to. [laughter] >> just a point of clarification, do we have to make a recommendation to postpone this bill? president mendoza: with regards to this item, we want to postpone the so which is heard on may 3. there will be the interim budget meeting. how do i need a vote on that? we will have a final vote on the denial of this charter. any questions? thank you all very much for this very lively conversation. item i is a board member's proposals. item j. a. request to speak on general matters. -- a request to speak on general matters. many of you have been waiting patiently for this item. i will call your name. a police lineup. we have probably lost a few people. i have over 35 speakers speaking tonight. i am going to ask you keep your comments to a minute and a half. there are a lot of you speaking on very common items, so if you can be

i certainly will. >> since we are talking about a special meeting on thursday for the board, why can't we just vote after this discussion at the special meeting on thursday? >> we are talking about a special meeting of not the full board, but the budget committee

i certainly will. >> since we are talking about a special meeting on thursday for the board, why can't we just vote after this discussion at the special meeting on thursday? >> we are talking about a special meeting of not the full board, but the budget committee [unintelligible] >> again, this is just a suggestion. >> so does everybody understand what the option is in order to give the board members of little bit more time to have a discussion around the budget peace? he would have a regular budget meeting on the twenty

transmittal of the recommendation to the board and final action by the board, some pages of the zoning map ordnance where inadvertently omitted through -- although the board voted on the zoning maps that were consistent with your action with those missing pieces out of the ordinance, we needed to follow up on that and make sure the maps mast -- map matched the blacklisting. this was heard by the board and approved on first reading this week. -- match map -- matt matched the block listing. an ordinance sponsored by supervisor farrell would remove block restaurants in the neighboring commercial district. the proposed restaurant would be allowed by conditional use of -- conditional use authorization. you recommended approval but recommended to also modified to allow the large fast-food restaurants. since your recommendations, the supervisors worked with the departments and merchants and labor groups. the supervisor amended the legislation in three ways. per your request, the ordinance includes large fast-food restaurants, second, the old legislation was amended to specify when this commission and cigarettes rents in the future in this area, the commissions should

the board did vote on a temporary replacement of her sherwin wakeman and the board was split and opponents said it's not a good message they are getting somebody from the outside and not looking at the people that work for bart that is next in line. the vote was 6-3. amy hollyfield, "abc 7 news." >>> stanford police are releasing new details about the man who broke into a graduate housing apartment on campus and sexually assaulted a woman who was sleeping. it happened saturday night. our media partner reports that police say the man got through an unlocked door. the suspect got through an up opened door and then ran out of the apartment. they describe the suspect as a dark skinned male. about 30 years old, 5'6" and chubby build, short wavy hair and rounded nose. >> terry: cbupuc is holding a meeting about the safety of gas pipelines. one of the ideas, reducing the pressure in pg&e's omitteder gas lines where the utility hasn't found records proving they are safe but pg&e warned regulators that could cause a big outage and hurt customers. another proposal, includes illegal stalling more aut

the board did vote on a temporary replacement of her sherwin wakeman and the board was split and opponents said it's not a good message they are getting somebody from the outside and not looking at the people that work for bart that is next in line. the vote was 6-3. amy hollyfield, "abc 7 news." >>> stanford police are releasing new details about the man who broke into a graduate housing apartment on campus and sexually assaulted a woman who was sleeping. it happened saturday night. our media partner reports that police say the man got through an unlocked door. the suspect got through an up opened door and then ran out of the apartment. they describe the suspect as a dark skinned male. about 30 years old, 5'6" and chubby build, short wavy hair and rounded nose. >> terry: cbupuc is holding a meeting about the safety of gas pipelines. one of the ideas, reducing the pressure in pg&e's omitteder gas lines where the utility hasn't found records proving they are safe but pg&e warned regulators that could cause a big outage and hurt customers. another proposal, includes illegal stalling more aut

that job was not up to the voters but the board of supervisors. by a majority vote, supervisors are able to choose the interim mayor. that is when the fun began in city hall. who would he be? >> we needed to protect -- perfect the process so that once the board asked us for that process, we could actually have something in place that was well tested that we could provide to them. >> mayor newsom would be sworn in as lieutenant governor in early january. so the board of supervisors had barely two months after the november election to select an interim mayor to complete gavin newsom's term. but how would the board do this? san francisco's charter guided -- offered little guidance. >> although it was obvious we would appoint an interim mayor, there was no time line for the two to occur. we looked to outside counsel for answers. they researched those questions. while they researched the legal angle, we began the research on the parliamentary level. at the beginning of the calendar year 2010, we started to craft a generic process for a successor for mayor. being a parlia

the sole discretion. that will have to be eliminated from this petition. commissioner norton: were we to vote to issue the charter, that would have to be changed? would the board have to amended prior to a vote in favor? >> yes. >commissioner norton: with our other charter schools, do we have language similar to this? is the unusual piece that the languages here in the charter application rather than in the district? >> there is always a section in the petition itself that would describe it. with the understanding of what the district's policy is and what procedures are. >> we have that language and we have discovered that the language is, in fact, in some other mlu's. the language has to be amended and clean up as the charter's come before the district. it has to be consistent with the language of the petition. it should be clear to stay in that it is in the district of the discretion whether or not we want to allow such a concession. commissioner norton: you know, this is a tough one for me. i did i also did not support a petition when the board voted on february 8 because of the deficiencies in the budget. i still continue to see that they want the best for