, and there are multiple budget the president's budget and the house and senate budget, but you see the number for 10 years but the focus and what quour doing each year is on the first year that leads to a lot of outcomes. one is that the big focus in budgeting is the discretionary portion of the budget. the one thoifered budget where the appropriations process takes place. we've seen with the sequester in place now, that's been in place in the past year, focusing on discretionary spending is not where the biga -- is not one of the big areas of the budget we need to be connell templating, health programs, retirement program, that's not where we take place. it focus all the smart talent that's thinking about the budget on a portion of the budget that isn't as important for the long term fiscal health and it leaves a lot of the rest of the budget out of the whole process. it also, i think, focuses us on short-term fiscal measures. there's been a lot of talk coming out of the great recession, our fiscal health of the country not as good as it was before. our debt is now at

when you have a budget multiple buts the president's budget, the house and senate budgetyou see the numbers for ten yearses but really the focus and what you're doing each year is always on that first year. and that leads to us a lot of outcomes. one is that the big focus in budgeting is the discretionary portion of the budget. the one-third of the budget where the progresses process takes place and we have seen with the sequester in place now, and that's been in place in the past year, focusing on discretionary spending is not -- we need to contemplate halve have programs, revenues. it focuses the smart talent think about the budget on a portion of the budget that isn't as important for the long term fiscal health, and that it leaves a lot of the rest of the budget out of the whole process. it also, i think, focuses on short-term fiscal measures. there's been a lot of talk coming out of the great recession, the fiscal health of the country not as good as it was before. our debt is now at record levels. twice where it was before the great recession, twice for historical a

showing everything about the budget is the exception to the rule. but i think we can tick off a list of things that don't seem to work, the disproportionate attention paid to discretionary spending, even though it's a declining share of the total resources, the fact that the targets for spending are largely symbolic and don't seem to be adhered to by the rest of the congress. the fact that for the most part, most of the budget is off limits, there are walls around mandatory tax expenditures and the like and there's no concerted review available to bring together how all those programs interact in areas such as higher education, low income housing and all the various other programs and policy goals that we care about. we say we have a unified budget but we really don't. in some ways the budget act was different than this. it was a comprehensive way for congress to tackle priorities, take them on through a special set of committees they create, it was in some ways in experiment creating a shadow set of committees could bring the rest of the congress t

whether it's the majority budget or whether it's the minority budget or the other budget that's offertentimes it's used an and opportunity to say this is how we address the challenges that we face. finally the third thing that it does is something that's not used terribly often but an incredibly powerful tool, the whole issue of reconciliation. a process that allows the congress to address spending or revenue or debt in a way that doesn't make a whole lot of difference in the house to the process but in the separate it allows us to move a piece of leng las vegas forward with a simple majority. doesn't require a super majority so you can get around the 60-vote margin in the senator. so it's pretty straightforward. ought to be easy to do, right? last year we passed a budget that balances within a ten-year period of time and agreed to it with a senate that doesn't raise taxes and gets us on a path to paying off the debt for the first time in 14 years. first time in 14 years. so if you're keeping track on a score card now, that's one reason -- this that is the first time in 14 years that

the public works prospective on how our operating budget it excludes the benefits of our budgeted positions we must manage the operating budget public works proposed budget for 2016-2017 and gross operating budget is two-hundred hundred and $72.9 million which includes many positions. >> the general supports totals $30 million representing the resources the proposed 2016-2017 budget capital budget is one and $52.6 million this slide here shows a breakdown of the budget sources as you can see the largest chunk of our budget comes from city departments that work with our money that is 74 percent and others come florida state gas tax and revenues 5 percent and 11 percent is general fund and then the two smaller ones an impound account are ecology 2 percent is general fund support of the two series of certificates of participation that is with the street right-of-way between 2009 and 2011. >> supervisor kim has a question. >> a quick questions i wasn't aware that public works can't stewart set fees for certain types fees like cigarettes people flick on the sidewalks what percentage of those fee

the c.b.c. budget chooses to invest in programs that we know will grow our economy and ensure that every american family is able to prosper. our budget proposes a comprehensive jobs program, totaling $500 billion over three years that will accelerate our economic recovery and ensure that it reaches virtually every community in america. while also investing in what will guarantee america's long-term economic competitiveness. this jobs plan includes funding for direct jobs creation programs, school modernization, jobs for teachers and first responders, immediate investments in our nation's crumbling infrastructure, assistance for neighborhoods and families still reeling from the housing crisis, job training programs and summer . bs our budget calls for significant and sustained investments, approximately $300 billion over the next decade, above the president's request, for programs that have been instrumental in lifting millions of americans out of poverty. some of these proposals include restoration of

whether it's the majority budget or whether it's the minority budget or whether the another budget that'sed. oftentimes it's used as an opportunity to kind of say, this is how we would address the challenges that we face. and then finally, the third thing that it does, is something that isn't used terribly often but is an incredibly powerful tool, and that is the whole issue of reconciliation. reconciliation is a process that allows the congress to address spending or revenue or debt in a way that -- it doesn't make a whole lot of difference in the house to the process, but in the senate it allows us to move a piece of legislation forward with just a simple majority, doesn't require a supermajority, so you can get around the 60-vote margin in the senate. in a very, very important thing. so it's pretty straightforward. ought to be easy to do. right? last year we passed a budget that balances within a 10-year period of time and agreed to it with the senate. doesn't raise taxes and gets us on a path to paying off the debt. for the first time in 14 years. first time in 14 years. so, if you're

this, number two, the budget committee of the senate has begun to start its budget process based upon the number mo that the law sets, and number number three, our appropriations bills are not the debt problem. it is the mandatory's bending and interest on the debt and sooner or later we need to deal with it. mr. president, last thursday senator feinstein and i am a senator appropriations committee approved the fiscal year 2017 energy and and water development appropriations bill by unanimous vote, 30-zero they all voted to for. us this bill includes items very familiar to the american people, things like they would like for us to fund properly. such as flood control, such as navigation on our rivers, such as deepening harbors whether it's in california, mobile, charleston, or savannah. such as rebuilding lots whether it in ohio, kentucky, or tennessee. such as the 17 national labs which are secret weapon and job growth acrossto growth across our country.ith super computing where we seek to lead the world, another great source of job growth. in a big part of our bridge it h

this effort required the senate and the nation to have a debate about a growing defense budget. we started that debate, including the waste and inefficiency in the pentagon and the growing fiscal -- federal fiscal deficits. despite the weeks-long pressure from conservatives in the reagan administration, i did not back down because i knew the policy was on my side. in this process, i stood up to pressure from president reagan, defense secretary caspar weinberger, secretary barry goldwater, senator john tower, chairman of the committee, and many others. i remember a meeting it he white house where i reminded the president that he had been talking through the campaign about the welfare queens fraudulently on the budget. it happens that i reminded him that there was defense queens as well. i started doing oversight on the defense department. it wasn't long before the evidence of waste and fraud began appearing. we uncovered contractors that billed the defense department $435 for a claw hammer, $750 for toilet seats, $695 for ashtrays. we found a coffeepot that even cost $7,600. i had

whether it's the majority budget or whether it's the minority budget or whether the another budget that's offered. oftentimes it's used as an opportunity to kind of say, this is how we would address the challenges that we face. and then finally, the third thing that it does, is something that isn't used terribly often but is an incredibly powerful tool, and that is the whole issue of reconciliation. reconciliation is a process that allows the congress to address spending or revenue or debt in a way that -- it doesn't make a whole lot of difference in the house to the process, but in the senate it allows us to move a piece of legislation forward with just a simple majority, doesn't require a supermajority, so you can get around the 60-vote margin in the senate. in a very, very important thing. so it's pretty straightforward. ought to be easy to do. right? last year we passed a budget that balances within a 10-year period of time and agreed to it with the senate. doesn't raise taxes and gets us on a path to paying off the debt. for the first time in 14 years. first time in 14 years. so, if

the entire federal budget is 3.$9 billion. superior talking about appropriated dollars plus 3 trillion other dollars we will spend this year that is mandatory or automatic spending with interest onou the debt. federal health care spending is an example of $1 trillion the same amount of all those we are considering the center for medicare/medicaid services is in charge of spending about $886 billion every year almost all mandatory spending so the part of the budget that we talk about today is one-fourth of the total federal spending and. democratic figure to the majority us on leader for making this a priority and the democratic leader to suggest that they also want to see us move to give the american people a chance how we spend their money. the american people care about how we spend their money because their resolve lot of talk about the debt of $19 trillion the total revenue is 3.36 billion but the spending is about 3.five so elementary school mathematics will show you we're adding 5,304,000,000 more to the $19 trillion debt

it is the rest of the budget that is unsustainable. so with mandatory spending programs with the obamacare entitlements and food stamps and other programs that is what is unsustainable. nothing else comes close the valves in the budget in eight years of not sure how he does it with his tax plans obviously to encourage greater growth. >> but that federal outlay of 38.$6 trillion between 2017 and 2024.s pled but the budget is cut nearly in half each year to fulfill his pledge without raising taxes promising to lead the entire month programs.rt >> he is right. we had an opportunity to deal with this issue calledhe simpson-bowles it was not perfect but they began a discussion. the schedule have to do both at some point but to do ahe pro-growth tax reform simpson-bowles recommended w clearing out the underbrush to marry that with the tide of reform but what i have heard he doesn't do intend to reform and i don't know of his tax plan and thater does not lessen that. >>. >> i have every intention to vote for you. with the general election but

the future. think that aat we long-term budget of this nature for this major parts of the mandatory programs, so-called entitlements, is a major part of getting it revamped budget act into place that can successfully keep our budget on track and do so realistically, within the constraints of the economy and of our other objectives and goals for our federal budget. >> thank you. . marvin turn to dr phaup. and then afterwards, we will turn it over to the audience. mr. phaup: maya asked me to talk about tax expenditures today and their treatment in the budget. i can only begin to say something about this by first berman, with whom i wrote a piece of a years ago. lynn has written papers with a lot of people in this room and i know you agree with me it's a wonderful experience. it certainly, it changed my thinking about tax expenditures so thanks to lynn. the second thing i want to do is thank maya and the committee for setting the five-minute rule. you probably don't know that but today there is a five-minute rule. there's a woman standing behind that you can't see, but when she oures the "stop" sign, micr

different ideas about priority tigdz your needs and that has so far been worked well in relation to the budgeted continued the key priorities and this is something i'm proud of because there's been times we don't agree huge priority by all facets of the department including the administration and fire commission and the presence of the fire commissioner hartman and of the 798 tom o'connor is here all the rough lean economic years question made sacrifices we're all in it together unified asking for doing everything we can to talk about the vehicle replacement plan a plan that went into place in 2009 and passed by the fire commission the men and women did a phenomenal job they make that work but out on the street we're spending a lot of money to keep safe and maintain similar to the great work the mayor's office budget office we're mirror what we've done with the hiring plan we would like to continue to let you you know that san francisco is unique in so many was hills those are are expensive 5 thousand dollars for a fire truck their worthy their weight negative impact gold we get that not from po

the budget committee met monday. at the meeting in march it was suggested by committee members it would be a good idea to invite a representative from labor to decuss budget needs of the department. prez dchbt o'connor of local 798 joined in addition to it commissioner covington and hardeman. one of the take away to request a joint meeting with the mayor and chief of staff to discuss and advocate frafr department needs going forward in the budget process, so more to follow with that meeting. as far as next steps, the department is in the process of scheduling a meeting for the budget committee with supervisor farrells office. supervisor farrell is chair of budget and finance committee at the board where the department will present. he agreed to meet with the budget committee and discuss the needs and priorities of the departments and hear committee concerns. the department would like to thank the supervisors in advance for his time as we iron out the details. next week the department is scheduled to present at the bud

>> good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the regular meeting of the board of supervisors budget & finance committee for thursday, march 17, 2016, my name is mark farrell chairing this committee joined by supervisor tang and supervisor yee and supervisor scott wiener i want to thank the clerk clouks as well as charles kremack and nona melkonian for c co-this meeting mr. clerk, any announcements? >> >> yes. electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the april 26, 2016, board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> okay. thank you very much mr. clerk, call item one. >> item one ordinance amending the administrative code to require the prevailing wage for loading or unloading products for city park property and driving of commercial vehicles for that purpose. >> thank you. this item was supported by supervisor wiener i'm going to turn it over to him. >> we're continuing to work with all folks and looking this so we need more time and i move to continue this item to the cal

number two, we're -- the budget committee of the senate has begun to start its budget process based upon the number that the law sets. and, number three, our appropriations bills are not the debt problem. it is the mandatory spending and interest on the debt and sooner or later we need to deal with it. now, mr. president, last thursday senator feinstein and i and the senate appropriations committee approved the fiscal year 2017 energy and water development appropriations bill by unanimous vote 30-0. 30 of the 100 members of this body are on that committee. they all voted for it. this bill includes some items very familiar to the american people, things that they would like for us to fund properly, such as flood control, such as navigation on our rivers, such as deepening harbors, whether it is in california or in mobile or in ohio. such as the 17 national labs which are our secret weapon in job growth across our country. such as supercomputerring, where we seek to lead the world in supercomputing. another great source of job growth. and a big part of our budget has to do with nuclear wea

budget. guess what, republicans have the chance, and not even a vote on the budget. i'm going to offer later in this debate a motion to rede-feet the previous question and if that passes, mr. speaker, i'll be able to offer an amendment to the rule to bring up the budget resolution. i hope it does. i hope there's enough democrats and republicans in this chamber who are outraged by the failure of the republican leadership to allow the republican and democratic members of this body to present and vote on their budgets. we've historically had a very open process around budgets. there's usually five, six budgets that come before the house and we try to get to one that passes. there's been years where i think they have a king of the hill process and whichever one gets the most votes can become the budget. but it looks like rather than any of those debates, or give members who have thoughtfully been preparing budgets from the republican study group, from the progressive democrat coalition, the chance to present their budgets along with the republican and democratic mobes of

the public works prospective on how our operating budget it excludes the benefits of our budgeted positions we must manage the operating budget public works proposed budget for 2016-2017 and gross operating budget is two-hundred hundred and $72.9 million which includes many positions. >> the general supports totals $30 million representing the resources the proposed 2016-2017 budget capital budget is one and $52.6 million this slide here shows a breakdown of the budget sources as you can see the largest chunk of our budget comes from city departments that work with our money that is 74 percent and others come florida state gas tax and revenues 5 percent and 11 percent is general fund and then the two smaller ones an impound account are ecology 2 percent is general fund support of the two series of certificates of participation that is with the street right-of-way between 2009 and 2011. >> supervisor kim has a question. >> a quick questions i wasn't aware that public works can't stewart set fees for certain types fees like cigarettes people flick on the sidewalks what percentage of those fee

the republicans. that's why there is no budget for the deadline. budgets, as we always say, our national budget should be a statement of our country's values. the president has put forth his budget. we will have ours, our statements of our national values. the republican priorities are not about our values. this just seems to be a congress that just wants to say no, no to the budget, no to appropriate zekea funding, no to puerto rico, no to immigration, no to gun safety. well, we know the votes are there for all of these initiatives. this zika situation is saying no to science. today america is facing a very serious public health emergency that threatens thousands of american families across our country. before we left for the break, as you may recall, democrats called for immediate action for supplemental appropriation bills for emergencies like zika, flint and opioids. the democrats entered a legislation and republicans said no. they offered an amendment to the appropriations committee to fully fund the president's emergency request for resources

the public works prospective on how our operating budget it excludes the benefits of our budgeted positions we must manage the operating budget public works proposed budget for 2016-2017 and gross operating budget is two-hundred hundred and $72.9 million which includes many positions. >> the general supports totals $30 million representing the resources the proposed 2016-2017 budget capital budget is one and $52.6 million this slide here shows a breakdown of the budget sources as you can see the largest chunk of our budget comes from city departments that work with our money that is 74 percent and others come florida state gas tax and revenues 5 percent and 11 percent is general fund and then the two smaller ones an impound account are ecology 2 percent is general fund support of the two series of certificates of participation that is with the street right-of-way between 2009 and 2011. >> supervisor kim has a question. >> a quick questions i wasn't aware that public works can't stewart set fees for certain types fees like cigarettes people flick on the sidewalks what percentage of those fee

i spent a long time trying to wrap my head around the reason why the budget the president would set a budget plan over budget. apparently, no one else sees the flaw in the logic. because over the last 50 years, we have run a deficit. for all but five years. since the idea of the debt ceiling was first created in 1917, it has been raised nearly 150 times. so, what exactly is the point of a budget and a debt ceiling if we are going to keep going over budget and raising the debt ceiling? now, i may be misinterpreting the facts. but i'm pretty sure that is called being irresponsible. as i gain knowledge and understanding about the debt crisis from working on this project, i decided for myself of that the only solution was to make drastic spending cuts across the board. in fact, i was so sure about my solution that i decided to approach presidential candidate senator rubio and ask him about it directly. what will you, if elected, would be willing to sacrifice in order to regain control of government spending? senator rubio: it is not about sacrifice, as much as it is about making ranges to

well, we're somehow grappling with the budget, the five-year budget. can't seem to get it together. enormous chaos on the side of my republican colleagues about thousand to do it. the appropriation process is under way and totally stalled out. until at least may 15. there's a solution. small investment. very small investment. and then we can look at the long-term deficit. then we can be in a position to improve the lives of americans. oh, by the way, the money is available. the money is available. in the budget and in the appropriations we're putting together, we are ramping up so hat over the next 20 years, 25 years, we're going to spend a trillion dollars, a trillion dollars on a brand new nuclear arms race. we're going to rebuild all of our nuclear bombs. we're going to develop new airplanes to deliver those bombs. new satellites, new rockets, new cruise missiles, new submarines. trillion dollars. well, i've got a better place to spend some of that money. i've got a better place to spend it where the lives of americans will be significantly improved. where the stress on families t

i did not win the budget fight but i kept my promise and i kept my word. reakthrough suggestions that ultimately got adopted into the law. i left the state senate. they took my district away from me. they wanted to end my career, but at age 30 i ran for congress. in 1976 i had campaigned with ronald reagan at the 1976 convention. i knew and worked with ronald reagan. he was an inspiration to me. what he taught me was a couple of things. you have to have strength when one, it comes to national security. secondly you have to give people , an incentive to work and give them the opportunity to rise. in 1982, i ran for the congress. at 30 years of age and i ran on the reagan agenda. there were not many people running on the reagan agenda. they were all running away because the economy was not doing well. i ran against a democrat and -- incumbent on the fact that we could shrink taxes and rebuild the defense and destroy the soviet union. in 1982, there was only one republican candidate for the united states congress who defeated an incumbent democrat and that per

than the one he earlier read a different association of the budget but related motion 20 the cac recommends that the mta increase san francisco operating contributions to the peninsula corridor joint powers board number 21 the mta cac sports the maintenance and repair of cable cars 22 cac supports the fund for the mtas new training facility we've rejected proposals for additional costs for singles- single rides on express rides reject the motion to establish a premium fair for single rides on the express lines and rejected the motion unfortunately in my book but i was on the minority we rejected the motion the mta provide additional funding for education and outreach and trying to understand what my colleagues on the cac were thinking i think the theory was here that the agency doesn't quite have the expertise to understand how vision zero can work better but try to get the expertise before they try to do education and outreach not exactly - my interpretation how that came out and finally another failed adoption motion which leads to no recommendatio

and above last year equal to the up president's budget request. f the science and engineering activity to maintain the nuclear stockpile without explosive testing. and with those nuclear warheads is also fully funded for the new cruise missile warhead which i will speak a little more about inin a moment. to discuss my concerns with the long-range standoff weapons and with us a defense department is wrong that this is not a new nuclear weapon. to carry the upgraded warhead capable of immense destruction and fitting f specifically designed with the most advanced missile defense system. i firmly believe this is the necessary. the and has already developed a conventional cruise missile specifically designed to do the same job as the al are so. furthermore the united states has a variety of nuclear ballistic missiles that can reach any targets anywhere in the world no wonder i feel so strongly it is very personal. i am one of the few thaty have seen this. since i was 12 years old when the united states of america dropped a nuclear weapon just as the hun

as a congressman, i found myself on the budget committee. s complaining that the republicans and democrats were not serious about balancing the budget. i wanted to budget -- balance the budget for two reasons, the immorality of leaving debt to the children, and i knew that if you could balance a budget and reduce taxes, you could put yourself in a position where you could have economic growth. things,earned was three creating jobs, creating more jobs, and creating all the jobs you could, because it is through job creation that allows people to recognize their god-given purpose in life to change the world and live out their destiny. i knew that fighting to balance the budget was the right thing to do. but it did not come easy. efforts10 years of my and efforts of the team built to get us to the point where he actually balanced the budget for the first time since man walked on the moon. we paved out the largest amount history, halfern $1 trillion. we also were any position where we had a $5 trillion surplus projected, it could have been used to

committee reserve at the request of the sponsoring sponsor we'll put it on budget committee reserve and handle that that way moving forward colleagues, any questions or comments happy to entertain them but first public comment on this item we've heard after all to the your budget analysts if you want to add something. >> to the call of the chair through the budget committee deborah from the budget and legislative in fact, office based on the testimony by the director of the small business commission that she had sufficient salary in her current year budget to fund the one new position that actually was heard yes at the full board and will be subject so one more meeting we are recommending that those funds which is 37, one and 9 be deducted from the supplemental appropriation and the total will be instead of $343,000 plus it would be whoops three hundred and 6 thousands plus then our recommendations is approval of the supplemental appropriation as amended with the policy decision of the board. >> thank you for grabbing any attention colleagues quickly before we act on the ame

colleagues, can i have a motion to continue to the april 13th budget meeting we'll take that without objection. madam clerk item 2. >> item 2 resolution approving the issuance of tax revenue obligation i the california authority for the principle not to exceed $10 million for the facilities owned by the school of san francisco. >> okay. thank you do we have the gentleman. >> i'm from the controller's office public finance thanks for considering the item in attention camilla the tax responsibility with the tax exemption on issues for the tjpa in this case, the city issues the citywide authority or c s da the transbay joint powers authority san francisco is a member the authority is issuing the bonds for participation and other forms of indebtedness the resolution before you today because federalist tax law in which the project is located approve the project and after the public housing is it can be issued on a tax exempt basis city and county of san francisco is not general obligation bond for payment on the embodying bond and published a notice in about san francisco chronicle the pub

i believe the sunday budget act needs to be overhauled. eds to be overhau overhauled to limit government and bring more accountability to the way we spend taxpayer dollars. i think you know the budget reforms i have been pushing for. the challenge is you have to a house, senate, and president all the way to sign these into law and we have not had that lined up well enough. to the budget itself, part of the problem is we are a victim of the success of the fact that we have appropriation numbers in law. we have an agreement in law and that has taken pressure off of the budget situations. that is one of the challenges we are dealing with. i want to support -- you know me, i am a regular order guy and i want our committees to do their work. tom price has been busy working on the budget but i know for a fact he is very motivated to get moving on budget process reform and i encourage his efforts. >> you had a pretty good back and forth with the chairman of the irs on this -- >> which time? >> there was one particular june of that year i remember.

colleagues, can i have a motion to continue to the april 13th budget meeting we'll take that without objection. madam clerk item 2. >> item 2 resolution approving the issuance of tax revenue obligation i the california authority for the principle not to exceed $10 million for the facilities owned by the school of san francisco. >> okay. thank you do we have the gentleman. >> i'm from the controller's office public finance thanks for considering the item in attention camilla the tax responsibility with the tax exemption on issues for the tjpa in this case, the city issues the citywide authority or c s da the transbay joint powers authority san francisco is a member the authority is issuing the bonds for participation and other forms of indebtedness the resolution before you today because federalist tax law in which the project is located approve the project and after the public housing is it can be issued on a tax exempt basis city and county of san francisco is not general obligation bond for payment on the embodying bond and published a notice in about san francisco chronicle the pub

colleagues, can i have a motion to continue to the april 13th budget meeting we'll take that without objection. madam clerk item 2. >> item 2 resolution approving the issuance of tax revenue obligation i the california authority for the principle not to exceed $10 million for the facilities owned by the school of san francisco. >> okay. thank you do we have the gentleman. >> i'm from the controller's office public finance thanks for considering the item in attention camilla the tax responsibility with the tax exemption on issues for the tjpa in this case, the city issues the citywide authority or c s da the transbay joint powers authority san francisco is a member the authority is issuing the bonds for participation and other forms of indebtedness the resolution before you today because federalist tax law in which the project is located approve the project and after the public housing is it can be issued on a tax exempt basis city and county of san francisco is not general obligation bond for payment on the embodying bond and published a notice in about san francisco chronicle the pub

the tug of wars in putting the budget together. we've got all these readiness gaps and at the same time the proposal is to quad rupele the investment in the european reoogsshurens initiative and to take it up to 3 plt 4 billion. i just would be curious as you talk about hard choices how do you trade off the need to do this dramatic increase with the fact that we are still short in some of the readiness investments that we need to make? >> senator, it's really important. and it trades off what trade-offs d.o.d. make to make that happen in other accounts those are priorities set by the secretary of deevens. but i can tell you that it's really important because the deterrence of russia from further aggression is a critical national security priority. they've been aggressive since 2008. that baver needs to change. this is only one of many other initiatives that are being done and actions being done by the u.s. government across all dome mains and by a whole of government approach. but this is important. deterrence happens because an agg

many of the items in the budget near and dear to governor cuomo. let's listen. >> i believe that this is the best plan that the state has produced if it's passed in decades literally. >> reporter: a $15 minimum wanl will go into effect in new york city for large businesses in 2018. small businesses 2019. and now suffolk, westchester counties, gradual increase and $15 by 2021. upstate new york to $15 an hour after 2020. it all depends, michael if the economy is doing well and the budget agreed upon just hours ago. already it has critics saying that the governor had to macon sessions. far away from now, he did macon sessions to get pieces of the budget approved. >> sure. people were anxious to get that wage right away. they feel they had to phase it in. >> reporter: right, michael. exactly. >> thanks very much, kat. >>> new this morning, police say a woman who claimed to be slashed in lower manhattan actually cut herself. the 20-year-old woman told police she was cut on the cheek as she walked north on broadway near wall street thursday. police say sh

the g.o.p. budget resolution ends the medicare guarantee, makes $6.5 trillion in drastic cuts, increases poverty, and erodes the economic security of all americans. ow, mr. speaker, as awful as democrats think this budget is the tea party faction of the house g.o.p. is demanding that we make even more draconian cuts and even deeper cuts. and they ought to have the right as well to offer their alternative on the floor. let me be clear, mr. speaker. i don't support this republican budget but i'm offering this motion to recommit because again, we cannot offer our alternative unless this budget is processed on this floor. republicans are abandoning their promise to restore regular order because they can't agree on a worst product. but hard working families deserve a congress that invests in their future, protect theirs safety, creates a level playing field for them and their children to succeed. you know what they always say, mr. speaker. the majority gets its way and the minority gets its say. let's get t

so i saw on the budget analyst report the list of the garages. and i was just curious as to how you went about selecting the order for the installation. >> sure. we started with a couple of the smaller facilities it is a large project. this is one of the largest projects in the history of parking equipment, as i know in north america. so there is a process in vetting this out. the equipment and there is always a learning curve and we want to make sure that everybody is happy with the new system. there will be lpr in these garages. and as we are going through the construction phase. and it will effect the ins and out of the traffic. so we are starting the smaller and rolling out the larger. and we have the flex in the contract to move the facilities around in that order but we will try to stick that time line as best as possible. >> so my other question that i think that this probably answers why, i was going to ask, why it was going to take the course of 3 fiscal years to install the equipment, but i am guessing that you want to make sure that yo

deadline. >> now, the house could still pass a budget down the road, but even without it, they'lltill be able to vote on spending bills after may 15th. >> no budget, but spending money. >> all right. see how it turns out. thank you very much. coming up next hour, we're going to speak with one of the lawmakers who has been turning up the heat on speaker ryan's leadership. freshman congressman, dave bratt of virginia joins us. >>> and donald trump has taken the stage in syracuse. we're monitoring it for developments and we'll bring it to you live. and still ahead, rising tensions on the high seas. >>> russian fighter jets playing a dangerous game with u.s. warships. how will the next president deal with vladimir putin's muscle flexing? >>> and why the least popular state in the u.s. home today to some very important people in the race for the white house. mike i manuel is in wyoming with a latest. hi, mike. >> 14 republican delegates and 14 alternates are on the line today and one of the republican candidates made the trip here. i'm mike emanuel. a live report coming up.

not being spent and then, of course, you know looking at outcome for the budget the budget spending plan and shows it so that again funds with gone and spent to where they were intended to go so those are the recommendations to you. >> one moment thank you for being our chair this is her last meeting and happily unfortunately for us a significant out-of-towner and we've been around inform sometime we had a vacuum of knowledge but she brought challenging issues to you and we want to thank her the committee and, of course, like you to the time and so thank you, peggy and children and family thanks for the wine and a this certificate for you. >> (clapping.) thank you for your report go ahead before we entertain any questions or comments from our colleagues we have one public comment on this item ms. blunt. >> good evening commissioner public, members the school district i wanted to make a few comments ahead of comments of the commissioners first of all, we are proud of work done through pta over the years and thanks to all the members of the respective committee i've been able to sit in

so i saw on the budget analyst report the list of the garages. and i was just curious as to how you went about selecting the order for the installation. >> sure. we started with a couple of the smaller facilities it is a large project. this is one of the largest projects in the history of parking equipment, as i know in north america. so there is a process in vetting this out. the equipment and there is always a learning curve and we want to make sure that everybody is happy with the new system. there will be lpr in these garages. and as we are going through the construction phase. and it will effect the ins and out of the traffic. so we are starting the smaller and rolling out the larger. and we have the flex in the contract to move the facilities around in that order but we will try to stick that time line as best as possible. >> so my other question that i think that this probably answers why, i was going to ask, why it was going to take the course of 3 fiscal years to install the equipment, but i am guessing that you want to make sure that yo

we'll have a path to balancing the budget. we'll move welfare, infrastructure, job training out of washington. we will fix social security. we will secure the border and have a path to legalization and never citizenship. and we will tell the world that we are in fact the leader of the world. i will have a plan to congress in the first 100 days that we'll do all of that, every little bit of it. >> we're just getting started as we continue with ohio governor john kasich. members of the audience will have a chance to ask the governor their questions. on the road in saratoga springs in beautiful new york as we continue. since 1979. i'm kelly wright. now back to "hannity." >>> welcome back to "hannity." we're on the road. we're in saratoga springs in new york for the hour. we have ohio governor john kasich with us. he's the guest. all right. i have to ask you questions about your past, but i want to hear more of your vision because i don't think we ask enough of that. i think that's legitimate criticism. you're giving a speech tomor

when we did every far above the budget so if you include gun violence do we increase the budget and more fundamentally how do you quantify what you talk about with the cost and the benefit and to wait in thank you with personal privacy. >> the issue is the good will and what do other countries to? in the u.k. and hired terrorism threat over a much longer period of time to spend on budget gdp basis. and just as effective but as chile and canada we spend one-quarter of gdp and is used to do a fairly fine job as well. sova seems to be excessive. >> with the cost of benefits that will be a challenge. but to go straight at -- fairly straightforward it is indeed accurate at 1% but to give you a good feel was a dead complete waste of money and then say we need to spend more to find out we do include the value of life overseas and it varies different agencies maybe 10 million based on the report in 2010. but most of the losses from terrorism is extremely tragic but most would affect society affects the loss of business there is a lot of flips on the ethics for that so if is the indirect losses d

into the base budget to get around the current budget caps. congressman adam smith who's a top democrat on the committee said he didn't know yet if he's going to support this bill. last year he voted for it in committee but against it on the floor. we're going to see if he does the same thing again this year. >> the funding level for the defense programs bill is the amount proposed by the president, but has the white house weighed in on any of the particular programs and policies in the authorization bill? >> the white house hasn't weighed in yet. but defense secretary ash carter today said he was opposed to the way that the bill funds the military, and so that's a good sign that the white house is also going to say that they oppose it. there's plenty else in here that the white house also is going to be against. look at guantanamo, the bill blocks the president from bringing detainees to the u.s., something that he wants to do in the last year of his presidency. that's likely going to get a veto once the bill goes to the floor. >> once work is

as a congressman, i found myself on the budget committee. was complaining that the republicans and democrats were not serious about balancing the budget. i wanted to balance the budget for two reasons, the immorality of leaving debt to the children, and i knew that if you could balance a budget and reduce taxes, you could put yourself in a position where you could have economic growth. what i learned was three things, creating jobs, creating more jobs, and creating all the jobs you could, because it is through job creation that allows people to recognize their god-given purpose in life to change the world and live out their destiny. i knew that fighting to balance the budget was the right thing to do. but it did not come easy. it took 10 years of my efforts and efforts of the team built to get us to the point where he actually balanced the budget for the first time since man walked on the moon. we paved out the largest amount of debt in modern history, half $1 trillion. we also were any position where we had a $5 trillion surplus projected, i

good morning chair farrell from the budget analyst office and ms. wagner said on page 3 there will be a reduction 2.7:00 friday's i million dollars it will be offset by an increase in the net about $1.6 million under the airports policy the rates methodology they'll be made because charges to the airline offset in the lease we recommend approval. >> thank you, very much. ms. campbell moving on to public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed colleagues, we have a motion and recommendation to approve. >> make a motion to approve item 4 i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. madam clerk call item 5. >> approving the terms of 2011 lease and use agreement between airways in the city with the estimate lease of seven hundred and $50,000 for the lease for board approval to 200021. >> ms. wagner welcome back casket it deals with the lease agreement this time we're requesting our approval to do an new airline to the 2011 lease agreement for the remaining 4 years a

directorer for a formal hearing to present the president's budget. well, madam speaker, how did that turn out for us? well, we all know how it turned out. the republican conference failed the american people and set us on a road to ruin. by not pat passing a budget -- by not passing a budget. mr. jeffries, i look forward to us continuing this dialogue tonight with other members of the congressional black caucus. thank you and i yield back. mr. jeffries: thank you, congresswoman beatty, for a very thorough presentation and for pointing out that the speaker himself, the republican majority have indicated that they should be judged based on their capacity to complete basic -- the basics of their job responsibilities, which is the passage of a budget resolution. in fact, it was then congressman ryan who in 2012 stated that failing to enact a budget has serious consequences for american families. and there are at least three current health crises that we're trying to deal with in america and throughout the world, where republicans have abdicated their resp