numbers increased significantly at the c.i.o." as responded" these results i understand them that the synthetic credit portfolio could ose $600 billion in one year." you forwarded the e-mail to london and you called the result garbage. you wrote, "we got c.r.m. numbers and they look like garbage as far as i can tell. you and your colleagues complained about the c.r.m. analysis to the head of quantitive research to the whole bank," if you look at exhibit 49, which includes an e-mail dated march 7. on the bottom of the page to all three of you and others, explain that the c.r.i.'s portfolio got bigger in january and february, which is why the risk of losing so much money also shot up. here's what he wrote, which is at the bottom of the that page on exhibit 49. "based on our models, we believe the $3 billion increase in our w.a., which is references to the c.r.m. is explained by an increase in short protection, long risk in our portfolio between january and february." pete weiland in your office confirmed this. mr. weiland, since the