the u.s. does and very pointed and adamant that this is a campaign against him by the democrats and by the clintonmpaign. i guess i don't really know what he thinks he's accomplishing by doing these interviews throughout the week if he doesn't have more that he's going to say. i am mostly struck that his story changed from as recently as two weeks ago, you know -- >> judy woodruff. >> that's right. and still declining to sort of put it out on the table. if you're going to to this, that's generally the school of thought. i don't see how keeping this alive helps him or the trump white house. >> if there's no "there" there and there may not be, why not just have the white house come forward and say, yeah, jeff sessions met and carter page met and then spell it all out? >> the big question that everybody acknowledges that meeting with ambassadors is not an unusual thing to do. so why not disclose it. jeff sessions says he forgot about it. but it was a meeting that hadn't happened that long ago and also in the context of an election where there was russian interference in the election. so i think it do

the u.s. does and this is a campaign against him by the democrats and the clinton campaign. on't know what he thinks he is accomplishing by doing the interviews if he didn't have more to say. his story changed as recently as two weeks ago and now still declining to put it all out on the table. this is generally the school of thought. i don't see how it helps him or the president trump white house. there may be no there there, why not have the white house come forward and say yeah, jeff sessions met and carter page met. >> everybody acknowledges the meeting is not an unusual thing to do. why not disclose it. jeff sessions said he forgot about it. it was a meeting that had not happened that long ago and in the context of an election where there was russian interference, it does seem like the type of thing you might remember or the people in the meeting afterwards would have said hey, you need to correct the record because you forgot to mention it. with carter page, it seems like he exaggerated his on the trump administration. it was an awkward interview why he came on when he d

. >> bill: a spokesman for vladimir putin says the clinton campaign was in touch with russia before the vote. wow. we'll tell you what happened there. >> do you like your health care? >> yes. >> i think i have it right. is that obamacare? l [laughter] >> bill: also, watters asking the folks what they know about their health care. >> probably 90% of americans don't know. >> bill: caution, you are aboutt to enter the "no spin zone." "the factor" begins right now. ♪ >> bill: hi, i am bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. how the obamacare brawl affects you. that is the subject of this evening's "talking points" memo. classic left-right brawl. president obama and theg' democrats wanted to provide health care to americans who could not or would not pay for it. republican party and president trump don't want to dn that. so, the battle lines are drawn. here are the facts. 81% of all americans who signed up for the obamacare health plan will receive government assistance of some kind this year. some will have their entire health care premium paid for by the federal government. that cos

we've been talking with glen caplin, a senior spokesperson for the clinton campaign. ery early very close look at the russian attack on democratic information. i want to bring in his boss, rob -- robby mook who ran the clinton campaign. thank you for being here. >> my pleasure. >> i want to ask you about this point glen was make about how frustrating it was to feel like you guys were describing this accurately, you were putting appropriate emphasis on what was going on here about the outrageousness and the unique nature of the fact that russia had interfered in the campaign but it just couldn't be heard. i know you well enough to know from our considerations on the air to know you were frustrated. looking back with a few months in hindsight do you feel like there's anything different you could have done? is there something you wish you could have changed about the way you handled it to make people understand better? >> it's a od questio i think we were frustrated because as glen said, when the story first came out in the "washington post" it was a one and done. i know

glen caplin, senior spokesperson for the hillary clinton campaign specifically on the issue of the russian attack at the time. we'll be right back with more. >>> continuing our discussion with glen caplin, former spokes person for the clinton campaign, who spent part of his 2016 election studying the russian interference in the campaign and trying to craft some kind of response in the moment. glen, when we left off at the break, you were saying after there had been this initial leak with guccifer posted on d.c. leaks, the second thing that happened was seemingly more sophisticated leak that came through wikileaks. >> much more. the first one was sloppy, had russian metadata on it. was not user friendly. >> russian metadata meaning? >> meaning traces on the actual documents. you could tell -- there was russian language on it. >> it so you could tell it was the work of russian hackers? >> correct. >> now we're going to wikileaks timed on the eve of the convention, highly searchable user-friendly search function, we could very easily cull the wheat from the chaff in terms of the e-mails and r

>> i think the clinton campaign put the clinton campaign at a disadvantage. i know the democrats went out of their way to try to prove that russian interference or russian influence had something to do with the outcome of this election, that's not the case. hillary clinton lost because she didn't have the right message. she didn't campaign in the battleground states, and she spiked the football in the third quarter, donald trump worked hard, he had the right message and played smart in the battleground states. and not the popular vote, at the end of the day, like it or not, he's the president of the united states that's the key here, i don't think anything the russians did with regard to their influence in this election, or interference had anything to do with the electoral college, if so, they're smarter than the clinton campaign, at the end of the day, donald trump won this election. >> that's going to be investigated. i read this quote from you, it says, "the washington post," this is the most failed first 100 days of any president. i mean, that is a prett

a white union family that voted for democrats all the way down, but they didn't feel that the clinton campaignhree, i think, factories close in their county, in the middle of the campaign. trump went to that county. clinton never went. and so they felt like, you know what? nobody cares about us, we're gonna try to vote. we don't like that stuff, but we gotta vote for our jobs. >> seth: and now, do you think the democratic party is doing a good enough job finding fault in their own efforts, as opposed to looking outward at external forces and blaming other things? >> is that a trick question? i mean, no. i mean, so far what you hear is, "it was the comey letter, it was the russians, it was all this stuff," and that's true. but she was running against an orange nightmare. she should have won 50 states. [ laughter ] i don't want to hear about the russians right now. i think that we thought as democrats that it was going to be a referendum on bigotry in the republican party. but in those counties where it mattered, it became a referendum on elitism in the democratic party, where people didn't feel

peskov who in the clinton campaign talked with russian ambassador. that is pretty stunning. us from florida, brit hume. first of all, do you believe anything the russian say, brit? >> i think whatever they say and whatever a spokesman for vladimir putin says it should be taken with a considerable measure of skepticism. on the other hand, when he said that about people associated with a cogent dominant clinton campaign, talking to the russia, it certainly would be worth a follow-up to see who that might've been. if you step back from his interview, what it all adds up to come by we have known all along, although, some refuse to admit it. for all the talk about there being collusion with the trump campaign, there simply isn't any firm evidence that that is the case. you can say that there's not any evidence at all. their suspicions, they are hunches, there are theories, but no real evidence. >> bill: i am not willing to take anything that the russian say hi's even remotely truthful. i think they are up to what they usually do, mischief. i think you drop that line, oh, the clint

that was suspected by the clinton campaign at the time. the fbi director confirmed today that, in fact, the initial release of documents that the russians hacked and stole and released through guccifer and d.c. leaks, he confirmed that it was a russian operation, he confirmed that the second wave of wikileaks stuff, that was done through what he called a cutout, some sort of intermediary. what we're beginning to understand about how this happened, the fbi is confirming that's the way it happened. in general, i think it's fair to say that the republican members of the committee contributed less to the investigatory nature of what happened today in this public hearing but it is also worth noting one exception to that rule. iliana is a moderate republican from florida. she did not go down the other roads, investigate hillary clinton. she didn't go down these other roads with the other republicans. she was an independent voice today and asked her own variety of direct, probing questions with most of the time that she had. and her questioning w

there is evidence that would preclude the clinton campaign from giving blanket denial that anyone within clinton orbit was communicating with russian diplomats. of course they were. somewhere in the line there were people in proximity to hillary clinton communicating with russians. so i think for now, the task of democrats is to distance themselves from that as much as possible because it undermines the central allegation which is that donald trump is uniquely compromised by having communications with russia in any form. liz: just a footnote, addendum here. john podesta got paid tens of thousands of dollars. looks like tony podesta got paid $170,000 to do consulting for russia to get the sanctions lifted, sanctions put on by the obama administration. vince, some say the democrats are concentrating trying to tie president trump to russia. basically alleging collusion there, john clapper, no evidence of that. here laura ingraham on "fox & friends" saying no one is paying attention to the accomplishments that president trump has achieved. take a listen. >> i think they want to dominate the

reporter: duo the voters an apology for passing a question for a town hall excuse me, off to the hillary clinton campaign you know what? i wish when you got your facts, you read -- you read the emails. >> did i read a lot of them. >> you clearly did not read my emails, sir. no one has ever, ever shared questions with any of us involved in cnn. >> in fact, greg, donna brazile denied it on several occasions, most recently in february. she said no, i never received questions from cnn. there is no there there. she told bret baier you have misinformation and on and on. grethat's what happens when you get away with something. deny it, deny it i'm married. i know these things. [laughter] >> have you to understand what she did. she elected donald trump. imagine if she hadn't done this. if she had not helped hillary clinton get the nomination and bernie got the nomination. you had mentioned this before. bernie was a bigger threat. >> totally. >> more die hard fans for bernie than there was for hillary. bernie was likeable. bern. he probably would have been a tougher challenge. we could have ended up, thanks to do

you owe the voters an apology for passing a question for a town hall excuse me, off to the hillary clinton campaign you know what? i wish when you got your facts, you read -- you read the emails. >> i did read a lot of them.ot >> you clearly did not read my>> emails, sir. no one has ever, ever shared questions with any of us involved in cnn. >> in fact, greg, donna brazile denied it on several occasions, most recently in february. she said, no, i never received questions from cnn. there is no there there. she told bret baier you have misinformation and on and on. that's what happens when you get away with something. deny it, deny it. i'm married. i know these things. [laughter] >> you have to understand whatat she did. she elected donald trump. imagine if she hadn't done thise if she had not helped hillary clinton get the nomination and bernie got thear nomination. you had mentioned this before. bernie was a bigger threat. >> totally. >> more die-hard fans for bernie than there was for hillary. bernie was likeable. hillary was detestable. he probably would have been a tougher challenge. we could ha

trump administration in any way, excuse me the trump campaign, let me be clear the trump campaign had anything to do with russia hacking into the hillary clintoncampaign and the dnc? you read the report. and there's nothing in there that connects its? >> did they mention it, yes. did they make the case? absolutely not. as far as i'm concerned this is all politics and very bad politics indeed. my democratic brothers and sisters whom i love dearly would be best advised at this point to get out of politics. we have health care issues in this country and not political health but the health of the american people ought to be focused on right now. we can seize the moment and come out for health care law enforcement administration consider this crazy assertion that somehow the russians elected our president. not a chance. elizabeth: dennis kucinich thank you so much for your time. really appreciate it. now to the latest on the biggest tech ipo since facebook. snap closing its first trading day of more than 25 bucks a share. some 44% from its opening price of 17 bucks. can you still get in on this action? stick around we have a market panel coming up.

one shk shocking thing that as we came to the end of the campaign he had both the clinton campaign andrump campaigns and their nominees under investigations with the fbi. that certainly is shocking when you look that the context. >> well, it it's embarrassing perhaps for the country. but when people say where there's smoke there's fire, one of our panelists just said it and others have been saying it today, do you agree with that? >> you know, it's interesting listening both to the people who are comment thong and of course in the hearing people are pointing out evidence or things that they think ever dispositive of this. if you look at clapper, the head of the defense intelligence agency coming forward and saying before he left in january, that's him having served from july through january during the investigation, that he saw no evidence, the chairman of the intelligence committee openly saying at the end of the hearing we've seen no evidence and we're asking the fbi and the intelligence committee to come forward, i think it certainly is highly speculative and people shouldn't be jum

but when asked, is there an investigation in any of the other campaigns, the clinton campaign or any of the 17 campaigns, saying i can't answer that question. why was able to answer the question about the trump campaign? >> juan: what's going on at this table, gregory, trying to distract people from the news of the day. the news of the day is that the fbi director jim comey, much hated by the left for his involvement and the finger putting on the scales on the 26 202016 campaign, talking about the tweets. president trump said i was wiretapped. cia, fbi, national security agency, nobody is backing up trump. >> greg: do you honestly think that's a revelation that there was no evidence behind one of trump's tweets? america has gotten used to those tweets. it >> juan: that's fine but he's the president of the united states. unprecedented. >> eric: those on the left and those in the intel community taking that tweet literally. president obama actually physically wiretapped. >> juan: it extends to surveillance. everybody is saying there was no surveillance. >> eric: how do we have a transcr

campaign were all over the news. >> wikileaks has announced -- >> the clinton delighted by clinton's misfortunes. >> russia, if you're listening, i hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. >> donald j. trump will become the 45th president of the united states, defeating -- >> in the end, america's election went putin's way. >> i just received a call from secretary clinton. >> hillary clinton was quite negative about our country and her attitude. >> it won't be bad to get along with russia, right? it wouldn't be bad. >> and to the contrary, the other candidate, donald trump, was saying that we have to find some understanding. >> when people like me, i like them. even putin. >> whom would you like better? >> this is not the outcome we wanted. >> hillary clinton suffered one of the most shocking defeats in american history. >> i know how disappointed you feel, because i feel it too. >> at least in part some observers say because of the alleged hacking operation. >> this is painful, and it will be for a long time. >> putin had apparently avenge

if this was false, if if this leak was a fun of phony baloney, the clinton campaign would've done whatdone they would've come out with a strong denial. the clinton campaign said, i don't remember sending those e-mails, it wasn't me. it says essentially that all this stuff is true, government has a capability and they're addicted to spying on you and that is wrong. >> but the spine is fun. team hackers have had this technology for a a while. that happened in california where a hacker watched a girl on a tv. do you remember? he's fantastic. he's age 12 the argument that i hate is that you shouldn't worry about law loss of privacy if you're not doing anything wrong. if you aren't doing anything wrong, you're a boring miserable person and i don't want to know you. >> who knows? you might someday want to hide something. ethnic themed halloween costume is now a hate crime. >> five years from now who knows what's going to be illegal. >> here's my real problem, the cia is not doing a good job of selling this as a safety technology. a lot of major terrorist events have been disrupted because of

campaign were all over the news. >> wikileaks has released -- >> the clinton>> russia, if you're listening, i hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. >> donald j. trump will become the 45th president of the united states, defeating -- >> in the end, america's election went putin's way. >> i just received a call from secretary clinton. >> hillary clinton was quite negative about our country and her attitude. >> it wouldn't be bad to get along with russia, right? it wouldn't be bad. >> and to the contrary, the other candidate, donald trump, was saying that we have to find some understanding. >> when people like me, i like them. even putin. >> whom would you like better? >> this is not the outcome we wanted. >> hillary clinton suffered one of the most shocking defeats in american history. >> i know how disappointed you feel, because i feel it too. >> at least in part some observers say because of the alleged hacking operation. >> this is painful, and it will be for a long time. >> putin had apparently avenged his old grudge. >> so help me go

campaign were all over the news. >> wikileaks has released -- >> the clintonhted by clinton's misfortunes. >> russia, if you're listening, i hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. >> donald j. trump will become the 45th president of the united states, defeating -- >> in the end, america's election went putin's way. >> i just received a call from secretary clinton. >> hillary clinton was quite negative about our country and her attitude. >> it wouldn't be bad to get along with russia, right? it wouldn't be bad. >> and to the contrary, the other candidate, donald trump, was saying that we have to find some understanding. >> when people like me, i like them. even putin. >> whom would you like better? >> thiis not the outcome we wanted. >> hillary clinton suffered one of the most shocking defeats in american history. >> i know how disappointed you feel, because i feel it too. >> at least in part some observers say because of the alleged hacking operation. >> this is painful, and it will be for a long time. >> putin had apparently avenged his

the two. i realize secretary clinton knew many of the people, would you expect the same contact with the clinton campaign? >> to the best of my knowledge there was knowledge. to the best of my knowledge, ambassador kislyak did not attend democratic convention. he did attend republican conviction. >> that odd to you that he would be at republican -- is that odd? >> i think do it's odd, when i was ambassador i was careful. i rarely talked to people. when meeting with different people in society, you want to be neutral. you want to meet with the commonist as well liberals. to your point, maybe ambassador kislyak knew the clinton folks and didn't feel like he need ed much time talking about them. >>> would the fbi be forced to land over any and all information. >>> also charge from the wikileaks founder. he says he wonders in cia spies on -- >>> you'll hear from both sides of the debate. >> this bill as written today, would not pass the senate. >> trump care helps the rich and hurts the average american. ate. liberty did what? yeah, with liberty mutual all i needed to do to get an estimate was snap a photo o

putin is confirming the russian ambassador met with people from trump's campaign during the election to discuss bilateral relations, but this is very important, get this: the clinton campaign also had meeting with the russian ambassador during the election. what do you know? >> if you look at some people connected with the, with hillary clinton during her campaign, you would probably see that he had lots of meetings of that kind. but there were no meetings abo election, elecl process. trish: so why no reportingen that? why -- reporting on that? why no outrage about clinton's team meeting with the russians? the left went crazy when they found out former national security adviser mike flynn and attorney general jeff sessions met with him. kind of feels like a double standard here. joining me now, ned ryan and fox news contributor leslie marshall. good to see you, guys. ned, i guess we're learning that these kinds of high-level meetings, they happen. they happened on both sides. >> they happen on both sides , and you're the democrats, boy, life comes at you fast. i mean, not only now finding out that the hillary campaign had interaction with the russian ambassador, a

pete: reminders of the clinton campaign. didn't he beat hillary clinton? ight, you would think those would be fond memories, right? speaking of hillary clinton and her campaign, remember that moment when the dnc chair donna brazile, she denied giving hillary clinton debate questions? clayton: right. >> sandra: now she is finally admitting. that will do we actually have sound of this? clayton: this is a look back when she said she didn't. take a look back when she said she didn't remember. this watch? >> >> do you owe the voters an apology for passing a question for a town hall off -- excuse me, off to the hillary clinton campaign? >> you know what? i wish when you got your facts, you read, you read et emails. >> i did read a lot of them. >> no one has ever, ever shared questions with any of us involved in cnn. >> sandra: my how things have changed. pete: debate had to come out in "time" magazine this is yesterday after months and months of denial. she said among the many things i did in my role as democratic operative and dnc vice chair prior to assuming th

the status quo is not sustainable. bill clinton said during the campaign, it's craziest thing he had ever even. if hillary clinton had won the campaign, we would be revisiting obamacare. it has to change and we believe has to be changed in way consistent with many of the things the president recommended tonight. we anticipate coming p with a proposal that speaker, myself and president all agree on and trying to sell to all members because we anticipate no democratic support for this monstrosity. they're stuck with it. the american people want it, had elections about it. ready for us to tackle this and come up with a better health care program. >> thanks for joining us.

the only thing that really came out is that the clinton campaign colluded with the dnc to game the systeminst bernie sanders. if the clinton campaign wouldn't have done that, there wouldn't have been anything for the russians to have leaked. >> i mean among the things that they did was, you know, was for three solid weeks have news be dominated that was about the context of john podesta's e-mails. so they did -- >> making unkind comments about the candidate. they had a lot of stuff. that was to create disruption. >> it just every day blocked out the sun. every day that is what we were dealing with. but, again, we're even now getting deflected by, like, the details what occurred on the campaign trail as opposed to -- >> let me talk to brabender. john, you know how you disrupt another campaign. you're not going to smile your way through this. i know you know. what you do is -- you rent all the buses so the other team doesn't get the buss that weekend, or you make robocalls to the offices so they can't answer the phones. there's all kinds of ways to screw up a campaign and the russia nsz fou

in the clinton campaign also knew that they cut it when any of those the states.wisconsin, pennsylvania, michigan they were very concerned about the reason being is that they took them for granted. it wasn't until the last ten days. look selfishly. i wanted that way. it had been very good to us. we at a rally there. that's can be a. he will not stop working at 8:00. give to make gift to make this like the midnight rally. i know this guy please only get the last stop. he came here and it is a massive blowout. he got on a plane and went to michigan. i went like this. thrown together last minute. he made it back at 330 in the morning. we now if we could just make a turnout model they are not been engaged in the election process. they did not connect with the african-american community. that title for nominee of a major party. he won across the board. nobody else saw. i was there with cnn. they were laughing at us at five clock in the afternoon. you know why i knew is i know numbers. the 40 bel wetter counties. no, 11:0012:00 we won. speaking of new hampshire you know

, get information on hillary clinton and try to get to people around that campaign or the to comment about the lahr campaigns. the particular campaigns. but the russians, in general, are always trying to understand who the future leaders might be and what levers of influence there might be on them. >> i just hope that if information does surface about the other campaigns, not even just hillary clinton's, but any other campaigns, that you would take that serious also if the russians were trying to infiltrate those campaigns around them. >> of course we would. >> okay. yield to mr. conway. >> thank you, chairman. gentlemen, thanks for being here. admiral rogers, you mentioned analytical standards early in the conversation. are those standards the same for all intelligence analysts across the various agenciesesome. >> there's a broad set of promulgated standards for all of us, and then there are specific issues associated, for example, with the particular authority that you're using to collect the information in the first place. >> so, chairman, the same thing with your agenc

brazil, the former interim chair of the dnc now admits she forwarded townhall questions to the clinton campaignion after months of denial. here's what she wrote on among the many things i did in my role, prior to assuming the position, was to share position topics with the clinton campai campaign. we wanted to make all our candidates look good and we worked hard to make that happen. sending that e-mail was a mistake i will always regret. they show her telling the clinton camp a plan to question from the audience about the flint michigan poisoning in the water. another proposed question about the death penalty. the story broke in october when fox asked about it at the time, she denied it calling it falsified information and an altered e-mail. >> as a christian woman i understand persecution but i will not be persecuted because your information is false. his e-mails were stolen. you are so interested in talkin- >> you are denying it. >> you are like a thief that wants to bring into the night the things you found. >> she said she regrets her actions but never apologized. laura: thank you for that.

the former woman of the dnc admitted to passing townhall questions to the hillary clinton campaign during that surfaced from wikileaks in october. instead of apologizing, she tried to push the blame on to the russian hackers who stole e-mail. she said, in an article for "time" magazine, this, by stealing all the dnc e-mail and selectively releasing those few, the russians made it look like i was in the tank for secretary clinton. the media narrative played out just as the russians had hoped, angry and throwing division in our ranks. here is more from washington. >> donna brazil, the former interim chair of the dnc now admits she forwarded townhall questions to the clinton campaign before the election after months of denial. here's what she wrote on time.com. among the many things i did in my role, prior to assuming the position, was to share position topics with the clinton campai campaign. we wanted to make all our candidates look good and we worked hard to make that happen. sending that e-mail was a mistake i will always regret. they show her telling the clinton camp a plan to question

and what is the clinton campaign thinking today? robbie mook will be here. and on defense, how is the white house responding tonight? >> all i can say is what i said before that we don't have information that represents those tweets. it's over. i've found a permanent escape from monotony. together, we are perfectly balanced. our senses awake. our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say...if you love something set it free. see you around, giulia with 9 lobster dishes.est is back try succulent new lobster mix & match or see how sweet a lobster lover's dream can be. there's something for everyone and everyone's invited. so come in soon. with e*trade you see things your way. ♪ ♪ you have access to the right information at the right moment. ♪ ♪ and when you filter out the noise, it's easy to turn your vision into action. ♪ ♪ it's your trade. e*trade. start trading today at etrade.com there'try phillips' fiberway to ggood gummies.. they're delicious... and a good source of fiber to help support regularity. mmm. these are good. nice work, phillips'

. >> is he under the impression that the clinton campaign had inappropriate contact with russia during the election? >> i think that's an interesting aspect of all of this that's not being covered. number one, from everything that had been publicly available on several occasions the dnc was asked by the fbi to allow their servers to be looked at despite all of the claims about their concerns about leaking. yet the question still doesn't come out, why wouldn't the dnc on multiple occasions rebuff the fbi? why were they not wanting did -- if they were so concerned about hacks and leaking, why did the dnc not ask the fbi to come look? not only did they not ask them, they rebuffed them on multiple occasions. why? what were they height hiding? what were they concerned of? i think there is a serious question. it's not -- they are very clear about the concerns that they have as well as all the leadership in the democratic party yet when it came to hacks and leaks out of the dnc -- and they are quick to jump to the conclusion about who did it, and yet they wouldn't allow the fbi to investigate

to that to slander, in their view, the view of cyber security experts, wine, certainly the hillary clinton campaignanda war, as they called it in this hearing, is being targeted times when they believed the then come up trumps —— donald trump candidate was tweeting. they used those hours to put that disinformation on line in the hope that the candidate would see it. and according to cyber security experts giving evidence today, a former fbi agent, he alleges that donald trump then cited some of that fake information. so, the level of propaganda in this propaganda war that was going on, that it was alleged, was one of the key things to come across. and when it comes to this committee, they are trying to show they are above politics. that republicans and democrats can work together. when it comes to hearings like this, their collea g u es comes to hearings like this, their colleagues in the house are struggling when it comes to playing nice in politics. china says it is determined to end ivory. there have been 3a licensed ivory. there have been 3a licensed ivory carving factories and shops able to se

democrats crossed the line. >> if this committee or in i -- anyone else comes to you about the hillary clinton campaigntheir associates, or someone from the clinton foundation, will you add that to your investigation? they have ties to russian intelligence services, russian agents. would that be something of interest to you? >> people bring us information about what they think is improper and unlawful of any kind, we will evaluate it. >> but there was really no discussion about the clinton associates beyond that one exchange with the republican chairman. but based on just the texture of the hearing today, shep, it does sound like there's multiple cases here that the fbi is looking at and that the allegations against mike flynn may be a separate and indication unto itself. >> catherine, there was testimony about the leak of the former national security advisor michael flynn's name. >> what we learned in the hearing today is that it's just a very small group of individuals at the nsa that have the authority to unmask or identify american citizens whose communications are picked up in the process of surve

the clintons they had the same list of major donors. they were identical. and then clinton sent the signal because there was of silver bullet out there trying to take him out of the campaign but the british secret service file or the hollywood access file over how to release the "access hollywood" files so right away that campaign is looking for the silver bullet because the clintons are telling them about it so be up part of the presidential campaign that was something to behold there were dozens of people in cubbyholes with the "national geographic" gamble "life" magazine it is hard to imagine how much money they spent on opposition research with the intelligence officers and they could not find it so as i get closer to the nomination with that particular approach with the clinton people that you were trying to tell us and by that time the clinton campaign says no. hugh cannot find your on your own. trump will wind of nomination we will go into the general. the bush family believes the nobility of public life but the master of negativity to pioneer if anybody is interested to reinvent politics in many ways. somehow whenever they needed to. laugh course there was also ro

was any of that's shared with the clinton campaign? where are these leaks coming from? nly felonies we know in this case were committed by leaking intelligence. that's a violation of the espionage act. james comey would not even acknowledge there was an investigation into this although he did acknowledge the investigation into russia even though there is no evidence that has been put forth whatsoever. >> i think it was reince priebus who said there's greater evidence of media collusion to get hillary elected dan russia getting trump elective. there's a whole lot we do not know. i would urge all people to relax, look at the evidence that will come in and find out -- james clapper, said so far, there's no evidence whatsoever with any kind of collusion. that's ultimately what i think is going to happen. >> sean: if you were doing an investigation -- don't you keep that circle tight in terms of evidence that you are gathering? isn't that the type of thing you would never let out and if it was left out, you would be able to very quickly determine who did it? >> the secrecy of

the trump campaign's ties to russia. cnn has learned the bureau has information that some of the associates may have coordinated to release damaging information about hillary clinton's campaign. >> also there's growing questions about whether the house intelligence committees investigation into russia is now compromised after it's chairman went correctly to the president with new surveillance information that he said he had. all of this as the show down over health care is in the final hours with republicans still at this moment divided it's driving the reporting. what is new. >> u.s. officials tell them that the fbi has indication that indicates that associates and possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to hillary clinton's campaign. the fbi director on monday made this bombshell announcement before congress that the fbi is investigating the trump campaign's ties to russia. the fbi is now reviewing that information which includes human intelligence, travel business and phone records and accounts of in person meetings. that information is raised intelligence committee investigators that coordination and some officials cautioned us and inconclusive a

the opposition party, and they y government employees who overwhelm only voted for hillary clinton. we know, for example, but 99% of the campaigney donated by the state department went to hillary clinton. 99%. >> sean: that tells a big story. we will have most newt gingrich right after this break. very important story we are telling here. the king of fake news himself, brian williams, who got caught for this. this is the destructa cancer cell by the body's own immune system, thanks to medicine that didn't exist until now. and today can save your life. ♪ ♪ dearthere's no other way to say this. it's over. i've found a permanent escape from monotony. together, we are perfectly balanced. our senses awake. our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say...if you love something set it free. see you around, giulia find fast relief behind the counter allergies with nasal congestion? with claritin-d. [ upbeat music ] strut past that aisle for the allergy relief that starts working in as little as 30 minutes and contains the best oral decongestant. live claritin clear, with claritin-d. the markets change... at t. rowe price

the two of over russian contacts with officials in president trump's campaign. goring to spokesperson for vladimir putin he met with people met with the hillary clinton campaign. he ambassador's job to stay in touch with both sides. that the meetings were about u.s. russian relations and nothing to do with the election. watch. >> if you look at some people connected with hillary clinton, during her you would probably see that he had lots of meetings of that kind. but there are no meetings about electoral processes. people working in think tanks advising hillary or advising people working for hillary. if you look at it with intention you would see yes, trying to interfear with hillary. it would be nonsense. this is not true. >> should we believe spokesperson for the kremlin on anything? >> i don't know that we should believe him. let me lay down the law, explain the law. there are two potential legal issues here. one is communicating with the russians so that they will use their computer cybersecurity skills to affect the outcome of the election. that obviously would be a crime. the other is one general flynn got in trouble for. i don't think he committed the cr

the opposition party, and they y government employees who overwhelm only voted for hillary clinton. we know, for example, but 99% of the campaignoney donated by the state department went to hillary clinton. 99%. >> sean: that tells a big story. we will have most newt gingrich right after this break. very important story we are telling here. the king of fake news himself, brian williams, who got caught success has always been measured in zeros. but shouldn't it be about firsts? and seconds? how about adding a third? we think there's a bajillion ways to measure success. like making your toddler giggle like this. yep that's a success! can teaching kids in another country how to say "pony" make you a success? the correct answer is yeah. what about taking pride in everything you do? finding the courage to do something you've never done? or doing something no one's ever done? we sure think so. this is what we call... the new success story and while success isn't just about money, no matter how much you have, we think you deserve the financial freedom to sleep like this at night. we are t-i-a-a, and we're with you. start today at t-i-

next, donna finally convinces she did help the clinton campaign chief by giving clinton campaign questionshead of time. but not the only democrat that has been misleading the american people. we're going to break down who else has been caught in the act of cheating after this. also coming up many liberals now say the president is giving them quote trump-induced insomnia nightmares. whether they should just stop the trip to the refrigerator once and for all. that's coming up. no matter how the markets change... at t. rowe price... our disciplined approach remains. global markets may be uncertain... but you can feel confident in our investment experience around the world. call us or your advisor... t. rowe price. invest with confidence. dearthere's no other way to say this. it's over. i've found a permanent escape from monotony. together, we are perfectly balanced, our senses awake, our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say: if you love something... set it free. see you around, giulia ♪ ♪ what we do every night is like something out of a strange dream except that the next