i talk about some of the data sets we use. most people still don't know they exist despite great efforts from the city and others. and, you know, a lot of entrepreneurs that we're looking for is the way to get leverage, a way to build an experience or build a product before we have 100,000 users using it. open data is the key way to do that. you can start out with this experience, very lively and robust with very few users. and then when the first users come in, there is actually something for them to do and see. and i think that you'll start to see as the data sets get more robust and a little bit better and hopefully as we get to improve them ourselves and put them back into the public domain, the innovation that comes off with them is just going to grow exponentially. >> this seems like a really important moment. the world of civic innovation until now has really been focused on sort of open public data and the private data world has been separate. the fact that the city realizes that it is private data that adds to that and

because you can't just open up the data. you have to do things like this, where you get the community together or you have people actually talking about it because the demand side, as we were talking about it, will be there because there is going to be someone there. there have to be people working with it who are getting out there. i think this is what this city is going to be really powerful. in terms of other cities doing as well, chicago is doing some really interesting stuff. scary cool stuff. they're taking 3 in 1 data, pothole request and crime report and matching it up with social media. they're getting this really deep and rich picture of what is going on in the city. and you can do that with data when you think about it creatively. philadelphia as i mentioned, they are really active in open data. and new york, again with 3 in 1 is doing smart analytics. i think that's what you'll see happening as well, government starts to become smarter, make better decisions, better policies. this term algorithmic regulation, whic

the data is intended to transform the individual data for the services in san francisco. it follows a national movement to give residents access to their own data. it establishes technical glz for the data coordinator. this will make the data more assessable. the date will be released and the documents for rp s and licensing requirement. the data will be available in memorandum and other formats using the most update standards. the following deadlines are going to be effected. winning within a month the mayor is going to appoint a chief officer to oversee the policy within his or her department. and they will have access to the data. within six months the department should publish a catalog that can be available. within one year the chief data officer shall present a plan to help the board of supervisors and the mayor. those deadlines insure with remain educational to the community so the public is made readily aware. one of the priorities of the united states in office is to improve the efficiency in office. i want to thank all my staff and in a particular to hannah who's

perhaps the phone companies do not retain the data for as long as is necessary. the e.u. has a data retention law for two years, covering a wide variety of communications of metadata, but that in itself is controversial. the u.s., one reason why it will be controversial is we don't have workshops and hearings as much on what private companies are allowed to do with their data, unlike in europe. having a large telephone company retain data for a long might be worse for privacy. i don't know. but it certainly is an issue. a data retention law is not an automatic answer to a privacy question. a second possible answer that occurred to me is the efficiency of search, particularly the indices. if you have a large amount of data it's often organized to make it efficient answer the kind candidates of queriries you need for your business purpose. arguably the phone company does not have the right indies -- indices for the types of inquiries needed to be done and that's rome for the phone company not to -- they don't have the same questions. it's also harder to say what should be do

pull out the laptop. >> the data gathering where does that begin? >> the about minute you turn it on. you are letting your ip company know that you are there and ready to rock. the ip knows about us. google knows about us. yahoo knows about us. the e-mail company knows about us. >> i will send an e-mail to a lawn is service company. >> he says he never had this kind of detailed information get phone recordstracing days. that said frank called ted at whatever hour. with e-mails it is frank e-mailed ted and this is what he wrote. >> let's pause her for a second. the words of caution hit close to home at fox news. we recently learned the government collected ehails from the g mail account of our chief washington correspondent james rosen in connection with a leaks investigation. who is sending. who is receiving. what they are saying and when. each e-mail generates a lot of raw you information about ourselves and according to the chipmaker intel we send more than 204 million per minute. every one ahearn says indelible. >> if we delete things from our acc

here we have data from the city. we also have data from private data sources that read -- not going to mess with it. there's one of the variables now, the bottom you see there is median household income. we're pulling in all these different data sources, creating a beautiful visualization to tell a story at the neighborv level of how the city is growing. and some of the things you're seeing on the map here are a pipeline of information about both residential permits over the past decade or so, how has the city allocated permits throughout different neighborhoods in the city. and some of the other things you're seeing on the map is the approved businesses, the businesses are currently doing business in the city. one of the things we said once we started visualizing on the map the slow and more rapid growth of residential -- residential property in soma and then in 2011 you just saw obviously a huge residential boom in the downtown area. so, we've just actually -- we're a company in southern california. we just relocate

the algorithms, how the data is being used. eed to start coming up with a new terms of the debate and determining -- i think we need to start figuring out what the questions should be. one of the things that happened with jim clapper, the director of national intelligence, he was asked in the hearing about whether or not nsa was collecting data on millions of americans and their were some arguments why he essentially said no. some are human about why he answered the way you did. , orntionally obfuscating another perspective i talked about in the piece that collect has a different meaning when it talks about data. sounds like or rally in -- orwellian speak may be. saying we are only collect ink it when we do something with it. we do not even have the sort of common vocabulary to talk about the juices of data in politics and governing. i think that is the place to start. i think in that piece, i reflected a little bit of disappointment about the idea that president obama's immediate reaction is no one is listening to your phone ca

will the utah data center hold the data of american citizens? >> no, we don't hold data on u.s. ake protecting your civil liberties and privacy as the most important thing they do in securing in nation and so when people just oh, they'll have all this stuff at utah data center, that's ballo ballo that's baloney. i'm not going to tell you what we're doing in utah. that would give our adversaries an advantage. we're not going to do that. >> reporter: this is about the possibility that the government's stunning new capacity to collect, store, and an l analyze data will tempt less than noble leaders. >> it could become a totalitarian state quickly. the capacity to do that is being set up. if we get the wrong person in office or in the government, they could make that happen quickly. life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. we balance those three virtues all the time. the question people like me ask the american people is so how much more do you want me to do? >> what can a government computer know? and how can it know it? with the nsa mum, we go to si silicon valley for answers. a

also for the sexual assault data, it was relatively rare thing, especially with the reference data. the details all provided are based on e-mail victims and also a couple years of data and most of the findings i present are part of this and female victims and include data from most recent report and with all that i will get you some data here as well. this gives us a context of the issue of the trends over time with serious nonfatal crime. it is pretty consistent and violent crimes are aggravated a salt and it is .9 in 2010. this includes the individuals over age 12 and providing context in 2011 and this includes 104 per thousand over age 12 and again we don't want any serious violent crimes to occur but it is part of this to some degree. the caveat is that they are not really culpable. so we have civilians in terms of information for each group and data and the total rate of violence has dropped over time and this is over age 12 to 1.8% of females over age 12 and in 2010 we had about a quarter of a million and 100,000. and again with the military data again, based on percentages, sl

i pulled the same data they did. if you look at their table 4 and look at the numbers they pulled out themselves in item of prices and as they relate to the size of units, my figures are lower than their report. >> colleagues, any questions to the appellant? >> okay, seeing none at this time let hear from members of the public who wish to speak in support of this appeal. any member of the public wish to speak in support of this appeal? okay. seeing none, let's go to the planning department who has 10 minutes for the grounds of the ch p's approving. if you can turn on your microphone. >> good afternoon, tim fry, department staff. my comment are brief. that in sum the planning department recommends the board alter for 706 mission street. as you know this criteria, the commission uses article 11 and standards. these criteria are not predescriptive and they are meant to be in evaluate iv framework which many options can be weighed and many results can be chooed -- achieved to show compliance. it was in conform ance with t

it is about whether they have the right to direct the data -- the right to collect the data in the first plates on every phone call on every american every day. the patriot act did not specifically authorize it, section 215 talks about tangible things that are relevant to an authorized

the data reports in tracking. we've made some leaps forward in terms of the collection of data. we now have it in place so the district stations report on line. and that is reported back to them so they see what's taken place. we're to input the data for enforcement so the lieutenants know exactly what is take place or not taking place. and as opposed to a data entry clerk just for that task. the leaders need to know what's going on and they see the types of citations and the locations where the sieksz are being issued. one of the things i want to point out one year to date we're hoping to see a continued decrease in pedestrian injuries. unfortunately, we are at 8 pedestrian facility year to date. we're going to increase our efforts to make sure we don't surpass last year. i mentioned the crossroads and how the department is issuing citations to handheld devises. we are having the devises programmed so there is a pedestrian a bike motorist box when you printout the citation so it shows exactly what is it and the court are excited because the prints are bigger. and they're more ex

the data recorder covers every aspect of the flight.ecorder picks up what the crew was talking about, were they on top of the situation. >> so if there is something that went wrong with the equipment in some way, shape or form, that will immediately show up in the data part of the recording? >> absolutely. if the plain was coming in too low or too fast, at the wrong angle, temperatures easily identified. gr so it seems that by the end of the day, you'll have the -- they, the national transportation safety board, will have a fairly good idea what happened. there may be other components that led to it. most investigations came up with multireasons why something happened. but they should have a pretty good idea at the end of the day and yet it takes sometimes years to get the reports. >> they will have a picture of what happened. but they won't know why it happened and what contributed to it. for example in the accident at heathrow where the engine spooled back and the plane crashed short of the runway, they knew that happened, but they ha

as for the statement, gdp data this morning let them off the hook.o much about the weaker economic data of late. they don't have to express too much pain about overinflation so they will true up the first paragraph and align it with what the chairman said in his semi-annual testimony a few weeks back. >> pep you want to diverge from that or concur? >> i would like to concur in the interest of good tv 1.7 better than expected the adp number better than expected so the fear is the economy was somehow faltering again don't look to be realized so i think you'll see status grow and a little tweak to the statement and there's no indication that they will change course to start tapering the quantitative easing in september which some wonder no inflation, why would you do that. unemployment is still 7.6%. economy not doing great, gangbusters, but they are indeed quite committed to start the wind winddown of qe. >> what we've been talking about, that 1.7% number. does it hasten the taper, do nothing for it? slow the taper, and what does it say about underlyin

the analysis of data. there are models that in fact do the approach and you have that with our other two plans. we've gone those conversations and the goal is to work towards the successful renewal. regardless of what methodology you use it the claims information. we won't have met 2013 information is it can't happen until the information has actually happened. the information that we do the engagement is the underlying data. we talked about the most important piece and donates the claims information. we looked at that kwaerl and annually and those conversations will happen >> supervisor mar. >> to supervisors avalos question how early would we start. you're saying immediately. what would have been the normal time now that you've started awe that is >> we'll typically have in a normal somewhere with most employers we've got a quarterly data most often on their desire we'll start around february or march talking about benefit changes is there go anything they want to see different. we add if our trend inform

the catalyst? catalyst is better u.s. economic dataer one, and more demand for the paper asset of oil, that's going to take these commodity funds which are beginning to see into energy, and i just don't think, i think gold is broken. >> the right trades in gold was buy it when dr. jay bought it. i don't think you start a position in gold now. if you're in it as doc said, hedge yourself, otherwise the minors as well. >> the whole caboodle. >> they will trade along with the underlying. yes. >> freeport, at least you get 10%. >> another commodity is crude and it is causing many oil stocks to hit new eyes today and the list includes big names like chevron, and anadarko and halliburton. what are the best to own now? john dow oversees 5 billion at fidelity investments and joins us from boston. >> welcome. good to talk to you. >> thank you very much. thanks for having me. >> we mentioned how many of these stocks have hit new highs. the ones that i mentioned and there are so many more whether it is the exploration of production names, the oil

we used keywords to search specific subjects, look for patterns in the data, decoded hundreds of military acronyms, and read tens of thousands of reports. we have no way of knowing just how accurate or comprehensive these reports are, but they do show what the u.s. army knew and when. the one person we asked to comment on them was dr. toby dodge, who has advised both the u.k. and the u.s. governments on iraq. one concern was that the documents named ordinary american troops and iraqi civilians. we have deleted those details. >> much more problematic for the americans is the insight these leaks give into their modus operandi, how they're functioning on the streets. the escalation of force, the killing of innocent iraqis, i think, it paints a damning picture of a-- of a culture of forced protection, to the exclusion of everything else. >> we've got a shooter on the roof! [gunshots] >> we will continue taking the greatest care to prevent harm to innocent civilians, yet we will not permit the spread of chaos and violence. >> initially, the americans stated that they weren't recording a body c

data of. that's already happening. on the flight data recorder, that holds information like altitude, the speed, the position of the plane. and the cockpit voice recorder is capable of picking up things like the background noises and any warning signals that may have gone off, candy. >> what else is critical to these investigators as they try to figure out what went on? >> well, we know that they're also going to look at things like human performance, specifically those four pilots who were on board. they're going to be looking at their training. did they follow all of the procedures? any possibility of fatigue? because remember, this flight was more than ten hours long, an international flight. they're also going to look at blood and alcohol tests. and the flight crew will also be interviewed as well. additionally, it will be very important to look at the mechanics of the plane. was everything working correctly? >> can you tell us about the two fatalities? >> right. we know that they were two 16-year-old girls. they were rep

we worked throughout the past three, four months to put the data together. it's all publicly available off the state department of education's website, so if people want to see for themselves the data, you can go on to the state's website to find that out. >> those who might find criticism with the report will look at the funding sources for it. obviously, it's a pro charter school group who helped fund the majority of it. your response to that -- maybe that part of the allegation from some of those that are critics of charter schools in general? >> yeah. we've been funded by the walton foundation, silicon valley community foundation, ann bowers and the noise foundation, lisa sancini, a number of other people have supported our work and these are all people and organizations and foundations that are haefly committed to creating great schools. they are funding things around the valley, bay area, and country, and it's really somewhat about charter schools, but it's really about looking at the models of schools that work and wanting to grow more of those great s

during the approach, the data indicate that the throttles were at idle and air speed was slowed below the target air speed. >> here are the casualty figures right now. 182 people were rushed to hospitals around san francisco. six of them are in critical condition. two teenagers who were on the plane died, but amazingly, more than 100 people walked away without a scratch. i want you to see and hear the video fred hayes shot yesterday. he is just out walking with his family and has no idea he is about to witness a disaster. watch and listen. >> look at him. yeah, he does. look at that one. look how his nose is up in the air. oh, my god. oh, it's an accident. >> you're filming it, too. >> oh, no! >> oh, my god. >> oh, my god, you're filming it. >> what happened? >> oh, my god. oh, my god. >> you filmed the whole thing. >> oh, lord have mercy. >> that video will certainly get the attention of the ntsb crash investigators. no doubt it will help them answer their key questions exactly what happened. former inspector general mary schiavo is here from the u.s. department of transportation and

sfwlu gleen some of the data from the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder, and it's this. they really needed to increase their speed. if you hear some of the witness statements and also from the passengers, they seem to indicate that the plane was too low and that the engines revved up just before the plane was about to touch down. i want you to listen now the to the ntsb chairwoman who boils things down second by second. take a look. >> a call was made seven seconds prior to impact. the sound of the stick shaker occurs approximately four seconds prior to impact. a call to initiate a go ahead occurred 1.5 seconds before impact. >> so it's clear that they knew there was trouble. the problem, don, when are you talking about just seconds, you know, it seems like there really wasn't enough time to make the appropriate adjustments to avoid this kind of mishap. at this point you have to wonder whether pilot error is really what they're looking at here, but as the ntsb chairperson put it, at this point everything just really seems to be on the table. don. >> dan simon at san fra

we are talking about the utah data center. the utah data center will not have analysts.s a data form. that is not to say that we don't have plenty of analysts out there. the actual number is classified, but there are analysts in jordan, at fort meade, all around the country, different facilities. you thought data center was not going to be the place where they were looking at screens are trying to decide the ruling, what information they will get or not. a dead data farm. i go back to the beginnings of the nsa, even before, after world war i. there were organizations within the united states government whose job it was to break codes, to try to gather intelligence from other countries. the secretary of state said, "gentlemen do not read other gentleman pops mail." of course, that has changed now. we come by readers of "the guardian host with these days. they have has some really fascinating information that the the nsa as well, what operations are. for the first time in a while, we are getting a good look at the secret activities that the nsa is doing, and obviously ther

you see some of the, from mills peninsula now some of the data coming in. 12 patients initially taken there. eight adults, four toddlers. two discharged, two admitted to the hospital. eight still in the e.r. we've been very fortunate. we've never had an airliner crash that killed anyone. the last crash that killed anyone was in 1995 when a small plane, a cessna crashed into the water approaching the tarmac. that killed three people. we want to bring in diane dwyer. i know you spoke about the two deaths here and where they found the bodies. >> i talked to the san mateo county coroner a few minutes ago. he is at sfo at the scene. it was very windy and it was hard to hear him and he is busy. tend two people who are confirmed dead are both females and adults. one body was found near the tail of the plane at the end of the run way. it is likely that person may have fallen out of the plane when the tail hit the rocks along the bay and then broke off. the second body was found near the fuselage. it is unclear if that person fell out of the plane or programs collapsed turk the evacuation. the

the government has stockpiled data on an unprecedented scale. the fisa court to serve as a rubber stamp. they're learning everything there is to know about american the american people have a right to know about this program. at the very least, they need to know this program is operating within our system of checks and balances. we need to protect individual privacy rights. it is time to re-examine the patriot act. we need greater visibility on the fisa courts. we need to make sure that these laws are not interpreted on the backs of the american people. and ensure our laws cannot be interpreted high in the backs of the american public. with this hearing, the committee has begun this important work of oversight and repair. thanks to the chairman and raking member calling the hearing and thanks to the witnesses for participating. i want to ask you about the october 2011 letter sent by ron are -- ronald whyte regarding section 215. information was classified and even most members of congress. mr. white seemed to reply in his response that because co

i know again your come back to the board but we could have some more data. he i would - i'm happy to meet with you >> and now there's a penalty for grant folks who submit the paperwork late. >> what are the - >> initially we save the paperwork for the next year and hopefully, the grant will be on time and hopefully restored. you see the penalty is - >> it's not neo-necessary to spend the whole budget. >> generally, the amount is relatively small thank goodness by because it's one time money it will be spent on one time cost. recently that's been some of the things we've done to prepare organizations to go into properties. and also some activation of the markets that would perform in the arts and it's one time >> thank you for the work of having an i guess arts the cultural activity in the city. i know it's also the entrants commission and the other departments. i've been doing my best to do the finding from 7 years ago and i think that some key recommendations are better oversight to make sure there's better representation in the city. i'm just wondering if t

at the last two meetings, kaiser was asked to provide the data to justify just like you are trying to do today. kaiser absolutely refused. they said almost every answer was that's proprietary. in the meantime kaiser has made $87 million, they billed this extra. they have made a profit for $2 billion. kaiser is doing perfectly well financially. with no data, we don't understand what you are being asked to approve, why kaiser should be given the check without providing the data. they fail to provide the data to hhf and hhf expressed their dissatisfaction with their answers. we are asking you to do the same. we are asking you to stand up now. it is time to draw the line today, folks. because if you don't stand up, then who will? if we don't do it now, then when? so don't give it to them. don't give them the increase. they do not deserve it. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> my name is karen, president of the health service board. pretty much everything has been said here but i do want to point out that a similar incident happened years ago where our board did not approve the rates.

in our model, the data is their data. we do not have the right to give away the data. if someone subpoenas us for the data a, then it's a process. we are a data processor, when you look at some companies, they own the data, we don't. the customer owns a data. >> is that important? if i'm an fbi agent and i say, we need data. you demand a warrant? >> we would say, you have to go talk to the kmr. >> they would want to go -- talk to the customer. >> they would not go after you, the they would go after the server. >> you did well. all right. neil, thank you for being with us. stay right there. technology's landlord, duncan logan here when "press: here" continues. >> uber, spotify and zappos are three of the most intriguing companies. they are cool and got their start at the simple desks inside an organization called rocket space. rocket space is a spiezingly simple concept, it's supplies a start up with every thing it needs. office space, desks, a coffee maker and a receptionist, and it will supply a motivational speaker on a evening if you like. he calls rocket space the

and the facts historical correlations historical data and determine where things are going to go so in terms of this war and disbelievers that the central banks are engaged in humans beating robots most since zero eight as trends shift currencies so this is in the forks trading markets and humans are proving more adept at then computers and reacting to the federal reserve's mixed messages i live on when policymakers will reduce their own precedent to stimulus so at the moment. most forex trading is done via algorithms but the few that are done by humans are actually outperforming the algorithmic trading currencies because they're looking at historical data and trends and what should normally happen and it's not happening so what's going on are the computers were generating returns that were consistent with market conditions and consistent with inflation trends and consistent with interest rate policies and those returns were not sufficient enough to cover the extraordinary malfeasance that people like vince cable is encouraging so what the humans have. one is they are basically riggi

brian, a beige book that in my opinion is a bit at odds with the weaker economic data. you just don't see it. the beige book a bit stronger than the economic data we've h.overall the beige book saying the economy increased at a mod toast moderate pace. manufactured which has been weak in some of the other data is said to be expanding in most districts according to the beige

quickly thefts when their tracked and the police departments crime data warehouse. recovered bikes are under the jurisdiction of the department and the property control division. they store the bikes and records of the bikes in custody are kept separate. >> so can i just say the 8634 is for one year and that's the average. >> it will be going up with the number of thefts because the theft rate is compared took the theft growth. for required is proof of ownership. it's not that common place it people keep their receipts and they only have their bikes for a couple of years but simply showing up and saying i lost my bike that won't do it >> well, if my two bikes were there i couldn't access them without proof maybe you could go back to the place of purchase and get a receipt but that may not be possible. in terms of investigation of reports of stolen bikes some stations have dedicated resources that are dedicated to bicycle thefts per we were able to get some information but there's no policy at a point for sprld approach that insures that all stations will have staff d

, the adp number will try to forecast what the data is for the month of july in the labor report. gdp is a second quarter number. i have seen numbers between 0, 5 and 1.5 that will be telling about what the underlying state of the economy is but, again, not new info. it's only when you move on to thursday, and this is the one i would focus on, it's the ism data, which is -- to be improved to 51.5 and auto sales will give you current information. what's the problem with that? it's a day after the fomc meeting which is going to lead to the question that i know scott is thinking, what does the fed know about these numbers and i don't know what they know about it. >> what does it know and when does it know it? >> exactly. we think they have a piece of the jobs report on the previous tuesday, but it's just the manufacturing piece which is a good number to have because there's always a lot of volatility inside that number but we don't think they have the full number until the afternoon of thursday. so what this sets up is the possibility of

so watch the data. >> neil: forget this july high, then to the guys who still think we're setting up for a september to remember. say more data like this, the less we need guys like this. ben bernanke.