we would like to supplement the density but i want to caution that given our data and the limitations of our data that will rely on a literacy refuse. we don't have the information to provide a conversation but it will scratch the surface. the other topic that comes up no more than where on the spectrum is rent. so what is labeled s is t

we would like to supplement the density but i want to caution that given our data and the limitations of our data that will rely on a literacy refuse. we don't have the information to provide a conversation but it will scratch the surface. the other topic that comes up no more than where on the spectrum is rent. so what is labeled s is the formula retail in the real estate market factors that influence that. where formula retail is located and releasing factors like rent and vacancy rates from the market and sales volume and sales price in the neighborhood and lack of controls in the neighborhood that will require a lot of legwork but it critically important. we welcome our feedback on those topics and the feedback of the public. i want to reiterate our next step. as was mentioned this is not the sweeping public engagement process that maybe we would engage in if we have more time but we've created opportunity for any public comment? whatever we can the next meeting it before you february 27th where we'll present the completion. so next during the mid point of phase 2 when we've begun

>> precisely. >> if the data were kept in private hands, if the phone companies are the sus the data, that would do nothing to undermine the efficacy of the program preventing future attacks? >> we believe that that way of handling the data can be done in wayy that would not in any undermine the efficacy of the program. we recognize in our report that that is speculative. we do not know that for a fact. if it turns out that there are deficiencies that make it more difficult to use the data in an appropriate way but the alternative is to have it held by a single private holder. that would eliminate most of the efficient -- inefficiencies. focusing on the question of overbroad surveillance. senator sanders wrote a letter to the nsa, asking if the nsa "spied, or is currently spying on members of congress or elected officials?" the answer to-- that was that they have the same protections as other citizens, which is appearing to be the affirmative. the question i would ask this , has theare you aware nsa ever done surveillance on members of congress, or other elected american officials? >>

is the data the same from other carriers? will it have to be normalized? who's going to be able to do that? contractors are necessarily up to the task. what is your take on that step in this reinvention of our policy? hire cgi for the project. that would be the first take away. i totally agree. it's going to get extremely messy. one thing we've learned from five years of messing about his normalization of these data sets is a disaster and leads to all kinds of false positives and correlations where none really exist because of problems fundamentally with how you put the data together. i have no reason to believe this will be different. we should hang onto the data longer because it's taking a while to normalize it. then you get into how long you should hold on to it. we hang onto foreign data longer, domestic data, and whenever you get into these real messages we're going to hang onto the data longer than we would expect because it will take us a while to sort out the intricacies of different data sets from different carriers and you get into privacy and r

it's not should the data be collect the but it's who should hold the data after it's been collected. number two, you just heard ben rhodes talk about this. it's not clear who will hold the data. will it be these phone companies and will they create another entity whose job solely it is to hold the data. is there some way outside of the government that it exists now -- that's a whole other hornet's nest in terms of who wants to hold the data much less whether we should collect it. the thing i thought that was most interesting and chuck touched on this, this speech struck me as an attempt to reassure the american public, reassure foreign leaders and reassure foreign citizens that there is reason to have faith in the american government and what they are doing in regards with the nsa. this was not a rejection of the surveillance programs. it was an attempt to largely defend why the surveillance programs are necessary and yes, we understand you're not happy so here are a few things we'll do to make it more transparent or make it sort of -- change it in some way but we're not going to fun

>> i think the enterprise is very cautious about the sensitive data, the personal data that gets exposed into the public cloud so they have their private cloudst that maintain perhaps financial details of their customers or personal attributes and facts about the customers. and then they put more of the commercial marketing or the less sensitive, security sensitive elements of data into the public cloud so you access it through some of the public cloud providers like amazons and microsofts and yahoos. >> you went with some of the companies -- give me a sense if you are selling maybe millions of storage devices for one of the data centers versus like an individual company, the prices of those a lot lower? >> the value of storage in the cloud is because the drives are much more sophisticated. usually the value proposition is better for storage providers like ourselves than at the consumer level. the consumer devices -- >> i want to make sure i understood your answer. are you saying to his question that the device we are selling to amazon is more expensive, a better device and therefore we

and the data factory sits in the middle, far more closely connected than any automobile factory or textile mill ever was directly connected to these consumers, who in turn provide immediate rich feedback and it's all maneuvered and massaged by these central data factories. and i'm going to spend the next few minutes explaining some of the implications of all of this. but here i am trying to get across the notion that the data factory benefits from unpaid contributions from lots of people and hear, to give the sense that the data factory is actually selling a whole bunch of services, that most importantly allow the purchases of those services to make money for themselves. but you can see now how powerful the position of these data factories has become. so, here is one example in this is the only example that i will give you of unpaid contributions but think youtube, think yelp and think of a whole bunch of other services and at the same precise thing. linked in about a year ago started to beef up its content effort and invited different people around the world to contribute content. if thes

we do not have all of the data for every year. based on what we can find, 25,000 new residents came to san francisco between 2010 and 2012. what can the city of? >> the nature of san francisco has changed a lot. there is the housing stock that has changed a lot. the whole area south of the 101, near the at&t park, they build all these high-rises. most people -- more people live there than anywhere else. these are high-rises for people who are making money. young urban professionals. add to that the type of technology work in the business angle. the type of work that is happening in technology is more urban. it is more based on talk of things like media. it is less about that were initially making their hay out of. that is not the nature of what technology is today. that kind of manufacturing has moved offshore. the need to be in a suburban and firemen in silicon valley is no longer there. that is one of the reasons that you see the change in technology. the change in business -- there has been a surge of social marketing and networ

the rundown. why is it your data safe with some of the biggest american retailers? on the heels of the target breach, name and marcus also says it is a -- neiman marcus also says it is a victim. and it is an app that many had given up on, but now foursquare has features to tell you what is good nearby and send you on the spot. we have more on the turnaround. and it is more than just robots. we explore artificial intelligence in a special weeklong series, starting with a look at how ibm is betting watson can do so much more than when jeopardy. -- then win at jeopardy. i'm here with sam grobart, senior writer for bloomberg is this week. he will be with us all week long. great to have you on the show. -- top story of the day. the fallout from the target breach has gotten even bigger. as many as one hundred 10 million customers may have been affected. credit card numbers, debit card numbers, personal information like phone numbers, e-mail addresses stolen. target is getting pretty long on the details. the ceo came out today. click status correct. -- >> that is correct.

we call it the data factory. nt to spend a couple of minutes six lightning the powers that have enabled the enormous rise of the data factory in the last 10 years. so a few quick thoughts. the explosion of bandwidth and the change here has been unlike anything anyone has ever seen before in any comparable time over the last 25 years. the second is in storage. it's hard for us to imagine today that about 14% of stored information existed believe it or not on vinyl records. then we all know what has happened with computers and computation. 25 years ago, most of the competing power in the universe -- computing power in the universe was in a pocket jacket later. obviously, that has shifted dramatically as the years have gone by. the other thing that has helped consumersrything for and workers everywhere and these data factories is the absolute massive explosion of applications in the last 40 years. todayor us to conceive when we have as you see on the right, millions of apps available on a little device that just 40 y

the network. and we draw from two data sets to get this information. one is the police records themselves that tell us who was involved and what time of day and the other data set is all the information we have about the physical environment in the city. so one example is left turns at signal lights at intersection. left turns account for 30 percent of severely or fatal crashes. turns in general are a big issue for us. so left turns is in the police report and then the locations of the places where we have signals is information that we have. so we put those two together and that is a very simple crash profile that we call left turns at signal intersections but they become more complex with more data. i will give you a few examples. so, this is just a little more information about the data that we do have information about the age of the pedestrian involved, but we don't have the, the police do not collect data about whether or not that person has a disability. national data has shown generally that those vulnerable populations are when crashes happened

are you afraid of future government having all the data? f course i am. >> yeah. >> of course i am. that's why there's a naicialt debate going on about -- >> but you -- stand up and you could actually make a big difference on the issue if you were to do that. >> of course, i could. but i only have so many hours in a day. guess what, i have a day job called sb angel. i spend 70 percent of my day helping entrepreneurs. you sound like the perfect leader, i think. >> no. [applause] i -- [inaudible conversations] right. i want government to be brought down over this. i'm not the guy to figure out a comprise over this stuff. but we can talk about that more in every other single discussion i have with anyone on the stage over the next three days. >> hopefully in the next three days you'll find tech leader -- >> i thought i found one. i thought you were going say i'm not going to stand for this anymore. because history will not look kindly on those that did. >> not when i'm spending seven hours a day helping entrepreneurs and another couple of hours

that's the type of data that the nsa has been collecting. that what does that tell you? >> the nsa have certainly adopted an attitude that they never saw a piece of data they didn't want to collect. i think it's true, the attitude really does seem to be getting now it may come in handy for something down the road. >> what do you think the president -- i'm sorry, what do

the bill of rights and our constitution. we're living in an orwellian time where data from the private sector, as you said, as well as data collected by the government is being collected on our every movement, location, text, internet searches and all of this is being stored by the government. and that is inappropriate. it's no problem if the government specifies in a warrant that they want to look into someone who may have ties to terrorism. and the government has full authority to act in emergencies, but they don't need to keep our data for seven years because the history is that the government, when it collects this data, it misuses it. >> let me ask you just one example. secretary chartov, tom's successor, wrote of two recent specific case, one involving a threat to new york subways and the other involving a threat to bomb wall street. both of which were picked up by scanning data and suddenly seeing connections that wouldn't exist. you could never have gotten an affidavit because you didn't know these connections existed until you found the connections. >> the president's own review panel that included republicans and democrat

i do want to responsibility about the data on disabilities. that's been presented several times on the pedestrian safety task force. years ago we tried to get it change. chp sat on it and we sent another effort and they are now considering it. we said put in these questions. we are going to take a different route, but there were command staff from parking and police level at the task and safety task force, why it didn't get here, but it didn't. >> next we have charles muss. >> thank you. charles mister, members of senior and disability actions. i know how to get a million dollars quickly from mta about transferring people that har as munis riders to find out they get. they only get one dollar. i don't see city of san francisco going after the bankers who stole trillions from us. i have been around the world as a merchant sale and have seen the traffic control officers in dangerous intersection. it's a simple matter. why can't they do it here? thank you. >> last we have jerry grace. >> good afternoon, a lot of people are watching across the stre

as you are aware the foundation of the focus of the five is based upon data that we received through the state wide integrated traffic reporting system and more commonly called switters. that system in terms of the processing of inputted into the system and analyzed and reported out. it's a very lengthly process. the idea in our city was to develop a process by which we could have a quicker turn around and more appropriately share the data with the likes of ssmta, the department of public health and we were able to implement such a system in 2013. that system was called cross roads. there are still some previsions or phases of that project that are coming to light, but ultimately it's going to allow for the quicker and more accurate sharing the data between the stakeholders and the most up-to-date information we can provide are officers and captains in terms of directing resources where they're most needed. we're having a discussion about the three e's. engineering, education and enforcement and although we're not engineers, the information we provide are engineers, playing a crucial

we won't abuse the data we collect. for history has too many examples when that trust has been breached. our system of government is built on the premise that our liberty can't depend upon the good intentions of those in power. it depends upon the law to constrain those in power. president obama may have presented his ideas for reforming the nsa but the debate is just beginning in congress, in the courts and in the public. joining us to discuss the president's proposals are alan friedman, visiting scholar at george washington security policy institute. he is a co-author of cyber security and cyber war, what everyone needs to know. in san francisco, raney wrightman a group that defends privacy rights. she is chief operating officer of the freedom of the press foundathes. here in washington, ben chan at the national security council under presidents bush and obama. it's a 7 ario vice president of communications at the albright stonebridge group in binchang. thef president laid out his philosophy of surveillance and drilled

i'd like to touch on two things regarding the data collection. first, we appreciate that grocery is being discussed as a separate item. the formula retail language is what was acknowledged one-size-fits-all and those discussions we realize the neighborhood nets the paramedic and other factual into one category i want to see more research in the study. the study is going to be you touching on employment and labor. i'm not sure how deep that discussion is going to be but add union labor and union grocery store and we'll appreciate having that discussion added on that. again withhold to continue to participate into the stakeholder and any other meetings that planning may pilth put together. i appreciate he everyone consideration >> thank you. next speaker, please for those who are in line. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> anyone interested to speak? >> good afternoon. commissioners and planning staff i'm pamela and i want to thank you for the opportunity to speak today. i would like to provide you all with a copy of a formula retail mapping pro

the data goes anywhere else. how do you provide that level of supervision? >> so is it critical then to get to the bottom and will you investigate who might have been involved and whether there was any link to the russians? >> absolutely. >> absolutely. >> that investigation is ongoing. >> absolutely. >> sure. but you have to remember, al

way the data is collected gets changed. and then you have to go back and readjust all the old numbers with whatever information you can gather about the time. but we have had some big decreases in the amount of gas emissions and it's been largely in the electricity sector and the shut down of hunters point and it potrero power plants which were the large electricity producers. [speaker not understood], shutting them down was a big thing. it made a big step in not just cleaning up our air, but cleaning up the content, greenhouse gas emissions content of our electricity. now we're much more similar to -- similar to the rest of the grid through the state. incidence of asthma in the nearby neighboring communities has dropped significantly since then. >> has it? >> well, that's really good news. another tangent to take. the blue line, there is where our climate action strategy will take us through to 2030. and you'll notice the dots along the line, those are -- we have san francisco targets that we want to achieve and we think th

nine companies had been giving the nsa direct access to all user data. adyfiant president obama said the math was simple. >> you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy, and zero inconvenience, you know, we're going to have to make some choices as a society. >> reporter: a few days later snowden took to the airways and identified himself. >> i sitting at my desk certainly had the authorities to wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president if i had a personal email. even if you are not doing anything wrong you are being watched and recorded. >> reporter: and he added that everything can be held indefinitely. >> the storage capability of these systems increases every year, consistently by orders of magnitude. >> reporter: the revelations kept coming. the british version of the nsa known as the gchq has intercepted communications of world leaders at a london summit meeting in 2009. another story said that they were were working with the nsa to track traffic around the globe and the nsa had secretly help

it is a combination of public and private data sources so the public data sources include things like, public records, and so forth. the private data sources can include things like the cash flow moving to the business. the last thing i would want a oneer to take away, because -- there is a negative that they cannot get a loan. the business operator with a track record of success, just walk through the economics with me. goldman lends to -- they lends at libor to 25. -- 225. >> goldman sachs and deutsche bank provides capital with different rates depending on the risk of the loans. we turn around and lend the money to small businesses. the way the loans work is they are shorter-term loans. the parlor might are over six months. save a borrow a dollar. ony might pay 15 to $.20 that loan. they might sell that inventory or retail at two dollars. they put $.80 in that pocket on that transaction. that causes their business to grow. >> like a factor. >> someone like a factor but it is a cash flow analysis. we are not factoring any specific receivable. it is based on the business credit perfo

the percent? 63 percent. >> yes. looking at local data, there is this slide that talks a little bit about the disparities in san francisco that roberto spoke to. here we are looking at ninth graders, african americans and latinos. we see this translated down to san francisco. it's not just national data. we see this also among our adults and with the latino and african american populations that consume more sugary drinks. >> can i ask about adolescence. it's my understanding that a ucla study shows slight decrease in younger children but in adolescence there has been an increase in energy drinks and marketing are tied in with a lot of the types of sugary beverages. can you touch a little bit on that? >> yes. i think it's part of the environment that children are in and as an adolescence you are going to have more independence and more pocket change. the industry does a lot of marketing towards young people and whereas in the younger age groups parents have more control of what their children drink. i think that contributes. the whole seri

in particular because of the edward snowden event. i mean, that was all dataed to be protected, supposed to be secret, and yet now it's all over the internet and in the public dough main, i think that's why so many americans are uncomfortable with the -- our intelligence apparatus hold this is data that really belongs to innocent americans. >> you are one of a number of senators that have taken a great into sportsnet in this issue you. are there some recommendations you thought didn't go far enough? >> well, we'll have to see what the president actually suggests we do tomorrow. but i think in addition to the administration taking executive action, this really is something that we need to fix in a legislative way. we need to have this conversation, because i think if you look back at the last few years before these revelations, none of us would have suggested that this was actually how the patriot act was being immateria. ed. we havbeing implemented. we have our jobs cut out for us and it needs reform. >> it's interesting you saying handled in a legislative fas

we know that his own administration came back with they hold the data itself. but not going forward. we know it's not enough for many advocates, many civil libertarians in this country, and where will the president go on that? where will he go with the so-called national security letters issued by the fbi to the communications companies requesting information without any sort of judicial review? will there be constraints on that as well? and back to the metadata collection, will there be review for when they two to the secret court, the court that hears law enforcement in the intelligence community. their request for intelligence warrants the tools that they need to fight terrorism and law enforcement. the advocate on that, the privacy advocate that speaks up for the public's right to privacy. and overall, the president expected to emphasize the need for further transparency, and the overriding theme, as the technology advances by leaps and bounds, del, and allows the intelligence community in the united states to do things that are unprecedented and surprising

however, some of the data collection is very selective. other problem is, lots of the data is available, but it is not open. it is copyright protected. you can't download it and do something with that. >> the japanese government says don't trust the information you have that it is very important to rely only on government readings. >> we strongly believe in order to have credibility, you need to check your data. we at safecast are using independently [indiscernible] >> and in response to tepco that owns the nuclear power plants to what you're doing? >> we have never been contacted by tepco, so i can't give an answer to that question. >> thank you for being with us. if people want to find out more information about this safecast geiger counter -- >> we have a website safecast .org. you can find out more information about what we're doing and how you can build this device were self and participate in the safecast project. >> and the global mapping of radiation. >> anywhere can participate. it is really easy. >> pieter franken, thank you for b

we call it the data factory. nt to spend a couple of minutes explaining the powers that have enabled the enormous rise of the data factory in the last 10 years. so a few quick thoughts. first, the explosion of bandwidth and the change here has been unlike anything anyone has ever seen before in any comparable time over the last 25 years. the second is in storage. it's hard for us to imagine today that about 14% of stored information existed believe it or not on vinyl records. then we all know what has happened with computers and computation. 25 years ago, most of the competing power in the universe -- computing power in the universe was in a pocket jacket later. -- calculator. obviously, that has shifted dramatically as the years have gone by. the other thing that has helped change everything for consumers and workers everywhere and these data factories is the absolute massive explosion of applications in the last 40 years. hard for us to conceive today when we have as you see on the right, millions of apps availa

the commanding officers of our stations have all received this report and use the data as a foundation of their enforcement efforts. in terms of the top five behaviors they are driving at unsafe speeds, basically speeding. vehicular violations of red light signals, failure to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks. those are marked and unmarked. failure to yield while making a left u-turn and failure to stop at a stop sign, limit line. those five are for all traffic collisions. i'm going to provide you with more recent analysis of the collision factors for pedestrian fatalities in 2013. we did see an increase in pedestrian fatalities in 2013. a total of 21 pedestrians were killed on our streets opposed to 16 in 2012. december itself was a very tragic month and that seven -- a full third of the total number were killed in december of 2013. >> i'm sorry and how many in 2012 did you say? >> 2012 was 16. 2013 was 21 and seven in december alone. the analysis shows of the 21 nine were because they did not yield, three attributed to jay walking and two failure to a boy a traffic control device. t

it could be the data is low or the bilingual officers are not utilized as often as they could be so there is work to be there and you notice officers not certified and it's not with the department and with human resources and slow and we can push them and it's been years and no reason how slow they have been and also with the civilian employees with the department to receive complaints and certain ones they can't receive and like domestic violence and feeling frustrated that the psa is not explaining the problem and getting interpretation for them so there's a lot of progress made this year and officer chang is doing that and work with the community groups to monitor the situation even the one case where it happens it's problematic and i appreciate the chief is on top of that and dedicated so many resources to address the concerns and lastly -- i think it's exciting that they have this live -- this much more advanced problem where you can identify officers in real time in the field and dispatch them out and the officer will come faster who is bilingual which is great and i am looking to h

this trial we haven't even seen the details of the data. so we'll have to find out what the additional paths are taken. however, the results that we saw, at least the initial findings, seem to be pretty robust. so i think that the risk that additional trials if needed would be negative are probably fairly low. so that is more of a timing issue versus is it actually going to get to the market. so the bigger question is, how big is this opportunity? and even very frequent that drug's not on the market yet but have shown great potential. >> you say millions of people, potentially billions of dollars in revenue, a drug on the scale of the lipitor and other statins. is this a company that is going to be bought out by one of the major drug companies? >> it would arguably say this is an opportunity that large pharma and biotech would be very interested in having. so it makes a lot of sense that this would be a take-out candidate for sure. so we have to wait and see. as you noted, there's only 25 employees. so obviously going to have to scale up and

government to have access to the data but minimize the risk that it could be abused in that way. keeping it in private hands would still pose privacy risks and they would be of different order and much less in the sense of the kind of abuse historically we're most concerned about. >> this will be my last question. one of the things i'm concerned about is that we not rebuild the wall that exists between law enforcement and national security commissions, communities before september the 11th. part of that is making sure we don't make it harder to investigate a terrorism case than any other type of crime. fbi director weighed in last week on reforms you proposed to national security. he called these letters quote, a very important tool that is essential, end of quote, to the work of the fbi. he also stated, quote, what worries me about the suggestion that we impose a judicial process on nsls is that it would actually make it harder for us to do national security investigations than bank fraud investigations. so professor swire -- maybe somebody else more appropriate, but why would w

she has coauthored a new book called "privacy in the age of big data." ase welcome to the program theresa payton. [cheers and applause] hello. thank you for being here. >> thanks for having me. >> jon: it's a shame -- a shame -- ms. payton that this is not a more relevant topic. really. >> yeah. >> jon: could there be anything with these n.s.a. revelations and everything going on. how long have you been working on this project? >> almost a year. >> jon: and how long have they known that you were work on it? >> immediately. >> jon: probably before you were working on it. >> probably before i knew it myself. >> jon: in your mind what is the largest threat to either our privacy or security through these issues? >> you know, i think it's the not knowing when data is collected about you so that you can have a voice in saying wait a minute, did i give you permission to collect that and how are you going to protect it? you have people in the uk trying to be good citizens throwing trash away and their phones scanned as they are throwing trash away. did they know

we will not abuse the data we collect. history has too many examples of when that trust has been breached. you are saying that you are not doing it, but the president says that att always take face value. this data be reversed engineered? giving me quotes about the nsa, which is not us and not what we are doing. you are in a contest of who can collect the most information. i fundamentally reject the categorization. we are doing,at we are making every effort to be very careful in satisfying the federal law in terms of security and privacy and in terms of treating consumers properly. if we are careless with their information, that is not consistent with our mission. we are not. >> can this data be reverse engineered? reversedr data can be engineered is a complicated one. that is why we aggregate as much as we can. there may be information gathering said the government has done across many sectors that at one time could not be reversed engineered. that is something we are careful about an mindful of. -- that is not an issue yo

they get fingerprinted, those stay in the data base. whether or not they are charged or released and if they have a traffic accident whether or not people are charged. i'm having difficulty understanding how you can carve out from what the supreme court said, your particular people, particularly when you have literally argued haskell v. harris to the supreme court in maryland versus king, you made those arguments. >> the supreme court never mentioned haskell. >> they never mention our cases unless they are reversing it. >> they did mention other cases it upheld or struck down d.n.a. testing of arrestees. i don't think that article iii courts secretly reach out to decide other cases and i don't think you can judge that based on -- >> i'm simply saying they heard your argument, the very ones you are making to us today, despite your desire they would go in a different direction, justice kennedy's opinion, which was just mentioned and we were going down those points, and scalia's interpretation of that, it seems to me that this distinction y

i didn't feel that way but when you actually realize it's here when the data set and your dream is ready to come true it's tough. what's next i don't know. if i like it i'll keep doing it but it's not. flying to antarctica from cape town. the landing strips can only operate for short periods. the weather is too unreliable and the distance too great. for example even in early autumn the temperature at the station falls to sixty degrees below zero skids can get no traction when the snow is that cold. in a month's time the academic field will deliver a year's worth of food and fuel for the station where. we'll spend the winter the ship is a floating headquarters. of the seasonal expedition. and the head of the winter team. right now i spend less time at home. of course my family is waiting for me back home but i think they get fed up with me after a while but. they are used to living with me just the way it is. gave me one toilet roll he told me it would be enough until i get home i said for a year and he answered when i say home i mean. those who are experienced are already used to it the

has a sort of utilitarian value of what i think the weather data as an example you know we have all the data and the prediction and work out. and the information from there anymore. i used to. generally almost all of the scientific. comes down to monitoring investigations and observing different processes. doesn't play the main role here. we have to make sure we have a claim here. at the program. but the polar explorers don't like it. used to going to the remote. seems to taste better. than. water here is the same after distillation and because of the lack of minerals. from dental problems. better to fill it. table and forget to take. it anymore. pull my teeth out all the time here i've lost four in this room alone it's my sacrifice. it's been a month since our. station. but thankfully this month. medical emergencies. even started to study english computer here help me he installed a ton of different programs everything i. usually don't have time for anything or to think. about anything seriously but here we have an opportunity to stop and think it's the first step that was the most imp

the road. that's important. i want to cite this data, 6 percent of san francisco total mile of streets account for 60 percent of the severe and fatal incidents here in san francisco. that means that our work in reducing pedestrian injuries and fatalities are possible. if we can extend our energy on 6 percent of our road, we can reduce 60 percent of our injured and fatalities and i think that is important and it's great we're falling on the cities like new york and chicago, but what we have above them is we have the data collected here already so the work of sfpd, so we know what work needs to get done and i'm excited to have a collective effort and coalition to make that happen. it's great that we'll see the increase of officers in our academy. commander ali reiterate these deaths are 100 percent preventable and therefore we should do everything we can to prevent them. i've said this at role call but there's nothing like going to a funeral to humanize these fatalities. i don't want to go to anymore funerals of our resident. it's hard to

he defended the widespread collection of data and it's continued usefulness and called on edward snowden to give back what he took last year. little by little americans are learning more about what their government has been up to around the world, and at home. flapper had plenty to say about the value of what was taken and the man who took it. what i do want to speak to, as a nation senior intelligence offer, is the profound damage that his disclosures continue that us ca. the director of national intelligence james clapper appeared before the senate yesterday. what snowden has stolen and exposed has gone way way beyond his professed concerns. as a result, we have lost foreign sources including some shared with us by valued partners. >> in blistering testimony, he told the committee the snowden leaks pose a greater threat to national security than terrorists. it is evidence to me that most of the documents stolen by mr. snowden have nothing to do with the privatesy rights and civil liberties of american citizens. or even the nsa collection program. it is hard to verify the claims but it

data movement. it called for the hiring of a chief data officer. it called for the establishment of open data standards. it called for data coordinators to be established in city agencies throughout city government. but none of these things after many, many months have occurred and this is why supervisor farrell has moved forward with his legislation. i do hope that all of the agencies throughout the city that have data can understand that we are serious about wanting to modify our open data standards. we are serious about releasing every open data set that we have. this is how we improve our government. this is how we make our government accountable and transparent and colleagues i also ask for your support. >> thank you, president chiu. so, colleagues, can we take this same house same call? thank you. [gavel] >> >> item 32, madam clerk. >> item 32 is a -- >> i'm sorry. looks like there are a couple comments. >> i apologize. i actually wanted to go back to item 29 and rescind the vote. i apologize i need to make a minor amendment. >> okay. supervis